Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specter: Agreement on eavesdropping near

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 10:55 AM
Original message
Specter: Agreement on eavesdropping near

Specter: Agreement on eavesdropping near

1 hour, 38 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The White House is nearing an agreement with Congress on legislation that would write President Bush's warrantless surveillance program into law, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman said Sunday.

Bush and senior officials in his administration have said they did not think changes were needed to empower the National Security Agency to eavesdrop — without court approval — on communications between people in the U.S. and overseas when terrorism is suspected.

But Sen. Arlen Specter (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa., and other critics contend the program skirted a 1978 law that required the government to get approval from a secretive federal court before Americans could be monitored.

"We're getting close with the discussions with the White House, I think, to having the wiretapping issue submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court," Specter told "Fox New Sunday."

more...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060625/ap_on_go_co/eavesdropping_1



Weren't they supposed to be holding hearings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nascar55 Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Holding hearings?
Hmmmmm is that oversight? If its oversight than I am sure they will not hold hearings. Also we will never know what the real deal is. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Specter has been threatening hearings, but looks like they will legalize
the warrantless wiretapping instead. That has been the negotiation--the dems will hold their own meetings, no doubt in a darl basement room with no microphones.

Really are you surprised? This has been in the works for weeks. Specter is a tool.Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleRob Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Specter is a lying weasel
Why should we believe anything he says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Adolph Bushoilini and his Rubberstamp Reichstag
It's never "illegal" when the Reich writes the laws ... even after the fact. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. This whole idea of retroactively writing illegal behavior into law
is very troubling to me.

So in other words, the United States Congress is saying Bush IS above the law. He can break the law, and then have his illegal behavior written into law?

Are these our American values now? Is this what we stand for as a country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC