Has Bill or FOX responded to anything about Malmedy? n/t

so that they had Billo saying, "AFTER Malmedy, our soldiers captured Germans and ... " instead of "AT Malmedy ... " like he really did.

I actually listened to part of his radio show this morning to see if he'd respond, but he didn't mention it during the half hour I endured.

but his response to the viewer e-mail was to say "after" instead of "at."

Makes it even MORE obvious a cover-up -- they didn't even "correct" it consistently!

What will he say about the bodacious ass-kicking he got from Olbermann? His usual response to criticism from KO and other media people is just to claim their show isn't as popular as his. He tried to sue Al Franken, but we all saw how that turned out.

Cmon man. Youve seen this before. Itll be a glossover and then a purge , ignoring it makes it go away.

what he actually said, and announce he's putting the whole event away forever, -just as he did when Faux had to settle out of court on the sexual harassment charge. He'll make it sound like any further mention of the episode would be unjust and unfair to both himself and the US military and would probably hinder the war-on-terror.

...(cross-posted to another KO thread!) I actually went to the Faux News site looking for Billo's response. :puke: :blush: Didn't see anything, but I gotta go take a long, hot, cleansing shower now... :scared: Those Faux creepies really make me cringe....

...to this Capitol Hill Blue article titled "Bill O'Reilly: A dangerous demagogue of deceit"

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_8778.shtml

But then again, I've seen some of you GD denizens slamming CHB lately....

DT

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1640952/posts



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now - if we can't stand his lying, forced phone-sex face, and they think he is a blow-hard - who the hell is watching his show?!

Off to the shower!! The things I do for y'all!

Let's see if the media is its usual complicit self in this.

Nothing but silence when a whacko does it. I dont care if he isnt a Senator, hes a huge mouthpiece with more power than Durbin ever had.

the record.

My father was in the US Army's ill-fated 106th Infantry Division in December 1944. He was taken prisoner in the town of St. Vith, Belgium on December 16, 1944, one day before and some 20 miles away from the Malmedy incident. He was liberated from a prison camp (Stalag 4-B) in mid-April 1945.

He passed away on January 30, 2005. As much as I still miss him now, I'm glad he's not around to hear about this latest bullshit from O'Really. As it is, he's probably up there in the heavenly peanut gallery with my Army Air Corps uncles telling us to flay the bastard any which way we can.

:patriot:

... to either admit error or apologize...

That may be the only commonality between the republican party and a very large segment of the American public.

to weasel out of it? Bet Faux will make him say something.
They've probably been trying to work out an angle since KO's report last night, -feverishly in fact. Then again, their tactic might be to say nothing at all and hope it's soon forgotten. It won't be.

to see what the enemy is up to) is pathologically loyal. They tune in because they hear nothing but what they want to hear. I'd wager that the vast majority hasn't even heard of Keith O (unless they have some interest in sports) and they certainly do not watch MSNBC. Faux changed the transcript to read "Normandy" and O'Lielly explained away his error by saying it was caused by "the heat of debate." That's all that small-minded Faux loyalists need to hear. How many do you think are actually going to take the time to research what actually happened at Malmedy? Who do you think is going to hold O'Lielly accountable? Hell, he called for blowing up Coit Tower and received about zero flack for that, but from the big, bad librul bloggers.

the first "debate" when he claimed his moronic mountain of a mistake as "documented" historical fact, or the recent second "debate" long after the first, when he repeated it over again? It must really suck to be O'Reilly.

O'Leilly is in total control - he just orders anyone who challenges him to "shut up" or cuts off their mikes. Which makes me wonder why anyone would agree to go on his show - only to be treated with contempt. If they didn't have Dems (or the "other side") to beat up on, wouldn't these screamfests masquerading as "news" just shrivel up and die? Fans tune in because the RW blowhards appeal to their basest instincts - it must make them feel empowered (even for a lousy 30-60 minutes). The Coulters and Malkins of the world have taken bashing liberals to a highly lucrative art form and I wonder how many of them truly believe the venom they spew forth. My guess is not many, and wonder how long they can keep it up. I'd find it exhausting, but then again, I'm not a pathological liar. I read a rather humorous article comparing Keith O. to O'Lielly and will post it if I can find it. O'Lielly was portrayed as the bully on the playground and Keith O. the kid who taunts him relentlessly. I think that's why so many of us enjoy this rivalry: bullies always get taken out.

I can't even stand the sound of Billo's voice anymore.

it for MONTHS, hell YEARS.