|
I'm not really good at the watercooler politics discussion, but a friend of mine at work (good guy, I consider him a "recovering Republican" -- he thinks Ann Coulter is a nutjob) decided to try and get me riled up last night. He is convinced that Hillary Clinton is already the '08 nominee. He said that he was "very afraid" of what would happen if she got elected. He was "afraid of the war that Hillary Clinton would get us into."
?!
There's some projection for you.
So we discussed Iraq and he in typical fashion brought up Bill Clinton who "had us in more places than Bush did"; reasoning being that we shouldn't expend our resources on peacekeeping missions and only respond militarily when our national security is threatened. So I got to go through the whole, "Saddam didn't attack us!" "Yeah, but he gassed his people!" thing. I am unfortunately not up on the alleged plethora of microwars Bill Clinton got us into. My friend apparently is basing his Clinton grudge on the Black Hawk Down incident. My response: "How many killed in that?" "Now how many are we up to in Iraq?" with hand-scale weighing gesture.
So he doesn't think we should involve ourselves in peacekeeping missions. He insisted that there was satellite proof of WMD's being moved out of Iraq right before we struck. I laid out the whole hypothesis that Valerie Plame/Brewster Jennings was blown because they had discovered quite by accident the WMD that was to be planted there and revealed. Of course he said, "Oh you want to argue with conspiracy theories!" and we got into the NSA. He claimed that we've been wiretapped since the 70's and it was nothing new. I countered with "Sure...there's secret stuff that has to go on, but even if you disregard the Plame revenge theory, do you really trust the Administration that bungled her cover for *no reason at all* to have their own room at the major telcos?"
We discussed how if Saddam was an evil dictator that we were morally obligated to take out (since the WMD thing turned out to be wrong) then why haven't we gone after the other nine or twelve "evil dictators" who are just as bad? Oh....that would be a "peacekeeping" mission...and what makes Iraq different? What do they have that the others don't have? It's not WMD...what's under all that sand??? Think hard!
I brought up how Iraq was probably just the launch point for continued gunpoint diplomacy with Iran, how the administration expected Iraq to roll over quickly. He said that he had always predicted we'd be there three years and couldn't believe me when I told him that officials had claimed Iraq to be a "cakewalk". He had never heard those quotes. Luckily Google didn't fail me; I typed in "iraq war cakewalk" and bam-bam-bam. There were the quotes and he was flabbergasted at Rummy and Cheney stating they didn't expect to be there longer than five months.
So yeah. Hillary is a warmonger and that's why we shouldn't elect her. I said, "Well, at least our soldiers would have health coverage."
|