Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fat phobic culture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:18 AM
Original message
Fat phobic culture


The results of this stigma and obessive hatred of fat...in America


People Willing To Lose Limb, Eyesight To Be Thin
46 Percent Willing To Give Up Year Of Life
Nearly half of people who responded to the study by the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity said they would rather give up a year of their life than be fat.

The report, which received responses from more than 4,000 people, said people would be willing to give up their ability to have children and become depressed rather than be obese.


http://www.local6.com/health/9243976/detail.html

Yes, fat (prejuidice) kills.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/diet.fitness/10/14/fat.phobia.ap/index.html

Diet soda makes you fatter
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/13/health/webmd/main701408.shtml

Where does fat phobia come from?

In their research on culture, ideology, and anti-fat attitudes, Christian Crandall and Rebecca Martinez (1996) found that our **culture of individualism and self-responsibility** might have contributed to our attitudes about obesity. By comparing anti-fat attitudes in the United States to those in Mexico, they found that the attitude that one is responsible for one's weight is not prevalent in Mexico. More often, they found that people assumed it was part of the genes or the physical makeup of the person. Additionally, there was little antipathy toward fat people. The Americans believed that the fat people had no will-power, making them culpable for the obesity, and they registered a much higher aversion toward fat and fat people.

http://www.ejhs.org/volume5/Areton/03Background.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why is then that the majority of Americans are overweight?
Hardly seems that we are a Fat-phobic culture now, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. There are a lot of pot (bellies) calling kettles black.
Probably a lot of guys with big guts think it's funny to make fun of the "real lardasses". It's easy, especially in the US, to always find someone fatter than you are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, it's easy to find a guy with a potbelly wearing a "No Fat Chicks"
shirt. But he'll still get laughs. If it was a "No Black Chicks" or "No Latino Chicks" t-shirt, he might get beaten up somewhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
284. You mean like this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think that quote is originally from George Bernard Shaw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Self-hatred & fear of embarassment are very powerful marketing tools
"Ring around the collar! Ring around the collar!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. crappy diets and not enough exercise.
...next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
164. Not always. Some meds really pack on the pounds.
don't be so narrow-minded.

Most human problems are FAR more complicated than do A and B and you'll get C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForeverWinter Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #164
227. True, but...
...the only people I've ever heard blame their presciptions for their obesity are also sendentary and eat a ton of high-cal, high-fat, low-nutrition junk food. My college roommate for example, would always claim the birth control pill "caused you to gain weight in feminine areas". We were both on the pill. She watched TV, binge-drank, and ate trash. I did endurance sports, never ate processed foods (and was vegetarian), and ate to nourish my body. She gained 25 pounds on the pill. I lost 5.
My point isn't that it's somehow morally better to be thin (it's not) but that you should accept (and love) your body as a product of your own thoughts and actions. If you truly respect and nurture your body and mind, no presciption will make you obese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #227
248. Nope.
Many meds cause weight gain:

http://www.psycheducation.org/hormones/Insulin/weightgain.htm

Weight gain is clearly caused by medications used to treat bipolar disorder, some more than others.

This weight gain can be so large as to have its own serious health consequences, so we need to take it very seriously.

Physical activity and diet can help prevent this weight gain, and sometimes reverse it -- but simply telling patients to eat right and get exercise as a means of coping with the weight gain medications can induce is pretty close to an insult and generally simply attempts to shift the responsibility for the problem to the patient. It takes more than this simple advice.

More meds that cause weight gain:

http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/causes/weight_gain.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #164
244. most human problems may be complicated...
but obesity isn't one of them.
eat too much and do too little and you will become obese.
it really is as simple as that.

and i should also mention that not everyone can eat the same foods and get the same results- you have to find the foods that are best for your bodies metabolism...but fresh fruit and vegetables are usually a good bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #244
247. No, that is not true. If it were simple, the weight loss industry
wouldn't be worth billions a year, and 95% of dieters wouldn't put the weight back on.

Did you know that every time you go on a diet, your metabolism slows down because your body thinks it's starving? And each time you diet and put the weight back on again, it becomes harder and harder to take the weight off in the first place?

Have you ever been overweight? If not, you're like an unmarried marriage counselor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #247
249. "going on a diet" is the WRONG thing to do.
"going on a diet" is a stupid way to lose weight.
if people are FAT, they need to permanently change their eating/exercise habits, NOT try some temporary fad diet to quickly drop a few pounds.

and YES it really is as simple as changing the way you eat/exercise, and YES i used to be overweight.

the VAST majority of FAT people have nobody but themselves to blame- eat less, do more...it's THAT simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #249
252. My goodness, how self-satisfied are you?
Just because something works for you doesn't mean it will work for everyone else. That, I have found, is the main problem with conservatives: they think that because THEY did it, EVERYBODY should be able to do it.

Keep on being self-congratulatory. Because you will someday have a problem you won't be able to solve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #252
257. it WILL work for everyone else...
eat less, do more.

it works.

the first thing people should cut from their diet is anything containing starch- NO: bread, pasta, potato, rice, corn, or flour in ANY form whatsoever. start with that, and see how much weight you lose after the first two months. and how much better you feel in general.

it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #257
292. More importantly: eat tons of veggies!
Pig out on vegetables and fruits!

QuestionAll: you seem like a proponent of Atkins / South Beach / high-protein diet. Am I correct? That may work for a while, but it's not realistic to say "never again eat any bread or pasta".

Gradual weight loss, and maintaining the desired weight, is the key. Just focus on wanting a healthy body. Sounds corny but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #292
295. Stuff your face...
Edited on Thu Jun-08-06 06:35 AM by quantessd
...with broccoli, spinach, watermelon, pineapple, asparagus, cantaloupe, artichokes, peaches, cherries, brussels sprouts, grapes, strawberries, and lots of tomatoes! (edited to add tomatoes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #292
298. my body is allergic to starch.
That may work for a while, but it's not realistic to say "never again eat any bread or pasta".

why is it unrealistic? i DO NOT eat ANY starch. starch is NOT a natural part of the human diet.

it is difficult to do, but not impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moloch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #247
254. No other country in the world has the same problem with
Obesity that we do in the U.S.

I refuse to believe that there is some kind of "American gene" which causes obesity.

It is all about willpower and self-respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #254
256. exactly.
god forbid any american be held accountable for their own actions and/or inactions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pookieblue Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #254
266. what about those of us WHO ARE trying???
As I said, I AM watching what I eat. I am exercising.... I did lose some weight. But guess what, I had a MS flare up, was put on steroids and gained some of it back.

Oh but that was my fault, that I had a flare up. Right?
I should have told the doctor, "No sorry, I can't do the meds. Dont want to gain any weight."

See that's what gets me.

I ran into someone who haven't seen in awhile and he said "You've really let yourself go."

I didn't go into what I Had been thru the last couple of years, of losing my sight for two months (steriods), trouble walking (steroids), losing the feeling in my legs (steriods.)

And with the roids, I gained weight...and it didn't help that I was struggling to walk.

as I said, before the MS I was very active. Now I'm trying to get back to where I was. But I don't know if I ever will.

I am trying to lose the weight.

but it's hard and depsite me doing what I am doing, I'm still overweight.

but at least I am walking.

I will say, just because a person is over weight does not mean that they have no will power.

Don't judge a book by their cover.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #266
270. Hugs for you
My hubby has MS as well and has the same problem. He can walk and drive, so many of his symptoms are "invisible" He tries very hard to lose weight, and does, but when the MS kicks his ass, there is not much he can do. And the rounds of steroids, immunosuppressents as well as other medication certainly don't help.
When someone asks how he's doing he says "I'm still vertical"

Like you said, Don't judge a book by it's cover.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #266
300. someone SAID that to you?????
Please, please tell me that you said something to him like "And wow, you've become a giant asshole."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #254
271. No, you're wrong.
Your attitude is pathetic. Nobody is claiming there is an 'American gene' that causes obesity. What we're saying is that it is an extremely complex problem that canNOT be reduced to 'willpower and self-respect'.

And quit judging others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PWRinNY Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
52. Prescription drugs, processed foods, super portion sizes
Most prescription drugs have fattening side effects. Most people don't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pookieblue Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. Prescription drugs will do it to ya.
I know that for sure.

Yes, I'm overweight. But I try to eat a healthy diet, I don't eat that much, and I walk 2-4 miles 5 days a week. Despite all that, I'm still overweight. But my sugar levels and all the other blood work is good.

Of course having to take steroids and a host of other meds for my MS doesn't help one to keep a slim figure.

I'm going to keep up the walking and eating healthy. I'm doing what I am supposed to do. I think it's great that I'm able to walk as much as I am, considering two years ago, I was barely able to walk after a bad MS flare up.

But, I would rather be fat, then have to this MS get worse.

People can think what they want to about me. Say what they want to about me. But they aren't walking in these shoes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForeverWinter Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #59
233. Good!
Do what you're doing. It isn't important what people say. You're doing your best and that's a lot more than the majority. I think it's great you're walking so much, too. Stick with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
67. Self-hatred?
Back in the fifties, models were normal sizes. Now, they've shrunk to size 0's as Americans have ballooned. It's sort of weird - almost like pop culture is creating an even more idealized, skinny, version of beauty as Americans in general become heavier. Making normal people feel even uglier. That's just self-hatred on a cultural level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #67
134. In the fifties, a serving of food at a restaurant...
...was half the size it is today. and most people didn't eat out often, if ever.

Not only are the portions huge, the ingredients at restaurants are often not fresh, and they put things in food like MSG (no, not just in Chinese food) that you would never use in your own cooking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
70. that's what I always say.
If anything, maybe we should be MORE focused on eating right and exercising.

Spend ten minutes at a mall food court and tell me that we are a fat phobic culture. I'd say we are pretty darn fat accepting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
104. History's most overweight culture with fat phobia? Ironic.
Something doesn't add up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #104
132. Well, we're also simutaneously the most sex-repressed and sex-obsessed.
It makes perfect sense to me. People hate their own shortcomings when they see them in others.

I think a lot of moderately overweight, unhealthy Americans LOVE seeing the morbidly obese who ride on badgers and suffer limited mobility. It allows them to scoff and feel superior to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #132
146. It doesn't make sense to me...
I've been "moderately overweight" at times in my life and neither I nor anyone I ever knew in similar condition "love(d) seeing the morbidly obese" and none of us ever "scoffed" or "felt superior to someone else" as a result. We just felt bad about our physical condition until it got bad enough that we did something about it - increased exercise and paying attention to diet. And lost weight.

I think it's a matter of different people in the culture. There are those who are obese and those who are moderately overweight and those who are thin (for a panoply of reasons). It's pretty rare and pretty perverse for the thin to scorn the moderately overweight or for anyone to scorn the obese. Thin is simply healthier, so there's nothing wrong with trying to live a healthier life for oneself, and even if it becomes obsessive only the obsessives suffer from their obsession.

And I think the sex-repressed are an entirely different group of people as a whole from the sex-obsessed. Neither state of being seems a very happy one to me.

All of this I think has to do with an overall culture of excess, and the advertising that promotes it for company profits at the expense of the populace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #146
147. It makes no sense to you, because you have empathy
American consumer culture and the competitive path we are set on from infancy manages to destroy or diminish any empathy in a lot of people, producing a nation of very callous people. A lot of us are capable of empathy, but only for people who look like us. A dead brown person just doesn't register any more than those swollen-bellied babies we saw on the Christian Children's fund ads when we were growing up. We become callous to it all, and it's all just a big TV show, so far away as to not be real. And those mammoth people on badgers, they're not people with feelings. They're just the inferior other, there to make us feel better about ourselves.

And it's nothing new. Hitler knew how to exaggerate and turn the semitic "hook-nose" and Jewish knack for business into the face of a rat and the character of a sneaky swindler, making his target audience feel superior. If Bush thought it would profit him politically, he might just as well be demonizing the obese right now, rather than gays.

But fortunately for the obese, a great many Fundamentalist Christians ignore the Bible's warnings about gluttony and are obese themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #147
149. OK, so what % of Americans would you guess lack empathy as a result?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #149
150. Probably all of us, to one degree or another.
I'm damn sure I'm more desensitized than I want to be. But a lot less so than when I was a teenager. I used to get a kick out of gory entertainments, now they make me wince.


Something like that is totally subjective and impossible to quantify, but I do know that our culture has a lot less of an emphasis on empathy than the Japanese culture (where I live now).

Children are taught from toddler age to have empathy, not only for living things, but even for inanimate objects. "How do you think your t-shirt feels when you cut it with the scissors, Takeshi?"

Even in adulthood, people still invest a sense of "being" into inanimate objects here. Quite fascinating. A sushi chef will talk about his knives as though they were co-workers almost, and sharpen them often and with care, doting on them.

People here, even men, cry at the drop of a hat, and I see elementary school boys running around holding hands in a wholesome, natural way, without the homophobic self-consciousness we instill in boys from such a young age here.

But I'm getting off the subject.

It is fortunate, though, that the emotional bumps, scrapes, and body blows we take as we make our way through life do help us to learn empathy. I just think our competitive consumer culture delays its onset, and in some people, like our president, it never comes at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #150
237. That's quite interesting. My personal feeling about the problem here
in the U.S. is that the vast majority of Americans lack any real sense of empathy for a host of reasons. And that insensitivity also makes us stupid people. We keep electing corrupt morons to lead us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I worked with a guy who, while pointing to fat people, would loudly say
"that's disgusting!". I know they could hear him. Guess what - he also hated gays, talked about killing Arabs, and was a die-hard Republican. Judgmental people will always find a reason to hate other people.

Our society is competitive and judgmental. I'm sure in 15 years or so they'll find out being overweight isn't as bad as they say it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have no aversion to fat people, but I have an aversion to fat...
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 06:32 AM by Yollam
It's funny that people say they would give up a year of their life to be thin, since being obese decreases longevity by MANY years.


I agree that it's totally wrong top be judgmental towards fat people. Our food is too nutrient-depleted, overprocessed, chemical-treated and unbalanced to expect the average person to always make the right dietary choices, much less a person with a genetic propensity towards overweight. Not to mention the fact that we are simultaneously bombarded by ads featuring muscular-rippled studs and skinny/curvaceous sex bombs, as well as ads of goo-dripping Cinnabons and sizzling steaks and steaming pizzas. We are being trained from an early age to think that there is nothing bizarre about a single serving of soda being 32, 48, or 64 ounces. No, it's not surprising that obesity is skyrocketing.

But an aversion to fat itself is good. Anything to keep us aware of it and to keep us watching our intake of food is a good thing. It's easy to let it get out of control. By simply not paying attention or caring, I let my weight go from 190 lbs to 275 lbs in just 6 years. I finally got my weight down to 200 a few months ago, and it's much better. It's not so great saying no to seconds, eating a salad when I want a grilled cheese, etc., but my mobility is better, I feel better, my clothes fit better - it's just plain better. I hope everyone can find the courage to do whatever they can to get the extra weight off, because it really does feel better, and I hate giving people the message that "you can't". What could be more cruel than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I went there too
Sleep apnea, I gained a lot fast. I soared to 350! So I know that end well, I made it back down to 175 but it was a struggle and required a medically supervised fast. You're right, shedding the weight makes a huge difference in one's vitality, but it requires an investment in eating correctly. Money many may not be able to spend.

I threw the question out rhetorically, knowing the answer full well. Our media driven culture promotes unobtainable idealized body types. Very few can measure up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. I do not believe that being "fat" decreases life span
I had a godmother that was VERY fat (like close to 275 lbs.). She died at the age of ... 101! Cause of death was deemed to be "old age".

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
151. My great uncle
smoked 2 packs a day for over 77 years, he died in his 90's - also "old age". That's hardly proof that smoking isn't bad for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. False
since being obese decreases longevity by MANY years.

False.

You will not find a single study that shows that. Not one.

You will find lots of studies whose abstracts claim that, but the data never back it up.

You will find a whole lot of studies clearly showing that weight fluctuation decreases longevity.

That's right, weight loss.

Short of morbid obesity, weight itself has no discernable impact on longevity, as long as you control for weight fluctuation.

We have a generation of nutritionists suffering from an anorexic ideation. I didn't believe it when a nutritionist friend told me that (he was blackballed for pointing out that studies' data don't really match what the studies' abstracts claim). So I went into pub med and looked. And, sad to say, he's right. We have about 30 years worth of "science" on nutrition and weight that doesn't even follow its own data to their clear conclusions.

This anorexic ideation is killing people by making healthy people change weight their whole lives, which makes them sick. The government's weight guidelines are ridiculously anorexic. And that's not all nutritionists do stupidly; look at how they lowered the "dangerous" cholestorol level a couple of years back... wow, out of nowhere, almost every American is now eligible for pointless, dangerous, profitable cholestorol-lowering drugs.

Until nutritionists can actually address the data their studies provide, this isn't a science. It's the modern version of astrology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mccoyn Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
46. Do you have any sources?
For the weight fluctuation decreases longevity stuff. I'd be interested in reading them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Sources are legion; this is a pretty good summary
This is a unusually candid editorial from BMJ about the subject; it lists copious studies. Of particular interest are Wannamathee, and Iribarren.

I love open-access journals...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
61. You should read your own citation more carefully:

The conclusion to be drawn is that the relation of obesity to mortality (especially from heart disease) is probably one of increasing risk with increasing weight--or with increasing weight gain in adult life. The change in risk is small at first, but it becomes too great to be explained by chance above a body mass index of 27 or with a weight gain of more than 8 kg after the age of 18.


The author is mainly addressing that people who gain weight and then put it on again may be doing a disservice, not that people who are significantly overweight should not make any effort to lose weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mccoyn Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #46
69. Thanks! -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
66. That is SO much BS.
Are you going to tell me that high blood pressure and diabetes that are the result of being overweight don't hurt longevity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #66
197. Yes
Because you have cause and effect reversed. A genetic tendency to be diabetic causes both obesity and weight gain, not the reverse. And high blood pressure is far more strongly correlated with high lean body mass than with fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conflictgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
156. Yes, and on your note about the cholesterol lowering drugs...
No study has ever found that lowering cholesterol via the use of medications actually reduces the risk of heart disease. But enough stories have linked high cholesterol with heart disease that people will believe anything.

Another very important point about all of this is that there is a major difference between being overweight and obese. I had a former doctor tell me that at 15 pounds over my "ideal" weight, I was obese. I do not believe I was unhealthy at that weight. There are a lot of people who think that being even 30 pounds overweight is just as dangerous as being 100 pounds overweight.

I exercise moderately and try to watch what I eat. I'm about 20 pounds above my "ideal weight" right now and I've had people call me fat (when you're short, being 20 pounds overweight is more noticeable). But I really don't care. I am doing the right things to promote my health; the fact that I don't fit some arbitrary standard of what I should weigh doesn't matter to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. Why is a stressful lifestyle idealized though?
People brag about how little sleep they get, how many hours they work, and how many things they are involved in. Popular culture and advertisements encourage people to strive for better and not be satisfied. We are encouraged to be strong individuals and to be tied to nothing except perhaps our spouse and children. All that takes a toll. Like many Americans, I suffer from anxiety.
I have seen various figures but anxiety decreases a person's lifespan by more than extra weight. Anxiety causes most health problems as well.
We condems fat. We idolize the anxiety lifestyle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #57
72. True, and lack of sleep has been linked to weight gain.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #72
120. And ADD.
Ever notice how many kids these days are diagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorder?

Children are SUPPOSED to be active. They are SUPPOSED to prefer running around to sitting still, they fidget (hell, I still fidget and I'm 38), they get bored when there's too many kids in class and they've already learned the lesson.

Kids used to be able to go home and play in the yard with friends. Now there's basketball practice, oboe lessons, piano lessons, this organized activity, that organized activity.

One of the main causes of ADD is sleep deprivation. All these organized activities include getting to and going from. I am NOT opposed to these activities, it's when every second is scheduled to 10PM for an eight year old that the poor kid never gets enough sleep and never gets to just run around and be a kid.

There are some kids who truly do have a chemical imbalance. But when just about every child under 15 that you know is identified as having ADD, you start to wonder. Is this a true diagnosis, or is someone slapping a bandaid on a systemic problem?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #72
232. I understand lack of sleep = weight gain
I've been there. If you haven't slept enough, your body wants food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Then there's the Bariatric Surgery boom...
...which is some cases and some places IS beginning to taper off (no pun intended).

I see far too many reports passing over my desk of follow-up surgery and consultations for complications from gastric bypasses. Even the "healthy" ones are frequently in the office for B-12 shots, so there's that, too.

I am overweight myself, but still very active, mobile and active. Yet my gynecologist broached the subject of the surgery last year. He was shocked when I told him I'd sooner put a bullet in my brain. Some may "rather give up a year of their life to be thin." I've made a rough peace with myself about my weight, and yes, I exercise.

Along with the fat-phobic culture goes a desire to live forever and look young as long as possible. I'll take a pass on those, TYVM. I don't look my age (but there are some mornings I sure do FEEL it) but I'm ready to "check out" at any time. Getting old in America the way we have policies and programs laid out now, especially for singles, is a horror show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red State Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. There are other surgical alternatives
I had a Duodenal Switch w/Biliopancreatic Diversion this past November. I have lost 95 lbs. and feel fantastic. I haven't had one complication or problem and neither have most of the other DS'ers on the discussion board where we gather. I can eat more normally than an RNY patient and have no issues with input/output that RNYers can also have. I take an ADEK and Dry A & D every day and my labs are fine.

It was the best thing I could have done for myself!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Blame the victim" even though there are studies that show there are other
causes of obesity then just over eating and/or not getting enough excercise. The fact that genetics and allergies plays a part has been known for some time now but more recently it's also been found that some "normal" stuff when in a person's life for a prolonged period of time, like stress and not getting enough sleep, can also slow your metabolism down to sludge.

It's unfortunate that people judge others by their appearance so much. Some of the warmest and most caring "quality" people I've ever known have not fit into the "social norm" some insist on judging by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sleep issues are a part of it, too. You're right.
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 07:14 AM by mcscajun
Sleep apnea isn't always weight-related, but it can cause hypertension, sap your daytime energy and make it difficult to lose weight. Quite a trap, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I Was Told I Was "Too Young, Too Thin and Too Female" To Have Sleep Apnea
Anyone can have sleep apnea - even young women. I have mixed apnea, a combination of anatomy (very small airways) and a brain that "forgets" to breathe. Sleep apnea can do more than just give you hypertension - it can cause a stroke or death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
152. The genetic factors
and other reasons (metabolic syndromes, allergies etc) for being obese (as opposed to a bit fat) are so rare as to be statistically irrelevant.

Stress etc can certainly make you gain weight (or for me lose it) but it CAN NOT make you obese, to reach obesity you need to have consumed FAR more calories than is neccesary and expended less energy than is desirable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. There is also an epidemic of untreated diabetes and thyroid conditions.
Also, it takes better-than-minimum-wage salary to afford a healthy diet. Processed food, which is a sponge of unhealthy oils (from frying), starches & sugars (carbohydrates), and additives, are not digested and transformed into energy; they are turned into fat cells and processed food is often more affordable and convenient than the time and money in finding and preparing affordable fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains, etc. (emphasis on the preparation as lots of folks have mor than one job and not a lot of time to cook).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. You've just described my problem
I am only about 15 pounds overweight, and you certainly wouldn't look at me and say, "Wow, she's a fattie" at all, but I was recently diagnosed with Hashimoto's Disease, a thyroid condition. I thought at first that it was just another fad, an excuse hypocondriacs use to justify their lack of interest in losing weight through diet/exercise. But when I went to Dallas' number one endocrinologist, and he did further blood tests, and showed me a sonogram of my thryoid, and really explained it, it made sense. I've been on medication for about twi months now, but don't really see any difference in my symptoms (which I didn't really notice until m doctor felt my thyroid and suspected a problem) - fatigue and puffy face, mostly. I am due for another round of blood tests and a tweaking of my prescription, but my doctor was kind enough to give me three months' worth in case I didn't find a job with medical iunsurance (which, of course, I haven't! Welcome to the greatest country in the world!).

Anyway, the fresh foods thing is a BIG problem. I am a poor young 'un, living alone in a very small apartment on an ever-decreasing budget. Finding time and energy to buy and prepare fresh, healthy foods is difficult - not to mention expensive. I was just about to go to the grocery store this morning, actually! And was scratching my head about what to buy that won't end up going off before I make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
62. Wow, I thought I was reading about myself for a minute
I also have Hashimoto's Disease and am about 15 pounds heavier than I'd like to be. I also have an ongoing anemia problem, which just makes it harder to exercise.

You're right about what's affordable vs what's healthy. Without housemates, you're also stuck either eating it all at once or putting it away to reheat and then forgetting about it until it's gone rancid.

I used to be a scrawny kid, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
73. Dry beans of various kinds are nutritious, cheap and long-lasting.
They are a remarkable food. I'm partial to black-eyed peas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #73
189. Now tell some fat woman with several part time minimum wage jobs
--and a crappy single studio with a hotplate, a tabletop fridge and no freezer how easy it is to make up a batch of this stuff to last just about forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #189
205. I don't make that much more than minimum wage, and I'm dealing with weight
Beans are way cheaper than any of the crapola they sell at McDonald's, and they last forever dry. You just cook them up when you need them. I'm not saying nobody should ever go to Mickey D's, but making it your staple diet is DUMB, whether you're rich or poor.

This is the first time I've ever heard ANYONE claim that cooking up a pot of beans was hard. It's about as easy as it gets, and it CAN be done on a hotplate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #205
224. It takes a long time
That's why I do big pots and store the surplus. What person with three part time jobs has the time to keep track of a two hour cooking process? Try reading Ehrenreich's Nickeled and Dimed for some pungent descriptions of how hard it is to find time to cook and eat anything among the new poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
83. have you checked your cortisol levels?
Thyriod and high cortosil commonly go together. I've had adrenal fatigue (result of stress) and initially the high cortisol levels will REALLY pack on the fat. Of course when you crash and 'burn out' your adrenal gland you are left w/o any cortisol.

Anyway - good luck to you and if you have a chance check your cortisol / dhea levels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. food ... yes.
Yes the quality of what you eat has a lot to do with the development of various conditions. I'm not horribly overweight myself (maybe 20 lbs.). I was shocked when blood work showed I had elevated blood sugar.

So what I did was change my diet. I knocked out all of the "junk" foods and the "trans fats" found in these cheap foods that people buy.

I buy less food now but it is high quality - either organic or the best quality I can find with the least amount of additives and preservatives.

I went again for blood work and my blood sugar is now at 85. So I guess diet was indeed the culprit and no, I have not lost any weight, I just changed my diet.

Does it cost more? Not really. That junk food was costly too and in more than one way.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. this is really true
"That junk food was costly too and in more than one way."

It's just the going to the grocery store every two or three days, after a long day at work, then coming home late to face cooking and cleaning up (no dishwasher here, folks) is a bit daunting. You feel like you 'owe' it to yourself to veg out, err lard out, as the case may be. Order a pizza, watch TV, rest your neurons. Really you owe it to yourself NOT to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dervill Crow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. And when you have a skinny family who insist on eating unhealthy . . .
When my family wants to eat Taco Bell or pizza, I find it hard to sit down to a salad. I'm happy that there are some fast food places that do have healthy items on their menus, although crazily enough many of the salads are high in fat.

I'm over 50 years old, 100 pounds overweight, and healthy as can be with normal blood pressure and normal labs. Some days I like myself just fine, some days I am angry at society for making me feel less than human, and some days I am angry at myself for letting myself go this way. I gained the 100 pounds over a couple of years when I worked two sedentary jobs, slept very little and ate a lot.

When I was younger I could gain 10 pounds and taken it off whenever I wanted. I still can; it's that next 90 that seems to be the problem. There's just no easy fix; even with the bariatric surgery if you have an underlying problem with food it will still be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #36
74. Even if your family are thin, the junk food is not good for them.
I'm the heaviest in my family, but I do a lot of the cooking and my wife hates junk food, so that helps...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I've found some organic frozen dinners that are quite good
One of them is made with organic chicken in fact. I buy them on sale when they have sales (last time around it was $2.99 a dinner). I stocked up on these because I have very low energy and frequently am just too tired to cook.

I've also found other ways to work around this problem. I make a huge lasagna every so often of all organic vegetables and other items as they may be available. Organic cheeses are very expensive so I tend to buy just regular cheese (the recipe uses 3 different cheeses).

After I cook this whole huge thing I let it set in the refrigerator overnight and the next day I cut it up into single servings and freeze them in Tupperware. I usually get at least 8 large meals out of one of these huge lasagnas. Total cost is maybe $10 to make one. That saves a lot of money and time and it is also very good for you (contains spinach, zucchini, mushrooms, onions, garlic, tomato sauce/diced tomatoes which I buy on sale canned/organic).

There are ways around being too tired to cook. I have many ways I work around this problem. :)

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. I disagree that you have to have money
to eat healthy foods that are good for you. In fact, I would argue that you can actually spend LESS money on a balanced diet. It does take some planning and effort, though.

Eating well does not mean shopping only and health food stores, buying organic or going to Whole Foods. Fruits and vegetables are much cheaper than meat, especially in the summer when Farmer's Markets are plentiful. In the winter, frozen food is nearly as nutritious or freeze and can items in the summer for winter.

Beans, in all shapes and sizes, and eggs are both inexpensive, high quality sources of proteins and can be used to create a huge variety of dishes. Barilla pasta now makes a protien pasta that pushes it lower on the glycemic scale.

I always pack lunch and snacks for work and stay away from the vending machines and fast-food places. I eat better and spend less money on food than a lot of people I know. If you're pressed for time, cook and freeze on the weekends for the week or make a huge salad, pot of vegetable soup, etc. and eat it for the next few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #32
190. And if you live in a studio
with only a hotplate, a tabletop refrigerator and no freezer how does that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #190
192. There are websites out there that deal with issues like that.
On livejournal.com, there is cheapvegan. I'm sure there is more. Working and limited kitchen facilities is absolutly no excuse to have a shitty diet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #192
193. Say the privileged who don't have to deal with being low-income
--and time and everything else stressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #193
211. Currently, I'm privleged. I'll admit it, however...
two years ago, I spent several months not knowing where my next meal was coming from. Okay, so I think I know what I'm talking about here. I'm been in a position when I've been scrounging for change, snagging food off of friends or stealing food. So I really think that I can talk about a low-income lifestyle...m'kay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #211
225. And your eating habits were exactly the same under both conditions
Right. And I'm Marie of Roumania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #225
235. Well, I ate less tofu, but I still ate a lot of whole grains and beans.
They're cheap and easy to make. I still didn't eat any fast food. I didn't gain any weight. It can be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #235
239. Yeah, right. Sure you did.
Since you had to steal food, how'd you manage to get those sacs of beans and grains past the security guards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #235
288. I don't call having to wait around for two hours to prepare a meal "easy"
It's only "easy" in the sense of "not very complex." How is someone who works at the 7-11 during the day and as a phone solicitor at night supposed to find 2 extra hours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #192
238. Because everyone has access to a computer, right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
214. It's the packaging (marketing) that makes it hard for poor people
to eat more healthy food.

A homeless person can get a hamburger for a buck. It's harder to get healthier food for a buck. To buy two eggs or a bowl of warm (healthy) bean soup.

I can afford to buy a dozen eggs and cook two in my kitchen. Or buy an assortment of beans to cook soup and freeze it in my freezer.

Plus, I read sometime ago that things tend to cost more in lower income neighborhoods - because the smaller stores buy in smaller quantities and because of other stuff. So, my eggs would cost more in a different neighborhood, too, although they cost enough right here in my mixed blue-collar one.

The actual cost of the unit of food is just one part of the problem, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
251. I agree 100%
as a matter of fact, when I was putting myself through college working full time and a full time student, I was 20 pounds lighter than I am now, and a LOT poorer and time-starved. I also could not afford a car and rode a bike, walked, and rode the bus more, which also helps, but takers more time.

Fresh food, which can sometimes take a bit longer to prepare, is so much cheaper than packaged or fast food in the long run. But there are TONS of fresh food options which don't take much time, especially if you can make an extra portion or two. Hummus (from any kind of beans, and if you lack space/eqipment, canned beans are still super cheap), salsa (tomatoes and peppers and onions are all cheap and can be eaten raw), breads, etc. I could not afford processed food for years to be honest.

I also at various times worked in restaurant kitchens (full time and/or on the side) to have access to a kitchen and food, because I could not afford much else.

I have a lot of sympathy for people without money and time and space, but sometimes you need to stop blaming everything around and make changes to your life, as much as you are able to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
44. You just pointed out one of the great sins of our culture.
We supposedly have this high standard of living, yet the food choices for those even slightly below middle class are not very good in terms of nutritional value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Don't You Know Fat People Cause Everything Bad?
Really - it's true! In their spare moments, when they're not jamming doughnuts down their gullets with both hands (because we all know that that's all fat people do is eat eat eat - if they were just better people they'd put down that fork and say no to that food! It's just that easy!) they're wrecking the economy with their health issues - nevermind that researchers and doctors think that the prediposition to be diabetic is the thing that may cause the initial weight gain - and by making us look at them! zomg!11! It's just so easy easy easy to lose weight - that's why everyone else is thin, and there's just a very few fat people, because fat is a choice made by lazy, sloppy, stupid ugly gross fat fat fat people who have made the choice to be fat. Because, you know, there's no downside to being fat - everyone's so super nice to those worthless lardasses, and it's about time that that stops, for their own good! I bet they don't even know they're fat! They just put on their plus-size clothes and are CLUELESS about their weight, so it's up to us to tell them, and tell them that it's so easy to lose weight (that's why it's a multi-billion dollar industry - ya know, because losing weight is easy and permanent and always safe - ask the 48 out of 50 bariatric surgery patients who don't don't die from the surgery) for their own damn good. And so we don't have to look at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
153. while I agree judgemental and rude people exist
I take issue with the assumption that any concern over the expanding waist bands in the west is down to plain old nastiness. I spent a few years seriously underweight and I copped a LOT of crap for it, people said things to me that they would never have DREAMED of mentioning to someone overweight. Eg I never once heard my boss tell a large co-worker that she was "even fatter than week" - replace the word fat with skinny and that's what he said every fucking morning, so I well understand that people can be right shits (the best response to stupid ignorant mean comments is surely to mention how ugly the person is, a situation that will not change regardless of their diet) BUT that doesn't mean being obese is healthy, that it isn't causing a strain on the health service or that to lose weight is simple (pls note I said simple not easy) less calories in than out. The weight loss industry is huge because people fall for easy options - ie frozen meals and meal replacements that will never work long term. The only effective long term solution is to change one's lifestyle which need not cost a penny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
285. Yea, Fat People and Clinton's Penis
They are the causes of EVERYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. We are all living in a big High School.
One big High School "speak no evil" popularity contest.

One big snobby neverending Martha Stewart fashion show.

One huge moronic "how long is your schlong" locker room showdown.

One widespread socially retarded wedgiefest.

One nationwide race to the bottom of the overclorinated pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
229. how about the health problems associated with obesity?
I was 20 lbs overweight when I was 20 yrs old and it was uncomfortable! My gut hurt. I gained the weight super-quickly because I had a big-eating, food-indulgent boyfriend.

I previously posted the fact that I was a chubby kid who loved to eat a lot, up until about 6th grade, when I got tired of peoples' snide comments. I was only just a little chubby, but I still got occasional "fattie" comments.
Never tell a teen s/he should lose weight. He/she already knows!

Obesity, and overweight, causes health problems. Ask any doctor. Obesity is unhealthy for the body. Yes it sucks to be overweight, but there are things you can do to combat the weight. Don't lose weight because "they" tell you to. Do it for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #229
234. Many of my friends are obese...

...never has it helped them to suffer verbal abuse. To the contrary, such abuse usually sends them running for the comfort food.

And even if our juvenile delinquent culture does have some upsides, which plainly in this case it does not, that would not make it right, or any less shameful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #234
236. teens are vulnerable.
I was one, once. I had a good upbringing but I still had some depression and anxiety.
No matter how tough you think you are as a teen, you're still vulnerable. It's so typical for teenagers to boast "not me, I'm way too smart."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alpharetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. 46 Percent Willing To Give Up Year Of Life
No offense, but maybe they know remaining obese will shorten lifespans by more than just one year.

And willing to accept depression? There's not already a connection between obesity and depression?

And yes, I admit I am prejudiced. But still I don't think the poll is scientific enough or does much other than starting discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. I think this is a new way of surveying all kinds of conditions
"How much of your life would you give up to spend the rest of your life without 'xyz' condition?"

Its a way to objectively determine how a condition subjectively affects someone with it, a misery index of sorts. My understanding is that people with certain conditions would give up more than a year to be rid of chronic conditions.

I dont know if it is a poll so much as it is a survey. I think big pharma and corporate medicine are into it. Its a way of 'proving' how seriously someone suffering from anything from asthma to dry eye is willing to sacrifice get rid of it. Hence R&D, treatment and costs are upgraded.

It is an attention getter, but subjective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
92. Again, they mean "Would you rather live 25 more years and be fat
through them? Or would you rather live 24 more years and be thin through them".

I agree that the poll isn't scientific. I wonder how hard it is to NOT be depressed when the whole world is telling you you are second rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariellyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. My friend's daughter died from weight loss surgery last year
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 10:39 AM by ariellyn
My friend had a heart attack from the shock and grief and couldn't even attend her daughter's funeral. Her 30 something daughter left two young children behind.

...And people look at disgust at fat people, as if they should have this surgery and risk their lives to appear pleasing to society. That's BS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I think there is a place for the surgery.
But it is not for people who are simply heavy. It is an individual choice, but if I were bedridden from obesity, I poersonally would probably do it. If I were Carnie Wilson and just very overweight, I would have maybe tried a few more things first, but I do understand that the pressure on her must have been enormous.

I do agree, though, it is life-threatening surgery and not to be entered into lightly.

But I'm sure the doctors tell you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
138. Do you know anything about the qualification for weight loss surgeries?
>But it is not for people who are simply heavy.<

There is a rigorous qualification process, including more than one session with a psychologist. The person in question must be proven to have no ability to lose weight under normal circumstances. There can be significant complications as a result of surgery as well.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. Willing to "lose a limb" but not go to the gym or eat sensibly?
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. No offense intended BES
But finding the strength to change your lifestyle is not easy. Especially, when we live in a culture of accepted and promoted excess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. How about if someone did both and it didn't make a difference?
Yep, I'm one. Although I was a chubby kid, I was rail thin from about age 12 on up through adulthood. About eight years ago, I suddenly started to gain weight. I wasn't eating more than usual, but I started dieting anyway. Kept gaining weight. Joined the gym with my husband, who was very into the science of fitness. "Calories in, calories out" was his mantra. After several months exercising under his watchful eye, and STILL GAINING, he finally looked over my shoulder at the number on the scale and said, "Okay, now you're defying the laws of physics."

I sure was. Thirty-odd pounds later (packed on in less than a year), I finally was diagnosed with hypothyroidism, which, I found out later, ran in both sides of my family.

So sometimes there's more to that overweight person than meets the eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Similar story here:
Gained about 30 lbs in three months despite a similar diet to what I had eaten all the rest of my life. After going to the doctor, I was diagnosed with hypothyroidism. Medication keeps me from gaining any more weight, but it is very difficult for me to lose it for whatever reason(the medication? the basic disease? who knows...the doctors and researchers don't give enough of a crap to find out why being on Synthroid hinders weight loss, but it does seem to be a common occurrence anecdotally).

I basically have to starve and exercise myself into exhaustion to lose more than about 1/4 lb a week. I know several people who have "dieted" eating approximately what I eat for a normal diet and have lost tens of pounds, but I don't lose anything at all, even with the addition of exercise. I am beginning to think that I will keep these extra 30 lbs all my life unless I do something drastic.

My mother is also medicated hypothyroid. She also had about 30 extra lbs, but was extremely athletic (way more than me). She and my father used to take month long bicycle trips, and they walked 5-7 miles a day, every day, rain, sleet, or snow. The weight never came off for her either until she went on a hard core low carb diet. Now she's at a normal weight, but you never saw anyone eat so carefully to maintain it. It's ridiculous what she has to eat to not gain it back.

Neither of us are predisposed to weight gain other than the thyroid thing. We are both small boned and were both very skinny up until getting hypothyroid in our late 20s.

You just never know what people's situations are. It really pisses me off that people judge me for my weight when they don't know anything about me. (And believe me, I know that I'm being judged negatively, because I remember how I was treated when I was skinny.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Oh, I hear that!
:hug:

I went hardcore low-carb about four years ago and lost 12 lbs., but I hated every minute of it. It was insane!

Then my fertility came back and I got pregnant and now I'm back to square one! :banghead:

Working out at the gym doesn't do ANYthing for me, although I haven't quit trying (Mr. MorningGlow reminds me it's good for my heart--yeah yeah yeah whatever).

Here's to ya, hypo sistah! :toast: (That's low-carb beer in there.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiobhanClancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
60. I had thyroid cancer...
and had my thyroid removed,so naturally I have to take Synthroid. They keep changing the dosage depending on blood work,but I still can't lose weight. I imagine people probably think I am just a chowhound(although I'm only moderately overweight). People should not make assumptions,and I really WISH that it was ice cream etc. that was responsible for the shape I'm in....it would have been a lot more fun that having thyroid cancer:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
108. same here--
as you can tell by my screen name..I am a competitve powerlifter...and a big girl.I work out over 16 hours a week,and watch what i eat,for the most part.I'm at the point where I am considering gastric bypass surgery.It sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. Hi MorningGlow!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Thanks! Good to be here! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. The obesity epidemic is not a genetic change in our species
Most (yes, i know, not all) cases are correctable through lifestyle.

I was a chubby kid too. I know the heartbreak of "Huskies".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #54
139. Are you a physician?
>Most (yes, i know, not all) cases are correctable through lifestyle.<

Again, what medical training do you possess in order to make this statement?

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #139
143. Yes I am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #143
145. I guess you won't mind a few questions, then
What med school did you graduate from?
How long have you been practicing?
What is your specialization?

Thanks,
Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #145
171. ROFL! It's hard to get shutdown, eh Julie?
You'd rather insinuate that he's a liar because he disagrees with you.

The politics of personal destruction. That's cold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #171
246. Thanks for the response
>The politics of personal destruction. That's cold.<

I don't think it's unreasonable to request that anyone representing themselves as a doctor back up their statements.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #246
250. just because he has an md....
does not necessarily make him an expert. Many MDs are still uninformed assholes. I've seen some pretty fat doctors in my day. One of the fattest people I've ever seen in "real life" was an OB GYN. Just got through with a temp assignment working with many nurses ... gosh there were a lot of fat people amongst these educated medical professionals.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #250
273. You bet. How many nutrition classes do MDs take in their
education? Most take none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #54
181. None are curable
The only result of lifestyle changes is weighing slightly less and being healthier. Obesity stays constant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #54
185. No, it's a change in other factors that individuals have no control over
Like extended work hours at sedentary crap minimum wage jobs in places with no public transportation, and less time to prepare whole foods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
148. It's an unfortunate paradox
Even in the absense of a medical condition like yours, dieting and weight-cycling in themselves lead to fatness. When you lose weight, your fat cells shrink but don't disappear unless you get lipo. With each successive gain/loss yo yo cycle it becomes easier to gain and harder to lose. Add to that aging and the behavioral component where your ability to gage true hunger becomes muted and you alternate between rigid control and overeating and it becomes nigh on impossible to be slender. But there's no convincing ignorant judgemental people of Slimfast Nation, who think all it takes is "one shake at lunch and a sensible dinner" to get your weight to whatever you want. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
28. A friend of my sister's whole family is obese.
The husband, the wife and the two kids. I don't think the husband was always obese but the wife was. And her two kids took after her, I am surprised she was able to have kids. She is the nicest person, I feel so bad for her because my sister told me her children are always made fun of at school and the girl (age 10) finally decided to do that gastric bypass surgery. The surgery was a success. It was shown on the news and everything. The topic was "Obese kids". Not too long ago, the daugher had to return to the hospital for dehydration. She looked really bad but you can tell she did lost some weight. She still has a long way to go. And over the weekend I found out she had to return once again to the hospital for dehydration. I am praying she gets through the problems faced with this surgery. It's awful that a little girl (and boy) has to go through all the demeaning fat jokes. And we all know kids can be so cruel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SupplyConcerns Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
29. If you're fat you're sacrificing a year of your life at least
I'm fat-phobic in the sense that I'm also afraid of becoming diabetic or being unhealthy. I want to be able to exercise and have physical endurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
91. No, they mean you could live 25 years more and have them be
"fat" years, or you could live 24 more years and have them be thin years.

Not "I'd sacrifice 1 year to gain 10".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. as someone who used to be a lot larger...
..I have mixed feelings about this issue.

On the one hand, I do think that general health should be emphasized in our culture more that weight. I know when I am active I feel a lot better physically and psychologically. I also feel that - much like with the sex issue - we are a very conflicted society on this. Americans are on average less active and eat larger portions than we should and are gaining weight.

On the other hand, not only do I never make fun of or even make an issue about anyone being "fat", I hate to hear people complain about how they are "fat pigs" when it's so not true. We have been brainwashed by media and advertising to think that anyone heavier than Ally McBeal is huge, and it is so damaging to us in many ways.

I think we need to re-educate ourselves. People come in a wide variety of body types and sizes, and beauty can be found in all of that variety. There needs to be a healthy balance between striving to improve and stay active and in seeing what is positive instead of dwelling on the negative.

Personally, a good personality goes a long way in attraction, and I think that I am not as much in the minority as some would believe.

I will say this also: as much as cringe when someone constantly picks at their own flaws, I truly hate when people pick on others' flaws, and often ignore the fact that they may have the same or worse problem. Men are very guilty of this, and popular culture props it up too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. Why not? Only thin, perfect looking extroverted people get action in bed.
Who doesn't want action in bed?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #34
64. well played
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #64
133. Unfortunately, I'm not a player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #133
172. Don't hate the player, hate the GAME.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
35. I am fat
and can't say that I have ever experienced prejudice.
I've never applied for a job that I didn't get.
I have never had a problem with interpersonal relationships.
I am not saying that it doesn't exist, just that I haven't experienced it.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'm not totally sure what fat folks want....
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 12:34 PM by BlooInBloo
...

If they just want, as it were, to not be hated or mistreated because they're fat (not sure how to word that - hope that made sense), then that's *completely* fair enough.

Reading through threads like these, which pop up regularly though, I get the feeling that fat folks want/demand that they be considered by the average Joe/Josephine as every bit as attractive as someone who isn't fat. And that anyone who doesn't find fat to be hot is therefore prejudiced in some bad way.

I think that's going to far - that it's not morally wrong to consider, of two people who are alike in all other ways, the non-overweight one as being more physically attractive.

Of course personal tastes can vary on this - I'm talking about on the average.

Please note that I explicitly said "alike in all other ways".

And it is completely to be acknowledged that people (typically girls in our society) can go WAY overboard on the not-fat tip, and end up looking absolutely awful (Lindsay Lohan comes to mind quickly here) - when they looked awesome to begin with.

In general, I think it's unfair in the extreme to think of someone as anything like predjudiced because they aren't turned on by the thought of rolls of fat wiggling through their hands.


EDIT: Flamesuit ON!

It's of course just fine if someone IS turned on by that - different strokes for different folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. "...rolls of fat wiggling through their hands."
Surely you can say this better than that. :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. And still convey (somewhat) what a lot of folks find not hot....
... about overweight folks? Maybe - I don't claim to be terribly slick with words...

Nevertheless - I'm TOTALLY with fat folks on the idea that whether or not one person (or many for that matter) finds them physcially attractive should be COMPLETELY separate from their value as a person, as a coworker, as a parent, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
53. I'm 31 years old and very happily married
I could really give a crap whether anyone other than my husband thinks I'm "attractive" any more, fat, skinny or in-between.

What really upsets me, though, is the invisibility. When I was skinny, I was a person to other people. Now I'm just a blank spot in space. People don't look at me, they don't recognize that I'm standing next to them, they ignnore me in conversations, etc. This was never the case when I was skinny. The way people treated me changed literally overnight after I gained weight (see above re: being diagnosed with hypothyroidism), and it definitely wasn't me, at least at first. I spent several months being mystified as to why I didn't seem to exist to other people anymore until I figured it out.

I've also been made fun of on several occasions in the past few years, and it hurt my feelings. The saddest part is that I'm not even that fat. I'm just not the skinny girl I used to be, and it's totally acceptable for people to make fun of others about their weight nowadays. It's the new black or Jew or *insert generic stigmatized-group-targeted-by-assholes here*

So...attractive? No. There are many ways in which I don't and will never again measure up to society's standard of beauty. Even if I was Ally McBeal, I'm not getting any younger. I'm over that already.

Treated like a human being? Yes. That's all I want. People to be interested in me because I am an interesting person, even if I don't have the body of an 18 year old.

What's so wrong with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #53
82. **** AB-SO-FREAKING-LUTELY!!! **** EXCELLENT POST ABOVE! I hope
everyone reads it.

Oh my god that is so true! If you're fat you're either invisible or a target. Almost never a human being.

I'm 36 and happily married to a guy who loves me just the way I am (and the feeling is mutual). I don't have any desire to be hit on or whistled at or anything like that. I don't expect or want everyone to find me attractive. I don't find tanned muscle-bound men attractive either, so we're even. But when I walk into a store, a restaurant, or anywhere really, I would like to be acknowledged. I would like to be treated like a human. That is all. I can't tell you the number of times I've been ignored when I walk into a place, but a thin young woman walks in after me and suddenly the staff (men and women alike) are tripping over themselves to help her. Hello? I don't look like I'm going to rob the place, I don't smell, I'm not a raving bitch, I have money to spend, I dress well. I'm just overweight. What, only supermodels buy things or need help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. What do Fat People Want?
To be left the hell alone and not lectured every minute of the day about how we're killing ourselves, driving up health insurance costs, etc. That's what we want!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
98. The average Joe/Josephine, skinny or not
Isn't all that hot to begin with so who the hell are they to think they're entitled to cast public judgement on every other person they see? The problem isn't if you aren't attracted to a particular body type, that's completely your prerogative. It's when you feel compelled to air your preferences at any time and expect others to comply with them. That's what wearing a "No Fat Chicks" shirt does. I don't find the majority of men sexually attractive but, unlike some of the rude-asses I know, I don't find it necessary to comment (loudly) about the physical attributes of the men in my midst.


Try this, if you can't say anything nice - KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. I saw an interesting comment recently comparing obesity to alcoholism and
drug addiction that said something like "Recovering alcoholics have to completely swear off alcohol because they know that even one drink spells disaster. Same for drug addicts. Yet food addicts still have to eat in order to live. Every single day they must ingest the thing they are addicted to, while simultaneously trying to beat their addiction. And while alcoholism and drug abuse is considered (rightly so) to be a disease, obesity is still very much considered to be a character flaw."

I thought that was very interesting. It's true, obesity seems to be the one thing left that is open season for people to ridicule mercilessly. I don't get what makes people so quick to judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. Drunks Put Their Tiger In a Cage
Food addicts have to take the kitty out and pet him three times a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
68. I've never heard it put better.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #56
80. Exactly! You said it much better than I did though!
Thanks. I guess that's what bothers me so much about people being so willing to ridicule others who struggle with weight. And food addiction is just one factor. Others have disorders and diseases that cause them to gain weight. But it's always immediately assumed that a fat person is lazy, never exercises, has no self-control, and thinks about nothing but food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
155. except that's a total myth
you don't have to never touch another drop of alcohol to beat alcoholism, you can still occasionally take drugs you were once addicted to.

Personally (as a recovered addict myself) I never viewed addiction as a disease, it happened because I took a shitload of a certain substance for a period of time and my body became physically addicted to it. I took the substance, not anyone else and not my genes. Food is the same, except of course it's not actually addictive. An addictive substance, if used repeatedly for a long period WILL produce a physical addiction, if that was the case with food then every person on earth with access to food would be obese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #155
191. But you still don't ever *need* to take another drink
or another drug again once you've recovered. Just because you are someone who *can* have a single drink and be okay (my uncle couldn't even use mouthwash once he got sober), you still could survive quite nicely for the rest of your life without ever taking another. In other words, those who truly cannot stop with one drink needn't ever tempt themselves. Food addicts stare down that temptation every single meal, every single day. They have no choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #191
215. Except that food isn't addictive
Also there is no NEED to over eat, there is no NEED to eat hydrogenated fats and other shite. Of course you need to eat but you certainly don't need to eat enough to be obese.

I think many people tend to personalise this issue a lot, instead of hearing concerns about health and fitness they hear "omigod you have a few extras pounds you're disgusting", being a bit chubby or carrying a few extra pounds/kilos, isn't what's being discussed, it's being OBESE and that's something very different.

If you're a large person who's fitness and health is fine then clearly the discussion about healthcare costs ISN'T about you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #215
221. Gonna have to disagree on the addiction thing but
that's okay.

As far as the personalization of this issue goes, I have no problem with concerned, informed, rational discussions of obesity in America. But I think some folks here have gone far beyond concerns about health and fitness.They've made it very clear that they feel being overweight is a character flaw, and they shouldn't be forced to tolerate overweight people. They've made assumptions that I could be doing something about my weight but I'm just too lazy, or lack discipline, rather than stopping to consider that maybe I am doing everything I can to stay healthy but there are other factors that keep the weight on. They've made it clear that they believe the discussion of healthcare costs IS about me and everyone else they see who is obese (yes, I'm considered obese) because they don't stop to consider that I might be in excellent health and the supermodel standing next to me might be in terrible health. When people make intolerant, uniformed generalizations like that on a board that is supposed to be a safe haven for tolerant, informed people, I speak up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #221
274. it's not physically addictive
but that's probably me splitting hairs. I agree that people tend to assume that bigger equals unhealthy which is stupid. I've always been slim (and was really unheathily skinny for a few years) but I've rarely been fit. I smoke like a chimney, drink too much and rarely get any exercise. You are most likely way fitter than I am.

For me the healthcare costs aren't such a huge issue (after all I'm a smoker) but I do get a bit annoyed at the myth that genetic and other health issues are a big factor in obesity. They're not, a tiny tiny minority of obese people can attribute their obesity to this sort of thing (many more syndromes etc can make you overweight but will only make you obese if you also get little exercise and consume high amounts of calories)

Again my smoking is a totally personal decision and I'm the only person who can do anything about it, I am not for one minute taking a self righteous view of this (maybe when I kick the fags and various other stimulants I'll have cause to but even then I don't think that sort of judgement is mine to make) but I do get a bit tired of the excuses. Very few people sympathise with smokers now, even though they have a physical addiction that is incredibly hard to kick, but people shouldn't sympathise with us because we STILL make a choice every morning to have another ciggie, over and above our addictions we make choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #215
255. I agree
as a former alcoholic and addict and as someone who was overweight (and still is mildly).

Also, to assume that recovering addicts don't face their temptations is ridiculous. They may not ever need to drink to live, but they also see people using/abusing alcohol and drugs all around them, often every day, in real life and the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #41
200. I'm much much worse than that!
Multiple substance abuse here--addicted not only to food, but also to water and oxygen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
48. can we move on to Pit Bulls & Concealed Weapons?
time to move on to the other pointless topics...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #48
195. I'm adopting a pit bull tommorow.
I'm so excited. He's so cute & sweet. Pictures will be forthcoming.

Sorry I just had to jump in there, but I really will be adopting a pit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
49. I been fat. I been skinny.

And I can assure you, I was a much happier man when I could easily bend over. I was happier when my feet wasn't sore from carrying around the extra weight. I physically felt a whole lot better about 20 lbs ago and was able to do so much more.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
51. Oh I admit to


I admit I have been insensitive on this subject. I dont go around insulting fat people , but I have used the term fat as an insult . I need to work on that. I dont like hurting anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #51
81. That's good of you to say.
Thanks for saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #51
163. But there ARE times when it's appropriate.
Making fun of a fat woman walking down the street, minding her own business is disgusting, cruel and inexcusable.

But making fun of a pig like Limbaugh over his weight is all right with me, since he makes a living telling people that the only reason they can't do X is because they fail to do Y, and that's why everyone is not a perfect billionaire success. Everything is a character flaw or laziness, or whatever, so I think it's fair to throw it back in Limbaugh's fat face the HE lacks the willpower to get his ass off of hillbilly heroin, and HE was a morbidly obese hog before the drugs took the weight off of him, and he no doubt will be again, because he's too LAZY to ever sweat a drop on anything more strenuous than golf.


I have sympathy for normal people dealing with weight - not sanctimonious assholes who try to make others feel like failures.

ANd what's with Dr. Phil selling a diet book? He ain't exactly thin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
58. All this fat phobia is rather triggering
I am recovering from anorexia.
Why do I have to be bombarded with articles like "Losing weight increases energy." "Losing weight decreases (malady)." "Americans are too fat."?
They say that I have disordered thinking by being obsessed with my weight and body shape. Isn't everyone else obsessed too?
And why am I supposed to gain weight when the attractive stars are idealized? If they are alright, aren't I alright? If they gain 10 pounds, the gossip magazines will say how they blimped out. If I gain 10 pounds, will I have blimped out?
Back to recovery/intellectual thinking: I had a lot more energy and was stronger when I was nearly overweight. I was healthier. I was ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Callista Flockhart is hideous
My friends all agree. She looks like she just got liberated from a death camp.

There are people who, when they were thin, felt rotten and had no energy. They gained weight and felt a lot better.

My main goal is not to fluctuate much. I hate shopping for clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #63
71. ITA. Anything can be taken to an extreme. There is a point where
thin is unattractive.

I think it is not "fat" so much as it is whatever is the sign of leisure, of having money. That is why, when the food supply was often still questionable, it was a status symbol to weigh more, just because it meant you could afford to eat. In the Victorian Age, thin was connected in people's minds with poor and so it was not attractive. The old maid was often insulted as being a dessicated and "thin" old thing.

Then when food was in better supply to more people, it was the rich who had the leisure for exercise. Having a tan was cool for awhile, until people understood that might be dangerous. But being thin then meant you had the leisure for exercise, so being "fat" became the lot of the old maids, etc.

It is amazing how much affect this search for status or even to fit in with society's expectations actually physically affects us, in a broad way. Why did women get thinner as they aged when it was unattractive, but put on weight as they age when that is unattractive? It just shows how much of life is all in our heads.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #63
124. Callista Flockhart is hideous
Geez, as someone who is Callista's size, I appreciate your insight. I was really pleased to see that no one on this board was insensitive enough to start bashing skinny people in order to veer away from the topic of obesity. But then, there you were. A real class act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #124
279. I apologize. See post 278
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #63
157. Why is what you said ANY different
to the fat taunts people are discussing here. I was skinnier than Calista for a while for reasons I wont go into, in short they were nothing to do with an eating disorder, I fucking HATED being that thin, partly because I kept hearing people say how hideous and disgusting women with bodies like mine were.

If I said "XYZ is hideous, she looks like she was birthed by a whale" do you think I'd be flamed from here to eternity, why do you think it's OK to pass negative judgement on the size of some people's bodies but not others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #157
213. You're absolutely right. I noticed that too.
It's perfectly acceptible to say "I don't find Calista Flockhart attractive in the least" because it's an opinion. To declare that she IS hideous is going too far IMHO.

I suspect it may be a little backlash to all the self-righteousness many thin people seem to exhibit even on this board, as if being thin makes them a better, more virtuous person. It still doesn't make ridicule based only on appearance right no matter who is saying it or what they are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #213
217. you're doing it too
"to all the self-righteousness many thin people seem to exhibit even on this board, as if being thin makes them a better, more virtuous person"

I doubt very much that impression comes from anywhere other than your imagination, based on YOUR prejudices about thin people.

Personally if someone thinks Callista is hideous that's fine, but it's also fine to find fat people hideous, as you say it's all opinion. Personally I don't find very skinny or very fat people attractive and I really don't care whether or not it's PC to say that. I don't think that means I have to go around saying "eeuww what a fattie" OR "eeeuuww what an anorexic" but I can and do have a personal preference.

I just find it funny that in every thread on this topic and every single real life discussion I've had, someone, after banging on endlessly about how mean people are to fat people, will pipe up with "no man likes a skinny girl/she looks anorexic and disgusting/skeletor/I've seen better nourished concentration camp victims".

And EVERY single time the larger women have a good cackle, I have pointed out people's innapropriate comments directed at larger people but guess what no-one has EVER come to my defense when the "scrawny" and "unfeminine" comments were hurled at me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #217
226. No, it is not in my imagination.
And, no, I don't have a problem with thin people, my two best friends are thin as can be. I have a problem with self-righteous thin people who want to judge me without knowing me. I've been reading posts all day where thin people think they have all the answers to other people's weight problems. That's self-righteousness as far as I'm concerned and it's right here in this thread. I'd be happy to direct you to the posts.

I am really sorry that some people have called you those names and had a good cackle at your expense. I know how it feels and it sucks. But I've never called you those names, nor would I have tolerated it if I read a post where anyone had. In fact, I did actually just try to agree with you and call out the person who made the remark about Calista Flockhart. But apparently I didn't agree with you the right way. I'm sorry about that.

"I don't think that means I have to go around saying "eeuww what a fattie" OR "eeeuuww what an anorexic" but I can and do have a personal preference." That was my point exactly. One's opinion on what they find attractive is totally different than hurling insults at strangers. We're agreeing here. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #157
278. Let me try again
Malnourished is not what people should encourage others to aspire to. Malnourished is not an ideal. It's not healthy, deliberately starving yourself until it becomes an eating disorder. It screws up your body in several ways.

By the way, I used to look like that as a 30 pound underweight 10 year old. If I'm calling anyone ugly, it's me as a child. Calista Flockhart is a name everyone knows. I'm just Nobody.

It wasn't that I was trying to look like anything in particular, I was a severely picky eater and could watch people eat entire meals without any of it appealing to me. I'm sure I mucked up my metabolism for life, and I'm now on the opposite end of the spectrum, but not as extreme. As an adult I discovered that I like eating.

You're right, though, I posted that and I didn't think it through. I take back the "hideous" label and replace it with "unhealthy-looking".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #63
174. She's very pretty. It would just be nice if she discovered DINNER.
But note that just because there is a such thing as *too thin* that's a FAR cry from anything remotely like fat is good. Such a notion is suggested by "they gained weight and felt a lot better". After all, people shoot up with heroin and feel "a lot better" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #174
243. She's gained some weight since the "Ally McBeal" days
She's still a skinny girl, but not emaciated. And she does say now that she was under a lot of stress during that time and that it did affect her eating habits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #243
267. Kudos to her then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #243
280. I'm glad to hear that
And I take back the "hideous" label.

Sorry to offend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #58
77. Good luck with your continued recovery! Someone close to me
is there too, and I know how hard it is. Even though I don't suffer from this issue, I did have a lot of self-image problems for many years. You know what helped? I know it sounds simplistic, but it really worked: stop looking at magazines, stop watching mainstream tv. When these fake images leave our daily life, they stop having influence over our minds. Best wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanaAustraliana Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
65. Sexual attraction: My girlfriend is moderately overweight
I am sexually attracted to an increasing variety of girls/women up to say 'moderately' overweight; and the sex life of my girlfriend and I has always improved as our honesty and openness develops.

However she and I both have a problem with her weight besides minor and potential health problems. Every few weeks or so I go through a phase where I mildly despair that she doesn't have a great bottom, legs and waist.

I suffer bouts of poignant, piercing, burning jealousy of fit girls and the things they wear (yeah I know, why don't I just wear them then:))

I sympathise with overweight people, especially (obviously) those who have health problems; and those who've lost a loved one for weight-related reasons.

I believe that I am self-actualised enough to have got over the cultural 'barbie' conditioning and pubescent imprints. I used to have contempt for fat people but I got over that years ago.

This study says men are on average attracted to womem with a waist-hip ratio of 0.7 and speculates on why:

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/060213_attraction_rules.html

No conclusion here. I just wanted to express that.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
75. BTW, my weight-loss regime has included choco-chip cookies...
...and other cookies - made with BUTTER.

But the trick is this, they are homemade - no chemicals, and no hydrogenated death glop in them. I originally ate a diet very heavy on veggies with an occasional cookie or homemade slice of cake, with a total daily calorie intake of 1500 calories, and I lost 75 lbs.

My sympathies to those who are dealing with hypothyroidism. That must be awful. I had no such excuse. My problem was eating slightly too much on a daily basis, plus occasional binges on store-bought cookies or nachos.

Now I allow myself between 1500 and 2000 calories, and even have the treats, but I limit those things to the specified serving amount - just one cookie, instead of half a package of store-bought. And since it is homemade, rich and real, it's MORE satisfying than a bag of fake-ass Chips Ahoy could ever be.

Losing weight is never easy, but it shouldn't be about punishing yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
76. "Phobia" = "fear", not "hatred".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #76
259. Exactly.
Most people aren't afraid of fat people, so it's not really a phobia. Fat people have been targeted as culturally-acceptable scapegoats and targets of hatred. It's not the same thing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
78. The world looks at us differently because the USA is fat...
That's why the hate us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. Is that a joke?
I wasn't sure. They hate us because we act like fucking bullies trying to tell everyone else what to do and how to live. They don't hate us because we're fat. They may use the fat/lazy/spoiled line to ridicule Americans. But if America was helping the world instead of destroying it I really don't think the world would care about our size.

If that was a joke, sorry. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #78
87. They hate us for our fatness? LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #78
294. Nope, I think, as a whole, America never really gets how much, and why,
the world does not like you. For instance, here you did not realise that only Americans see fat in such a bad individual light; in fact, the statistics are just interpreted as "Americans eat lots of food" (an implication of having too much available, not one of bad internal character)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carl_pwccaman Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #78
305. Maybe Europe is full of Fat-hating ignoramuses too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
84. It's an AMAZING litmus test though. I'm telling you.
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 01:58 PM by grace0418
I've found that being fat is an useful litmus test for weeding out assholes in sheep's clothing. I think it's because these days many assholes (not all of course) have learned to bite their tongues about gays/minorities/the disabled in mixed company. Sure, they still think their ignorant thoughts and they still say shit when they're among like-minded folks, but they "behave" themselves otherwise. However, since it's still acceptable to ridicule and judge fat people, that is where their asshattery shines through.

I'll give you some examples (out of many, many experiences with it):

#1. My friend is sweet, intelligent, kind-hearted, and really funny. And not to toot my own horn but I think I am also all of those things. In fact, people who know both of us often remark how alike we are. Even her new boyfriend was amazed when I visited them for a few days (she lives in a different state) at how similar our personalities were. The biggest difference? Our size. My friend is thin and I am fat.

Well, for years (when we still lived in the same place) I often noticed that she didn't seem to be the best judge of character. She would meet people at work or wherever and tell me how great they were, how nice and funny and cool they were. Then I'd meet them. Some of them really were nice and cool. But some people immediately gave me a very bad vibe. I could just sense something negative about them. My friend would introduce us and the person would look right through me, or not make eye contact, or just ignore me beyond a very forced "How's it going?" and continue to focus on my friend. I would remain cordial and friendly for my friend's sake, of course. It's not like I demanded that all of her friends also be my friends. But I could tell that they had immediately made some judgment of me based on my appearance just by their expression.

Anyway, down the road and truly without exception, that person would turn out to be a user, or a liar, or really self-centered, or not who they said they were, or just a plain old jerk.

It happened with men and women both but it happened more often with men. Even when my friend was married, some guys would act like uber-sensitive "friends" (not at all interested in sex, of course) but they were really trying to get into her pants. I could pick those guys out so fast because they wouldn't even give me the time of day. I truly do not understand when a guy can't be at least polite to a woman he doesn't find attractive. That is mind-boggling to me. I am kind and friendly to all kinds of people, lack of sexual attraction does not preclude me from treating others with respect. It was almost as if some of those guys were afraid I would molest them if they dared to look me in the eye or speak to me.


#2. My friend and I had a running joke about this one guy who had an art studio in the same building as ours. He immediately took a shine to my friend and would stop her in the hall to chat all the time. Eventually, he would realize that I was also standing there and he would introduce himself in a very perfunctory way, even though I had already met him a million times. At first I would say "Yes, hi _____, we've met. Nice to see you again" but after awhile we just started messing with him. As soon as he walked up my friend would say "Oh hi, _____. Have you met my friend Grace?" and EVERY TIME he would quickly mumble "Nice to meet you" or something without ever ONCE remembering that he had indeed met me many, many times. I was utterly invisible to him. I was so tempted to say "You know _____, I don't bite and I'm not desperate. I'm not going to fall in love with you for being nice to me. And by the way, don't flatter yourself, hon. I don't find you attractive either. But I fail to see why that means we cannot be friendly or at least civil to one another."


#3. I used to work in a graphic design agency. One time were were doing a special project and I had to call a bunch of different vendors for quotes. It was a complicated project so once we narrowed things down a bit I was in communication with two different vendors several times a day for about a week. The two vendors, both male, were very friendly and funny. I had excellent rapport with both of them, but all very professional. I wasn't flirting or making suggestive remarks to them or anything. In fact, the project we were doing was for my husband's company so I know I mentioned I was married.

I scheduled appointments with both of them to visit our office with proposals. When the first vendor arrived, I happened to be sitting at the reception desk looking for something so he probably thought I was the receptionist. He walked up and said "I have an appointment with Grace" and I replied "You must be ______, I'm Grace. It's nice to meet you in person." Well you should have seen his face drop. He couldn't even disguise it. We walked into the conference room and he gave his proposal in the flattest, driest tone imaginable. I could just tell that in his head he had pictured me looking very different, and was bitterly disappointed when he turned out to be wrong. It was bizarre to me. I would never judge someone professionally based on their attractiveness. I will say that he was no hottie, but that never even remotely entered my mind when I was speaking to him on the phone. I just thought he seemed nice and easy-going, which is something I want when working with a vendor.

As it turns out, the second vendor came into my office and was exactly the same as he seemed on phone. Guess who got my business? Plus, I ended up hearing from someone who had hired the other vendor that he sucked and totally screwed up their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #84
88. Your post was very interesting to read.
Especially your examples. I can relate to that but in a different way. I guess I should say Black Phobia.:) And at least your friend acknowledge how these people behave, there are some that think nothing of it and say like, "oh you're just imagining these things".

Thanks for the well informed post! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #88
93. Thanks cat_girl25, that's kind of you to say. I should clarify that
I know this *still* happens with race, sexual orientation, disabilities, etc. I do not mean to diminish Black Phobia (LOL, good one) or any other asshattery. My personal experience just happens to do with weight. :hi:

Honestly, I am so grateful for not being "perfect" or whatever you want to call it. Because I know for sure that the people who are my friends are *truly* my friends. They're not secretly hoping I'll dump my husband and sleep with them, or using me to get dates (unless it's to be the "thin one" LOL), or using me for my money (that would be really misguided), or any number of reasons. They like me for who I am. Because I make them laugh, and I'm there for them, and sometimes I make them homemade jam. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. Oh, you don't have to clarify.
I know you were giving your personal experience. I just think it was dead on and reminded me about the other phobia. And I'm glad you mentioned disabilities. On one of my recent train rides, I noticed a guy that was in a wheel chair. No big deal. When my stop came, I got off the train and was walking to my job....the guy in the wheel chair was along side of me and asked me if I wanted a ride across the street. It shocked me, then I started to laugh at myself. I thought, of course disabled people can flirt too! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #95
101. Thanks!
So did you take that guy up on his offer of a ride? That's awesome! Good for him for being a flirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dervill Crow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #95
130. That's awesome! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conflictgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #84
158. That is interesting...and I have noticed the same thing
I used to be significantly underweight, and then due to a combination of medication side effects and eating the wrong things (not too many calories, but too many processed foods) I gained a lot of weight. So I have seen things from both sides.

My weight now seems to have settled, somewhere about 20 pounds above my so-called "ideal weight." One of my friends from before I gained the weight barely talks to me anymore, and on the occasions that we have had conversations, she made several insulting comments about fat people. She even made comments about her CAT being fat! I wondered if she had always been so fat-phobic before, and I just didn't notice it when I was underweight. Nonetheless, that's one friendship I felt okay about ending. I don't need "friends" like that. Other people have treated me as invisible. I don't think I'm even all that fat, but apparently my weight is enough to weed some people out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
85. Fat people cost us all tons of money
In increased medical expenses. It's a public health crisis. Get your head out of the sand. It's unhealthy to be overweight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dervill Crow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. Yeah, that's what I hear.
I bet lots of thin people would love to have my cholesterol levels and glucose tolerance. My 200 pound 6'7" husband has higher blood pressure than I do, but it's still in the normal range.

Ironically, better health care and people living longer has as much to do with the health care crisis in our country as anything else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. It's a chicken-egg thing
What came first....obestity epidemic or health care crisis.

Not all the blame lies with the obese. Our culture teaches us that eating junk food is the the american birthright. Food manufacturers sell us Frankford's like high-fructose corn syrup.

But I really get annoyed with this fat-acceptance movement that seems so apt to equate being fat to being black or gay or whatnot. You can lose weight. It's hard. You need to get support, guidance, encouragement, etc....but it can be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #90
94. Not always though.
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 03:27 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Some people who would be the genetic kings in the world of old are the "fatties" now. They eat the same way thin people do and never lose weight. Why should their lives be horrible because they get lumped into the "They could but they are just lazy" category?

Some of these arguments remind me of the "You wouldn't be poor if you would only work a little harder--poor people are a drain on society".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #94
96. Why dont they just eat less?
They could if they would choose that. It's just that they feel like they should be able to eat the same amount as someone with high metabolism and get away with it. So they look to science to find them a magic bullet to "cure" this condition.

Being obese basically comes down to self discipline. It's very hard to learn self-discipline, this i know from experience. Our medical system makes it worse by trying to offer a pancea other then helping people develop self discipline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. Wow, I'm so glad you've simplified that for everyone. I bet no fat person
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 04:20 PM by grace0418
has ever tried eating less, much less thought of it. We must all be too busy stuffing our faces to think clearly. It's NEVER due to chronic medical conditions or genetic makeup or other factors beyond one's control, no matter how little they eat or how much they exercise. It's really just as simple as this: fat=undisciplined/lazy/gluttonous. Thanks for clearing that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #99
109. The fact is
That you have a number of calories you need to maintain your current weight.

If you eat more then that you gain weight.

If you eat less weight you gain weight.

It takes self discipline to maintain a proper diet.

Self discipline is the variable that a person can control to lose weight. You can't change your genetics.

Thousands of people have proven that you can lose weight and keep it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #109
115. Yep, self-discipline is a VARIABLE. Not a constant.
I know plenty of people with loads of self discpline that are overweight. I know plenty of people who eat nothing but junk food and never exercise who are thin.

Thousands of people have proven what works *for them*, not for everyone. And until you can personally diagnose the reason for an individual's obesity, you cannot judge what will absolutely work for them. You can say it any way you like, but it will never stop being ignorant to make assumptions on someone's self-discipline or lack thereof without knowing them and their medical history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #115
117. What?
I'm sorry but you have fat people who are bitching that they should be protected under civil rights law.

Well that's bullshit because nobody is born fat.

You have to over eat your way into it. It doesn't happen over night. It takes years. People ignore that they are gaining weight or make half hearted attempts to deal with it.

Trying to make "fat acceptance" into a civil rights issue makes a mockery of civil rights.

Fat people shouldn't accept that they are fat. They should empower themselves to change it. By educating themselves about diet. By forming positive habits. By creating a support structure for themselves, etc.

They shouldn't ask all of society to tolerate them, especially when obestity-related illnesses burdens our limited healthcare resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #117
126. Yes, you're right. I can't imagine why any less than perfect human being
would ever expect or even hope to be tolerated by other, better humans. Lord knows the only people who matter are those who are perfect and beautiful. Because lord knows beautiful people never burden our limited healthcare resources or ask for assistance of any kind. Besides, even if they ask for assistance, it wouldn't be a burden. It would be a pleasure to help them because they are beautiful and perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #117
168. 'Tolerate them'???
What, you want some kind of witch hunt?

Sheesh, have a little bit of compassion. Not everybody is as perfect as you think you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #117
169. You're right, and you're wrong.
Things are seldom as simple as they seem.

People shouldn't lose their job for being overweight. However, it's perfectly reasonable for police and fire departments to require their people be in shape. There are exceptions.

And it is true that you cannot become overweight without eating. However, metabolic differences do exist, and some people can gain weight on a remarkably small amount of food. Most notably hypothyroid.

That being said, there is a lot of excuse-making going on, too. A lot of processed foods don't fill you up, so people THINK they are not eating so much, when they are actually eating a great deal. F

or an average size man in America, 2000 calories is an appropriate intake, but it would be very easy to eat 3000 and not feel like you are pigging out. And if your daily calorie use is 2000 and you eat 2100 a day (one extra slice of bread), you will gain 1 lb. EVERY MONTH! It doesn't take a lot of excess intake to cause gradual weight gain. I don't think people bad or lazy if they're not attuned to sensing that they didn't need that last 100 calories. I have to weigh myself EVERY DAY and count the calories in EVERYTHING I EAT in order to maintain my weight, because I honestly can say that if I didn't, I would have no idea of when to stop. I find myself undereating somedays, and wanting to massively overeat on others. I have to make an effort to keep that daily intake within the range I've set (1500~2000). Because I've almost reached my weight goals, the last thing I want to do is discourage others by putting them down. I would hope to encourage them by saying "I did it. Here's what I did, maybe it will work for you. Or maybe something else." But dammit, I went 6 years where I paid no attention to my weight or what I was eating. I had a lot of other crap going on with family and work and moving and quitting smoking, and I'll be damned if I'm going to be made to feel bad because I didn't watch my weight as well as I should have. Hell, I liked eating all I wanted. If I hadn't started having food pain and acid reflux, I might not have made the determination to change it.

But then again, half of the people in the world get by on about 1500~1800 calories per day and they are perfectly fine. The average American takes in 3000 calories per day! I've had people tell me they don't like being on a "starvation diet", and they consider 2000 calories to be "starvation". The human body can function quite well on 1200 calories (women) to 1500 calories (men) per day, provided you eat balanced meals.

I agree that "fat acceptance" is a bad idea. I don't want to accept a lot of body fat, and I disagree with NAAFA's position that people shouldn't diet. But I do think we need "fat people acceptance", and less of the judgmental attitudes you exhibit. As for diets, no to crash diets, but yet to a lifestyle change that you can stick to. We are ALL on diets. They may be fattening diets, or slimming diets, or lo-carb, or whatever, but if you eat, you have a DIET.

Last, this stuff about healthcare resources - there are any number of health risk factors that burden our health care system. I'd rather not have a totalitarian health system to enforce healthy lifestyle choices. I'd rather have comprehensive universal care, like every other western democracy has. Maybe then, a lot more fat people could get the advice and assistance they need for managing their weight. How many people overeat to cope with stress? How much stress is caused by the fact that 40% of us are uninsured?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #169
186. Absolutely stellar post. Thank you.
I agree that NAAFA's position goes too far IMHO. I don't think people should stop trying to get and stay healthy. But the demonization of fat people and the over-simplication of a huge and complex issue (just eat less and get some self-discipline, stupid) is really beyond comprehension to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #169
188. Correction - "foot pain" not "food pain"
Sorry, too late to edit when I noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conflictgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #109
160. Yes, but what is the standard you're using for "overweight"?
I maintain a proper diet and exercise 3-4 times a week. I'm 20 pounds overweight. Is that a health crisis? I have worked hard to lose weight - I'm almost 30 pounds below my highest weight now. But my weight is not budging from where it is, despite my maintenance of the healthy diet and the exercise routine. Am I lacking self discipline because I'm 20 pounds overweight? Some people have called me fat - at 5'1" being 20 pounds overweight is very noticeable. But in many of those cases, I knew that the people calling me fat may have been within the acceptable weight range, but had a significantly worse diet than I do and didn't exercise.

At what point do you say that people are at the weight they're supposed to be? Or is everyone supposed to fit within some formula for their "ideal weight" and if they don't, they need to try harder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #160
202. Do you lift weights?
If not, you may want to try it. Weights are much better are causing weight-loss than simply doing cardio because it builds muscle. Muscle tissue also burns more calories than other tissue. So you get the calorie burning from the workout plus the added boost of the muscle itself burning extra calories.

I'm lucky in that I'm naturally muscular. When I do exercise, I put on muscle very fast. I realize not everyone does this. Even at 5'1" people often guess my weight 10lbs low. My body naturally leans towards muscle, but with weights, anyone can put it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conflictgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #202
212. I do, but they're light weights
I bulk up extremely quickly when I use weights. I made that mistake many years ago - I joined a gym and found that I really loved weight lifting. I loved using the weight machines and got to a point where I enjoyed increasing the amount I would lift. Unfortunately I started looking very unfeminine pretty quickly.

You are right that weights are good to use, though, and many women especially don't think to do so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #202
263. weight lifting is great, BUT
you can injure yourself. I took a course designed just for seniors and I was lifting 3 times a week on all my gym's machines, 12 reps and 2 sets each, and after a few months I developed tendonitis in my shoulder (impingement) and elbow (golf elbow). I had to stop lifting with my arms (I still do leg and ab 3 X a week). I've had 2 regimens of physical therapy @ 6 sessions each. I tried therabands at home. I am only a little better and it's been 8 months.

I'm disgusted and I am gaining some weight back. So I am starting cardio classes to make up the difference.

P.S. I had two physical therapists tell me NO ONE should use the shoulder press machine or lift free weights over their heads. They say that's what caused my problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #263
264. I can't do over the head shoulder exercises anyway.
My left shoulder is all fucked up from dislocating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #109
167. Um, no.
95% of dieters eventually put all the weight back on - and more. Keeping it off is EXTREMELY rare. So much so that those who DO keep it off are often studied extensively by weight loss doctors.

http://www.bodyfatguide.com/regainweight.html

Let me guess - you've never had a weight problem, have you? You talk like someone who has all the answers without ever having experienced the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #99
170. THANK YOU!!! You're right on.
I cannot STAND people who have never suffered from a particular problem but think they have all the answers. Walking a mile in someone else's shoes is more than a phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #170
183. Thanks. And even if someone *has* gone through the
same thing, it doesn't mean his or her solution will work for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #183
203. It doesn't? Really?
You mean when I succeed in making my skin a lot lighter by spending less time outside in the sun, that won't work for black people? Wow, the new things you learn every day here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #99
275. I guess the post you're replying to
is an example of the ones you view as self righteous, I'd say it was more dissmisive. However it's not self righteous to say that for the overwhelming majority of people with obesity a change in diet and some exercise will reduce their size. It's SIMPLE but not EASY. Just like it is SIMPLE to give up smoking, you just have to stop lighting up, it is not EASY however and I really don't think the poster you're responding to said it was.

Some people have syndromes etc that mean it's harder to lose weight or easier to put it on and there are some people without any syndrome or health issues that simply put on weight faster, unfortunately that's just life but that's NOT the same as obesity, there are a microscopic number of people for whom obesity truly is something they have little control of.

It's really just as simple as this: fat=undisciplined/lazy/gluttonous

this is where I think you're overly sensitive, that isn't what the poster said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #275
283. Well, I'm afraid we're going to have to agree to disagree.
I just don't see it the way you do. But I appreciate that you stated your opinion without the smug self-righteousness (yep, I still think it was) of the poster to which I was responding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #96
105. Yes, we should be able to eat the same as people with normal metabolism--
--and get away with it, just as gay people should be able to form relationships with people of their own sex and get away with it.

Self-discipline is just bullshit. Why should gay people be required to have the "self-discipline" to ignore their true desires and marry the opposite sex in order to have basic human dignity? Why should people inclined toward weight gain have to have the "self-discipline" to make attaining average weight their life's obsession in order to have basic human dignity?

Good health recommendations work the same for fat people as for anybody else. Real food instead of junk food and regular exercise. That will have no effect whatsoever on the incidence of obesity (300 lbs - 50 lbs = 250 lbs = STILL FAT), but it will make fat people and everybody else a lot healthier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #105
110. So you are saying overeating = sexuality?
That's interesting.

Nobody chooses to be gay.

People choose to eat a second donut. People choose to drive to work rather then ride a bike. People choose to drink soda instead of water.

By in large the problem fat people have is the same problem smokers have. They have been taught that they cannot change thier lifes and kick thier habits on thier own. It's learned helplessness and a lack of self discipline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #110
178. Those things have nothing whatsoever to do with obesity
The only effects that being more active and eating less junk food will have on a fat person is to make them weigh less. The fact that they are obese does not change in the slightest.

300 lbs - 30 lbs = 270 lbs = STILL FAT

You have the choice to take up healthier habits, but you have exactly zero choice about what effects those changes will have on your weight.

My skin is always a lot lighter if I spend more time indoors in the summer. Funny thing, though--that strategy doesn't work at all for black people. Must be because they have no discipline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #96
206. Why don't black people just stay out of the sun if they don't like racism?
Works for me. The less time I spend in the sun, the lighter my skin is. They must be doing something wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #96
230. And why don't poor people just work more?
Nobody would be poor if they all worked 20 hours a day, even at a minimum wage job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #94
198. How would they be the "genetic kings?"
Are you talking about pre-civilization times? I would think they'd be at a disadvantage because they tend to be slower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #198
204. No, not under conditions of life-long semistarvation
They'd be the ones of normal or slightly higher weight who could have normal babies under those conditions. It would have been like being heterozygous for the sickle cell trait in a malaria belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #198
210. Much more recent than that.
People who would be considered fat today were at an advantage because they had the reserves to help them survive famine, long voyages, wars, cold winters, illness, pregnancies, etc. These were survival issues for much of the world until relatively recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #198
228. No, they would need less food to survive because their bodies
metabolize food more effectively. If we were both gatherers, and I only had to gather 1/2 as much food as you did to get my body to function, I'd have a better chance of survival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #90
97. So you've researched and diagnosed every single case of obesity in the US?
That sounds to me a bit like the "gays can be straight if they want to be" argument.

My friend eats 1200-1700 calories a day and works out 5-6 days a week. She's been to a million doctors and put herself into all kinds of debt getting "support, guidance, encouragement, etc" but they can't figure out what is causing her weight problems.

I don't agree with everything the fat-acceptance movement says, but I think most people just wanted to be treated with the same respect and humanity as any other person. To me that's the crux of the argument. It's just not okay to judge anyone if you haven't walked in their shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #97
113. Yeah that's ONE CASE
Newsflash we have an obsesity epidemic.

Not everyone has some mysterious medical problem that causes thier obsesity. Most overweight people will react to diet and excercise. It's a huge challenge to be sure, not unlike quitting smoking. But it can be done as thousdands of formerly obsese people can attest to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #90
103. It's like being gay, not like being black
You can choose to lose weight, but it's exactly like gay people choosing to marry opposite sex people. If gay people have the choice to ignore their orientation and act straight, then fat people have the choice of making the attainment of "normal" weight their life obsession to the exclusion of everything else in life besides work and sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #103
112. How many gay people do you know?
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 04:40 PM by iconoclastNYC
How many people do you know who choose at the dawn of puberty to be sexual aroused by the same-sex versus having it be a natural innate reaction to stimuli?

Now contrast that with people you know who choose to eat more calories then thier body needs to maintain or lose weight?

There are ways to structure your life so you can eat the correct amount of calories. It requires education, dedication, support, self discipline, and hard work but it can be done. Thousands have proven this to be effective.

No ex-gay treatment program has ever been shown to be effective.

The constrats could not be any clearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #112
116. I know lots of gay people.
And every single one of them wants to be treated as a human being. Not be judged at first sight, not be told what they should or shouldn't be doing, or how they could be doing it better (because CLEARLY they don't know). And they ESPECIALLY don't want to be told this by a stranger who knows NOTHING about them or their life.

In fact, every single human I know wants that. Spouting vague statistics and talk of self-discpline doesn't making sweeping judgments any less sweeping or any less ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #116
118. You are the one equating sexuality with overeating
But yet i'm the ignorant one. OK.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #118
121. No, I'm equating assumptions and sweeping generalizations about
fat people with assumptions and sweeping generalizations about gays, about blacks, about immigrants, teen mothers, about homeless people, or any other group of people you'd like to name. You are making snap judgments and sweeping generalizations. It doesn't matter who you're are judging, it doesn't make it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #121
122. I'm stating a fact
There is no comparison between being black or gay and being overweight. One involves choice and the others don't.

But don't let that get in the way of you putting words in my mouth in order to elevate being fat to a protected class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #122
125. Fine, then I'll use the right-wing "welfare queen" argument.
If it bothers you so much to see a fat person's desire to be treated as a human compared to being gay or black, then look at it as an issue of human dignity.

I will even use your own words, so as not to put any in your mouth:

People on welfare (fat people) lack self discipline.

People on welfare (fat people) cost us all tons of money.

Why dont they just get jobs (eat less)? They could if they would choose that. It's just that they feel like they should be able to get free money from the government while they lay around doing nothing all day (eat the same amount as someone with high metabolism) and get away with it.

Being on welfare (fat) basically comes down to self discipline. It's very hard to learn self-discipline, this i know from experience.

Self discipline is the variable that a person can control to get a job (lose weight).

Thousands of people have proven that you can get a job (lose weight) and keep it (off).



Is it making any more sense now? Or are you prepared to say that all people on welfare are a bunch of undisciplined layabouts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #122
184. Living in an industrialize society with enough to eat is a choice?
Where do you get off suggesting that everyone in industrialized countries inclined toward weight gain should be required to move to Darfur?

Being fat is a choice only in the sense that some of us insist on our right choose to read to our kids, engage in political activism, and take courses to improve our professional lives instead of spending every spare non-working minute on a treadmill.

There is nothing you can do about being fat. All you can do is be active and eat better, and those things have no effect on being fat. They just make you weigh slightly less and get healthier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #122
196. And who ever said anything about elevating "being fat
to a protected class" anyway? Talk about putting words in someone's mouth. I don't think anyone should be elevated to a protected class. Nor am I keen on folks being relegated to second class because of arbitrary judgments on their self-discipline or appearance. People should be judged on their deeds, their contributions to the planet and their willingness to accept others. In fact, I'm actually pretty into the whole "all humans are created equal" thing that's so popular with the liberal pinkos. Perhaps you've heard of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #112
177. There is no such thing as some static "need" for calories
that doesn't change. There is no such thing as a "correct" number of calories. It is not possible to eat less than you "need" over extended time periods. Eat less, and what you "need" will instantly change, and change very quickly to lower than starvation level if you are inclined toward weight gain or have a long history of yoyo dieting.

There is no such thing as successful long-term weight loss either. Check the statistics--it's no more successful than reparative therapy. The tiny minority that do succeed do so at the cost of sacrificing every other aspect of their lives, just like that tiny minority of gay people who succeed in staying heterosexually married.

"Thousands" have proven it effective? Well, lah di dah. There are some 60 million obese poeple in the US, so 6000/6,000,000 = 0.1% "effectiveness," probably about the same as "cured" gay people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #90
201. Sure, like gay people can ignore their true desires and stay married
--heterosexually. It can be done. But why should it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #86
107. Exactly
Better health is precisely what is driving health care costs up. A far greater percentage of people are living long enough to join the most expensive health care demographic. And of course, the longer you live, the higher your risk of some drunk driver turning you into a permanent expensive basket case. That's where the expenses are--10% of the population accounts for 72% of all medical costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #107
119. Oh that's rich.
So eating healthy is bad for the healthcare system. Wow. That's very interesting.

The problem with aging is that it isn't until late in the process that the consequences of a lifetime of bad eating surfaces....meaning you have to have 3 50,000 heart bypasses or a liver or kidney transplant.

Every study has shown that we'd save billions and billions if people would eat the right amout of calories and eat the right foods.

The thinking you exhibit is not unlike the tobacco industry saying that smoking is good for society because people die young and tax the medical system less as if they don't get 100K in treatment trying to prevent thier smoking related death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #119
187. No study has shown any such thing
Longer lives mean longer lifetime health care expenses overall, and a greater risk of expensive catastrophic accidents.

And it's true about smokers costing society less money by dying earlier. Lung cancer progresses quickly and is therefore far less expensive than other forms of cancer to treat. It doesn't kill you until your kids are grown and you are past your most productive years, as a tobacco company pointed out to Czechoslovakia 20 years ago. You have to be a sociopath to make such an argument the basis of public policy, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #86
242. You're right
Health problems and increasing costs today are related to lack of access to health care.

The entire "wellness" and "prevention" movement isn't panning out. There was no scientific evidence that promoting wellness (how is it defined?) would actually significantly prevent andy illness or reduce mortality. The benefits have been limited and its obvious more research has to be done.

Conversely, no one seems to care about improving access to health care, which is proven to save lives and prevent serious illness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #85
100. Nonsense
The average person is overweight. Overweight is the rule, not the exception, and still only 10% of the population accounts for 72% of all medical expenses. The odds of any one individual getting expensively sick are pretty low. In any given year, 50% of the population has NO medical expenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #100
207. Then the average person needs to lose weight.
Europe and Asia tends to be thinner. The rising weight-problems overseas is a result of the American lifestyle & eating habits that are now happening there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #207
216. Definitely true. The body is a temple.
But we've come to a societal consensus that a Cinnabon here and a nacho there is no biggie, it's okay to be 10 or 20 lbs overweight. Why be overweight if you don't have to? Those gloppy foods aren't really worth it.

Here in Japan almost everyone is thin, and the few who are heavy are like Archie and Edith Bunker, not Gilbert Grape's mom.


And there was a time, even when I was a kid, when Gilbert Grape's mom types were a true oddity. Now they seem to be proliferating everywhere you go. I would like to think it's just that morbidly obese people now feel more comfortable going out, but I think it's much more likely that there are a lot more people becoming morbidly obese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #216
268. Why is not ok to be 10 or 20 lbs overweight?
If you are otherwise healthy. Some people are that heavy or heavier even if they don't eat a lot of junk. Why cause someone who is otherwise healthy to feel bad about themselves for no reason except that they aren't hitting some arbitrary weight target? Why encourage them to get down to a specific number by any means possible, even if it is unhealthy? Even traditional dieting messes with metabolism and they might end up another 20 pounds heavier and then another.
If 10 lbs overweight=100 lbs overweight in your eyes or society's eyes, why shouldn't the 10 pound overweight person binge on nachos and Cinnabon? After all, they are a faliure either way for being "overweight".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #268
281. It's not a crime - it's a free country.
But I do disagree with the attitude we have developed as a culture that it is okay to shovel swill into our mouths. It's not about failure or that society finds slightly heavy people as ugly as obese people. When I decided to lose weight, it had nothing to do with aesthetics or what society thought of me. I've never cared much about that. It was about wanting to live a long life with my kids and grandkids, it was about feeling healthy and good and mobile in my own skin, and being able to go for a job without spraining my ankle from being so heavy.

And I don't believe in "traditional dieting", if you mean eating grapefruit and salad until you reach XXX lbs, then going back to eating too much or eating crap.

It's not about living up to some BMI number on a chart. Everybody has an idea of the weight they should be. It doesn't always correspond with the actuarial charts. I've mentioned Queen Latifah a few times because she is a big woman, but also stunningly beautiful. She would look great if she lost a few pounds, but would probably look weird if she was as skinny as Eva Longoria. People do need to consider their own body composition when managing weight. But we each individually know when we are putting garbage into our bodies. Why should we abuse our bodies this way? We have to live in them? I'm not sure how to say this any better than I have, but the body as temple metaphor really sums it up. Cinnabon and nachos are gross. Our bodies deserve better, and they don't need the enormous servings at Chili's to function.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #207
219. The average person needs to forget about weight entirely,
--focus on being more active and eating more whole foods, and accepting whatever weight results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #85
102. The last time I went to the doctor:
Blood pressure: 110/70; resting pulse rate: 65; fasting blood sugar: 85. Care to post your comparative stats?

And re: just get some self-discipline - did you bother to read ANY of the posts upthread about thyroid cancer, hypothyroidism, Hashimoto's disease? It's more common than you think. And "self-discipline" in regard to food is harder than you think, and in many cases dependent on education, social issues, and financial resources - just like everything else in the world that people demand that inferior faceless others "get some discipline" about.

And replace the word "overweight" and "fat" in your posts in this thread with _______ minority, and you just described perfectly the Repuke viewpoint on welfare queens, Hispanic immigrants, drug abusers, and the crisis in NOLA.

But hey, nobody will call you a racist for suggesting that fat people are all responsible for their own problems and just need some "discipline", so it's ok, right? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #102
111. Amen to that.
I tried, but couldn't say it better myself. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #102
272. BRAVO!! And thank you!!!
for telling the truth, and outing these fat phobics for the bigots they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #85
123. Yes
My Mom has MS and Arthritis cause she's fat.
I had cancer cause I'm fat
:sarcasm:

Or maybe you had to pay for our healthcare because we can't afford insurance? Maybe health care costs so much because it's run for profit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pookieblue Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #123
131. damn that's how I got MS!
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 06:29 PM by pookieblue
;)


seriously, I hate it when some people simply assume just because a person is overweight (fat) they eat too much.

I have skinny friends who eat more than me.

I have thin friends who have high blood pressure.

Me, my blood pressure is good, my cholesterol is good, my sugars are good.
I watch what I eat and I exercise.

But I'm still over weight.

What more do people want me to do? What more do they want us do to?
Starve ourselves?

anyhow...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #131
199. Yes, as a matter of fact that's exactly what they want
If you are fat or gay, you see, you aren't entitled to a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #85
286. The Bush administration is costing us a lot more than fat people
Anything we can do about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
89. Coming up on British TV (More4): "Tax the Fat"
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 03:03 PM by muriel_volestrangler
A proposal by a restaurant reviewer that people's tax rate should be set according to their Body Mass Index. They had him briefly on the radio this morning, and he appeared to be serious. He suggested adding the square root of the BMI to people's tax bill, so a BMI of 20.25 pays 4.5% extra, 25 pays 5% extra, 36 6% extra etc. :crazy:

Audio from this morning: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today5_overweight_20060606.ram
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #89
106. That should make a lot of money from professional athletes as well
Most of them have enough extra muscle mass to be obese by teh BMI index.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #106
114. That's just what his opponent pointed out on the radio
He said Schwarzenegger (OK, not really an athlete, but the same principle applies) has a BMI of 33 or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #114
144. But in the long run beefy bodybuilders have almost as many health problems
as heavy people. They are overeating and turning all the extra protein into muscle. There is no other animal in nature that does this. Even the mighty lion lounges under a tree all day. The notion that bodybuilding is a "healthy" pastime is ludicrous. (And I'm talking about massive bodybuilding, not just light strength training, which I believe is excellent)

I would much rather keep my calorie intake low and stay slender than try to turn my fat into muscle and keep eating a lot. The more one consumes calories, the faster your body's cells oxidize and the faster you age. There is a strong link between calorie intake and longevity - it's not just about weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #144
179. That "oxidation" nonsense is just pure bullshit
There is no established link between reduced calorie intake and longevity in humans. One thing that is established, though, is that regular aerobic activity is linked to living slightly longer. You know, when you boost your OXYGEN intake. The resulting extra oxidization seems to be beneficial rather than harmful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #179
194. There is LOTS of data linking low calorie intake to longevity.
Yes, being active does a body good, but burning a ton of unnecessary calories, even burning off a binge meal on the treadmill, is NOT healthful.

http://www.webmd.com/content/article/113/110801?src=RSS_PUBLIC

http://starbulletin.com/2004/08/31/news/story4.html

http://www.seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Aging/6-05-31-LowCalorieDiet.htm

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/living/14574850.htm?source=rss&channel=centredaily_living

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19025515.600&feedId=online-news_rss20

Study after study after study have confirmed that lower lifelong calorie intake improves longevity. By eating less you take in less toxins and do less free radical damage to your tissues.

I have yet to meet any 300 lb. centenarians...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #194
218. Most of those studies are with rats and mice
Completely meaningless for humans. What does extending a mouse's 2 year life span to 4 years mean? That can be interpreted as either plus 2 or times 2. so for humans with life spans of about 80, does that mean 82 (+2)years? Probably. Nothing so far has shown that it means 160 (x2). Just about all of the pop science write-ups leave out the more unpleasant facts, like that the life extension thing doesn't work unless the critters get constant coddling in a highly protected environment. They have poor tolerance of heat and other environmental stress (a grad school buddy of mine working on ageing in rats had his whole post-doc shot when some jerk messing with the animal room thermostat killed off all his calorie-restricted, but only about half of his normally fed rats). Attempts to get a long-lived breed established fail because restricted females aren't capable of reproduction.

The Okinawan study shows no actual life expectancy numbers. What does 1/3 actually mean? Six months? 20 years? No clue from reading the article, or any of the sidebar references either. The Japanese had life expectancies of around 53 pre WW-II, and the world's largest ever single generation jump in life expectancy postwar. During that time, their diets increased in total calories and became more westernized with bisuteku and isukuremu. 100 years or so is all you get, and the overall expectancy of death is exactly 100%. Large percentages of people in a population living to 130 would be impressive, but I haven't seen any such thing.

So given that fat bariatric surgery patients are restricted for the rest of their lives to about 900 calories a day (either that or constant diarrhea and vomiting), what would you predict their lifespans to be? You don't see too many 300 lb centenarians for two reasons. 1. There aren't many young people who weigh that much. 2. After age 60, most people tend to lose weight slowly in the same way that (in industrialized societies) they tend to gain weight slowly until age 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #218
220. Most of the longest-lived Japanese are in the countryside...
......and their diet is still the same as it was 500 years ago. When the generation that grew up on the katakana crapola you mentioned get up in age, life expectancy will probably decrease.

And people here still eat in much smaller portions, even if they do westernized crap. Please don't lecture me on Japan. I live here.

Bariatric surgery is in and of itself, and the patients who have it have bodies that have already been ravaged by the stresses of morbid obesity, so it's little surprise that people die of it. I am not a big booster of the surgeries unless there is no alternative.


The scientists doing the studies do think that the results with rats are relevant, and I concur. If you want to tank up on food that your body does not need, then knock yourself out. I'd rather not take a chance. That's why I quit smoking, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #220
223. There is no such thing as a particular static number of calories
--that you "need". If you decide that there is and try to eat less than that, then what you "need" will rapidly adjust downward, how rapidly depending mostly on genetics and yoyo dieting history. If you think that being less able to cope with environmental stress and unable to reproduce is something worth striving for, go for it. Another thing they don't talk about is that the earliest calorie restriction is the most effective--so much so that if rats are restricted early and then allowed to eat freely, they overeat for the rest of their lives and become obese, but still live longer than their non-restricted littermates. Try that with humans in an equivalent state of development and what you get is permanent brain damage.

Those Japanese country folks were not so healthy and long lived before WW II--check out Mikiso Hane’s Peasants, Rebels, and. Outcastes: The Underside of Modern Japan for a gruesome description of how older peasant women usually had to have their backs broken to be buried because they were so bent over. Their really large increase in live expectancy over the past 50 years can't possibly have been due to calorie restriction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #223
241. Resting calorie utilization varies from day to day...
...and yes, yo-yo dieting tends to slow the metabolism somewhat, but that doesn't mean calorie reduction always results in the scenarios you describe. I would never advocate a calorie-restricted diet for children anyway. A balanced diet with reasonable portion sizes and LIMITED SNACKS almost always produces good results.

Both of my kids are a perfect weight. That's because we give them a balanced diet with plenty of veggies. When I was a kid, my mom made instant tacos and deep-fried hot dogs inside tortillas, or left us on our own devices to eat can ravioli or TV dinners. I never had a salad until I was a teenager and a friend taught me about them! I was shocked that they were good! My mom even taught me to eat raw cookie dough out of the package - she would go through a quarter of it on the way home from the supermarket. It took me a while to break THAT habit. We had no concept of limiting the times when snacks would be eaten, or their amounts. As long as it was not an hour before dinner, anything was okay. We were also told that we had to finish every bite on our plate - another thing we don't do to our kids.


The sad thing is, my mom was a professionally trained cook with a degree in nutrition. But she didn't like to cook, so she gave us instant crap - and she liked to binge, then starve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #241
287. It's mainly because their genetica allows them to maintain average weight
Calorie restriction almost always follows the scenarios I describe in the case of fat people. Expecting anything different is like expecting black people to be able to lighten their skin by spending more time indoors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #287
290. Well, black people need to protect their skin from UV rays too.
Just like we should teach our kids good eating habits. My point is merely that I became obese due to poor eating habits and overeating - period. Theere may be people who can eat a bit more than me and get away with it, but that doesn't change the fact that I was overeating. My wife tried to cajole me into dieting but I wouldn't listen. I was convinced that I was fine.

If there's anything I can agree on, it's that nagging and guilt trips don't make heavy people go on diets. The determination to make a permanent lifestyle change has to come from within.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #290
293. My skin gets noticeably darker when I am in the sun more--
--but there is no visible difference in a black person's skin who spends the same amount of time outdoors. It is possible to make permanent lifestyle changes, but it is utterly impossible to either predict or control what the effects of those changes will be on any given individual. You have no control over whatever visible changes result, if any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #293
296. That's not true.
Except for very dark-skinned people, people of African ancestry can and do get suntans, and even sunburns, it differing degrees depending on their pigmentation.

And too much sun damage everyone's skin, including black people's, although more melanin does grant more protection from UV rays.

By the same token, overeating and unbalanced diets are bad for everyone.

I would never suggest that black people carry around parasols to try to get lighter (or that that would even be desirable).

But I wouldn't suggest getting all slicked up with vegetable oil and laying in the sun on a daily basis, either.

By the same token, I wouldn't suggest that anyone overeat or eat a junky diet.

And I disagree with your notion that all overweight people are somehow inherently different than all thin people. It is not an either/or question. There are all kinds of health problems that can cause or aggravate obesity, and there are also a lot of people who simple eat too much. I was one of the latter. I don't make any excuses for that. There is no doubt in my mind that I am healthier for having lost all that weight, and no doubt in my mind that I'm healthier for quitting smoking. Nagging and attacking people for being fat is wrong and cruel, but I believe that telling them that reducing their calorie intake will only lead to more weight gain (I there is no hoe, so just accept it and be obese forever) is even more cruel.

It is perfectly healthy and normal to be black. Being obese is neither healthy nor normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #296
299. Being obese is normal if you live in an industrialized society
--where almost all work is non-aerobic and there is enough to eat, and you are genetically adapted to live in a society where hard physical labor and intermittent starvation are normal. It's like having genes for sickle cell anemia that were useful when your ancestors lived in a malaria belt but harmful if you are not living in one now. You can't really do anything about either condition. Whether it's "healthy" or not is beside the point if it can't readily be changed.

Accepting reality isn't cruel--on the contrary, it helps people make more realistic plans for improving their health. Hollering "Just develop a sense of personal responsibility and make more insulin, dammit!" at diabetics is cruel, whereas telling that they will never under any circumstances be normal but that there are many things they can do to postpone or control diabetic symptoms is kind.


Stephanie Coontz in her book The Way We Never Were, cited research showing that conservative black men who believed that discrimination didn't exist anymore and that achievement was a matter of personal responsibility were far more likely to abandon their families or their educational goals in the face of adversity that black men who correctly realized that the odds were stacked against them.

Healthier eating and more physical activity are prescriptions for better health for everyone. If you are fat and you change your habits to do those things, how much weight you lose (if any) as a result is entirely out of your control. If such weight loss as occurs leaves you still fat, then fucking FORGET about ever being thin, OK? This is the point I was trying to make about black people and sun exposure--avoiding excessive exposure to UV rays is good for everybody, but if you are black, no one will notice any resulting minuscule change in your skin color. It sure won't make you white, just as healthy eating will not make most fat people thin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #299
301. It won't make you stick-thin, but it will make you healthier...
...and more comfortable overall. Like I have said elsewhere, there are different body types that we each have to work with. Oprah didn't look healthy when she got super skinny on that liquid diet. But she didn't look healthy when she got extremely healthy, either. What she's doing now, watching her eating and exercising is the best way to go about it, and she looks to be at a healthful weight. We can't all have personal chefs like Oprah, and it is tough eating healthy on a budget, especially if you have several jobs, as you mentioned, but going to the extra effort is better than the alternative of subsisting on convenient junk foods and slowly getting heavier and heavier until movement is hindered and health deteriorates.

I agree that in a society like ours, it's normal to carry around a few extra pounds. I have never advocated that people try to live up the the "ideal BMI's" that the insurance companies put out. But each person generally has a sense of whether they are at a healthy weight or not, and it's incumbent on them to take action to stay healthy, if they want to live to see their grandkids. If the food, the satisfaction, and the convenience are more important to them than living a full lifespan, that is their prerogative.

If you think I want everybody to be a bunch of Brad Pitts and Paris Hiltons, you couldn't be more wrong. But I know what the discomfort of overweight is like, and the thought of people being immobilized by it is heartbreaking. NAAFA has basically stated that it wants people in such a condition to continue to suffer, and I think that's unconscionable. It's just as bad as fashion mags promoting dubious crash diets that ruin people's health. I don't understand what the chip on your shoulder is about this issue, why you seem to have a kneejerk defensiveness against healthful eating and sensible portion sizes, because that's all I ever advocate. I'm not a fat-basher, and I don't consider heavy people to be ugly, lazy, or of poor character. There are millions of people who have been through the nightmare of obesity or severe overweight, and gotten it under control on a long-term basis. We are not bashers. We have been there, and we're just trying to share what has worked for us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #301
302. NAAFA does not want people to continue to suffer!
Good friggin' Christ! By far the most popular workshops at their conventions are the movement and exercise classes. Attendees report that it is often very difficult to carry those lessons back home, because there are so few safe and supportive places to duplicate the experience.

Fat means immobile? Bullshit, even for people 400+ lbs. Inactivity for sure means immobile, and more so for fat people. For most, mobility problems are greatly helped by proper exercise. I'd say that using Mara Nesbitt's yoga video has made far more fat people mobile than any diet.

http://www.sizewise.com/articles/videos/nesbitt/yoga.html

I've taken her workshop, and she is amazingly flexible. Given that I can carry a fully loaded touring bike up a flight of stairs and bend over to put both hands flat on the floor, I wouldn't call myself immobile either, though being half her weight probably does make it easier. The heavier you are, the harder you have to work in order to maintain mobility.

Millions have succeeded in permanent weight loss? Bullshit. Long-term success rates of dieting for fat people are about 2%. You are a very rare exception, not the rule. Most of those "millions" of success stories are middle-aged men who have never dieted and are motivated by cardiovascular concerns. They lose 15-20 lbs on average, an amount which is utterly non-consequential to your average fat woman.

I repeat--nutrition and exercise programs can have tremendous health benefits for fat people, but they almost never result in enough weight loss for others to not perceive them as still fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #302
308. They don't say it in so many words...
Edited on Fri Jun-09-06 06:17 AM by Yollam
but their admonitions that "diets don't work" and "don't diet" are easily rationalized by their acolytes to mean "I can continue eating as much of whatever I want and it's okay". I would support NAAFA's efforts 100% if they would drop that misguided verbiage from their materials, or at least amend it to say "crash/yo-yo diets don't work". Healthy diets do work, and we are ALL on a diet. As long as we eat food, the choice is a healthy diet or a junky one.

And it's not about being perceived by others as thin. It's about being healthy. And I've seen the pics from the last NAAFA convention in SF. Many of those people look very unhealthy and like their movements are severely restricted by their weight.

I don't think I'm exceptional. I'll probably gain weight again at some point in my life- I'm not perfect, but I'll try to keep it in control and prevent the yo-yo syndrome. I was an overweight teen and got my weight down to 175 at age 20, and kept it under control for 10 years. It only started increasing after I had my kids and stopped paying attention to what I was eating, and started pigging out on junk food. Diet sodas only seemed to make it worse, after I started drinking them, I craved sweets constantly and gained another 40 lbs, to a whopping 175, which came as a shock, since I hadn't weighed myself in about a year at that point. I've heard wonderful things about yoga, too, but I don't know what it would have done for my acid reflux, gas, and foot pain, which was especially agonizing in the mornings. I literally felt 20 years older than I do now. I respect everyone's right to maintain their weight at a point where they feel comfortable. What I don't respect is when an organization that was founded by a "chubby chaser" who was not fat himself, which ostensibly works for civil rights for fat people, spreads the misinformation to fat people that diet modification will not improve their health or well-being. The theories they push are far from being conclusively proven. You seem to think that I want everyone to starve or be skinny. I don't. But I don't want anyone walking around with 50% body fat. It is painful and extremely unhealthy. It is a matter of personal choice, of course, but it is slow-motion suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #308
310. "Whopping" 175 lbs?
You're kidding, right? That may be overweight, but it is damned well not fat. If you were female, you wouldn't even be allowed in to a fat women's swim unless you were well under 5 feet tall. Your experiences are completely irrelevant to any really fat person, and you don't have a fucking CLUE about being fat.

NAAFA damned well does NOT say that dietary modification will not improve heath. Quite a few of their members control diabetic symptoms by carefully controlling their diets. If they don't approve of exercise, why are their convention exercise workshops so popular? What they say is that improved health is very likely to NOT be accompanied by significant weight loss. People with 50% body fat can probably reduce to 40-45% fat. THIS IS STILL FAT!!! What is it about that that you are having trouble understanding?

All you are doing here is calling my friend Lisa a big pile of shit and a failure. Her new employer offered subsidized health club memberships, which she took advantage of. Ove three years, she went from 375 lbs to 275 lbs, and gave away most of her insulin because she no longer needed any except for an emergency stash to deal with the occasional bout of flu or stress. All you are doing here is saying that her dietary control of glucose levels is atotally worthless accomplishment. (BTW, the diabetes symptoms improved immediately, well BEFORE she had lost any measurable weight.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #310
314. No, I was 245 or 250 as a teen and got down to 175 as an adult.
175 is as thin as I can be and still be healthy. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I'm a 6'2" male, so 175 is a perfectly normal weight for me. 240 is rather overweight, and when I was 275, I was significantly overweight.

I didn't mention exercise as it pertains to NAAFA. I've never seen them take a position against exercise. Exercise is an individual thing, same as diet. I tried to start a jogging routine at 250 lbs and sprained my ankle, and was limping for a month. Not a good idea.


I never called your friend or anyone else anything. But if your friend is carrying 50% body fat, I believe that is a serious risk to her health. For the nth time, I don't want or expect everyone to be skinny, but hell yes, anyone at 50% body fat should get it down to 30% if they can. They will still be overweight, but the stress on their heart, feet, etc. will be significantly less. What your friend did sounds like a tremendous accomplishment, and I'll bet that she looks and feels a lot better.

I honestly don't know what we're arguing about. The only thing we disagree on here is that you think that it's impossible for morbidly obese people to lose a significant amount of weight, and I don't think anything is impossible. Rhetooric like that is just as discouraging as being told by mainstream society that you are ugly and worthless.

As for NAAFA, the smallest modification in their rhetoric, and I'd be 100% on their side. I'm all for being positive, and their is no reason that big should not mean beautiful. But at 40 and 50% body fat, the health problems start to get more an more severe, and most doctors would advise getting the weight down to a more healthy level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #314
315. Getting your spinal cord cut in an accident is very risky to your health
People who are paraplegic or quadriplegic should not be pessimists and just get serious about using their limbs. Limb immobility is a serious risk to health, so why aren't they doing something about it? :sarcasm: Advising people to get their weight to any particular level is similarly stupid and counterproductive, regardless of what their weight is and what effects it has on their health.

I did not say that extremely fat people can never lose weight. What I said was that everybody can choose to eat better and be more active, but that there is not one single thing you can do to control WHAT THE EFFECTS OF THOSE CHANGES WILL BE. That is totally and completely IMPOSSIBLE. Looking at what happens to people in real life, losing no weight at all under those circumstances would highly unusual, and losing large amounts of weight and becoming average weight would be just as unusual. The typical result is that you weigh somewhat less, but remain fat, albeit healthier.

Sure, Lisa feels a lot better, and is happy to be able to mostly manage diabetes while using insulin rarely, but the general public doesn't think she looks significantly different at all--she gets every bit as much generic random abuse at 275 lbs as she did at 375 lbs. They saw a fat woman then, and that's what they see now. Her weight has stabilized, and her chances of ever becoming "normal" weight are about zero. Now, maybe she could lose more weight if she spent every single spare moment in the gym instead of just lunch hour and a couple of evenings, but she'd rather have a life. NAAFA is merely saying that fat people should not be subject to constant public abuse for making such decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #315
316. And I agree with them on that point.
And I'm sorry about the abuse she endures. I still remember vividly when someone shouted "move it, fatass!" at me in the hallway in jr. high school, over 20 years ago. Funny how things like that stick with you.


I don't really agree with equating obesity and paralysis, since obesity can be improved, paralysis is permanent. However, I do think that at this point we've pretty much talked the topic into the ground. I get where you're coming from, and I respect it, although I disagree on some finer points. Take it easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #301
307. And what worked for you is irrelevant--
--to all the very many people who are not genetically like you. It amounts to telling black people that if they stay out of the sun their skin will turn white. Sure, it might be impercerptibly lighter, but nobody is going to notice. And other fat people who adopt whatever regimen you used will weigh only slightly less than they did before, but still very far from being thin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #307
309. "slightly less"
Edited on Fri Jun-09-06 06:25 AM by Yollam
Even a loss of 5% of body weight can make a perceptible difference in well-being and health. I would say it's still worth it.


When I started my regime, I felt better after just 2 weeks and 10 lbs. My reflux was totally gone after a month, and my foot pain not much after that.


I could have stopped at about 240 lbs, and I still would have been much better off than I was at 275, when I felt like crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #309
311. After a 5% loss, you are STILL FAT!!
What is it about that that you don't understand? I feel a lot better when I'm more active, but that does not result in significant weight loss. You don't decide when you stop--your biology does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #194
261. All my older heavy relatives
Started losing weight when they were elderly unintentionally. Some of them who were mildly obese became normal weight by their late 70's and 80's. I have seen varying studies on how common weight loss in old age is but the ones starting out heavier usually are better off than the already thin people who lost weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #144
209. While I think being overweight is unhealthy...
I think that the problem with bodybuilding is more the steroids than the calories they consume to build muscle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllNamesHaveBeenUsed Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #106
140. Athletic types
I started weightlifting before I left the Navy. I had to get "taped" after every weigh-in before PRT because I was out of height/weight standards. Thankfully, my neck was thick and my waist was thin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #89
208. Actually, that would be a GOOD IDEA.
But not taxing fat people on BMI or body fat, no, tax the fat and sugar content of food! The higher in fat or sugar the item is, the higher the tax!

Just a thought....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllNamesHaveBeenUsed Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
127. Diet Soda and Weight Gain
I had a related discussion about a week ago, with a gentleman at an animal rescue. He mentioned a report that detailed how the sweetener in diet soda made the human stomach empty its contents sooner. Thus, a person would be hungry sooner and consume more. - This is second-hand information.

My personal theory has always been that some folks think that drinking a diet soda somehow counterbalances having a Double Whopper and x-large fries. I drink nothing but diet soda during the day (water at night), and do not have a problem with weight. Then again, I eat sensible portions and rarely ingest junk food.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #127
128. Diet soda is junk food.
Being nothing but chemicals with no nutritional value, diet soda is the definition of junk food.

It may have not calories and no fat, but it's still junk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllNamesHaveBeenUsed Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #128
129. Junk
I'd prefer to think of it as a vehicle for my caffeine - my only vice. I dislike coffee and tea, but still need my fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #129
136. Oh, so it's your drug delivery device! LOL!
Junkie!

I understand now! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllNamesHaveBeenUsed Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #136
142. Well...
It is not "just for the taste of it." (Old Diet Coke jingle)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
135. You say "...in America".
Is there another culture or nation that exhibits a more accepting or tolerant attitude about obesity?

I'm not aware of any studies about attitueds, but my personal experience is that the rest of the world is actually less tolerant and accepting of obesity than the United States. I would say the U.S. and the U.K. are the most tolerant, even if people say they don't like fat people.

I've seen fat people treated with blatent contempt and suspicion outside the U.S. more than inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #135
162. Yes. Many.
Many Asian-Pacific cultures primarily view beauty as a very big, very happy woman. These women are the definition of big and beautiful; they're goddesses.

In the US most people would gag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #162
173. Strange thing though...
Darker peoples look prettier even when overweight. Pale flab is so much uglier than cocoa flab. Seriously, I don't know why that is.

Plus, there is a happy medium - a big woman like Queen Latifah is very beautiful and sexy, IMO, but when someone gets up to the level of the mom in Gilbert Grape, it just looks...sick, because that's what she was, deathly ill from morbid obesity. It's hard to look at anyone in that condition and not feel sad. It blows my mind that some people find it funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #162
175. That's a good example.
But I think it may be the exception, rather than the rule. Bigness is regarded as a sign of wealth and power, even in men.

More than 70% of Samoan women are obese, however, so perhaps that has a lot to do with their more accepting attitude. Obesity isn't outside the norm.

Conversely, the Japanese have a more rigid view in their society and members are discouraged from straying too far from accepted norm.

Regardless of how a culture feels about obese members in general, I've learned that many are more tolerant of obesity in those of a certain age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #162
262. African cultures as well
It is a sign that her family is well off and has enough to feed her well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateModerate Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
137. I would cut off a year of my life in a second
I see overweight people all the time struggling simply to move around, not to mention living an active lifestyle that so many people enjoy. Cutting a year off the end of my life would easily be worth it to me if my quality of life would be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pookieblue Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #137
141. hell, I'll cut a year off my life
just to get rid of the MS. Make that ten years....

Then I'll be able to move better... feel better. not be in pain....

I would be able to work out like I used to be able to. (I used to be able to walk 6 miles a day on the track, fast, then go work out at the gym. But those days are over. I'm lucky most days to make it two miles on the track)

Being overweight is not the worst thing in the world people.

In fact, even though I have MS, I know that it's not the worse thing in the world.


but let me add, when you see someone who is not able to get around as well as you...don't assume it's because of their weight okay?

I know people see the way I walk and judge me. Either that I'm overweight and that is what is causing my problems. Or I have been drinking...

*sigh*

on that note, I'm going to go exerise now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #137
180. That's lack of activity, not weight
I weigh 220 at 5'6", and I can bench press 120, do hundreds of miles of loaded bike touring (including carrying the loaded bike up flights of stairs at hotels and railway stations), and I used to be able to put both ankles behind my neck. Haven't tried that lately--I'm just satisfied with advancing age to be able to bend over and put both both hands flat on the floor.

If I were not as active, I'd probably get pretty immobile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
154. Every Fat Thread I've Seen Here Tends to Devolve Into a Battle
Between a few insufficiently sensitive folks and a few overly sensitive folks.

Just an observation, perhaps one that some will find insufficiently sensitive.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
159. no fatties.
as far as relationships and choosing a mate is concerned, i'm sorry- but if you can't see your genital region without the aid of a mirror- i have no desire to see you naked, because i would probably be disgusted.

does that make me a bad person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #159
161. Maybe
The fact you say no fatties.. is bigoted.
You could have been more considerate in your choice of words the fact you were not shows you don't care how you sound to fat people,which is shallow and bigoted.

I wish you were not so shallow and superficial.Maybe you need to get over yourself a little more expand past your usual boundaries..

I like people who are deep emotional creative and not scared of body fat. You would not be a good match for me..

No shallow minds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #161
176. the reason i chose the term "no fatties"...
is because it's the one that pops up over and over in personal ads.
and i can grok to it.

btw- i'm not scared of body fat, just disgusted by it in excess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #161
222. so physical looks mean nothing to you
seriously can you honestly say that? you'd date John Merrick? The way he looked had NOTHING to do with his lifestyle (which the overwhelming majority of obese people can not honestly say) So if Mr Merrick started chatting you up in a bar you would agree to a date?

Having a physical attraction to someone is not shallow, neither is NOT being attracted to someone, it's just how things are, and not being attracted to fat people has nothing to with being "scared" of bodyfat anymore than not being attracted to blondes has to do with "scared" of blonde.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #222
240. Having physical standards for your dating partners is your prerogative
But when you see fit to publicly air your views on whether a given person fits them or not, regardless of the basis of your interaction with that person, then you are being an asshole. When you are only nice to people who fit your image of what's attractive, you are being an asshole. When you can't state a preference for a particular type without making a nasty comment about those who don't fit that type, you're being....you get the point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #240
276. so if they hadn't used the word fatties
it would have been OK?

But when you see fit to publicly air your views on whether a given person fits them or not, regardless of the basis of your interaction with that person, then you are being an asshole

it wasn't about a given person though, it was about body/physical types. If I said no blondies is that bigoted or just personal preference?

When you are only nice to people who fit your image of what's attractive, you are being an asshole.

well of course, but I don't think anyone said "I'm not physically attracted to 'fatties' and I wont be nice to them or anyone else I wouldn't want to shag"

saying you don't find someone (or more abstract a certain type) physically attractive does not equate to saying you're nasty to those people. In my whole life I've never slept with or dated a blonde guy, I like my guys big, tall and dark, do you think that means I go around being nasty to blondes and short guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #276
303. Fatties is a shame word
A word to humiliate. If you said I am not attracted to overweight people sexually that would be stating a preference. Fatties is a taught a bully would use. And your bigotry shows in your choice of words.
I will not gloss it over and pretend it is not a derogatory statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #159
165. No.
It just makes you an honest ass. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #159
182. No it doesn't make you a bad person. Not at all.
No one is asking you to date someone you find sexually unattractive. No one can help what turns them on. If you don't want to see me naked, that's fine. I may not want to see you naked either. If everyone was attracted to the same things this world would get really boring really fast (and probably pretty inbred ;)).

The problem occurs when people take that to the next level. Does the fact that you wouldn't want to see a person naked automatically mean that you wouldn't want them as a friend? Does it mean that you would be unable to treat them with respect, look them in the eye, work with them, or converse with them? Would you be compelled to insult them or laugh at them? Would you make assumptions, based soley on their appearance, about their character and self-discipline (or lack thereof) or even their worth as human beings?

Please understand, I'm not accusing you of any of those things. I'm just trying to establish that there is a difference between finding certain physical characteristics sexually attractive and treating people with respect regardless of their appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #159
253. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #253
258. oh, well...
i guess i can live with that-
at least i'm not fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
166. Did you know the size you were as a baby has a significant
impact on whether or not you'll have a weight problem as an adult? In the first year of life your body sets the number of fat cells you'll have for life. If you're overfed and have a rapid weight gain in the first few months, you'll have more fat cells, which makes it much more difficult to be slim or of a normal weight as an adult. You never lose fat cells; they only get bigger or smaller. And babies don't have any control over how much they're fed.

"Infants with a rapid weight gain were found to have a relative risk of obesity in young adulthood that was 5.22-fold that of infants without a rapid weight gain and an attributable risk of obesity of 30%. These findings confirm and extend previous data suggesting a relation between weight gain during the first year of life and BMI in childhood (2–7) or adulthood (8)."

http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/77/6/1350
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laundry_queen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #166
231. Were the infants in the study
breastfed or formula fed? It doesn't say. (Although it does mention the study is too small to draw any conclusions)
Breastfed infants tend to gain fast the first 3-6 months then level off. Formula fed babies were more steady gainers throughout their whole first year (And are also more likely to be over fed). Formula fed babies are also more likely to be obese.
There are too many factors unaccounted for in this study IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #166
245. i did not know that and i was a large baby, my mom was tiny and i came
out of the shoot at a little over 10 pounds and struggled all my life with my weight, in the past year i've lost 80 pounds through exercising and the south beach diet and i'm really trying to make it stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samurai_Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
260. This interview with Gwynneth Paltrow might shed some light...
on why those of us who are overweight are 'sensitive' to fat bashing. This interview is on the Shallow Hal DVD, the movie where Gwynneth dons a fat suit to play her character. She did some 'test runs' out in public of her in the fat suit, and this is how she commented afterwards:

Gwyneth: I put on the full body suit and makeup in the hotel room, and then went down to the lobby.

Makeup Artist: It was sort of like Gwyneth didn't exist.

Gwyneth: I went down to the bar... no one would make eye contact with me, no one would look in my direction. I asked people questions, and people were dismissive. It was a very sad and startling experience.

Gwyneth: I think people think it's the polite thing to do not to look if someone is really, really overweight, but it's incredibly isolating. And lonely and wierd. It was a very profound experience -- I felt so alone, it was like no one was connecting with me. Nobody would look in my direction, nobody would make eye contact or smile.

------------
That is what it is like for overweight and obese people every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #260
277. and yet she still played
a role in a movie that used someones weight as a cheap gag (a very long unfunny cheap gag) kinda off topic but I can't stand Gwyneth so I thought I go OT for a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samurai_Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #277
282. Yes, they did do fat jokes in that movie
But the moral and ending of the movie more than made up for it, IMO. And I think that movie was more about how shallow Hal was than how fat Rosie was. I love that movie, and I love Gwynneth Paltrow. I'm about the same size as the actress who played the 'fat Rosie' when Gwynneth wasn't in the fat suit, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #260
313. Dod people treat her differently because she was "fat"....
Or because she was not recognizable as a movie star?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
265. GET YOUR RED-HOT PHOBIAS, BEFORE BUSH OUTLAWS IT....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
269. Diet soda DOES NOT make you fat or fatter.
From the article you cited:

" Fowler is quick to note that a study of this kind does not prove that diet soda causes obesity. More likely, she says, it shows that something linked to diet soda drinking is also linked to obesity.

"One possible part of the explanation is that people who see they are beginning to gain weight may be more likely to switch from regular to diet soda," Fowler suggests. "But despite their switching, their weight may continue to grow for other reasons. So diet soft-drink use is a marker for overweight and obesity."


Just had to clarify there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #269
289. My weight gain accelerated when I started drinking diet...
...and I lost weight after I quit. I got extremely addicted to diet sodas, drinking up to 2 liters a day. Some days, I ONLY drank diet soda and no other liquids. I found myself craving sweets like I ever had in my life. Whether it's the "excitotoxin" effect, all that sweetness making the brain crave more sweets, or the insulin rush from the body being fooled by the artificial sweeteners, I have no idea, but I never craved sweets like that before or since, and I never was heavier in my life. Regardless of what research comes out either way, I'm firmly convinced by my experience that diet sodas do NOT aid in weight loss, and probably aggravate weight problems.

But hey, this is just my anecdotal story. If you want to go out and drink products that do not exist in nature, that Donald Rumsfeld helped put on the market, go right ahead. It's your body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
291. Indeed
My childhood was a living hell, largely due to the fact that I was overweight.



In their research on culture, ideology, and anti-fat attitudes, Christian Crandall and Rebecca Martinez (1996) found that our **culture of individualism and self-responsibility** might have contributed to our attitudes about obesity. By comparing anti-fat attitudes in the United States to those in Mexico, they found that the attitude that one is responsible for one's weight is not prevalent in Mexico. More often, they found that people assumed it was part of the genes or the physical makeup of the person. Additionally, there was little antipathy toward fat people. The Americans believed that the fat people had no will-power, making them culpable for the obesity, and they registered a much higher aversion toward fat and fat people.

More of that "pull yourself up by your bootstraps and get a grip on yourself you lazy *&%$#@!" mentality. If you're anything but thin, beautiful and rich you're obviously not doing things right. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #291
297. Ding, ding, ding! Folks, we have a winner!
Every prejudicial attitude in this country can be tied back to this cultural value in some way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #297
304. Elitism
by body size/type/weight is elitism is a form of social darwinism,and eugenics and fascism.
It's the same evil agenda. It doesn't matter if it is based in race or in forcing people to lose weight,the results for the victims are the same.The"undesirables" will get scapegoated,BLAMED ,victimized,shunned,denied rights,humiliated,forced to fix themselves,made the dumping ground for all of societies suffering,and unresolved issues..Fascism as a belief glorifies the idealized body,health and the vain pursuit of the perfect physique,too. Remember the nazis wanted a perfect master race.. What types of flesh personified evil to Nazis? Any softness, and femininity. A hate of equality,tolerance,empathy, liberalism was called weakness and it symbolized to nazis the devil, personified by independent women,fat people and the bodies of other "impure" races.
Social darwinism in the name of "public health" is bullying and domination to those unable to fit the pogrom. And there are plenty of health bullies who don't even realize what they advocate,even on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #304
312. I'm sorry for all of your suffering.
But I refuse to consider "Public Health" equivalent to Nazism.

Should we let sewage run into our drinking water & bring back typhoid & cholera? Should we stop inspecting food--although Bush has ended quite a bit of it. Should we stop all vaccination?

Should we encourage smoking? Should we encourage drinking & drugging to excess?

I, myself, watch what I eat & get a bit of exercise, so I'm in fairly decent shape. I know that it is different for the morbidly obese. But I will continue to live as I wish to live. Have no fear: I will NOT lift a finger to try to change you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #312
317. Really now??

<But I refuse to consider "Public Health" equivalent to Nazism.

Should we let sewage run into our drinking water & bring back typhoid & cholera? Should we stop inspecting food--although Bush has ended quite a bit of it. Should we stop all vaccination?>

NO That is not the public health issue I was referring to.

<Should we encourage smoking? Should we encourage drinking & drugging to excess?>

No. Let people do what they do in areas set aside for it,arrest them if they hurt others or steal, and when they want to stop help them stop,but don't force them An addict won't stop if forced to they have to come to a realization..

<I, myself, watch what I eat & get a bit of exercise, so I'm in fairly decent shape. I know that it is different for the morbidly obese. >

How do you KNOW that? Do you know ALL the morbidly obese people on Earth and know thier habits? You'd be suprised to know how many heavy folks also watch what they eat and excercize just like you do and THEN some more..

<But I will continue to live as I wish to live. Have no fear: I will NOT lift a finger to try to change you.>

Even through the state?
If no than THank you,this means you ARE NOT a health Nazi.. But your self rightious assuming about how fat people live is obnoxious and bigoted.So I'm not convinced you are all that"sorry" yet..You showed ignorance are you willing to throw your assumptions away and admit you might be assuming how other fat people live?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carl_pwccaman Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #297
306. In other cultures they just focus their idiotic nastiness in other ways
Like towards Jews or America, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC