"The NYT has now made it more difficult for us to prevent attacks..."

BurtWorm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:41 AM
Original message

"The NYT has now made it more difficult for us to prevent attacks..."

"The New York Times has now made it more difficult for us to prevent attacks in the future."

This is a blatant lie. But then it's from Dick "Go Fuck Yourself" Cheney. It would be news if it weren't a lie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Epiphany4z

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message

1. does he say

How it makes it more difficult?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Touchdown

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message

2. BGLOS

Big Giant Load Of Shit.

trademark.:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marmar

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message

3. Bollocks. Bullshit. Mierda. Merde. Scheisse.

Edited on Wed Jun-28-06 11:54 AM by marmar

Cheney is a big pile of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

tinfoilinfor2005

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3

7. Suds. Pronounced SOODS. That's Latvian, for your collection

of shit words. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marmar

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7

9. Thanks. I'm always trying to expand my linguistic horizons.

Edited on Wed Jun-28-06 11:56 AM by marmar

:hide: :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

VOX

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message

4. And the Republican Wall Street Journal that reported the same story?

Has it also made things difficult for BushCo? Funny that it doesn't merit a mention from Deadeye Dick.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gasperc

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message

5. there must be an attack coming, and they want to blame the press

because an attack on US Soil would obliterate their fight em there so we don't have to fight them here theory

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marmar

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5

10. I put on my tinfoil hat and was thinking the same thing...

Now they can stage an attack and blame it on The New York Times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Mz Pip

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message

6. Bullshit

Like the terrorists never suspected we'd be checking into their finances. :eyes:

of listening into their phone calls. :eyes:

Never in a million years.

Mz Pip
:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

diamondsndust

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #6

12. the old way of catching terrorists

Dear ________________ (insert name here)

In our effort to curb terrorism we are sending out this survey/questionaire. Please check all that apply to you.

1) If you are a terrorist please check here _____.

2) If you hide your money in offshore accounts please check here ____.

3) If you use a phone or computer for your terrorist activities please check here ____.

Thank you for your help,

The Gubmint

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

zbdent

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message

8. Covering their collective asses . . . now, if the "We haven't had an attac

k since 9/11 (lie) because of the courage of our President" fails when we "get hit with a terrorist attack" (where's the homeland protection? Can't afford to pay for port protection while we're handing blank checks to Halliburton), then it can all be blamed on the New York Times . . . "hobbling" the anti-terrorist measures that Bush refuses to back, let alone fund . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gasperc

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #8

14. I posted similar above, we need to whack with the 40% cuts

The NYT should run a front page story on the huge cuts in the homeland security budget and the devastating effect that it will have on New York city

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Ganja Ninja

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message

11. Already making excuses for their next failure. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

frylock

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #11

16. or success..

depending upon one's POV.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Deja Q

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message

13. In other words, the scapegoat for both

another attack AND shredding the 1st Amendment has now come to bass?

Shrewd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

katty

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message

15. such Bull****!! they are so desperate in their daily diatribes

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

truebrit71

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-28-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message

17. Complete and total BULLSHIT.

But then again look at the source...

These guys have been talkaing about this programme for YEARS....Why hasn't the "liberal media" pointed this little factoid out?

Hey Dick, Go Cheney yourself...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed May 15th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.