Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Gay Marriage Ban Short of Votes in Senate" Looks like this is going

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:16 AM
Original message
"Gay Marriage Ban Short of Votes in Senate" Looks like this is going
NOWHERE.....for at least a year. IF we take back the government in '06 and '08...it's a DEAD ISSUE for a long, long time. :bounce: :woohoo: Ben Nelson of Nebraska, as usual, supports the repuke agenda. Why is he a Democrat?


<snip>

But Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said he will vote against it on the floor but allowed it to survive his panel in part to give the Republicans the debate party leaders believe will pay off on Election Day. Specter has chosen a different battle with the Bush administration this week _ a hearing Tuesday on the ways the FBI spies on journalists who publish classified information.

As that hearing gets under way, debate on the marriage amendment will enter its second day on the Senate floor. All but one of the Senate Democrats _ the exception is Ben Nelson of Nebraska _ oppose the measure and, with moderate Republicans, are expected to block an up-or-down vote, killing the measure for the year.

Democrats say the amendment is a divisive bow to religious conservatives, and point out that it conflicts with the GOP's opposition to big government interference.

"A vote for this amendment is a vote for bigotry pure and simple," said Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, where the state Supreme Court legalized gay marriages in 2003.<snip>

http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/06/05/406773.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love Ted Kennedy nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Newsom on Good Morning America
Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco, which in 2004 began issuing marriage licenses to gay couples, on Monday denounced Bush's move as predictable and "stale rhetoric" aimed at rallying conservatives for this year's midterm elections.

"It's politics. It's pandering and it's placating a core constituency, the evangelicals," Newsom said on ABC's "Good Morning America."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060605/ap_on_go_co/congress_gay_marriage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. SPOT ON, Newsom. That's EXACTLY what it is.
Stale rhetoric.....as stale as can be and people are seeing through the RW ploys now. Need to win an election? Need to stir the RW wacko fundie pot? Just bring up Gay marriage and abortion.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. So it's dead for now, but Specter will keep it on life support
until November?

The mind boggles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. IF the Dems take back the
House in '06....it won't be an issue in '08. Right? We MUST win back the House this year. We MUST kill their agenda.


from my OP:
All but one of the Senate Democrats _ the exception is Ben Nelson of Nebraska _ oppose the measure and, with moderate Republicans, are expected to block an up-or-down vote, killing the measure for the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. much like the flag burning amendment, which has been . . .
brought up by every Congress since AT LEAST the mid-60s . . . way back then, I worked for one of the two Members of Congress (John Dow of NY) who voted against the flag burning bill (the other being Phil Burton of San Francisco) . . . passed the House no problem, but died in the Senate . . . as it always does . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC