Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Busby Hasn't Lost Yet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:54 PM
Original message
Busby Hasn't Lost Yet
Busby has the right to ask for a recount. And there are absentee votes left to count. Just heard this on Thom Hartmann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, came into the room just as he was finishing that
and wasn't sure which race he was talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. That little special election cost the GOP FIVE MILLION BUCKS
From a Kerry email, today: This morning, Republicans are making laughable claims of momentum in the 2006 elections. They poured over $5 million dollars of national Republican money into a California special election to hold onto a seat that they've held since it was created by the GOP, for the GOP 15 years ago.

And they eked out a victory by 5,000 votes.

Their claims of momentum are as phony as their claims of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Help make today a day of defiant determination by personally joining in a remarkable display of grassroots support for four key Democratic challengers locked in tight House and Senate races in historically Republican districts that are at the tipping point of electing Democrats.

Show them that, come November, we're going to win these elections, and we won't be denied...


If they are using that much NATIONAL MONEY for a lousy House seat in what used to be a SAFE GOP DISTRICT, they've got trouble. BIG trouble. How long will the faithful, the middle income idiots who contribute to the Great Oil Palooza regularly, be able to keep this shit up? Or be MOTIVATED to keep this shit up? Local taxes are going up, up, up, services going down, down, down, gas ain't getting any cheaper, food costs, utility costs, all on the upswing...something's gotta give.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It also cost the Democratic side 5 million bucks
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Who was her campaign manager?
Who were they paying for advice? Whomever it was, the money was wasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, we were outspent about 2-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. OK, I found a source that says $2.25 million as of 5/25
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Not all national dough, though, and in a HEAVY GOP DISTRICT
If we were spending that amount in a Democratic district, I'd be more concerned.

The playing field wasn't level to start with. They had home field advantage in a big way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. You think $5M means anything to Rove?
C'mon. that's one day's income for Richard Scaife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yeah, it does, when you consider that this is one race that must
be RERUN in the fall. It's a special election, not a regular. And how many other GOP candidates are up for reelection in these challenging times? If this were a one-off, with a protracted term of office instead of a few scant months, no big deal. But it's a harbinger, when a once-SAFE, completely noncompetitive GOP district is a struggle to keep. They spent five million to put a dickhead in an historially GOP seat for five lousy months. And the guy is such a jerk, he won't be able to keep his mouth shut--that's five months to get video of the carpetbagger saying idiotic things. I have a feeling he'll oblige.

The race, which was initially expected to be a slam dunk for Republicans, turned into a nip-and-tuck affair thanks to a toxic local and national political environment for the GOP.

....Democrats sought to paint the loss as a moral victory, a sign that they can compete even in districts that are heavily tilted to Republicans. Party officials also noted that the NRCC will not be able to spend $5 million in every competitive race in the country come November....

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/06/the_results_are_in.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tell that to
DainBramaged who just might take issue with that assertion. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:00 PM
Original message
How close was it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. About 4700 votes out of 125,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, she WON her primary
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 02:00 PM by slackmaster
Busby will be the Democratic candidate for CA-50 in the general election in November.

What would be the point in asking for a recount? It would make her look even whinier than she does already, after her terrible performance recovering from last Thursday's gaffe.

Busby has the right to ask for a recount. And there are absentee votes left to count.

Recount procedures are clearly laid out in the California Elections Code.

See http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=elec&codebody=&hits=20
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Prediction: She will not ask for a recount
With over 4,700 seperating her from her opponent, she would look foolish to do so. This one wasn't a squeaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I don't understand your logic
how would asking for a recount make her look "foolish"?

Isn't that request well within her right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Some Hope She'll Believe Just That
so that she doesn't try. I say we call her and pressure her to fight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Recounts are usually only requested in close elections
If not, why wouldn't all losing candidates request one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. but the absentees haven't even been counted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Why should she? It's a waste of time and money.
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 02:14 PM by tjwash
A lot of people don't understand what district 50 is like. If Cunningham was able to run for congressional seat from his prison cell against a Dem, he would win that election. It's all old money, or the people there are somehow tied to defense contractors, land developers, or mortgage bankers. It's the quintessential Bush base of "haves and have-mores" that love the status-quo.

Besides Bilbray can't do a damn thing ANYWAY. He is going to be spending all of his time raising money and campaigning for November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is it true that Billbray DOESN'T LIVE in California?
He MUST HAVE permanent residency to run here. Do we know what the status is on his residency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. That is still in the courts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thanks. That's good to know.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooney Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Last night as they were posting the returns
the first numbers made up 11.5% of the votes and it repeatedly said that these were the absentee votes. It was about 1 and a half hours before any of the other numbers came in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC