|
Edited on Tue Jun-20-06 10:26 AM by TwoSparkles
As usual, the Republicans have crafted a smarmy slogan. Anyone who is against this lie-based, ill-planned, colossal disaster in Iraq is someone who wants to "cut and run."
Excuse me. We've been in Iraq since March 03--that's more than three years.
Adopting a new strategy--after you've failed disastrously for three years--can hardly meet the definition of "cut and run."
Three years of excuses. Three years of watching the bloody faces of innocent Iraqi civilians pop up on my computer screen. Three years that took the lives of 2,500 American soldiers. Three years in which American tax payers watched 300 billion dollars squandered down a rat hole.
Three solid years of outlandish lies: Three years of being told, "Mission Accomplished", "We're turning a corner in Iraq", "We're making progress", "It's hard work", "The insurgency is in its last throes", "The insurgency is just a few 'dead enders,'" "Things will improve after Bremer hands over the keys to Iraq," "Things will improve after the Iraqi elections," "Things will improve after the Iraqis craft a Constitution," "Things will improve after the Iraqis elect a new parliment..."
Three years of tolerating this evil, sick, murderous, discombobulated drain on our country's psyche, on our soldiers and on our Federal budget.
THREE YEARS. "Cut and Run." I don't think so.
We tried it your way, George. Not only were you wrong about the "mushroom clouds" and the "mobile weapons labs" and the "yellow cake" and the "weapons of mass destruction that were in Baghdad in the north, east south and west"...you were wrong about everything else.
"Cut and Run" is absurd and grossly inaccurate.
The real slogan for the Iraq war, should be, "We stay, we pay."
We'll pay in billions more dollars and thousands more lives---and so will the Iraqi people who risk death walking to the market. We're sick of paying--in so many tragic ways--for this failure.
Ending a disastrous foreign policy that worsens by the hour--after three years--is not "cutting and running." Not even close.
|