Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Hawaiian Preserve: Easy Election Year Environmentalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 08:29 PM
Original message
Bush's Hawaiian Preserve: Easy Election Year Environmentalism
On June 15th President Bush turned a large portion of Hawaiian ocean into a national monument. Environmental groups, half shocked half delighted, cautiously praised the action.

Why did the Bush Administration do this? The answer is 1) it is an election year, and 2) it was easy.

The industrial opposition to the preserve was very small. No major industries are seeking oil drilling or other commerce there. Only 8 commercial fishing boats had authority to fish there. This was a good thing to do and the President gets the credit but environmental protection is important when it is difficult as well (i.e. ANWR and Global Warming).

This will no doubt be used to distract voters from the generally dismal Bush/GOP environmental record. Do not allow it. There is no oil in the ocean surrounding Hawaii and this only occurred because it is an election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. If anyone has ever heard of oil being in this area let me know...
but I have never heard that and can not find a mention of it any where...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Most of the reefs will likely be dead in 20 years or less anyway
Cheap-ass environmentalism from a president who couldn't give a tin shit about the environment.

It's a perfect setup - hardly any land worth developing - hell, hardly any land at all, so it's not like he's restricting pipelines or mining or logging on the borders of Yellowstone or Glacier.

Nobody will lose their fishing licenses except for a few small operators, so no sweat there. And the location is so remote that perhaps a few thousand people will actually see and visit and dive the islands before the reefs turn into a boneyard.

It's a great concept, but a decision made at next to no political cost and with no committment to the root causes that are going to take this ecosystem down.

Republican "environmentalism" at its finest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Precisely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush may have done it to help out Democrat Rep. Ed Case who introduced
a similar bill to congress.

Oh, by the way Case, (a Lieberman supporter in the 2004 Dem primaries)is challenging Sen.Dan Akaka for his senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Did not know that... the plot thickens....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder how the protections will be enforced in open water...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Actually...he did it because
he saw it in a movie. Sad isn't it? He got a chance to see a movie by the son of Jacques Cousteau (Jacque's son was there with scrub). After the movie was over scrub decided something had to be done.
I saw the story on HuffPo, I think,
Anyway...it's kind of sad that scrubbie needs to see a movie to get him to movie into action. I guess that's why he wants to go to Mars...he saw Independence Day and wants to be ready...or he saw Jurassic Park and figures that's the only way to be safe from the dinosaurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC