Yes or No : Will Zarqawi's autopsy be made public ?

Will they report any gunshot wounds or blunt trauma other than a bomb? Will they withhold it altogether? What will they report was the cause of death? What say you?

Always a mystery about his leg. I guess they could say it was blown off by bombs if he lacks one.

I'm curious what they looked like, how they died, just so we know about victory.

show that his colon is impacted with Humus!!!!!:scared:

content to see if he was perhaps poisoned

his family in Jordan, odds are they will burn it and then say he was buried at an undisclosed location. This would prevent anyone from
digging him up again to conduct their own tests.

If it is, some will certainly denounce it as a fabrication, and some will consider it proof, according to their present views of the matter.

When do you think they will make it public?? There's nothing that would prevent them from doing that immediately, do you agree?

Nothing would prevent immdiate release of what is on hand, but there is little to be gained, from their point of view, by doing so either.

Two more men, two women, and a child between the age of 5 and 7. The child was advising him on how to build carbombs, no doubt. Or maybe he was just on a vacation and didn't have all his "assistants" and advisers with him?

They will release a report that reflects exactly what they want the world to believe.

before and after the bombing.

Apparently he had his tattoos removed (as reported last year) here:

-snip
He forbade other prisoners to read anything else. He had his un-Islamic tattoos removed (shedding the last reminders of his old street life).
-snip
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1494965,00.html

yet they said that one of the ways he was identified was by his:

-snip

Tattoos

Zarqawi's body was taken a secure location.

"By visual identification it was established that that probably was him, but they... did further examination of his body, found more scars and tattoos consistent with what had been reported which we knew about him.
-snip

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5060468.stm


I suppose that even if he had them removed and there were scars where they once were, perhaps that could still be sufficient to identify they guy. Still, before and after photo of these alleged tattoos would certainly clear up some inconsistencies in my mind about the reports...


on edit: It does say, non-Islamic tattoos, so I suppose there are Islamic tattoos that are allowed? Well, not according to this site:

-snip

I have been receiving many requests for designing or writing names or phrases in Arabic script to be used as tattoos.
I am sorry that I have to decline such requests because tattoos are not allowed in Islam.

-snip

As far as tattooing is concerned, it permanently disfigures the face and other parts of the body with blue pigment and repulsive designs. Some Arabs, especially women, were in the habit of tattooing large portions of their bodies, while people of certain religious sects tattooed pictures of their deities or religious rituals on their hands and chests. To all these abominations is added the pain and agony which the person being tattooed must undergo from the pricking of the needles. Because all of this, both the tattooer and the one who is tattooed have been cursed.

-snip

http://www.sakkal.com/Graphics/Calligraphy/Custom_Arabic_Tattoos.html

to prop up all the lies they told so far.