Please! Need intelligent rebuttals

to this garbage:

"Seems ignorance is relative in the ocean of Moronic Liberalism. Yes, you are correct, Clinton lied and lied and justified. The Clinton administration, which largely ignored international problems, utterly failed to confront the known threat of Al-Qaeda. Amazingly this failure continued even after the counter resistance in Somalia, the attacks on the U.S. embassies, the USS The Sullivans, the USS Cole, the first attempt to bring down the World Trade Center, terrorist bombing of the Khobar Towers American military barracks, and 1996-1999 knowledge of terrorist plans to use airliners as bombs. Monica-gate blurred the country’s focus from recognizing Clinton’s biggest failures: 1. Not seriously addressing growing radical apocalyptic Islam, 2. The audacity in his administration’s exchanging key components of intercontinental missile technology for re-election campaign cash from the Communist Chinese, (who have passed much of the data to N. Korea and Iran). Making a consentual soap opera disgrace of placing his official sexual acts above national security may have been Clinton’s slickest trick to turn the county’s attention away from his strategic defense failures as Commander In Chief. The ultimate effect from those failures were blamed on whomever followed him as a successor. Tsk! Tsk! Boom! "

Thanks in advance!

Jenn

Do these people talk just to hear their heads rattle?

They had his hands tied in Congress would not let off of him.Then when he stood tall they claimed he was wagging the Dog and other comments. They blame Clinton for everything but who controlled Congress

a BJ?!?!?!?!?! In order to distract us from what our govt. was doing (presumably in secret) to fight terrorism?!?!?!?!?!?!? It amazes me what passes for "logic" in the mis-wired dittohead idiot "brain." Please point out to that idiot that Clinton was being more distracted from the terrorist issue by the GOP driven lewinsky-gate BS than the public was.

Peace - :)

Dear Friend,

Please don't send me such malicious, outdated tripe. If you'd care to discuss the state of the nation as it is today, feel free.

Lying about screwing with an intern is a LOT different, and far more ridiculously pathetic than lying about screwing the country and sending more than 25-hundred Americans to their deaths in a war that didn't need to be fought in the first place.

Also, I wonder what the sender would have to say about bush leaving that downed American fighter jet in China for so long, back in early 2001 just after he "TOOK" office, before getting it home. It was his first bungled international incident/crisis. Now, I could certainly be mistaken, but it seems to me (and seemed to me back then) that the Chinese had an AWFUL LOT OF TIME to wonder through there, take notes, make copies, lift out equipment to take away for further study, etc., before we ever got anything returned.

been confirmed an al Qaeda attack on the USA, Clinton came up with a battle plan and handed it off to Bush. That plan.. was the one Bush sorta followed.. though he let Rummy cut half the troops. So it would be a long war.

to find out how many "W" keys were "stolen" . . .

responses. Keep 'em coming! :grouphug: You folks :yourock:

Jenn

http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/30/clinton.terrorism/

President wants Senate to hurry with new anti-terrorism laws

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess. (1.6 MB AIFF or WAV sound)sound icon

"We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference.

But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.

and it doesn't start with "Clinton" It starts with "Bush" and then continues about Bush. "ClintonLied" is NOT a defense for "Bush Lied." How do you defend Bush for lying about the yellow cake uranium, for example. And the defense does NOT start with "Clinton..." anything.

and he goes in to great detail about the differences between the Clinton and the Bush administration and how each handled terroroism.

Wilson, a middle east expert, and a man who was raised as a Republican, is extremely critical of el pretzeldente's cowboy go get em policies. He also points out the hypocrisy of outing a CIA agent and penalizing those who criticized that, rather than those who outed his wife.

Seems pretty clearcut to me. If dubya was concerned about security, he would not be giving KKKarl a free pass.

the percentage of our debt owned by China in the "Clenis" years vs the explosion of it since *dumbass and his minions staged their coup? I have googled to no avail.

Thanks in advance (again)!