Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'The age of the Empty Stare: Why ignoring Ann Coulter won't help'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:37 PM
Original message
'The age of the Empty Stare: Why ignoring Ann Coulter won't help'
by Pamela Troy
http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/s9/index.php?%2Farchives%2F782-The-Age-of-the-Empty-Stare.html



“And, of course, there were the inevitable wishful calls to "Just Ignore Her and She'll Go Away." I recall hearing the same thing from liberals about Falwell back in the '70s and Rush Limbaugh back in the '80s.

Anyone who assumes that this is about nothing more than publicity for her book, or that the mainstream right has now hit its own moral nadir and will now drive her away with righteous outrage, or that if all of us liberals just pay no attention, everyone else will get embarrassed and stop listening to and reading Ann Coulter, is failing to grasp an important point. It's not just about publicity. It's not just about making liberals angry. And as far as mainstream conservatism is concerned, it's certainly not in any way shape or form about Coulter's affront to basic humanity.

It's about multiplying those empty stares. It s about taking American discourse into an even lower level, one in which both common sense, common decency and even the basic verities of how language works are deliberately discarded, allowing the likes of Mary Matalin and Lou Dobbs, and Sean Hannity and, a few weeks down the road, Tucker Carlson (trust me, he'll get over it), to defend the indefensible.

Over the past twenty years it has become sadly obvious that many people are not used to connecting belief with logic or morality with human consequences. When they hear a statement they don't examine it to see whether or not it is actually true, just, and humane. They measure, instead, how often they have encountered it on TV, in print, or on the radio."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. This was one of the best things I have seen here on DU.
She originally posted it here a few days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ok..... I did not see it here
There have been so many "just ignore her" posts,

I thought people might see why that won't work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It is worth the re-post. k&r nt
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 10:06 PM by TomInTib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Please at least always prefix "Republican" to her name, if you cannot ..
.. resist mentioning her; that way, all the free publicity you give her might have the effect of more closely identifying Republicans with their hateful icons

I don't know why anybody would take her seriously, when (for example) we have real issues like Iraq, Katrina, government spying, election fraud, and so on that need public attention -- especially since every time WE take her seriously we send a message to the public that SHE deserves to be taken seriously, which results in more media coverage of HER, instead of coverage of the important issues.

But if you cannot help taking her seriously, then try to think strategically about how you mention her: ask, for example, why David Brooks -- who has gone on and on about how "hateful" the Democrats are -- doesn't denounce that woman's hate speech? Such an approach has the advantage of putting Republicans on the defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. k and r
for the Ambien Nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did Lou Dobbs defend Coulter? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He was way too charming to her
He told her she was a good writer.

I was yelling at the tv....she's a damn plagerist...you fool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ask yourself this question
Would you be happier if Coulter was on our side?

I say ignore her. She is a Fred Phelps of politics. She's mean, not funny, not serious, and there is no truth to what she says. After 5 minutes, she runs out of material. I doubt anybody has become a conservative because of Ann's 'reasoned' arguments.

Wingnuts like Limbaugh, doctor Laura and Pat Robertson are another matter. They make serious, but flawed, arguments for conservatism. They use phony statistics, circular reasoning, strawman arguments and NEVER debate anybody without their finger on the 'kill' button.

I'd say forget about Coulter. Limbaugh, Robertson, Hannity etc. are the one who need to be confronted and exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Limbaugh, Hannity, et al are cut from the same cloth
They all lie, misrepresent, distort. Ignore them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. She was seen as a mercenary mean spirited witch on CNN
tonight, Larry King. Even the 9/11 widows and widower who were not part of the Jersey Girls saw her that way.

David Horowitz, in trying to defend her, appeared bumbling.

What can you say about a classless confused mercenary?
She is darn good about milking the uninformed right wing neocons.
Got to give her credit for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. yeh let's give her credit for milking the hateful retards...
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 10:42 PM by Ragazz68
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. People should be disgusted with her.
It's natural and appropriate to react with shock to this hateful republican. People should be talking about those horrible, vile, things she says. We, as a society should decry her, until it becomes embarrassingly clear to Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, etc, that most Americans think she is a nasty bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. IMO we should not ignore
Coulter or Hannity or Rush, Matalin or let any of the rest of them get away with it. I think we should put them down and disparage them every bit as much as they do us. "Expose them and confront them" as someone said above. That doesn't have to be done angrily--just consistently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. This deserves another kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC