Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times censors newsroom Internet feed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 04:03 PM
Original message
LA Times censors newsroom Internet feed
2006-06-20 LAT censors the Internet access

LA Times censors newsroom Internet feed
Peacefire, an anti-censorware site, says that journalists at the LA Times have told them that the LA Times has begun to censor the Internet feed in its newsroom. LA Observed says that the Times told them it uses Websense to restrict reporters' access to the Internet, and that peacefire.org is blocked in the newsroom, along with many other sites.

This is the first example I've heard of a Western newspaper censoring its reporters' Internet feeds. The companies that sell censorware services deliver a notoriously biased and Orwellian system. For example, sites like Peacefire and Boing Boing, which report on the bad judgement in these services and expose their technical failings, are classed as "proxy avoidance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're censoring the internet from employees entirely?
We get our AP stories from their site online. How are editors in the newsroom suppose to get outside source material like AP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. No, 'filter' is a better word.
Follow the links, and it's peacefire.org saying that their site is blocked, along with sites like playboy.com.

But that managers can override the block upon request.

(I worked in a place with limited internet access: two general-use terminals with Internet access, while the desk-top computers we each had only had access to a small intranet; the managers had a work-around so they could get out-of-office mail and Internet access. It was a secure office, and we couldn't even check mail over the internet: they made sure that the Internet-access computers had such low-encryption browsers that e-mail services considered them too insecure for webmail.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. "I'm only going to choke you a little bit at a time." -- BushCo
Edited on Thu Jun-22-06 04:13 PM by SpiralHawk
and the BushCo Skull & Boner ChristoFasciost Big-Brother CORPORATE-Profit/propaganda machine.

And I am not exagerating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess I do not understand what you are saying.
Are you saying that the paper is not letting them read news on internet? How do they get news if they can not read what is coming in? It is one of those things that I do not know what all the terms mean I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. LAT limits what sites their reporters can look through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh OK it is called the Bush style of news.
--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. I remember when the LA Times used to be considered a "liberal paper"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, the LA Times is now China. n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC