Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the Democrats take on a Populist-Labor agenda?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:20 AM
Original message
Poll question: Should the Democrats take on a Populist-Labor agenda?
I think the Democrats to adopt a Populist-Labor agenda. We need to be talking about how the Republicans are selling jobs overseas with things like CAFTA and an increase in the minimum wage. Definately talk about universal healthcare and alternative energy sources. When you start talking about the population's well-being and economics, I think you can get people to listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftupnorth Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. a REAL fair tax policy, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. If you are talking about a true Populist movement...
Like the Non Partisan League in ND for example, then no...those are losers on a national level. If you are simply talking about addressing economic issues in a more forthright way then yes definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think just pro-labor as opposed to pro-corporations, will do fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. An agenda that caters to the interests of the vast majority
of the population. What a novel idea.

Now if only the MSM and the voting machines would cooperate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Damn straight they should! And an antiwar agenda as well!
It's time SOMEBODY started representing the majority of people in this country--58% of whom opposed the Iraq war, in Feb. '03 (BEFORE the invasion), and who now oppose it by over 70%; 63% of whom oppose torture "under any circumstances" (May '04)--and whose views, altogether, show huge disagreement with every major Bush policy, foreign and domestic, way up in the 60% to 70% range, in a wide range of polls for at least two years.

We are paying for war and torture, and tax cuts for the rich, and a huge deficit, and assaults on our civil rights, and the outsourcing of jobs, and gouging at the gas pump, and de-regulation of global corporate predators, and the installation of expensive, hackable election theft machines--WITHOUT REPRESENTATION THAT IS EVEN CLOSE TO OUR NUMBERS.

That's what the first American Revolution was all about, as I recall.

-----------

Throw Diebold and ES&S election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor' NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handsignals4theblind Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. -USE Legal tools to tame the corporate beasts

these unruly bunch need regulations and heavy penaltys. And if you really want to see them squirm revoke a few corporate charters.

How do you think the entities - legal persons known a corporations have become the dominant institution in the last 150 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes.
May I point out that Democrats had that choice in the '04 primaries and passed it by?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. absolutely yes . . . but to do so with integrity would require . . .
that Democrats reject all corporate contributions . . . since that ain't gonna happen, any Populist-Labor agenda will necessarily be severely compromised . . . probably to the point of irrelevance . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good points, all. n/t
Edited on Fri Dec-30-05 07:24 PM by greyhound1966
Edit to add: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC