Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Funniest reason I've heard *not* to elect a Democrat.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:53 PM
Original message
Funniest reason I've heard *not* to elect a Democrat.
I'm not really good at the watercooler politics discussion, but a friend of mine at work (good guy, I consider him a "recovering Republican" -- he thinks Ann Coulter is a nutjob) decided to try and get me riled up last night. He is convinced that Hillary Clinton is already the '08 nominee. He said that he was "very afraid" of what would happen if she got elected. He was "afraid of the war that Hillary Clinton would get us into."

?!

There's some projection for you.

So we discussed Iraq and he in typical fashion brought up Bill Clinton who "had us in more places than Bush did"; reasoning being that we shouldn't expend our resources on peacekeeping missions and only respond militarily when our national security is threatened. So I got to go through the whole, "Saddam didn't attack us!" "Yeah, but he gassed his people!" thing. I am unfortunately not up on the alleged plethora of microwars Bill Clinton got us into. My friend apparently is basing his Clinton grudge on the Black Hawk Down incident. My response: "How many killed in that?" "Now how many are we up to in Iraq?" with hand-scale weighing gesture.

So he doesn't think we should involve ourselves in peacekeeping missions. He insisted that there was satellite proof of WMD's being moved out of Iraq right before we struck. I laid out the whole hypothesis that Valerie Plame/Brewster Jennings was blown because they had discovered quite by accident the WMD that was to be planted there and revealed. Of course he said, "Oh you want to argue with conspiracy theories!" and we got into the NSA. He claimed that we've been wiretapped since the 70's and it was nothing new. I countered with "Sure...there's secret stuff that has to go on, but even if you disregard the Plame revenge theory, do you really trust the Administration that bungled her cover for *no reason at all* to have their own room at the major telcos?"

We discussed how if Saddam was an evil dictator that we were morally obligated to take out (since the WMD thing turned out to be wrong) then why haven't we gone after the other nine or twelve "evil dictators" who are just as bad? Oh....that would be a "peacekeeping" mission...and what makes Iraq different? What do they have that the others don't have? It's not WMD...what's under all that sand??? Think hard!

I brought up how Iraq was probably just the launch point for continued gunpoint diplomacy with Iran, how the administration expected Iraq to roll over quickly. He said that he had always predicted we'd be there three years and couldn't believe me when I told him that officials had claimed Iraq to be a "cakewalk". He had never heard those quotes. Luckily Google didn't fail me; I typed in "iraq war cakewalk" and bam-bam-bam. There were the quotes and he was flabbergasted at Rummy and Cheney stating they didn't expect to be there longer than five months.

So yeah. Hillary is a warmonger and that's why we shouldn't elect her. I said, "Well, at least our soldiers would have health coverage."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somalia was a left over from Papa Bush. Clinton's interventions in
Bosnia and Haiti were surprisingly bloodless--at least for our troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. and the no fly zones in Iraq where Papa too
Reagan in South America, republicans have been intervening for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freexone Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too much stock in Hill...
It's not going to happen, the nomination that is...BUT if it does, it will be for VP, not Prez.
I smell a DE Dem as the prez nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateShame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Biden?! NOOOOOOOOO
And that's coming from somebody who LIKES the guy!!! But, can Bubba RedStater who needs Cliffs Notes to follow an episode of "Magnum PI" keep up with a Biden speech?

From where we stand now, I think Gore HAS to be our candidate!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Joe Biden IS my senator and all I can say is HELL FUCKING NO
And not only do I like Joe Biden, I signed up to volunteer to help get his son elected Attorney General
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. So you trust a guy who got behind that bankruptcy bill?
I'd expect more stabs in the back from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. My career is in the credit card industry (Top Industry in Delaware)
Edited on Fri Jun-09-06 02:59 PM by LynneSin
Next question?

Anyhow, I'm not some dumbass democrat who puts blinders on her eyes to a single issue, neglecting everything else being debated on in Washington DC.

Plus I've had Rick Santorum as a senator and if I had to choose - hell, I'll take Mr. Biden again and again and again and again and again and again and again...... And on an edit note, if had to choose between Santorum or Joe Lieberman as my senator I'd go with that Joe too!

I won't vote for Joe for president unless for some bizarre reason he gets the nomination (which he probably won't)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Santorum is setting the bar pretty low--he's like Charles Manson without
testicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Or Clark - also from a red state.
Gore doesn't live in a red state anymore - he live sin California, which will, sadly, work against him - again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. In Hilary Clinton's defense....
...there may not be many places left for us to start a war unless perhaps Ms. Clinton has a raging desire to invade Canada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. The only cure is a frontal lobotomy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. You bring up something I hadn't considered before.
I thought all the RW fear-mongering about Hillary as the next Presidential candidate was just a lot of smoke and mirrors to rile up their base and raise money. But I never thought of the effect it would have on people like your friend. It sounds like he does not want to vote Republican, but he is 100% convinced that Hillary will be the '08 Dem nominee and he is more scared of that than another 4 years of being screwed by the GOP elephant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. I also have fun with Republicans at work.
I like to remind them of the 50 or so warnings * received about terrorist attacks prior to 911. I also add that at least Clinton got the first guys in the failed bombing of WTC. They where tried and convected and are now in jail. It's going to be hard to convict terrorist these days since we torture the shit out of them in Cuba. Sometimes I remind my Republican friends that Reagan did nothing when the terrorists blew up that Marine Barracks back in 83. Nothing. That showed em. And I never forget to add the whole Iran-Contra issue into the conversation--where Republicans sold weapons to Islamic terrorist in order to finance right wing terrorist in Latin America. It's also fun to add that when * took office in 2001, he restored relations with the Taliban--Clinton cut off all relations with the Taliban. Bush also awarded the Taliban with $$$$$ for fighting the "drug war." Then I usually follow up with the question: "So why is it that republicans are thought to be so vigilant against terrorists again?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Your friend is no "recovering" Repug---he's a Repug.
He's got all the RNC talking points down. He'll pull the (R) lever every time. Don't be fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. BWHAHAHAHA!
Sorry, I couldn't get past the part about him behing afraid of the war Hillary is going to get us into.

Pardon me while I pick myself up off the floor.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. What is it with Repugs claiming Hillary is running?
I got into a small (I dropped the subject because they "knew what they knew") argument with some people at work who swore up and down that Hillary has already declared her candidacy. Doesn't matter that no news sites mention this, or web sites, they swear they heard her say it on CNN. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Oh well, if they "heard " her say it on CNN
must be the God's honest truth. Or maybe they need their hearing checked?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Why don't you suggest they call her Senate office and ask for confirmation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. wishful thinking--the opposite of how they felt about Dean
They were pissing themselves worried that Dean would get the nomination.

Rightly or wrongly, they must think taking on Hillary would be a cakewalk because they can just trot out their lesbian, witch, murderder shtick from the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. Don't waste your time with him.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. He's a nice guy, and we rarely get into politics...
He actually told me he went on a trip to some Young Republican thing (he's going to school for poly-sci) and spent like 20-30 minutes there before getting fed up and leaving to just do the tourist thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC