Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Folly of War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 04:55 AM
Original message
The Folly of War
I ran across this NYT article yesterday, and have been thinking about it ever since:

U.S. Competes With China for Vietnam's Allegiance

HANOI, Vietnam — With the fastest growth in East Asia after China and a capitalist game plan that is attracting global investment, Communist Vietnam is emerging as a regional economic power as it moves steadily from rice fields to factories.

And with the wounds of war all but healed, Washington is paying attention.

Trade talks between House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, Republican of Illinois, and his Vietnamese counterpart turned into a lovefest here recently, choreographed by the hosts to show their affection for America.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/19/world/asia/19vietnam.html?ex=1150862400&en=108daff17f7a5c1b&ei=5087%0A


Whatever happened to the domino theory? Why are the Communist Vietnamese no longer an evil threat to the US? What has changed about them in this respect since the end of the war? Whatever it was we were trying to 'save' the South Vietnamese from, it is obvious that they've done just fine without us.

Just three decades later, many things have changed. But some things are the same: Many vets experinced lasting emotional changes. Arms and legs were lost, and they are still gone. Of the 58,226 brave US soldiers who died, all are still dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. No longer evil because...
Edited on Tue Jun-20-06 05:32 AM by neoblues
Our "leaders" have made alternative arrangements for providing the excuse/convincing the people that we need to spend Trillions to feed our national military-industrial complex.



Our military spending is six times greater than that of the next biggest spender (China), and we account for 47% (nearly half) of the entire global expenditure on military "defense". This year alone, every household in the United States spent $20,000.00 dollars on our military--and yes, we had to borrow to do it. One day in the future, we will have seen "an epic increase in taxes" to make up for our mounting debt. Even if taxes are restored to a fair rate for the wealthy at that time, it will still be a disproportionately heavy burden on the average citizen.

What would you do with that $20K?

Anyway, the point was--Vietnam and 'the Communists' are no longer needed to keep Americans scared into spending this way; we now have the everpresent threat of "Terrorism" (which, owing to Bush's policies and actions, has been stimulated and given all possible assistence to ensure it's continued growth while, obviously, no real effort has been made to reduce the threat). Amazing... and we fall for it every time.

Caveat: I just realized the $20K was the amount for FY 2003--it's probably worse this year

Edit: added Caveat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wow, that $20K figure hits home pretty well.
And that's $20K every year! It's a lot easier to relate to than half a trillion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC