Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Roberts: "I understand newspapers want to sell papers..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:35 PM
Original message
Sen. Roberts: "I understand newspapers want to sell papers..."

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1914560&C=america

<snip>

"There was no public interest served by disclosing an effective and highly classified intelligence program that is legal and properly overseen by Congress and the executive branch. The New York Times knew that and printed the story anyway," Roberts said in a statement released with his letter to Negroponte.

"I understand newspapers want to sell papers and authors want to sell books, but some things shouldn’t be for sale."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. A whore suggesting that some things should not be for sale?
If I weren't from Mississippi I'd suggest that Kansans should be extremely embarrassed about who they send to Washington. And please Pat where is part II of your investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is getting old. This came out of Bush years ago.
Bush said he was tracking money years ago, this is just getting the base fired up. It is Carl's plan going at full speed ahead and it is working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Like Congress?? Oh, that is soooo rich coming from a repuke. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Hypocrisy thy name is GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did Roberts not get the memo??
The NYT didn't disclose anything that wasn't already known. But it's not about that, is it? Roberts is participating in a stunt to demonize the NYT, taking his orders from the WH.

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hey Roberts, the NY Times is informing the public of possible government
snooping into their finances. Okay.

The bad guys already knew about it and, either adjusted accordingly, or got caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unlike say Congress which is not only for sale but
now available at a steep discount.

jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually newspapers sell ADVERTISING
more than half the papers in NYC are now free. And even the ones that charge readers make the bulk of their money on the advertiser side.

Morans like Roberts claim to champion capitalism but they show very little understanding for how it actually works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. I understand, because we're in the business of selling wars
idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Then how about not selling my freedom, Pat? . . .
or my country's Constitution, or the piddling Social Security I hope to one day collect, or my children's future for a mindless war, or. . .




Which is better?

Sen. Pat Roberts (Quaking Coward-Kansas): "You don't have any civil liberties if you're dead." (2006)

or

Patrick Henry (Patriot-1775): "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. John, quick, there's a religious zealot threatening to nuke Foggy Bottom!

What? It's a Christian religious zealot? Well, that's different.

It's funny that Robertson din't mention that he said that the State Department building should be nuked. I'm sure Negroponte would be interested in that threat...Or not.

On the 700 Club show he said in October of 03:

"Maybe we need a very small nuke thrown off on Foggy Bottom to shake things up like Newt Gingrich wants to do."

CNN reported then: "Robertson was referring to former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who was part of a group of conservatives accusing the State Department of undermining U.S. foreign policy by coddling authoritarian governments in the Middle East."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/10/09/robertson.state/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. They are right freedom of the press should never be for sale nt
Edited on Wed Jun-28-06 02:48 PM by Minnesota Libra




edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Bush cabal wouldn't be interested in "selling" financial information
that it gathered to their corporate pals. Oh no. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. i'm tired of republicans "understanding" things
that they then dismiss.

bush 'understands' there are critics of his war - but he doesn't give a fuck.

'understanding' is code for 'i pretend to care but i don't'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Senator Pat "Cover-Up" Roberts - what is he hiding for Bush today?
This false outrage over the NYT (any fool knew they were following terrorist money, or at least they should have been) is some kind of SMOKESCREEN to either "destroy" the NYT before they publish the real dirt, or to hide something else that Bushco has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hell hath no Fury like a bushie scorned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. properly overseen????? Senator Coverup doth protest too much
Edited on Wed Jun-28-06 04:34 PM by Supersedeas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC