Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AMERICAblog's got something fun planned for Monday...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:34 PM
Original message
AMERICAblog's got something fun planned for Monday...
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 05:19 PM by The Witch
Check this out!!



A little birdie tells that a top deputy in the White House is a big fag. I'm just curious if he's going to be attending the big gay-bashing ceremony that Bush is having at the White House on Monday with all the far-right hate groups.

(hack, slash, )

And if you think I'm joking, just wait until Monday. Congress is going to be some very interesting phone calls, and we're going to keep a list of their answers.

George Bush and the Republicans in Congress want to have an open debate about the morality of our sex lives, come Monday we start having an open debate about theirs.

Speaking of which, I really hope Mary Cheney and her lover Heather Poe are celibate.


I can't wait! :bounce: :bounce:

EDIT for clarification: It looks like John & his crew will be calling all the Congress members and asking them about their sex lives... if you read the article. Although I don't know what he's planning regarding the "top deputy." (Or whether he's REALLY a top.) :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. What does this mean?
Is he going to "out" the deputy on Monday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm guessing Jimmy Jeff Gucket Gannon spilled the beans
Must not have been too discreet during those WH sleepovers, eh Jimmy Jeff? And now your enamorato is threatened with imminent media exposure. Tsk tsk, but self undoing results from self-loathing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yowch!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love AmericaBlog! I love it SO MUCH! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sodomy includes heterosexual oral sex? I learn so much at DU.!
:D

More from AmericaBlog (emphasis added):

Next week, I think we really need to start asking how marriage protection is going in the House and Senate as well. After all, we wouldn't want any Senator or Congressmen who have committed adultery, are committing adultery, or ever will commit adultery voting in favor of "protecting marriage" when they refuse to protect it at home. That would be a travesty that no good American could accept.

It would also be a sin, and against procreation, if any member of Congress or White House staffer engaged in sodomy of any kind (that includes heterosexual oral sex). Not only are such sex acts sinful, but they don't promote procreation, the disgust for such sexual acts is part of the basis for the "marriage protection" movement. So, I really think we need to start asking our Senators and Congressmen, and the White House staff and Cabinet, if they've ever had oral or anal sex, whether they're currently having oral or anal sex, and whether they inted to ever have oral or anal sex (whether inside or outside of marriage).

<http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/06/speaking-of-marriage-protection-monday.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's threatening to out people. 'bout time some hypocrisy was exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_ed_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. There's an easier way
I think the Democrats could end this nonsense fairly quickly by demanding that this "Federal Marriage Amendment" ALSO OUTLAW infidelity and divorce of any kind, under any circumstances. If we're going to make America a theocracy, let's go all the way. The Bible has far more pronouncements against infidelity (Hell, it's a COMMANDMENT!) than homosexuality. Let's see these bible-beaters put their money where their collective mouths are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC