WP op-ed: U.S. Ambassador John Bolton "poisons atmosphere" at U.N.

At the U.N., Bluster Backfires
By Sebastian Mallaby
Monday, June 12, 2006; Page A21

....John R. Bolton, the ambassador in question, has a rich history of losing friends and failing to influence people. He was notorious, even before arriving at the United Nations last year, for having said that 10 stories of the U.N. headquarters could be demolished without much loss; he had described the United States as the sun around which lesser nations rotate -- mere "asteroids," he'd branded them. Perhaps not surprisingly, the Senate refused to confirm Bolton as U.N. ambassador. "Arrogant," "bullying," and "the poster child of what someone in the diplomatic corps should not be," Sen. George Voinovich called him.

Bush sent Bolton anyway, bypassing the Senate by appointing him during a congressional recess. It soon turned out that dismissing foreign ambassadors as asteroid dwellers was merely a warm-up....Bolton has so poisoned the atmosphere that the cause of management renewal is viewed by many developing countries as an American plot. And if Bolton carries through on his threat to cut off money for the United Nations, the United States will be more isolated than ever. Refusing to fund U.N. officials who are planning for a peacekeeping mission in Darfur is not a winning strategy.

Last week the U.N. deputy secretary general, a pro-American Briton named Mark Malloch Brown, went public with his Bolton frustrations. He pointed out that the United Nations serves many American objectives, from deploying peacekeepers to helping with Iraq's elections. Given this cooperation, the powers that be in Washington should stick up for the United Nations rather than threatening to blow it up. They should not be passive in the face of "unchecked U.N.-bashing and stereotyping."

This merely stated the obvious. If you doubt that U.N.-bashing and stereotyping goes on, ask yourself what gallery Bolton is playing to -- or check out the latest cover of the National Rifle Association magazine, which features a wolf with U.N. logos in its eyeballs. But Malloch Brown's speech didn't seem obvious to Bolton. "This is the worst mistake by a senior U.N. official that I have seen," he thundered in response. "Even though the target of the speech was the United States, the victim, I fear, will be the United Nations."

Which would suit Bolton and his allies perfectly. But it should not suit Bush, at least not now that he's grasped that bluster can backfire. Arriving at the U.N. summit last September, a different Bush greeted the secretary general and gestured at Bolton; "has the place blown up since he's been here?" he demanded, teasingly. Well, it's now time for the new Bush to acknowledge that Bolton's tactics aren't funny. The United States needs an ambassador who can work with the United Nations. Right now, it doesn't have one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/11/AR2006061100765.html?nav=hcmodule

get to serve? Congress is back in session.

so his time is up in January. . . and he either has to be re-submitted to Congress or Bush has to by-pass the Legislature again.

Remember when Clinton got a standing ovation from the U.N.?

We need to get rid of the right wing idiots.

:mad:

I remember when he said that.

uh... invade the USA ("Regime Change")?

or... move to The Hague (and "Leave BoltBu$h Behind")?? :shrug:

Oh. JOHN Bolton... I must have been thinking about Michael Bolton.

Wait for it... "Johnny, you're doing a heck of a job.." The kiss of death is coming soon, Bolton baby!


How does bushco say that Americans who want to keep some jobs here in America are "isolationists" while he puts a freak in the UN who "isolates" US from all our allies by offending each and every one with a fervor that would put Don Rickles to shame?

:hide:

Just like nutcase lobbyists now infest the EPA and anti-scientific political hacks run USDA, etc. etc.

They want to undo everything liberals have done since the 1800s. Let's face it, children make better coal miners because you don't have to dig large tunnels. Get rid of those pesky child labor laws, and bingo, coal mine owners get that much richer.