Here's an article from "The Hollywood Reporter" by Ray Richmond on the perils of giving people like Ann Coulter an outlet on network news. I don't know if it necessarily brings out any new points (and publishing this in HR is somewhat like preaching to the choir), but I thought some might be interested.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/columns/the_pulse_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002690616Let me preface what I'm about to say regarding Ann Coulter by declaring what may seem obvious: She isn't a genuine molder of opinion any more than the Ku Klux Klan. She's not a real pundit but an actress, a screeching smoke alarm in the guise of a point of view. And yet the media encourages her, legitimizes her, mainstreams her and collectively serves even to venerate her.
If you're wondering why, look no farther than the packaging. Were Coulter a balding, middle-aged, paunchy, finger-pointing white male, her self-aggrandizing hatespeak would enjoy a short shelf life. But because she's blond, female, semi-attractive and shows up in a black cocktail dress, her opportunistic brand of extremism is cast as somehow unique.