Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IT GETS PERSONAL: SENATOR SPECTOR SLAMS CHENEY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:50 PM
Original message
IT GETS PERSONAL: SENATOR SPECTOR SLAMS CHENEY
IT GETS PERSONAL: SENATOR SLAMS CHENEY
FOR WALKING PAST HIM ON WIRETAPS...

Senator slams Cheney for lobbying Congress on wiretaps

RAW STORY
Published: Wednesday June 7, 2006

In a terse and highly unusual letter to Vice President Cheney, Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) today rejected the Bush administration’s insistence that a secret wire tapping program being conducted on U.S. civilians by the National Security Agency is legal, complaining that efforts by the White House to stonewall Congressional inquiries into the program “denigrates the constitutional authority and responsibility of the Congress and specifically the Judiciary Committee to conduct oversight on constitutional issues," ROLL CALL reports Wednesday.


Specter’s anger peaked Tuesday after he learned that Cheney had been lobbying Republican members of the committee to “oppose any Judiciary Committee hearing, even a closed one” that involved telephone companies that have cooperated with the NSA. “I was surprised, to the say the least, that you sought to influence, really determine, the action of the Committee without calling me first, or at least calling me at some point,” Specter wrote in the letter, adding that “this was especially perplexing since we both attended the Republicans Senators caucus lunch yesterday and I walked directly in front of you on at least two occasions en route from the buffet to my table.”

Specter has authored legislation to require the NSA program be brought under the jurisdiction of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which would require wire taps be signed off on by a judge prior to being initiated.

Specter warned Cheney that this stonewalling must end and that “if an accommodation cannot be reached ... The Judiciary Committee will consider confronting the issue with subpoenas and enforcement of that compulsory process if it appears that a majority vote will be forthcoming.”

more at:
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Senator_slams_Cheney_for_lobbying_Congress_0607.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. maybe Cheney was asleep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. As Cheney quietly releases the safety......
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. More smoke and political Bullshit!
Sphincter ain't didley!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. If Specter is for real, he should change party affiliations NOW!
He doesn't have to become a Dem. He could become an Independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. He is what he's always been...
an unpatriotic corporate worm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Specter reminds me of a blow fish. He puffs up, then at the
critical moment, he deflates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Very accurate
That explains his cheeks. :rofl:

Spector is just mad that Gfy cheney didn't salute him. I do dig the idea that he wants to put the tampering under control.

I hope somebody goes after sneaky dick. He should be subpoenaed just for GP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow.
You gotta think - if you are a moderate, you are changing party affiliations right now.

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. hey Spector there should have been ...
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 04:56 PM by flyarm
subpoenas and enforcement of that compulsory process
immediately..you Spector have failed the people..and our constitution and our nation by abdicating your job..and your responsibility!

screw you Spector..you screwed my country for me, my childen, and the future generations of this once great nation..i hope you rot in hell for what you have done!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuzzyDicePHL Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well put.
Specter is a grandstander and a coward. Anything he does that might fool someone into thinking he's got his constituents' best interests in mind is all for show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. He'll "consider confronting the issue" . . . and y'know what he'll do?
Nothing.

He won't do JACK SHIT, because he's all blow and no go, just like the rest of his boneless GOPhucklican colleagues.

Lampreys have more spine than Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Specter is finally waking up to the underhanded tactics of this...........
....administration. Oh, isn't that precious!!:sarcasm:

Acting "surprised" is one thing, following it up with real Senate guts now is quite another matter. Guess time will tell how stiff Specter's backbone truly is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. 'Too little, too late' and 'Doth he protest too much?' ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleRob Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Specter is a weasel
His constant bending over for the Bush administration will go down in history books under "Profiles in Cowardice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laundry_queen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. ooooo an angry letter!
What cajones that Specter has! I bet Cheney is freaking out! :sarcasm:

He had his chance to do something. He blew it. A feigned outrage letter won't fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. "I oppose it but I'll vote for it anyway." Go home, Arlen. Tell it to the
dog. He's the only one left who expects that your actions will have anything at all to do with your words.

...zzzZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzz....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. contrived artificial hissyfit
Put Arlen on "ignore"

He ain't worth the effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. blitzer talking about it now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfresh Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here's the letter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yesterday, on The Situation Room, Jack Cafferty slammed Specter for not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Notice the timing?
these people are so transparent. All you have to do, is pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. really larded up at the buffet, didn't he?
Gee, two trips...

You'd think they wouldn't have something as proletarian as a buffet at a Republican function, would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. whatever... another right wing fraud
shut up or put up you poser!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. Blah...blah...blah. Is this the 3rd or 4th time Specter's been tough??
This is Specter's modus operandi. He get's pissed and incensed about the administration's pro-dictatorship moves and makes a lot of noise, but soon thereafter he backs down ON ALL ISSUES SO FAR.

Specter is an assclown. His posturing against King Chimp is nothing more than fluff meant to increase his own bona fides in the Senate.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC