Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the Senate Judiciary Committee met this morning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 10:39 AM
Original message
So the Senate Judiciary Committee met this morning
Let's see what was on their agenda!

AGENDA
Executive Business Meeting
Senate Judiciary Committee
226 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Thursday, June 22, 2006 at 9:30 AM

I. Nominations

Brett L. Tolman
to be U.S. Attorney for the District of Utah

II. Bills

S. 2453, National Security Surveillance Act of 2006


S. 2455, Terrorist Surveillance Act of 2006


S. 2468, A bill to provide standing for civil actions for declaratory and injunctive relief to persons who refrain from electronic communications through fear of being subject to warrantless electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes, and for other purposes


S. 3001, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Improvement and Enhancement Act of 2006


S. 2831, Free Flow of Information Act of 2006


H.R. 1036, Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act


S. 155, Gang Prevention and Effective Deterrence Act of 2005


S. 2703, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006


S. 1845, Circuit Court of Appeals Restructuring and Modernization Act of 2005


Senator Leahy had a few words about the Agenda...(complete letter at link)
http://judiciary.senate.gov/member_statement.cfm?id=1962&wit_id=2629
Ninth Circuit Split

I was surprised to see the listing of a bill on today’s agenda to split the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Press was reporting that this issue would not come up during this busy year but would be considered next year. The overwhelming majority of Ninth Circuit judges oppose the split and the majority of Senators representing States within the Ninth Circuit oppose the split. I will certainly want to hear from the senior Senator from California on this measure. This is another issue that seems to surface during election years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC