Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hoekstra response to why Bush didn't advertise the "WMD bombshell"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:40 AM
Original message
Hoekstra response to why Bush didn't advertise the "WMD bombshell"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

<snip>

Asked why the Bush administration, if it had known about the information since April or earlier, didn't advertise it, Hoekstra conjectured that the president has been forward-looking and concentrating on the development of a secure government in Iraq.



Check out the Freepers reasoning:


http://wizbangblog.com/2006/06/22/wmd-in-iraq.php

<snip>

General Tom Mcinerney is reporting on Fox Hannity and Colmes right now that that the administration has been keeping this low profile to avoid exposing 3 of the 5 members of the UN Security council; Russia, China, and France. McInerney says these weapons will be traced to these countries, and asserts it is well known that Russia helped Saddam move most of his WMD stockpiles out of Iraq before the war.



:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Saddam had these weapons
but was discovered hiding in a hole. You can't force reality on these right wing nuts, nor critical thinking skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hahaha- "freeper reasoning".
Yeah- let me just stack that over here next to my midget NBA team photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tom Mcinerney
I like it better when these nutty ex-military idiots stick with UFO sightings & things that they are experts in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. The WMDs were smuggled out of Iraq by those UN black helicopters.
Edited on Thu Jun-22-06 12:51 AM by Mika
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. let's take a step back, shall we? Compare the news reports of
North Korea getting ready to launch a missile...

For the past week, satellite images have indicated the fueling of a ballistic missile in a remote eastern region of North Korea, sparking international tension.
http://news.monstersandcritics.com/roundups/article_1174560.php/News_Roundup

apparently, we have satellite imaging so clear that we can even discern that they have 10 fuel containers parked there ready to use (I can't find the article that gave that # at the moment, but it also stated that South Korea had the same quality images)

and the freepers keep screaming that Iraq moved their WMD's to Syria (or where-the-fuck-ever) but we have no images of this happening. Big ass trucks convoying across the desert. And when you bring that up, they say... well our satellites can't catch everything all the time... yea, whatever. :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, they're going with all out bullshit now. Sheesh.
They're going to condemn other nations for supplying Iraq with wnd, when we've got rumsfeld shaking hands with the guy? Bullshit.

All the while making some false claim that they've finally got justification for our mass slaughter of Iraqis?

And who's going to believe a damn word now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's right, moran freepers. WE KNOW IRAQ HAD WMD
BECAUSE CHIMP DADDY HAS THE RECIEPTS.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC