Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXACTLY WHERE IS THE US WINNING "THE WAR ON TERROR?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:36 AM
Original message
EXACTLY WHERE IS THE US WINNING "THE WAR ON TERROR?"
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 08:39 AM by Jeffersons Ghost
For that matter, where is current leadership in DC winning the "War of Ideas?"

IN IRAQ?



IN IRAN?



IN VENEZUELA?





Please try to answer the next question before opening the link:
What do the three countries have in common?
http://internationaltrade.suite101.com/article.cfm/top_ten_oil_countries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope we are winning because terrorists are to busy to attack amerika
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. what more can the Administration do to stimulate an attack?
Does Bushyboy have to send them an engraved invitation? He's called them cowards multiple times. Many very vocal supporters of the war claim that absense of an attack proves terrorists are weak. An attack would certainly improve his poll numbers and Mr. Resident is doing all he can to spread the word that our borders and ports remain unprotected. Perhaps he could provide further assistance to terrorists by flying them into the country on Air Force One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Oh, I think he wants an almost permanent war (at least permanent action)
where the US military can strengthen US control over the region.

And it's all about the FUCKING OIL!!!

It's got NOTHING to do with WMDs or Nucular weapons or Democracy or (insert BS talking point here)



Imagine taking the $300 billion spent for Iraq and putting it into creating an alternative energy source and infrastructure here making the US energy-independent (corn- or soy-based ethanol)?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I disagree with this Roland...


"where the US military can strengthen US control over the region." I believe they want to destabilize the Mid-East and EVERY major oil producing region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. To what end result? It's counter to the stated goals of PNAC and WINEP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. to drive up the price of oil, thus helping his true "base" make more money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Well, from what I've read in the recent past, the plan to control the
political climate in the Middle East and to PRIVATIZE natural resources in Iraq would have provided a better stream of revenue for the base while the ideologues of the PNAC got their jollies in watching Muslims die by the thousands so Israel would be "safe" and "freedom" would reign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I'm no high paid strategic analyst but I knew invading Iraq =instability
I full well expected a civil war in Iraq when we invaded, didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Well, I will be honest with you. No. And here's why >>>>
You see, I'm a reformed Republican. I voted for Bush in 2000 and was even for the invasion in 2003.

I had my revelation about 6-9 months later and am utterly dismayed in that I was oh-so-blind to what was going on.

And, when you consider the current opinions and statements from the likes of Perle, Kristol, Ledeen and Hadley still in the admin and also Rumsfeld (hell, throw in Hitchens, too), well, they TRULY believed in their ideology and that the US would be greeted as liberators. They were not students to history and ignored how the British helped to create Iraq from a portion of the former Ottoman Empire.

These people are literally batshit insane.

As far as some of the others, Wolfowitz has managed to escape much of the debate of late in his nice spot at the World Bank and others like Fukuyama are lamenting their ideology and the way the B/C WH strategeryized.

Perhaps I don't want to imagine an administration WANTING a destabilized Middle East which would only foment a huge increase in Islamist desire to fight the "far-enemy" instead of their typical focus on the "near-enemy". Esp. given the insane cost of what's transpired so far in terms of lives and money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess they're winning it over the telephone lines...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I know you to be pretty sharp Roland. can you answer my last question?
I'd also like to expand this thread... Please present comments by our leaders directed toward countries on the list at the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Where is the administration winning?
Well, they've liberated billions and billions of tax dollars that might have otherwise been wasted on roads, or schools, or health care benefiting millions of Americans, and funneled those dollars into the pockets of their campaign benefactors and financiers. Meanwhile, many of the people hit hardest by this nonsense are worried about "permanently" repealing the estate tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Stupifying, isn't it?
When will people get a clue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. stupid policy has an amazing ability to "stupify."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. On FAUX News
You turn on FAUX and they will tell you that we have already won the war. We are just fighting over there to give them Democracy or some other bull shit story for the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. which war? the one on terror or ideas? still no answers the last question
what do the countries in the OP have in common?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. Here at home, against us.
That's the answer to both your questions. The "war on terror" was designed to scare the hell out of all of us and as an excuse for our criminal government to wage a war of aggression while stealing us blind. The "war on ideas" is waged daily within this country with the media as the tool - keeping us all confused and exhausted from doublespeak, obfuscation and lies.

We are the target of both, and they're winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astro Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. 17 permanent bases in iraq to execute the neoCON agenda of PERPETUAL WAR
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 10:55 AM by astro
oil is above $70 a barrel, patriot act, BBV, etc...

things are looking real good if you are bent on world domination financed by the price of oil and suppression of dissent here at home.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hi astro!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astro Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. hi newyawker99
thank you :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Again, it seems like we're OBL's wet dream
a majority of US troops out of SA and into Iraq. Saddam Hussein, a secular leader, out-Shiites gain more power--the war in Iraq increases recruitment to Al Quaeda. Hussein was against Al Quaeda and especially Shiite fundamentalism. It seems we've given OBL everything he's wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC