Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would the economy be better for average people if Clinton was still Prez

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:19 AM
Original message
Poll question: Would the economy be better for average people if Clinton was still Prez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would be better for rich folks too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. IT WOULD BE BETTER FOR SOME RICH PEOPLE
The oil companies wouldn't like it so much. Then remember the those hybrid cars Al Gore was forcing Detroit to build.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It would be better for GM share holders......
Maybe they would have had innovation shoved up their........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. The Clinton Stock Market? Hell Yes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are you kidding? Would we be at war? Would the entire
world hate us? Would we even have a deficit? I just...can't...go....:cry: ...on.

As for dimson, there's this to consider...


We Should of Had Him

by Larry C. Johnson on December 29, 2005

The book the CIA didn't want you to read, JAWBREAKER by Gary Berntsen, is out and it kills. I've sent Gary a nasty note because his story kept me up till 4 am today. Just couldn't put it down. Gary spent most of this year battling CIA censors, who were refusing to release the book. They insisted on excising parts of the story that have already appeared in other books about CIA operations in Afghanistan written by Steve Coll and another CIA veteran, Gary Schroen.

Gary Berntsen was the second CIA officer sent to Afghanistan and put in charge of directing the destruction of Al Qaeda and the hunt for Bin Laden. He arrived in the fall of 2001, replacing veteran officer Gary Schroen, who had led the first CIA element into Afghanistan in the immediate aftermath of the 9-11 attacks. Gary 2, i.e., Berntsen, built on Schroen's foundation and played a critical role in directing the offensive that broke the back of the Taliban and scattered Al Qaeda.

The key news from Gary's book is that we had Bin Laden in our sights but Tommy Franks and JSOC Commander, Dell Dailey, dilly dallied and did not deploy U.S. troops requested by Berntsen to the battle at Tora Bora. We could of had him; we should of had him; but we let Bin Laden get away.

Gary's book is important in another regard. It shows what the CIA is capable of doing and why we need this capability in addition to the talents offered by U.S. military special operations forces. When the CIA puts its mind to it, it can move fast, innovate on the fly, and do some mind boggling things.

<clip>

More at the link:

http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/12/we_shoul...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. We would be paying less for
interest on the national debt for one thing. No war to pay for. No shift of tax burden to the middle class. He would be doing SOMETHING about outsourcing and energy prices. You've got to be frigging kidding. I can't imagine how even freepers would argue otherwise but I'm sure they would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. no- he'd still be pushing that globalization crap and selling out unions
no war in iraq, maybe, but that would be the only thing different
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. And NO Bankruptcy "Reform" Bill Passing Either. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. it is better because of Clinton
imagine sliding rapidly down a hill covered by snow, and you see a stonewall at the bottom. You're moving faster the further down you slide, and the further you go..the less control you have. Then you hit a gap in the snow..Clinton is President. You've slowed down..haven't quite stopped, but again have some control. Then Bush becomes President, and you've started the downward slide in the snow again..but at least you'll be moving a little slower when crashing into the wall. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'd like a "hell, yes" poll entry, please.
:evilgrin:

We wouldn't have the high levels of unemployment that we have now. I know that the unemployment rate is a helluva lot higher than 5%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. I shamelessly admit to missing Bill so very much
The world misses him too. I would love for him to be VP and give us hope again. He has grown so much since leaving the WH. I think he would make some amazing contributions to to the world, if we were lucky enough to get that opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. It would be better for a lot of people
Especially the families trying to get along on paltry military death benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC