Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

((At last! Effective strategy on how Democrats can REALLY win! I love it!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:17 PM
Original message
((At last! Effective strategy on how Democrats can REALLY win! I love it!)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kathleen-reardon/countering-terms-of-ensme_b_23031.html


Countering Terms of Ensmearment


Most current Republican strategists are masters of ensmearment. They've effectively connected the concept of pro-choice with PRO-abortion, suggesting a cavalier Democratic advocacy for the termination of "life in the womb." They've coupled consideration on key issues with indecisiveness, the impending disaster of global warming with "tree-hugging," reconsiderations of a "yes" vote on the war (now using actual facts) with flip-flopping, arguing for defense of the country against the real rather than preferred enemy with cowardice and undermining the troops, sensitivity to people in need with being a wimp or having a victim obsession, and criticism of the Iraq war with an overemphasis on the negative.

So what are the options? Specialization is one important tactic. Democrats and their supporters need to become strategy specialists. They need to stop letting the first Democrat who leaves his or her office on a given day be the one who meets the press. They should be prepared with their own specialty or say nothing. Here are three of a host of potential specialties:

Debate needs to be put on the backburner for a while. Unfortunately ours is not an era of debate in government and few Democrats or Republicans do this well anyway. To rely on debate at the moment is like a swim coach sending the proficient butterfly stroke guy into a pool to win a breaststroke race. He's going to lose. Better to find among Democrats and their blogger supporters the best debaters and have them ready for opportunities, but don't make this the only form of response.

Retaliation in kind to terms of ensmearment is an option. But the opposition is better at this particular strategy. Nevertheless, a few associations of the non-gutter variety wouldn't hurt. As I mentioned in my prior blog, "giving them the rope to hang themselves" is often a useful strategy with the arrogant and vile -- a kind of gentle nudging toward the farthest reaches of their own hateful pathology. I'm not talking about all Republican leaders here or even most. Strategy needs to be targeted. And if members of the Republican leadership are reasonable and averse to low tactics, then treating them with respect is the best policy. We're talking here about multi-faceted strategy. For others, however, associations of callousness, dishonesty, desperation tactics of the most distasteful order, dragging the country in the mud, polarizing, alienating the country from the world and rewarding the obscenely rich again and again while rounding up "illegals" they let in to get richer are a few options. Short phrases capturing these would be best. Some Senators and Congressional Reps need to specialize in this strategic option along with some bloggers ready for the task -- ones capable of sparring on the edge without, figuratively speaking, drawing blood.

Disassembling of ensmearments holds considerable promise, but it takes cleverness. Those who specialize in this tactic would be ready to substitute constructive for derogatory descriptors -- immediately. The example I use when training or teaching is one of referring to a job applicant as "stubborn" in a recommendation letter. The person wouldn't get the job. But one person's "stubborn" is another's "determined," "persistent," or "resolute." One person's Commander-in-Chief bashing is another's "patriotic duty." You get the picture. It's strategic reframing. It isn't just wordplay, but rather management of significant perceptions. The Democrats need a TOE (Terms of Ensmearment) Squad devoted to the immediate decoupling of insults conjoined to disparage their party. They need to select these people today and crush this underhanded campaign like a house of cards.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
Edited on Thu Jun-15-06 04:09 PM by rocknation
:woohoo:

If I've said this once, I've said it a thousand times: Rethuglicans are nothing but animals and bullies, and the only thing that scares them are--well, animals and bullies!

C&L: Gary Hart refuses to put up with Hannity's punk-ass CRAP

Mr. Galloway goes to Washington

A special edition of the Colbert Report

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They Only Thing That Scares Them Is PRISON. WITHOUT A PARDON
This prison:



The International Criminal Court

does not do pardons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOVE it! (two very enthusiastic SNAPS!)
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for posting something positive to read.
I was beginning to wonder if I should log out of DU today.

Great article. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. There are two ways to counter a smear.
The first is head on: sue the bastards for libel or slander. No, the point isn't winning. The points are tying up their financial resources fighting the suit while gaining subpoena power to trace their dirty money.

The second is in your face: "You mean somebody is saying that about me? Well, I guess there are REAL SUCKERS out there who will believe anything that other party says"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. If you cannot beat them in criminal court, tie them up in civil court!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. No kidding
and I wonder just what it's going to take people who have been Rushed, Swift Boated and Coultered to take that stand and do it.

It's the only way to make them stop in the absence of fair media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes!! We can no longer afford to be "above the battle".
Edited on Thu Jun-15-06 03:28 PM by BrklynLiberal
Paul Hackett was espousing this point of view this AM on AAR.


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. This must seap into election justice world: Can't be above the battle
We can no longer afford to be "above the battle" - before, during, or after the election.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Label Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is GREAT
Something to nail the lid on the cons coffin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. This should be MANDATORY reading for ALL democratic leaders and voters!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. they also need to buy up all the mass media oulets in the country-
if they want to get their message out...

that's how the repukes did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. The death of The Fairness Doctrine is what finally did it.
Being able to say whatever you want with no one countering you is what makes owning a media outlet so attractive to right-wing corporatist criminals, and to the ideological and religious extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm a convert to "retaliation in kind."
They don't understand anything else, and they don't have the attention span to endure "disassembling of ensmearments."

True, re putting debate on the backburner. It's pointless. You wouldn't try to "reason" a rabid animal out of biting you -- and trying to debate a Wrong-Winger (even a "reasonable" one) on a level playing field results in the same outcome.

If there's one problem with Democrats, it's that we give the Wrong Wing too much credit for thinking. They do not think; they react, on some primordial, visceral level (which may be another reason they can't grasp evolution -- they haven't experienced it yet).

A large part of the Left's failure involves holding the Right up to the same standards of introspection and debate to which we hold ourselves. You may as well try to teach a pig to sing.

The HuffPo author is well-meaning, but misguided; she writes about "responding to an attack with a reply about feelings"? That's nice, and effective if you're dealing with reasonable people. But we are not dealing with reasonable people, and the old "When you do ABC, I feel XYZ" fair-fighting tactic (ever so popular in marriage counseling) only satisfies the Rabid Right; to them, that shows weakness. Making you feel means that they have won.

To use a deliberate mix of metaphors, I say: Stop casting pearls before swine, and start fighting fire with fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Let me be the first to nominate Kerry's spokesman to TOE the line.
David Wade is the exact kind of responder she's talking about:

The move comes one day after Rove called plans to exit Iraq proposed by Senator Kerry and Representative John Murtha (D-PA) "profoundly wrong" "cut and run" strategies. "They may be with you for the first few bullets," Rove said, "but they won't be there for the last tough battles."

Both Kerry and Murtha are decorated service veterans.

"The closest Karl Rove ever came to combat," said Kerry spokesman David Wade, "was these last months spent worrying his cellmates might rough him up in prison. This porcine political operative can't cut and run from the truth any longer."

Wade continued: "When it came to Iraq, this Administration chose to cut and run from sound intelligence and good diplomacy, cut and run from the best military advice, cut and run from their responsibility to give our troops body armor, and in November Americans will cut and run from this Republican Congress."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. You'd think women would get abusive assholes
Obviously we haven't retained anything we've learned about them in the last 20 years. You do not get in knock-down drag-out blood baths with these pricks. You pick yourself up and walk away and let him dissolve in his own pile of shit. When he breaks the law, you have him arrested. When his shit stops working, he changes or is shunned by society. There is simply no other long term strategy that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. Terms of Ensmearment
I like that phrase... That sums up the Republicans so well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. If the strategy doesn't include demanding impeachment, it's a loser.
It is fear of smear that has silenced the Democrats on Impeachment.

Until they get over it, go after Bush for nuking the Constitution and demand Impeachment they will continue to sound like mealy-mouthed morons and will fail to engage Americans across the political spectrum who are desperate for REAL strong and decisive leadership.

To "criticize" Bush for destroying every constitutional principle we hold dear and turning America into the nation of torture and criminal war, but remain silent on Impeachment, is nothing more than whining.

They can keep whining or do something. Duty or complicity.

It's pretty friggin' simple.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC