Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Wilson and Larry Johnson both think Rove has flipped.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:16 PM
Original message
Joe Wilson and Larry Johnson both think Rove has flipped.
Hey Bob, Where’s Your Letter?
By Jane Hamsher @ 2:24 pm


I have to say I don’t know what all the fuss is about.

When I first heard that Rove got a letter saying that Fitzgerald did not intend to bring charges against him, I immediately thought — as emptywheel did — of a conversation we had between the Plame panelists last Thursday. Emptywheel took a poll of those who thought Rove had flipped and both Joe Wilson and Larry Johnson raised their hands. Christy acknowledged that it was awfully weird for someone to testify before a grand jury five times and NOT be cooperating in some fashion with the prosecution. Today emptywheel offers this account:

http://firedoglake.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. From your keyboard to Dog's ears! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick - always a good read @ firedoglake EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. And as long as he cooperates he need not 'anticipate being indicted'
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 05:18 PM by cryingshame
But what would these guys know anyway.

Let's follow Corn's lead and blame the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I posted that pic in an earlier thread.
Rove is so much thinner now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsIt1984Yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. So someone on the internet is claiming that someone else told them
that they saw Joe and Larry "raise their hands"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
IsIt1984Yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I can read just fine. If you go through the links it says:
"...asked who thought Karl Rove was cooperating with the investigation. Two and two halves of us raised our hands.

OK, first, cooperation and "flipping" are entirely different concepts.

Secondly, I am not a "troll", I just don't agree with these theories. That does not make me less of a Democrat. That's very judgemental.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Flipped on who?
And why?

Wilson keeps pushing this "Rove will flip" idea like we are talking about the Castellano murder trial.

Why would Rove flip? He's facing indictment under an impossible statute. Even if convicted, he's almost certainly not going to jail. And if he does, he is a hero for the Right-wing for the rest of his life. G Gordon Liddy is a millionaire today because he never said a word. And he did real time.

Meanwhile, Rove testifies against Cheney, brings down the administration, and is a pariah for the rest of his life.

No one has ever explained this to me in a way that makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Perjury, obstruction, lying to investigators,
those are impossible statutes to prosecute? Libby is looking at 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AussieDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Good point, but compare Rove to Liddy
Liddy is someone who could DO time - he's gung-ho and perfectly able to look after himself.

Then there's KKarl - can you imagine him in prison?? With the threat hanging over his head that he wouldn't do time in a Club Fed but somewhere a little more harsh?? He's a tough political operator but in the slammer he'd be bending over grabbing his ankles on his first night.

Previously I would have found it difficult to believe a Bush capo like Rove would flip, but now I'm not so sure.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. You assume
He wouldn't like bending over and holding his ankles. If his gay lover releases the pictures things could change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Not to mention that offer Cheney makes him that he can't refuse.
Leave the gun. Take the cannolis.
Wake up and smell the buckshot, Rove.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AussieDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. OK - who the hell left this f**king horse's head in my bed ???
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Or the elephant in your pajamas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AussieDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. STOP IT !!
Now I have to clean my keyboard AGAIN !!!!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Larry's been quiet today...wonder what he thinks...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Maybe he'll post his thoughts DU tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsIt1984Yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. And until then, I think we should hold off on announcing what he and Joe
think about anything. Neither has many any such statement. If you read through the links, you are reading an account of someone who heard from someone else that they say they saw Joe and Larry raise their hands when asked who thought Rove was cooperating.

I would prefer to hear a statement from either to that effect before I claim it as truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. I don't know if it is true or not but weren't both JW & LJ on the stage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsIt1984Yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Even so, the claim is that they believed he was cooperating. That's
a far cry from "flipped".

Wilson made a public statement today, and this was not mentioned. I just am bothered by the idea of claiming to know what people are thinking; especially based on as little as this.

I would love for either or both to discuss this matter in greater depth; but until they do, I find it a bit presumptuous to draw such conclusions on their feelings in the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. The thing I remember about Wilson
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 05:26 PM by joeunderdog
was his conviction when this story broke--it was when Bush had the whole world by the balls--when they asked if the people who did this will be prosecuted. He said without hesitation, "yes." It was stunning to see someone from the inside believe that BushCo wouldn't be able to get around this.

Now we see that Rove (is HE "Person A"?) is not gonna get slammed. But the investigation is not over as far as we know. Well, then...who really is "person A"? If KKKarl is off the hook, it's because he either can't be prosecuted by a skilled prosecuter who has a few birds singing already or because KKKarl is not the primary leak and has only reported about who is. And that person would likely have to be above KKKarl.

Why is the GJ still convening if all the ducks who are going to fall have fallen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. he may or may not get slammed... but will he have to testify?
And will he hold to his previous testimony during Libby trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. I remind that this grand jury is hearing other cases too.
The GJ will convene even if it has nothing else to hear regarding Rove or any other matter from Fitzgerald.

As for the rest, even if there was a deal - which I regard as a huge reach, no offense to Joe Wilson, he's entitled to his opinion just like I'm entitled to mine - we can't possibly know a thing about it. We look to Fitzgerald for hope in vain. Even if some exists, he can't be a professional and respect the GJ process and let us know it exists. Time to bury this and move on. And if we're pleasantly surprised later, great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. That thread at firedoglake was excellent reading and far above the crap
that has flown around here on DU today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. A good read, and food for thought
Since I said more than once that this investigation is far from over I am assuming my crap is excluded from your wrath. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I think it best to start hiding even more of these threads. Yes?
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 05:49 PM by cryingshame
enough is enough is enough.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I'm not one for hiding threads
The obvious flame-starters are easy enough to spot and ignore, but even at this late date I still glean info from most of the others. Some I refute when I can, others I research, and some I agree with.

It's important, to me at least, to try and get a majority of this community to start looking critically and objectively at things that are presented to them, and not just put them in the "worthy" column because they happen to agree with a desired result.

That is/was the thing that profoundly bothered me with a lot of the "believer" arguments, and still does to this day.

If we purport ourselves to be a reality-based community, we must behave as such, and that means calling ourselves out when we do wrong.

The game of golf is the only game I know that polices itself, i.e. when someone breaks the rules or attempts to cheat other players will "alert" on him/her. It keeps (or attempts to keep) the game above reproach.

That is not a bad rule to follow, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. please, God let Jane Hamsher be right...
'cheneymas' may be a comin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. I heart FDL!
"It’s become ever more apparent as time goes on and Fitzgerald releases bits of information in his filings that this was a Dick Cheney operation. Rove may have gotten involved because smearing people is his idea of a good time, but the Cheney scrawlings on Joe Wilson’s op-ed are the "blue dress" of this case. Look at Conrad Black. Look at George Ryan. I’m sorry, but Fitzgerald had Rove dead to rights if he wanted him, and anyone who thinks he got nothing for something has been following the story of a different prosecutor than I have been."

-- Jane Hamsher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. It has been obvious from the start of this that
Cheney was behind the outing of V. Wilson and Brewster Jennings. The problem is legaly pinning this on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Well, if,
like it said somewhere in there, during Rove's fifth time Fitz got what he wanted signed, sealed and delivered, no need to indict. In effect, if Rove said, "Cheney made me do it.", they go for Cheney on possible perjury depending on his testimony to Fitz way back in the day -- et voila! If Rover lied to Fitz: Perjury, OOJ, all the stuff he's already got on him and more.

That also squares with the "no deals were made" statement from Luskin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. Rove Flipped! Bet On It!
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 06:07 PM by Vinnie From Indy
I have thought all along that the Plame operation originated with Cheney. Rove was most likely brought in to assist without knowing of her undercover status. In short, when the story broke Rove realized pretty quickly that he was in danger and he was probably furious that Cheney did not tell him the whole story about Plame. Rove probably made it clear he would try to navigate the minefield without compromising Cheney, but he would not fall on a grenade for him and take the wrap.

I believe that Cheney will resign and be pardoned as Smirky leaves office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I'm not getting my hopes up again...these criminals are...
completely above the law. They are untouchable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitter Cup Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. They have made themselves the law
and I don't see them paying for any crimes. Any time one of them appears to go down I suspect it was because they pissed off someone on the inside and they're being hung out to dry deliberately. We are in a state of absolute governmental corruption. It happens to every society...and for some reason it gets accepted 99/100 times. I won't bet but I do hope that this is that 1 out of 100 times when the peasants have enough.

But I suspect BK Delux Burgers, cheap DVDs and lots of FAUX news can keep them down on the farm for a good long while yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
34. Who is that creepy guy in the picture with Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney
And he's a good liberal lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. a good liberal lawyer wouldn't be defending Karl Rove
no matter how much cash Karl paid. You gotta draw the line somewhere, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. No
Defense attorneys don't choose their clients.

You could just as easily say that the ACLU should not defend the Klan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. Thank you, hang a left! This makes me feel better about
pig boy getting away with this!

Your paragraph:

Christy acknowledged that it was awfully weird for someone to testify before a grand jury five times and NOT be cooperating in some fashion with the prosecution. Makes perfect sense.


:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
37. Velly intellesting.
It was almost without doubt that Rove had been pegged. How could Wilson be sure enough to talk about a lawsuit, if he didn't have something incriminating?

I have opted for the wait and see attitude all along on this. I never expected quick results.

The plot thickens, and it's so intriguing. Too bad it's such a nightmare, or it might be fun.



So Rove will still get his day in court. But meanwhile, Dick! Pat is coming for you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
38. This Place Is Amazing
I bet you guys would be dancing to the music in the ballroom while the Titanic was going down. What a bunch of cheerleading.

We're all dreaming. We lost. AGAIN! Accept it. Get used to it. It's what the liberals do best.

It is getting so that you can set your watch by it. Next stop, November. I'll bet many of you still think the dems are going to take control of at least one, and possibly both houses of congress. If you do, I've got a bridge to sell you, very cheap. This is a repub country now. It does not even so much matter whether the people are democrats, it is not a country of the people anymore. And most people don't really care anyways, so long as they have their SUV's and flat screen tv's.

King george and the congress could drop to 10% ratings, and they would still maintain control. That's what is not being understood here. They are in power, and will not give it up. And along the way, they will break laws, and change things to suit themselves and their friends. And if you want to continue hoping for the best, well that's fine, but it's truly a waste of your positive energy, and will result in getting more depressed when things don't work out.

I cannot tell you how much today's developments sicken me. Again I feel like I've been kicked hard, and the kicker is walking away with a smile on their face, about to kick another friend of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. No need for illusions if the audience is blind...
Maybe this never was a nation "of the people," but the illusion was necessary when more people could see.

My faith is that the manufactured reality of those holding power cannot long keep pace with natural reality. Turning back the odometer on a car does not make the car last longer. As hard as those holding power might try, this economy they depend upon cannot be maintained by illusion. When this economy fails, We the People will have renewed opportunity to form a republic that represents us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. Then you had better take that feeling and turn it into anger at the kicker
rather than depression. This fight is very far from being over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
39. it makes sense to me
"Shooter" has become more and more a liability. Now if they would only wise up and get rid of Rummy. But I think * is too enamored of Rummy's fairy tales about the future of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
40. K&R
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Flipped what, his lid? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
44. Rove is a traitor to everyone but himself. I hope the pugs know that
he turned on Libby and probably Cheney to save his own sorry ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
45. Kick - this is important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. False, wishful thinking but important
Karl Rove did not "flip." He is not Sammy the Bull and Cheney is not John Gotti.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsIt1984Yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. In addition, the thread title is TOTALLY misleading.
Nowhere, I mean, NOWHERE does either Joe Wilson or Larry Johnson make the statement that they think Rove flipped.

And it bothers me that some think it's OK to speculate that is how THEY feel.

But, whatever makes you FEEL better is OK to pass along as truth, it seems. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC