Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Avant News: U.S. to Reduce Troop Levels From 138K to 163K

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:08 PM
Original message
Avant News: U.S. to Reduce Troop Levels From 138K to 163K
:silly:

http://www.avantnews.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=262

U.S. Military to Reduce Iraq Troop Levels From 138,000 to 163,000
Temporally realigned by admin on 2006/6/1 11:36:22 (111 reads)
By Ion Zwitter, Avant News Editor
Washington, D.C., June 19, 2006

Citing an improving security situation in key Iraqi provinces, U.S. military commanders say they have begun the long-promised task of reducing the American troop presence in Iraq, beginning with a reduction to about 163,000 from the current 138,000 scheduled over the next six months. According to high-ranking military officials who asked to remain anonymous as they are not authorized to discuss troop reductions, the Bush administration hopes to have lowered troop levels by a further 20,000 to 183,000 by November, with additional reductions scheduled for next year.

"We're confident that the improving security situation in Anbar province, Baghdad and other hotspots will allow us to continue our promised withdrawals of troops from Iraq at a steady and predictable pace," General John Abizaid, the top commander in the region, said during a defense department briefing. "Assuming no further deterioration or flare-up of internecine strife, I believe we should have lowered levels to just over 210,000 by early spring, 2007."

In the first stage of the troop reduction program, the U.S. military will be redeploying about 1,500 troops currently stationed in Kuwait into Iraq. The new troops are intended to help support anti-insurgency operations in the Anbar Province of Western Iraq

More at link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sable302 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. and if you squint hard enough
2+2=5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It does, if the Ministry of Truth says it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm reminded of the strategic hamlets program in Vietnam and ...
'We have to destroy the village in order to save it' kind of DOD logic that gets us into these messes time and time again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does that include
the 1500 they just sent into Anbar province to quell the rioting?
What planet do they live on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Careful...
Avant News - deadpan satire from plausible futures...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yeah The Date Of The Story Did It For Me
Washington, D.C., June 19, 2006. For a minute there, I thought Jon Titor wrote the piece. I like this part though.



According to Mr. Snow, the Defense Department plans additional, major troop reductions to be accomplished in several stages over the course of 2007, eventually reaching the reduced level of between 275,000 and 300,000 troops in Iraq by early 2008 should ground conditions warrant.


Funny stuff.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. irony? trickery? humor? none of the above?
help. Can somebody turn back the clock for me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Once we get down to 220,000 we will have made some good progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. We'll be turning some corners then!
...And in "six months" all will be coming up roses in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Naturally there will be a few "spikes" and "upticks" in violence
in the "run up" to the next Iraqi political event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. gotta remember.... this is B*shworld.
up is down, black is white, lies are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ah, yes, Ion Zwitter.
Haven't thought of zwitterions for a while ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. "And because of reduced troop levels, we will be able to...
finally institute the draft."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC