1) The comparison is flawed. They are comparing US combat deaths to homicides n a major city. First, this leaves out the total number of homicides in a comparable Iraqi city (why should the comparison be limited to US troops)? Second, it distorts the role and qualities of the US force vis-a-vis the Iraqi population. The correct comparison would be # of US troops killed in Iraq to # of policemen killed in California, since this comparison takes in the whole population (Iraq has about 20 million people, like California), the comparison set specifically (140,000 troops to about 180,000 peace officers in California), and the role of the specific comparison set (it being assumed that it's easier to kill an ordinary civilian than it is an armed and trained officer/soldier who has a communication infrastructure). So, were 39 police officers killed in California in January? Hardly. No. If you take the years 2004-2006 inclusive, 25 peace officers have been killed in the line of duty in California. That's the comparison.
http://www.camemorial.org/2001.htm. One could go a step further and look at the whole population. Best estimates are that 780 Iraqi civilians and security forces were killed in the month of January. Were 780 people killed in the state of California in the month of January? If so, the emailer would have a point. Needless to say, this isn't the case.
2a) FDR asked Congress to declare war on the Empire of Japan after we were attacked
2b) We declared war on Germany
after Germany declared war on us. The sequence was as follows: 1) We are attacked by Japan; 2) We declare war on Japan; 3) Japan calls in its treaty obligations with Germany, so Germany declares war on the US; 4) The US declares war on Germany. Now, even being so wrong, they still make a severe mistake, since germany had been attacking US merchant marine vessels in the Atlantic for at least two years by the time we declared war on Germany, so whoever wrote the email is even more wrong than can be.
http://www.usmm.org/casualty.html2c) We entered the Korean war under UN mandate. North Korea, moreover, unlike Iraq,
did, in fact invade a sovereign nation to begin the war, which is why the UN saw fit to get involved. Have the emailer send you the name of the sovereign nation that the Iraqis attacked to begin this war, and have them show you the UN mandate for this war.
2d) It is true that Vietnbam never attacked thge United States, and there should have been no war in Vietnam, at least not for us. The emailer, however, gets the dates wrong. We were assisting ther French during their colonial war in Vietnam, and were actively involved in the sham that was the RVN from 1954, under Eisenhower. Johnson, however, does deserve a great deal of blame for his Vietnam policy, but of course, he wasn't President from 1965-1975, was he?