Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shocker: Evidence of G-RATED Olbermann Replies to Anti-Semitic E-Mailers!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:45 PM
Original message
Shocker: Evidence of G-RATED Olbermann Replies to Anti-Semitic E-Mailers!
I just found something I thought might prove an interesting contrast to the picture that Keith Olbermann's American freeper enemies are currently trying to paint of him as a foul-mouthed bastard who routinely uses his MSNBC e-mail account to spout obscenities at everyone and anyone on the planet who disagrees with him about anything.

This material was posted on a message board called War Without End, run by a group of British anti-Semitics who learned that KO has no intention of addressing the recent Mearsheimer/Walt paper on the so-called "pro-Israel lobby" on his show, and thus have taken him to task repeatedly in e-mail for it.

On their board, a poster known as "Alpha" has posted a series of supposed e-mails between Olbermann and a James Morris. In these e-mails, Olbermann states simply, succinctly and clearly (and repeatedly) why he sees no reason to address the paper or its claims on Countdown, despite the arguments pressed on him by Morris for doing so.

At one point, he is quoted as saying:

please keep your prejudice to yourself -- don't write to me again.

(A far cry from "Go f- your mother," eh?)

Here, he is deliberately baited--told that obviously, as an MSNBC employee, he's just a tool of the GE war machine and thus a neocon, a supporter of the Iraq war, and helping to cover up the secret plan to make Iran the next country the US attacks "for Israel." Also, that he "wouldn't dare" tell the truth about how 9/11 is all Israel's fault. Etc., etc., etc.

Olbermann's replies, however, remain calm and considered throughout this exchange. At only one point does he even indulge in what could legitimately be called "snark."

And, oh, "Alpha" begins this post by questioning parenthetically whether the reason Olbermann fails to see the paper as anything of importance is "because he is Jewish as well?" BZZZZT! Nice try, thanks for playing. Olbermann has stated on air that he was raised in the Unitarian faith. Which is as much as he's ever said publicly about belonging to any organized religion. But heck, if you're an anti-Semite and you don't at least TRY to accuse a man with a German surname of disagreeing with you merely because he's Jewish, I guess you're just not trying very hard, right? :sarcasm:

Read for yourself:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=54300

And when you do, remember who posted this: anti-Semites who hate Olbermann because he refuses to play their game. But even they don't present the picture of a man who, when repeatedly pestered in his e-mail by those who disagree with him, can't respond without bursting into a flurry of obscenities. They have every motivation for making his replies look as rude, crude and obscene as possible. Yet...they don't.

Please don't tell me that anti-Semites in Britain play fairer than our homegrown American freepers when one of our cable news personalities fails to push their agenda? That's just too scary a thought for me to process just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. What kind of blog is that?
No one else is commenting save for this one weirdo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not much of one, obviously.
He's talking to himself, the sound of one hand clapping...or, well, doing something.

Much like many of the freeper bloggers on the other side of the pond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Looking at the top level forum page, it's a 'read only blog'
of which they have 4 or 5 - postable only by one member. Some look pro-Israel, some anti. Perhaps it's their solution for how to calm down Israel/Palestine debate - give the truly committed somewhere to post their stuff without it being interrupted by refutations, attacks etc. It says comments should go in the main forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. In other words, keep the children in separate playpens?
All I know is, this child may be alone in his playpen, but he has buds who have posted on their own blogs about how KO's responses to these e-mails prove that he is just a part of the Eevul Pro-Israel Media. So he's not entirely alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a HUGE non issue.
Everyone and their momma knows Olbermann is taking the heat for his "underlings".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, I don't believe that he's "taking the heat for his 'underlings.'"
But I do agree that this is a huge non-issue, and am perfectly willing to wait to see what he has to say about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for representin', Berry.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. What? No "go kill yourself" in there?
Thanks, Berry, for the digging. I think (hope) that we'll get some kind of explanation tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC