Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sad news about polar bears

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 07:32 PM
Original message
Sad news about polar bears
I mean, calling this sad is a major understatement. Sort of like saying that Jupiter is sort of big. Heart breaking.

ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea may be turning to cannibalism because longer seasons without ice keep them from getting to their natural food, a new study by American and Canadian scientists has found.

The study reviewed three examples of polar bears preying on each other from January to April 2004 north of Alaska and western Canada, including the first-ever reported killing of a female in a den shortly after it gave birth.

Polar bears feed primarily on ringed seals and use sea ice for feeding, mating and giving birth.

Polar bears kill each other for population regulation, dominance, and reproductive advantage, the study said. Killing for food seems to be less common, said the study's principal author, Steven Amstrup of the
U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center.

more: http://tinyurl.com/php4n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is horrible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like survival of the fittest.
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 07:43 PM by Rex
What's really sad is mass cannibalism pushes them into eventual extinction. :(

Actually this could force them to bread with southern grizzles; can you imagine a madcow type bear grizzly/polar hybrid? More like a monster than a bear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatwasthequestion Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Hybrids already happened
Thought you might like this. I remembered seeing it a couple of weeks ago...

Bear facts: DNA confirms polar-grizzly hybrid shot
TORONTO — A DNA test has confirmed what zoologists, hunters and aboriginal trackers in the far northern reaches of Canada have dreamed of for years: the first documented case of a grizzly-polar bear in the wild.
Roger Kuptana, an Inuit tracker from the Northwest Territories, suspected the American hunter he was guiding had shot a hybrid bear after noticing its white fur was spotted brown and it had the long claws and slightly humped back of a grizzly.
Territorial officials seized the bear's body and a DNA test from Wildlife Genetics International, a lab in British Columbia, confirmed the hybrid was born of a polar bear mother and grizzly father.

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/05-06/05-12-06/06world-nation.htm
Lots of other reports if searching Google news "polar grizzly hybrid".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. if the polar bear's father was an archie bunker type...
there could be an animated sitcom in it...

a DNA test from Wildlife Genetics International, a lab in British Columbia, confirmed the hybrid was born of a polar bear mother and grizzly father.

to paraphrase cleavon little: "...where the white bears at?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. This makes me sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is terrable...how long before a world food shortage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conflictgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I was wondering something similar
I wonder if what's happening to the polar bears is predicting our own future as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's exactly what it is...
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 08:26 PM by misanthrope
...These forewarnings have been occurring with greater frequency over the last half century.

My only advice would be to get used to it...along with the denials of the bigger picture from other homo sapiens. If you're lucky, you are over 50 years-old right now otherwise, you're going to see some really ugly stuff before you die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conflictgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Unfortunately I'm only 32
And I have young children. I worry about their future a lot. I try to cut the difference between preparing them for the fact that their future is going to look a lot different than the way things are now without scaring the crap out of them.

Pretty much all of my life, I have always known that my grandparents were the ones who had it comparatively easy. They're too young to remember the Great Depression, were raising their families during the post-WWII boom era, and have had a traditional retirement and good access to medical care. Between the economy, the environment, the finite nature of oil, etc. I have no illusions that my life will be anywhere near as comfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. My guess is with in 20 years.
I will see this happening before I departure from this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Within 20 years sounds about right to me
maybe even ten. Even the scientists I know who have been studying climate change for over 40 years are shocked by how swiftly the changes are coming now. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. I read somewhere that they are drowning, too.....
....due to increased open water....they can swim great distances, but not great enough, now, evidently - or maybe they are weakened by starvation, too...

I really hate reading this stuff...doubt very much either the tiger in the wild or the polar bear will make it even to mid-century, rate things are going, and who knows how many other creatures as we savage every landscape and sea on the face of the earth....

we all keep working and working and donating and writing and the world goes merrily on its way to hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. why are there no polar bears in antarctica?
something i've wondered about...i imagine it gets just too damn cold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Was that supposed to be sarcastic?
I was prepared to answer that question until I realized who it was posing the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. no...it was serious.
it seems that with the penguin colonies, there'd be plenty of prey...

i imagine a couple of things- although there was once one large land mass, things split apart early on, and while bears evolved in the northern climes, ultimately the climate and the isolation didn't provide for enough bioversity to evolve and sustain large animal populations.
like i said- ultimately it's just too fucking cold.

btw- they just found that huge impact crater in/near atarctica that may have resulted in a mass extinction and the break-up of pangea...i was also wondering- since the impact was supposedly at/toward the southern pole- would that also explain why most of the earth's land mass can be found in the northern hemisphere? because of the forces of that particular impact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Bears in general are a Northern Hemisphere "thing"
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 10:17 PM by theHandpuppet
Bears are found in the Northern Hemisphere because that's from whence they sprang, so to speak. The evolution of the modern bear is, in terms of the evolutionary timeline, rather recent and happened loooong after the breakup of the supercontinent, pangaea.

This is one of the best summaries of the evolution of the bear: http://www.geol.umd.edu/~candela/pbevol.html

Here is a timeleine map of continental drift: http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=&imgrefurl=http://geology.com/pangea.htm&h=686&w=550&sz=100&tbnid=n2ot6toZphLNiM:&tbnh=137&tbnw=109&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpangea&start=1&sa=X&oi=images&ct=image&cd=1

The issue of a (meteor) strike having anything to do with the breakup of pangaea is debatable, although I wish the area lent itself to a real scientific study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Because bears didn't evolve untill long after Anarctica became isolated...
Antarctica seperated from South America 40 million years ago, the first bears evolved from racoon-like ancestors 20 million years ago in Europe. Polar bears evolved from Alaskan brown bears around 2 million years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. and the reason that no bears evovled in the antarctic...
to feast upon the chewy chewy penguins... was ultimately due to isolation and FUCKING COLD not being able to support the type of plant/animal life needed to sustain the evolution of large animal populations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Or it simply could be something else
http://www.awi-bremerhaven.de/AWI/Presse/PM/pm05-2.hj/050915PolSerengeti-e.html

"In analogy to the large fish stocks in African lakes being dependent on hippos, large mammals may also control their environment in the coldest oceans on earth. It is already clear that the notion of short food chains with few organisms represents an oversimplified view of polar ecosystems. in the productivity of the Arctic and Antarctic is comparable to temperate oceans. However, large differences exist between the Arctic and Antarctic with regard to nutrient availability and key species in the food chain. In the Antarctic, availability of iron is the primary growth-limiting factor in the system."

As an aside, some of the largest mammals known find Antartica a virtual paradise. It's just that bears aren't one of those species. The ecosystems of the Artic and Antartica are quite different, despite the fact that they share a numbingly cold climate. Expecting them to share the same flora and fauna because they are both cold is like wondering why we don't find the same ecosystem in the Amazon as we do in the Sahara, or even the Sahara and Death Valley.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. while whales might find the waters around the antarctic paradise...
being creatures of the ocean, they wouldn't find the actual continent of antarctica too inviting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. And your point is?
Or was I just spinning my wheels trying to answer your questions in a rational manner?

I believe I explained why bears are not found outside the Northern Hemisphere and why the ecosystems of the opposite polar regions are quite different in the kind of life they can sustain. There are actually few large mammals in the northern polar regions inhabited by the Polar Bear, other than some species of seals and walruses. Large seal populations can also be found in the Antarctic as well, including elephant seals. But since there are no large bear species in the Southern Hemisphere, killer whales are the main predator of the seal population.

If you have another point please raise it in a forthcoming manner. Otherwise I consider this to be yet another instance of pointless, contentious posturing and will let you continue talking to yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. It makes me cry , every time I think about it
:cry: We people did that and continue to contribute
to climate change . Both my husband and myself have
a goal to go electric locally . We will have to keep
one gas burning vehicle for my husband's work but will
work toward bio- diesel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Bad news...
...Chances are the electricity you use comes from burning fossil fuels, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatwasthequestion Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Found two links that go in depth
into the discussion about polar bears. Opposing views, of
course...
This regarding the suit and reasoning behind...

Global warming has U.S. rethinking polar bear status
http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2006/02/08/polar-bears060208.html

...and this one with comments from one of the wildlife
managers...
Polar bear worries unproven, expert says
http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2006/05/15/polar-bears.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. The San Diego zoo has a wonderful polar bear exhibit---
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 08:44 PM by hlthe2b
I just got back from LA on business but stayed a day to drive down and visit my fav zoo. All, the while I was watching this incredibly active and playful enormous male play with his floatable plastic "ice berg"-- that he would drag into the water, toss about, and dive under--I was near tears thinking that soon we would be losing his relatives in the wild--and all because our political asshole "leadership" have CHOSEN to look the other way to line their own coffers. It is just heart breaking added to heart-breaking.

I guess I understand why so many people choose to remain ignorant (even though they must know on some level what is going on). All of us who have been glued to DU and the progressive blogs since January, 2001 are becoming overcome with the intense and very comprehensive knowledge of worldwide horror being committed in our names.


'Guess I better turn in early. I sound about ready to lose it and in truth, I probably am. :banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. It's not just our leaders...
...It's all of us contributing to this. We're all in it together.

And the evidence as to what is coming has been there long before 2001. Those of us who looked at the entirety of human history, our actions and courses, saw this on the horizon decades past. In utmost honesty, the seeds for it were planted millenia ago.

While politics are a portion of the scenario, they're nowhere nearly as integral as plain old human behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. this is so sad, man is screwing up everything.
the Kyoto Protocol means nothing to these thugs who abuse power. they will burn in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Comadreja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Each generation just builds upon the mistakes of the last
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 11:19 PM by Comadreja
We've been approaching planetary ruin ever since the first immigrants began chopping down the original forests. Of course, the Industrial revolution picked up the pace, but everyone thought it was a good thing at the time. We are already paying for our parent's excesses. Each generation will pay a higher price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. but from the perspective of a seal...
it could be worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. The one Polar Bear that's left
Is going to be one mean SOB.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. The question is what does he eat
after he runs out of Polar Bears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC