Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is "An Inconvenient Truth" Gore's "Profiles in Courage"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:11 PM
Original message
Is "An Inconvenient Truth" Gore's "Profiles in Courage"?
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 03:12 PM by Gidney N Cloyd
Partly in the sense of it being a non-political sidestep toward the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think you understand it perfectly.
Good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Y'know, I can think of a number of people who'd
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 03:19 PM by Gidney N Cloyd
make me feel comfortable with them as president. Gore's the only one I can think of who'd make me feel happy.
A little off topic but it just occured to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agree with you on the comfortable and happy business, but
would add Feingold to the very short list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I like what I see of Russ so far but
I don't yet have that sense of him that makes me go 'yeah, President Feingold <smile>; as it should be.' I'll keep an open mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I certainly hope you are right!! Every time I mention the fact that......
.....I think Al Gore is the only one who can take the neocons on - head to head - and beat them at their own game.:yourock:

"Gore's the only one I can think of who'd make me feel happy." :applause: I agree totally!!:headbang:

One thing for sure, some people at DU hate the very mention of Al Gore running.:rofl: To them it's almost as bad as news of Hillary running might be. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. "some people at DU hate the very mention of Al Gore running"
I don't know if it's all that similar to Hillary. In Gore's case I think mostly there's some residual 'why didn't he stand and fight?' issues but with Hillary, I think (besides a few WTF? votes) it's less personal, more a practical worry about the anti=Hillary forces effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. As a result of your post, I just realized why he isn't running...
Certainly, anyone with half a brain or a little wisdom is okay with Gore as president but to a public of rather closed minds, he makes them feel damn uncomfortable. He's a bit out of step with the times when it comes to overall mental approach. People in America need a real actor, who can lie like a nazi at Nuremberg to make them feel all warm and fuzzy inside. Who wants a leader that thinks and conducts himself like Galileo for Christ's sake! I might start a SAVE THE CHIMP-THINKERS FOUNDATION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. o.........
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeker Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. I think you are right---
Al lost in part because of the Clinton sex meltdown and a poor public image.Gore has more to say than most other candidates.Hillery has that same baggage,plus a poor poll rating,and a woman. We gotta get a viable candidate out there,and Al Gore fits that slot.
My rant,My dimes worth(inflation from rebubs)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes
Good analogy. I'm not sure but I think Nixon had a book in between his first and second presidential runs - Six Crises?

If he ran in '08, Gore would be by far the most well-rounded of all the candidates, having experience in the military, journalism, academia, the corporate world, the legislative and executive branches, and now the film industry. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. AND he's won presidential elections before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, I get the strong sense that Gore will "make himself available--"
which is a different thing than running for the nomination. He's using this period to good effect in more ways than one, first by getting the environmental message out, but also by giving the public a chance to get to know him in a non-candidate context. It'll be a lot harder to pin him as "wooden," "stiff," "humorless," "a serial liar," etc. when the public has a better sense of him as a real person. He's pre-empting his own image control rather than letting KKKarl and KKKaren do it for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Great point on "image control."
And another good reason the DVD will make a nice christmas present for an undecided near & dear to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree, he could make himself available for drafting
if the people want him.

A leader isn't a leader just because he declares he is. A leader is chosen to lead by the people who need and trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wouldn't that be a hoot! A politician chosen the way the
Founding Fathers most likely envisioned: By popular acclaim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Remember the old political conventions
when they actually meant something? Those were truly exciting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yeah, I do. I do remember.
There were some bad sides to them, though. Machine control, backroom deals, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cybergata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Popular Acclaim by the chosen few!
That's what the electoral college was all about. They didn't trust the people to make the choice, and remember at the time, the people who voted were white, property owing males 21 and over. Women, Africans, Native Americans, and the youth were totally locked out of the power elite as well as landless white men. Universal manhood suffrage didn't come about until Jackson was president, and I'm sure he worked to that end since it was those landless white males who supported him. Think of Indian Removal Act and Trail of Tears! Jackson also made a bundle being a land speculator and selling off Indian land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC