Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zarqawi story is bullshit because Zarqawi was bullshit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:07 PM
Original message
Zarqawi story is bullshit because Zarqawi was bullshit.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/09/AR2006040900890.html

Military Plays Up Role of Zarqawi

Jordanian Painted As Foreign Threat To Iraq's Stability


By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 10, 2006

The U.S. military is conducting a propaganda campaign to magnify the role of the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, according to internal military documents and officers familiar with the program. The effort has raised his profile in a way that some military intelligence officials believe may have overstated his importance and helped the Bush administration tie the war to the organization responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The documents state that the U.S. campaign aims to turn Iraqis against Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian, by playing on their perceived dislike of foreigners. U.S. authorities claim some success with that effort, noting that some tribal Iraqi insurgents have attacked Zarqawi loyalists.

For the past two years, U.S. military leaders have been using Iraqi media and other outlets in Baghdad to publicize Zarqawi's role in the insurgency. The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. How come they don't mention his missing one
leg as some sort of ID? They say DNA, fingerprints, scars, etc.. But they have not mentioned his fake let at all....:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. MSNBC article this morning said "one leg" story was false.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13205661/page/2/

"He was long said to have an artificial leg, fitted in Baghdad during Saddam Hussein’s rule — a claim some U.S. officials used to bolster their case that the Iraqi president was conspiring with al-Qaida. The tale about the leg — like so many of the myths around al-Zarqawi — turned out to be false."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. leg
I hear it was his middle leg, he had a woody
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's why Boosh had him killed.
Penis envy. It's all about who has the biggest dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why would Bush be jealous?
He's always been the biggest dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. They won't be able to bullshit their way out the fact that things
Edited on Thu Jun-08-06 01:16 PM by The_Casual_Observer
will continue to get worse in Iraq. Unfortunately, the insurgency doesn't buy bullshit like the american public does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This should distract people from Hidatha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Perhaps that's why they finally sacrificed the guy.
He was a valuable asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Now, now. We MUST focus on whether he died or not. Whether...
he was important or not is irrelevant - irrelevant because that's harder to prove. You see, if we focus on whether he died or not, it's easier for the troll crowd to make fun of our skepticism..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC