Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stop talking about goddamn troop withdrawal! They are NEVER coming back!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:37 PM
Original message
Stop talking about goddamn troop withdrawal! They are NEVER coming back!
It's a dishonest argument!

"When will they come home?"
"Sooner or later?"
"We the Congress demand a timetable for withdrawal."

Enough! We are building 14 permanent bases in Iraq. Per-ma-nent. This is no secret. Everyone knows this. So why is everyone wondering when we'll bring our troops home? I don't get it. They are never coming home. Not in our lifetime most likely.

We can talk about ending military operations, but talking about when the troops are leaving Iraq is a bullshit debate. THEY ARE NEVER LEAVING. EVER.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some of them will be coming back...
...one flag-draped box at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. not while there is oil in the ground under the Middle East...
...and not while Israel runs U.S. Middle Eastern policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. On that happy note, who are you going to support in November?
I Hope it is not someone who b believes in the WingNutz fantasy that we will prevail in Iraq and use it to be our base from which to project AmeriKKKan power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "AmeriKKKan?" That's an insult to all of us who love this country enough
to stay here and fight for change.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. AmeriKKKa is the PNAC view of what used to be our country.
The point I was and am making to the OP is that by buying into their world view they are complicit. If you are fighting I salute you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, but why give them the recognition?
Sorry, but I cringe whenever I see "Amerika" or "AmeriKKKa." That's just my opinion, and of course I'm not going to tell you what to do or not do, but I still believe it's an insult.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It is an insult. I am insulted every time gw wipes his a$$ on my Bill of
Rights. I am insulted every time the corporate controlled media pushes their twisted world view as having any semblance of reality.

You should be offended as well.

The problem to my mind is not that I label what they are doing as AmeriKKKA; the problem is what the fascist thugs are doing.

Keep up the fight to oppose them.
Do not be fooled into fighting naming what they are doing.
Keep on fighting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. OK, then, how about calling it "PNAC's AmeriKKKa" instead?
then your intent would be more clear.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. WingNutz fantasy that we will prevail in Iraq and use it to be our base
from which to project PNAC's AmeriKKKan power.
Happ now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. That works for me. And it's the truth, it is.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. We're looking for an end to the war proper
I don't think most of us have dellusions that we'll be leaving entirely. Hell, we're still in Germany.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. "NEVER" is a long time in world affairs. The way they will probably come
home, barring some "Bush on the road to Damascus" experience, is that Congress eventually will refuse to continue passing the supplemental appropriations necessary to keep them in the field.

N.B. Congress finally used its "power of the purse" to bring about total disengagement from southeast Asia, albeit 20 years too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Sorry, but that "power of the purse" action didn't get the US out of
Viet Nam; 98% of our people were already home.

What it did was gut the ARVN, and give the NVA the South on a platter.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. You are technically correct, I suppose, but my readings in
the history of that time are that congressional threats to cut off appropriations accelerated Nixon's "Vietnamization" policy (itself morally questionable, btw). Unfortunately, I'm at work right now, so can't source that (and I may in fact be wrong -- if so, apologize in advance).

As for "handing the NVA the South on a platter," I think that is a highly dubious and questionable interpretation of what transpired. The fact is that Nixon in '72 settled in Paris for exactly the same terms he and Kissinger could have had in Jan. '69. Are you disputing the right of the Vietnamese to be unified under the leadership of the North?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. And let's stop pretending it's not about the oil...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. I find this funny, in a sick way
All these fairytales about troop withdrawals.
My son is a Marine who was in boot camp at Parris Island when we invaded Iraq. At that time, people told me, "Oh, good. He won't have to go. It will be over by the time he's out of infantry training."
Then, he finished infantry training and went to Okinawa. Again, I was told "he won't have to go to Iraq. It will be over."
Well, two tours in Iraq later, he'll be going back for a third tour in early 2007.
And I've been told repeatedly, before both tours (don't you love that word?) not to worry "because it's a lot better over there now."
People have no clue. They really don't.
And I'm always asked, "doesn't it frustrate him that the "good news" isn't reported more?"
No. He's frustrated by the reality of the bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hopefully my Son will come home in November
For how long? That is anyone's guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Never Say Never
Unless you intend on doing nothing to get them all back. That's a fact too... stiffling people from talking about it seems odd to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. The US military went to Iraq primarily to steal and control the oil.
They never intend to give that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hey when You're Right, You're Right!
What do the following have in common?

England
Germany
Okinawa
Japan
Spain
Italy
Cuba
South Korea
Kuwait
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Bahrain
Turkey

The US maintains bases in each of these nations. You can add Iraq. IT should be noted this is not a complete list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC