Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge headline: "4.6%" Is that Bush's new Approval Rating?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:17 AM
Original message
Drudge headline: "4.6%" Is that Bush's new Approval Rating?
Help me out here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would say it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. that's the unemployment rate as of today's labor report. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sure, if you divide the real number by 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. well, that's the unemployment stat cited from a survey of 60,000
households. The other survey: (And, remember that folks whose unemployment benefits have expired disappear from the Dept. of Labor's unemployment headcount).


Economists tend to put more stock, however, in the much broader business survey of 400,000 work sites that is used to calculate the payroll figures.

In May, job cuts at factories, retailing and other fields tempered job gains in education and health care, financial activities and elsewhere.

The payrolls performance was much weaker than the 170,000 jobs that economists were forecasting would be added in May. They also were predicting the unemployment rate to hold steady at 4.7 percent.

Adding to the weakness in the payroll picture: job gains for both March and April were lowered. Employers actually added 126,000 new jobs in April, instead of the 138,000 previously reported. For March, employment grew by 175,000, rather than 200,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. And Good Economists. . .
. . .that know what they're doing, put even more stock in moving average values of the employers' survey, so that each datapoint is not assumed to be meaningful.

But, there aren't any good economists at Treasury. Yeah i said it! None!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Wow! I guess that means I'm not really unemployed after all
whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Are you unemployed? Another person just like me?
Somehow it just doesn't seem like Kansas City is just rolling in jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm now at 300 resumes sent out
with nary an interview

These are all jobs for which I'm "overqualified," because that's all there are.

So, I've dumbed-down my resume but it hasn't seemed to make a difference. For someone over 40, there are scam jobs and that's it around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yea. I don't even know where to start.
Seems kind of pointless to just send resumes hither and yon.

Can you do the resume so they can't tell how old you are? Don't put down all of the experience.

Hell, I don't know what to do, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think with the complete privatization of all our records
it is trivial for many companies to find out your age.

I'm also handicapped by having been relatively prominent in my field for a decade or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Wierd how that works, isn't it.
Everybody in my field knows me, too. I'm not sure it is a big help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Yes. start resume 10 years ago and blast all prior dates (college grad,
etc, ) off it, STAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mylittletribe Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. you never know..
my husband's contract with a university, after only 6 months was non renewed (one year contract) But...we gave up our home in Wisconsin, and a very very good job with the state to move here (NY) for that job. We thought for sure he'd get picked up right away, but many resumes went out, only a few interviews and nothing. We were starting to hit panic mode. So one night, husband drank a sixpack started googling tech jobs in the state and started sending out not only his resume, but a cover letter, that at first I found questionable (basically said, hey, I'm very damn good at what I do, but listen, I'm American Indian so I wear my hair long, and and have piercings based on tradition.. these things I will not comprimise) I think he sent it to 20 places, and the following day a company called him. He went for an interview and ultimately he didnt get the job...BUT the owner of the company had just taken over yet another organization and needed someone just like my husband. So to the HR person passed my husband's information over to him and ultimately they created a position just for my husband.

Not sure how many chances you've taken in your job quest, but i'm sure glad my hubby got drunk that night and did what he did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Neither is Wichita.
sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unemployment stats are meaningless
A better measure of employment is the labor participation rate - which still does not account for underemployment on part-time workers who wish to work full-time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. That's An Extrapolated Value
Such as i mentioned in my earlier post. It's based upon a sound statistical method of moving averages that allow predictions of the "truth" to within 0.06%, as opposed to the massive month to month swings we see in the current data.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. LMAO! You think it's that high? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. Well, I do think it is that low...
I don't know anyone that doesn't have some type of job.

The problem is the quality of the job and the wages. Over the past decade, the quality of jobs have declined and the wages are basically in a holding pattern.
If you look at careerbuilder.com or Monster.com or Hotjobs.com. Yes. There are jobs in your area.

But manufacturing jobs have disappeared, and people who used to work those are now working at places like Wal-Mart or Home Depot. That is what has happened...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. 10712
Thats how much you make per year on minimum wage.

5.15 * 40 * 52
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC