Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why shouldn't I be able to charge smokers with assault?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:07 PM
Original message
Why shouldn't I be able to charge smokers with assault?
I have asthma and I'm allergic to cigarette smoke. If I'm in a bar and someone punches me in the face, I can charge them with a crime. If I'm in a bar and someone gives me an asthma attack and headache, plus poisons me with a drug that can kill me, its their "right" to do so. A punch in the face sounds preferable. At least it won't stop me from breathing and kill me years later. Since second hand smoke causes more harm than physical assault, why shouldn't I be able to call the cops and charge those who smoke in public with a crime?

While we're at it, we should charge the corporate and advertising executives at tobacco companies for being serial killers and give them multiple life sentences. They deserve it for getting children addicted to deadly drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then don't go to bars where people smoke. Pretty simple.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What about my right to be in public?
Why should I have to be a hermit because others want to attack me with smoke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "Attack you with smoke"
SKY HIGH rhetoric. Get real. Cars produce more toxic pollutants - in both toxicity and volume. Sue every driver! Call the police!

ONE thing I agree with some conservatives about - hardcore nanny-statists are fucking pussies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. No higher
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:23 PM by Radical Activist
than the ridiculous "right and freedom" to smoke talk I've been hearing. Yes, I'm flipping the rhetoric on its head to challenge those who claim its their right to harm others.

Your nanny-state comment is completely irrelevant to this discussion. That phrase typically refers to the government stopping people from hurting themselves. I'm not arguing against a persons right to smoke a highly addictive drug with no decent high in their own home. Its about other people affecting me, and yes it does amount to an attack on my health. If someone slipped a pill in another persons drink in a bar that give them an asthma attack and a risk of cancer, they could be charged with a crime for poisoning. How is this any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. INTENT is how it's different.
A vast number of people, smokers or not, are doubtlessly utterly indifferent to you. Since mickeying your drink is a premeditated act, its in an entirely diffrerent class.

And you ARE talking like a nanny-statist - calling for govt. or police intervention into your every complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:28 PM
Original message
This is not 1950.
People who smoke know the effect it has on others. It is therefore a premeditated act.

I bet you call laws against murder "nanny-state" laws too. This has nothing to do with protecting people from themselves, which is what a nanny-state is. You either don't understand the term or you don't understand the effect of second hand smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #70
78. I'm showing that you
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:43 PM by Radical Activist
are misusing the term "nanny state." We're talking about interaction between people, not a case of government protecting people from themselves, which is the meaning of a nanny state.
And yes, this argument is "out there" but I think its a valid discussion to have and more reasonable that what I hear from smoking advocates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #78
83. Where have I advocated for smoking?
And "nanny state" is a somewhat broader term than you seem to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
183. Nope.
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 02:52 AM by Clark2008
Some of us simply believe that smoking is being used as scapegoat for all the world's evils and don't buy for a cotton-picking minute that every thing bad is attributed to second-hand smoke.

Sorry. It's not a lack of understanding. It's a mistrust of motive of some of the research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #183
192. They released a report summarizing a bunch of studies about
second hand smoke. They estimate 400+ babies die from SIDS caused by second hand smoke every year. I suppose that isn't as important as someone's 'right' to exhale in their faces. I remember when people used to smoke in grocery stores. It isn't about nanny-statism or whatever. Its about health, public health. If someone is drunk, they can't drive because their actions hurt others. Same with smoking and it isn't just a 'nanny state' thing. Read this:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/27/AR2006062700710.html

U.S. Details Dangers of Secondhand Smoking
'Serious Health Hazard' Is Cited

By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 28, 2006; Page A01

Secondhand smoke dramatically increases the risk of heart disease and lung cancer in nonsmokers and can be controlled only by making indoor spaces smoke-free, according to a comprehensive report issued yesterday by U.S. Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona.

"The health effects of secondhand smoke exposure are more pervasive than we previously thought," Carmona said. "The scientific evidence is now indisputable: Secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance. It is a serious health hazard that can lead to disease and premature death in children and nonsmoking adults."

According to the report, the government's most detailed statement ever on secondhand smoke, exposure to smoke at home or work increases the nonsmokers' risk of developing heart disease by 25 to 30 percent and lung cancer by 20 to 30 percent. It is especially dangerous for children living with smokers and is known to cause sudden infant death syndrome, respiratory problems, ear infections and asthma attacks in infants and children.

The report -- which was applauded and embraced by public-health and tobacco-control advocates -- found that nearly half of all nonsmoking Americans are still regularly exposed to smoke from others. It concludes that any exposure to secondhand smoke is a risk to nonsmokers, and as a result the only way to protect nonsmokers is to eliminate indoor smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #183
193. that mistrust of the motives of some of researchers is the same
argument used against global warming science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #193
340. Do you trust the 1964 Surgeon Generals report?
That report showed that pipe smokers live longer than non smokers.
Or do we only trust reports that conform to our worldview?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #340
354. actually, citing a report from 1964 is ridiculous and disengenuous.
you eighty-six your argument with blather like that. cite something closer to the here and now, not something that was 42 years ago when things weren't as possible to know as now. Good grief. what a
laughable question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #354
391. Confirmed in 1979 SG report
Edited on Sun Jul-02-06 12:33 PM by SOS
15 years later the original findings were corroborated with more extensive research by the Surgeon General.
Pipe smokers, smoking less than 4 bowls a day had a lower mortality ratio than non-smokers.
Pipe smokers smoking more 4-10 bowls a day had a statistically insignificant increase in mortality from 1.00 to 1.01.

See section 13:

http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/NN/B/C/M/D/_/nnbcmd.pdf

And speaking of laughable "science":

"Thirty-three studies on secondhand smoke had been completed by 1993. More than 80 percent of the studies reported no association between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, including the largest of the studies. The EPA reviewed 31 studies - inexplicably omitting two studies reporting no association between secondhand smoke and lung cancer - and estimated secondhand smoke caused 3,000 lung cancer deaths annually."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-03-06 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #391
402. let me see, 1979 was only 27 years ago. how about citing a legit
report in THIS millennium?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-04-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #402
407. In THIS millenium, the "research" is political quackery
The EPA report, an analysis of then-existing studies, is the most common source used by media and special-interest groups; a report not only dismissed by the scientific community and U.S. Congress as invalid, but legally declared as such by the courts.<1> How can research go so wrong? The problem began when the EPA announced the conclusion they intended to reach, prior to completing the work. When the results ultimately proved their assumptions false, it became necessary to manipulate the data. Obviously, determining what you wish the facts to establish, rather than allowing the evidence to control the conclusion, is not science, but politics.

The EPA seemed doomed to fail from the start. Of thirty-three available studies, they chose thirty. Of these, only six indicated a small, yet statistically significant risk from second-hand smoke. Eighteen established that there is no danger, and six found exposure to be beneficial. Deciding to compile their data from only eleven selected studies that might support the EPA’s beliefs, the results indicated that when correct scientific methodology was applied, the final conclusion proved that there is no statistically significant effect.

Once again the EPA data had proven their presumptions wrong, so for the final report, they simply changed the standard scientific guidelines to create a result that, even then, suggested a barely significant correlation between tobacco smoke and health.

The World Health Organisation had embarked on a lengthy, tightly controlled, research project<2> prior to the release of the EPA report, meant to counter the preponderance of evidence indicating that second-hand smoke was harmless. In 1998 they had their answer: no statistically significant negative impact, and in fact children raised by parents who smoke are twenty-two percent less likely to develop lung cancer<3[br />
http://www.reasoned.org/e_study.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #183
226. It's a divide and conquer campaign.
Pit the smokers against the non smokers so they will fight amongst themselves about some perceived pollution. That way we won't recognize and fight with them about true environmental pollution.

In our town, we have a huge factory that spews out mountains of stinky smoke a day. And we have a Mickey D's on every corner. No one says a word. But light up a cigarette and everyone becomes "the victim".

It's a campaign that has been going on for a while. People just don't recognize it as such. And they internalize the victimization with the indignant righteousness. Just another stepping stone to incorporating more hatred toward one another into our society.

Keep them bickering at one another so they won't bicker with us. It is the oldest trick in the book.

But...if one would just think for a moment... these people don't care about our health. If they did, we would have a universal health care system. Or at the very least...AFFORDABLE health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #183
332. So what if it can't be blamed for all the world's evils? There is NO
arguing with the fact that it is an asthma trigger. People with asthma can have a reaction to cigarette smoke that's worse than healthy people's to pepper spray. Why shouldn't second hand exposure be limited?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #332
396. So what if it's trigger?
I am violently allergic to 99% of perfumes (just about every type of scent actually, Febreeze kills me). I have asthma attacks when around it, develop migraines, and, if I spend more than a few minutes in close proximity to a heavy perfume wearer, I break out in hives. How do I cope? I avoid situations where I'll be exposed to it. I've gotten off of buses and elevators because of it. Do I get pissed? Well, sure, but I don't run around trying to force all perfume wearers to stay in their homes just to accomodate my allergies.

I do not frequent bars where there is a "high-class" crowd, big department stores, or other places where people are more likely to be wearing perfume. I've adjusted. I don't even go down the laundry detergent aisle in the grocery store, I just make a commando-style gas attack snatch and grab to get my hypo-allergenic detergent. I do not expect the world to tailor itself to my specific needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #183
377. It's just junk science right?????
"shrug" worse than Republicans these smoker advocates are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
88. "hardcore nanny-statists are fucking pussies"
:thumbsup:

biopower. awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. walk upwind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. There are plenty of non-smoking establisments for you to.......
patronize. Unless of course you just like to stir up trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. No, not really.
There are no smoke-free bars within 200 miles of me and only two smoke-free restaraunts. Smokers are taking away my right to go out and enjoy public places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guinivere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Sounds like you need to move. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
60. California has no smoking laws for bars & restaurants...
Santa Rosa, CA just passed a law prohibiting smoking in outdoor public spaces.

California is the place for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #60
161. Washington, too. (no text)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
290. Great. How much are you going to donate for my moving expenses?
Since smokers think I need to move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
282. How about smokers pay for me to move?
Since they're the ones forcing me to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #282
356. no one makes you go to bars!!..so stay your ass home!
i don't like drinkers..they kill people instantly with cars..so can i sue you when you drink and drive?? or do you walk to your bars??????????????

yeah right..you walk to bars right??????????????????

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #356
389. No,
if smokers can't go a few hours without satisfying their addiction, THEY are the ones who should have to stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #282
373. Do you drive
If so I'd suggest shutting up now, cars throw more carcinogens and irritants into the atmos the second you start the ignition than I as a pack a day smoker produce in a month.

When you stop using cars (that includes any buses or taxis you ride in) I'll promise to only smoke at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #373
390. There's a reason we regulate car exhaust.
There's a reason why we now have unleaded gas, CAFE standards to increase gas mileage, and why I support stricter standards. The government already regulates cars because of pollution, so I say we should do the same for smokers. Good comparison, but its one that doesn't work in your favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
75. Really?
"No smoke free bars within 200 miles"? So you have visited every bar within 200 miles?

I highly doubt that.

Go ahead and file a police report, I am sure they will chuckle quietly, if not loudly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #27
274. Maybe you should open one....(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eerriicc Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #274
319. not a bad idea
no message
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #27
333. I think some people are unaware of what a disparity there is between
different parts of the country. When my daughter looked at colleges on the east coast, she was surprised at how much smoking she ran into there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Go to bars that don't allow smoking, then.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Where are those bars?
Besides California? Around here the only bar like that is in on Make-believe Lane. The same is true in most cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. The Free Market at work. We had two no-smoking bars in the area
befoe the Nanny Laws tooke effect.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. Smoking is prohibited in public places in NY and NJ
Bars, restaurants all smoke free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
347. And yet NYC
just surpassed LA as having the most toxic air in America, despite the toughest smoking ban in the US. Of course, we New Yorkers aren't even informed of this. I read it in the LA Times.
More than 11,000 New Yorkers die every year, smoking factored into the number, just from breathing the filth that passes for "air" here. One out every 714 NYers dead from auto and factory pollution every twelve months.
A person would be much better off living in Montana and visiting a smokey bar once a week, than living in this this poisonous brew of auto and industrial exhaust.


Copy of LA Times article (no registration):
http://www.cicle.org/cicle_content/pivot/entry.php?id=492




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Champaign County soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
155. sheeeeeit
they may beat allegheny county...

btw... it was 8 @ 7.50 each last friday....

and i would have felt better if there were no smoke - fucking hangover multiplier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllNamesHaveBeenUsed Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
115. Bethesda, MD
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #115
285. Would you like to buy me a private jet
so I can fly there on weekends?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllNamesHaveBeenUsed Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #285
311. It is accesible by road/rail...
Take the Amtrack to Rockville and the Metro to Bethesda. The Metro runs until 3AM on weekends. I'd buy you that jet, but I'd have no money left to hit the Bethesda bars. They ain't the cheapest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #285
334. I have an idea, Radical. Maybe one of these frustrated smokers would
like to swap locales with you.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #285
359. buy yourself one!! better yet since you are so sick..stay the hell out of
Edited on Sun Jul-02-06 12:01 AM by flyarm
bars!!

and street corners..there was a study done when i lived in LA.....that young children never exposed to cig smoke but lived near major intersections and exposed to 15 minutes of car pollution a day, for a year.. ...had the lung damage of someone who smoked 5 pks a day for 50 years!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #359
384. How about smokers stay out of bars
if they're so addicted to their drug that they can't help but inflict their pollution on others. There's no reason I should be punished for someone else's deadly addiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #384
392. no reason anyone should have to pander to your ailment!
obviously you do not care about the dust mites and mold in a bar..or the germs in the bar and bacteria in the bars that are just as big of triggers for your asthma..so why sould someone else have to protect you, when you don't protect yourself?????????

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #392
397. You have no idea
what triggers my asthma the most since its different for everyone. This is another ridiculous comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-03-06 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #397
404. in fact i do , my lifelong best friends husband is top research phd f or
Edited on Mon Jul-03-06 03:40 AM by flyarm
largest research project being done nationwide by a major pharm company, he is head of dept looking for cure and medicine...with the largest federal grant for research..

and my son has asthma..we discuss it all the time! and how close they are coming to a major break through treatment

this man has a triple phd from duke, tulane , and johns hopkins!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #285
363. hey sue the dust mites..or pollens..or car pollution ..go ahead just try!
http://www.healthinsite.gov.au/topics/Causes_of_Asthma

i would tend to believe if you really have asthma..a bar with its mold and old stale beer and bacteria would be the last place anyone with asthma would want to be..let alone cig smoke..the other triggers, would most likely get you first!!


oh and don't bother to try to sue the weatherman when the cold weather triggers your asthma!!

fly

http://respiratory-lung.health-cares.net/asthma-causes.php

What causes asthma?
During an asthma attack, the smooth muscle layer goes into spasm, narrowing the airway. The middle layer swells because of inflammation, and more mucus is produced. In some segments of the airway, the mucus forms clumps that nearly or completely block the airway. These clumps are called mucus plugs. In most cases, asthma is caused by inhaling an
allergen that sets off the chain of biochemical and tissue changes leading to airway inflammation, bronchoconstriction, and wheezing. Because avoiding (or at least minimizing) exposure is the most effective way of treating asthma, it is vital to identify which allergen or irritant is causing symptoms in a particular patient.
In an asthma attack, the smooth muscles of the bronchi narrow (called bronchoconstriction), and the tissues lining the airways swell from inflammation and secrete mucus into the airways. The top layer of the lining of the airways can become damaged and shed cells. These actions further narrow the diameter of the airways; the narrowing requires the person to exert more effort to move air in and out of the lungs. In asthma, airway obstruction is reversible, meaning that with appropriate treatment or on their own, the muscular contractions of the airways stop, the airway obstruction ends, and the airflow into and out of the lungs returns to normal. This damage results in the development of easily irritated bronchial tubes, which is called hyper-responsiveness. This condition is then causes the lungs to become excessively "twitchy" and to react (or overreact) to previously non-allergic stimuli, such as cold weather, pollution, dry air, and chemical odors. The also-twitchy bronchial tubes will react by going into spasm, which leads to the symptoms of shortness of breath, coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness. This entire process is possibly reversible if caught early in its onset by establishing preventive measures or treating with appropriate medication.

In a person who has asthma, the airways narrow in response to stimuli that usually do not affect the airways in normal lungs. The narrowing can be triggered by many inhaled allergens, such as pollens, particles from dust mites, body secretions from cockroaches, particles from feathers, and animal dander. These allergens combine with immunoglobulin E (a type of antibody) on the surface of mast cells to trigger the release of asthma-causing chemicals from these cells. (This type of asthma is called allergic asthma.) Although food allergies induce asthma only rarely, certain foods (such as shellfish and peanuts) can induce severe attacks in people who are sensitive to these foods.

The symptoms of asthma occur when some trigger causes the lung’s airways to swell and produce excess mucus. The smooth muscles that line the airways (called bronchioles) contract, narrowing the airways and making it difficult to breathe. The most common triggers are substances to which the child is allergic, such as household dusts or molds, animal dander, or pollen. Triggers can also be irritants, such as perfumes, aerosol sprays, air pollution, or cigarette smoke. Some children have asthma attacks when exposed to cold air, during times of stress, or when they engage in physical exercise. Upper respiratory infections can also trigger an asthma attack.

Inflammation is our body's response to foreign or toxic substances that enter or come in contact with the body. Inflammation is caused by the arrival of blood and protective cells into the area involved. When a bacterial infection occurs somewhere in our body, white blood cells blood rush to the infected site and try to either destroy the bacteria or isolate and neutralize their harmful effects. Inflammation causes mucus to build up in these tubes, cutting down on the space available to move air. Inflammation also stimulates the muscles around these tubes to contract, narrowing the tubes and further cutting down the airflow. Although inflammation is the root of all asthma, the trigger for this inflammation is different for different people. Inflammation is an important part of your body's response to injury or infection. Basically, inflammation is the immune system's call to action. Signals sent by the immune system recruit an army of cells to fight off invaders, such as bacteria or viruses. They also start the healing process when there are signs of tissue damage.

In people with asthma, the lungs and airways overreact to foreign substances in the air, such as cat hair, mold or pollution. Sometimes even clean, cold air can constrict the airways, especially in people with exercise-induced asthma. In many ways, asthma is a type of allergic reaction, which is why many people with asthma also see an allergy specialist to help manage their condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #363
381. gosh
thanks for posting an article about asthma because I've never read anything about the condition I've lived with my entire life. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #381
393. gee since you know so much about your ailment you should know
the bar with or without smoke would be the worst place in the world for you!

SO WILL YOU SUE THE BAR FOR HAVING GERMS/bacteria THAT TRIGGER YOUR ASTHMA?????????

or how about restaurants that have carpets?? chock full of mites and bacteria ready to attack your lungs!!..woooo...there you have a serious problem..so are you ignoring that ??? where do you stop your law suits?????????

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
131. Beaumont, Texas (after August 1)
:)


And while I know that your rhetoric is over the top, I am constantly amazed at the denial of smokers. Shit people, at least admit that smoking is a nasty vile habit that really does affect other people who are around you, whether they want to breathe in the toxins or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #131
136. "Vile habit"?
So's picking your nose, farting and belching, talking in movie theatres, tailgating and failing to discipline your rugrats- to name just a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #136
141. And that other person eating their own snot doesn't impact my health
A smoker's habit does. You want to kill yourself with the cancer sticks, go for it. I'd personally rather you not, but it isn't my choice to make for you. But neither is it your choice to make for me by exposing me (unwillingly) to second hand smoke. It really is that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #131
163. smokers act all insulted because we say their smoke stinks.
......It does stink.

I think maybe smokers aren't aware of how bad it truly smells. It's a documented fact that smoking deadens one's sense of smell.

My nose is working at optimal function, and I am here to tell you, cigarette smoke stinks!

Now watch, some smoker will chime in to say "no it doesn't". :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #131
225. I'm one of the first to admit
I'm one of the first to admit it's a filthy, albeit highly addictive habit. But honestly, I don't know any smoker who wouldn't agree.

I'm also the first to admit that about the only places I smoke anymore are on my apt. balcony, my truck and outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #131
273. Hey Lastliberal, a question
I lived in Beaumont for a work project for a year and a half a good many years back. It seemed pretty conservative to me. This no-smoking law and another comment I heard someone make about "liberals over in Beaumont" makes me wonder....does Beaumont lean more to the left than other parts of Texas? Yikes! And only a few miles away from Vidor, TX, where the KKK practically patrol the streets after dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saphire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #273
297. what do you mean "practically"....I think they positively do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #297
345. That's just sick
So sick, so sad that this happens in America. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #30
168. guess you haven't been to "most cities " lately!! just try to find
a bar you can smoke in in "most cites!!"

nonsence..its we smokers who have been "banned " in "most cities!"

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #30
177. Try Austin Texas and New York City
Hmm, all of California, New York, Dallas, Austin... fucking move.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #177
286. Why don't you
"fucking" pay my moving expenses? You and all other smokers who think I need to move can pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #286
360. stay the hell out of bars..you have that choice!!
or go live in a fascist country!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
190. the entire State of Maine
no smoking in any indoor public spaces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
211. Massachusetts too! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #30
235. Thanks to the eight posters who just proved my point
my naming a bunch of bars in other states, as though that is realistic or reasonable. funny. I guess us non-smokers can just travel several hours or days if we want to go out to a bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #235
372. Hey,
you are the one who claimed it was impossible to find a city where there were non-smoking bars. We just provided entire states and cities where there are many of them. It's not our fault that your state legislators haven't gotten around to banning smoking where you live. Write to them to provoke the move. It'll do more good than talking about sueing smokers on this message board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #235
374. pub owners should surely have the right to decide
whether they allow smokers or not, most bar owners realise that even non smokers often smoke when they drink so prefer to allow it, if you don't like it take it up with the owners, they're providing a service for the majority of their customers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
324. You must not know your way around the city very well.
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 11:52 PM by Susang
There are lots of bars in the Chicagoland area that now are smoke-free or have added smoke-free areas. The Hopleaf and Morseland have no smoking sections. Rhythm on West Randolph and The Indigo Lounge in Evanston are completely smoke-free. Here's a list of even more from the Chicago Lung Association: http://www.lungchicago.org/site/epage/34768_487.htm

Here's the new smoking ordinance, just in case you haven't taken the time to familiar yourself with it.

When and where is smoking being prohibited?
As of January 16, 2006, smoking is prohibited in:

* All enclosed workplaces;
* All restaurants without a bar area;
* All restaurant areas more than 15 feet from the bar counter;
* Within 15 feet of the entrance to enclosed public places;

As of July 1, 2008, smoking will also be prohibited in:

* All Restaurants, including Restaurants with Bar Areas; and
* All Bars and Taverns


http://www.smokefreechicago.org/

Then there's downstate: http://www.smokefreechicago.org/

Springfield City Council Passes Smoking Ban!
The Springfield City Council approved the ordinance that will effectively ban smoking in nearly all Springfield workplaces - including restaurants, bars and taverns. The ban goes into effect on September 17, 2006 at 3:00 a.m. You can read more about the ordinance and the City Council vote in the here.


Champaign/Urbana passed a ban: http://www.cu-smokefree.org/

Bloomington: http://www.smokefreeillinois.org/BN/

Bloomington joins Normal by Passing a 100% Smoke Free Law
On Monday, May 8, 2006, Bloomington, IL became the 16th Illinois community to pass their own Clean Indoor Air law. The new law will make all public places, including bars and restaurants, smoke free. While many different alternatives and loopholes were discussed during the council meeting, each alternative failed when brought to a vote. One amendment did pass, which removed language regulating smoking in outdoor public places, such as parks.

Aldermen Huette, Hanson, Crawford, and Matejka voted 'yes', causing Mayor Stockton to cast a tie breaking 'yes' vote. The 100% smoke free ordinance passed 5-4 and goes into effect on January 1, 2007. Bloomington's sister city, Normal, also passed a 100% smoke free law the previous week, and goes into effect the same date.


So seriously, nobody is trying to assault you. You have options. Chill with the rhetoric, 'kay?

Signed,
An Asthmatic Non-Smoker Who Does Her Research
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #324
341. I don't live in Chicago.
I know my city very well and I'm fully aware of the smoking bans in downstate that have not gone into effect yet and the one in Bloomington being challenged in courts by the smoking lobby. You forgot to mention Champaign/Urbana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
371. I don't think so...
New York City, London, Boston, Miami, Los Angeles, Baltimore, and a slew of other cities currently have no smoking laws. In the Northeast you can not smoke in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Massachussetts, Rhode Island, and other states, I am sure, in bars and restaurants. (Exception is Atlantic City!) Non smoking bars and restaurants are not only sweeping the US, but also the world. London and Dublin have enacted bans in their bars. It's insane to think that there isn't a non-smoking institution within two hundred miles of you these days. It's truly shocking to me, living here in NYC and dealing every day with non-smoking restaurants and bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. Hermits are nice
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
64. You some privileged class?
Isn't my fault you have asthma. Isn't my fault someone has any disability. Why the hell should I be a 'hermit' because of junk science, hysterics and 'superior-complexed nosy-parkers/hypochondriacs?


That said, the majority of available space on the planet is already dedicated to anti-smoking bullies.
Most of whom don't even acknowledge or care what's being done to their 'breathing zone' by big bidness. Of course, they're a harder target.

And yes, I cleaned this up quite a bit before I hit 'post'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #64
81. I just love the non-smokers who walk through my designated smoking area
at work and mock cough, wave their hands, screw up their face and glare.

I just tell them to get the hell out of my designated area... no non-smokers allowed here... see my great big ash tray here? It was put here for me because this is my area, not yours. I don't allow rude non-smokers in my area.


I'd much rather be a slightly inconsiderate smoker than a completely rude non-smoker any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #81
105. It's called righteous indignation.
They picked it up from the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #105
111. LOL!!!
Life is too short for pontification and righteous indignation from pretentious whiners:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #105
216. !
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #81
248. I get those standing outside the mall in the designated section
and that is outside on a windy day! It wouldn't surprise me if any day now, I'll be sitting in my car with the window down holding my cig out the window and loud dramatic hacking begins from the car sitting next to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #81
252. damn it, I agree
I don't even smoke much, other than socially, and have cut back those too, but the righteous indignation of vehemnet anti-smokers makes me want to light up every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #64
134. Wow- are you for real?
Junk science, huh? And you're so dependent on those cancer sticks that you'd have to become a hermit if you couldn't smoke in enclosed public places? Really?


And btw, I can multi task. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #134
139. so you can multi task.
what does that mean? that you can whine and type at the same time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #139
142. That I can worry about more than one kind of air pollution
Read your post and see where you said that people like me who are opposed to smoking don't care what big business spews into the air. I can focus on both, it really isn't that hard. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #64
335. It actually could be your fault someone got asthma, depending on
Edited on Sat Jul-01-06 05:01 AM by pnwmom
the circumstances. I developed it on the job after working for a year in heavy smoking conditions. This wasn't a bar or anything; just an open office where half of the dozen or so people in the room were chain smokers. We worked with a lot of paper, too. It's amazing that someone didn't accidentally start a fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
166. Bars aren't public n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #166
178. Thank you! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #166
194. but you then advocate excluding non-smokers from bars. don't
come to bars if you can't stand the smoke. exlusionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #194
236. Great point.
Many smoking advocates just don't seem to get how they deny the rights of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #166
233. The argument of segregationists.
Nice. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
208. There are plenty of public places where smoking is not permitted
You need not become a hermit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Tsk, Tsk, Stop talking sense Redstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. delete
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:16 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
39. oh
and :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:24 PM
Original message
good suggestion
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
89. Monkey see, monkey do...
That's what my b/f says... if I see someone smoke, here I go...


:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #89
100. oK DEN
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #100
112. Okily dokily, a pig in a pokily!
:smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #112
116. Call you one and raise you 20
:rofl: smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #116
307. Break time!
:smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke:


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
212. Thanks for a sane response, Redstone. I'm a life-long
non-smoker, but I find the New Prohibitionists more offensive than second-hand smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
370. Most bars don't allow smoking anymore, anyhow...
And those that do let you know that they do. So, I don't see grounds for sueing. Just don't go to those places that are smoky. Hell, since quitting, I hate the smoke myself, but when I go to places that I know will be smoky (Las Vegas Casinos and my in-laws house), I deal with it. If I feel sick, I leave. It's a choice being there. You can't control the entire environment around you at all times. Sometimes there are bad toxins out there. C'est la vie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, everyone with an allergy should do that.
People with perfume sensitivities should be able to sue middle aged women at the opera! People with nut allergies should be able to sue those bastards who eat Payday bars right out in the open - that could suffocate someone!

Sue sue sue, cops cops cops.

Agree with you about charging the tobacco execs, though, 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. None of the other things you mention
commonly cause death. And the peanut example is just silly because no one but the eater is affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Wrong - there's a reason there are no peanuts on planes anymore.
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:14 PM by asthmaticeog
The airborne dust can close off an allergy victim's throat just as easily as eating one. Hey, what else is airborne dust? SMOKE?

edit: sp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
72. Would you like
to document that? Haven't heard of any passengers croaking on peanuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #72
86. The upswing in the number and severity of nut allergies in recent years
is in fact WHY the airlines made that change. I don't know that anyone died, but there were incidents, and lobbying by a group of nut-allergy sufferers led to that change, and the labeling on some products that they're made in facilities where peanuts are proceesed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #86
117. Upswing?
or too many people easy street to 'disability' payments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #72
198. I don't know about the airlines
but a school up here had to get rid of all peanut products, and students couldn't bring peanut products because one student had a major allergy to nuts. So, depending upon how severe the allergy is, and if it's really severe, then yes, a person could die of air born dust from peanuts. I have a couple of family members who have this allergy as well. So we all know the drills.

As for smoking, well, I quit cold turkey if Feb when I found out I was pregnant. No matter how much I beg my boss not to, he still lights them up in the store. Currently due to being pregnant cig smoke (which I miss dearly) makes me want to puke. I lost my breakfast the other day when he lit one up inside, and I haven't had any morning sickness. And state law prohibits him from doing so, not like he gives a shit either. So, I could file a complaint, and most likely lose my job which I need badly at the moment, or I have to suck it up. How is that fair to me? (rhetorical question, not directed at you)

Btw, I have no beef with anyone who wants to smoke, my husband still smokes ( I really wish he didn't)just the people who don't bother to be courteous about it. In fact most of the ones I know are rather courteous. I see many who are not. But up here there is no smoking in bars, restaurants ect.... but people will go outside for a smoke and they'll just stand right by the entrance to the bar/restaurant. It has also caused a pretty big problem on our sidewalks with cig butts everywhere as well (even with the giant butt buckets everywhere).

If it was just me, I don't think I'd care a whole lot, but the fact that I don't want my kid exposed to it. If you have ever seen a sonogram of a pregnant woman just after she had a smoke (in her 8th month, I do believe it was) it makes an active baby (or fetus what ever floats your boat) go into a "trance" like kind of state. My nephew's mom smoked all through her pregnancy, and I have never seen such a skinny baby before. He also has asthma, tons of ear infections, and usually has some form of "goo". He's three now.

So, go a head and have the smoke, personally I don't care. Just a little common courtesy is all I ask for. I don't walk into smoking areas....please don't walk into my non-smoking area.



:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-03-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
406. I was on a flight a couple of weeks ago
And they gave me peanuts. When did they stop serving peanuts on planes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
164. remember the young woman who died after kissing her boyfriend who
had just eaten peanuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #164
301. Apparently that story turned out to be incorrect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
172. you are "dead wrong" about peanut allergy..whats wrong with you??
how can you make such uneducated statements like you are??

do you know if a person with peanut allergy tells an airline they have that allergy..no peanuts are allowed boarded on an aircraft??

because peanut allergy can be deadly!!

especially in a confined place.

you are soooooo wrong ..and your statements are worse than silly!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
181. Bull fucking shit!
I had a close friend with the life-threatening version of lacto intolerance. If someone who ate dairy breathed on him he would itch. If milk drops left over on a diner table touched him he'd break out in hives. If he ingested even a sip of dairy he'd die in minutes.

And his life sucked because of his illness, but he didn't go around punching milk drinkers or demanding that everyone accomodate him.

And my ex-girlfriend was about as serious an asthma case as you could get. In the hospital 2-3 times a month until she was on the proper meds. And she WORKED in a fucking smoking bar.

Take your whiny shit elsewhere.

Oh...and I DON'T EVEN SMOKE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #181
277. huh
So smokers helped put your girlfriend in the hospital on a regular basis and you don't even mind. I guess you really know how to turn the other cheek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. what sneeze and
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
185. BBQs should be outlawed also
fireplace fires, trash burners, car exhaust, fireworks, camp fires all emit toxic fumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because there was no attempt on their part to give you that attack.
If they knew you would have the attack and they intentionally blew smoke in your face to cause you to have the attack that is battery. Under your scenario there is no criminal intent. You have no case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. An estimated 23.2 million Americans suffer from asthma
That's a significant size of the population so that a person smoking in public with more than a few people around, such as in a bar, knows that someone near them likely has asthma.

Second, we do know second hand smoke causes cancer, so on two counts any smoker knows the they are having a negative impact on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:30 PM
Original message
Under your scenario
You go into a bar where people are smoking and you want to be able to sue and/or prosecute because your asthma was affected. Where is your responsibility to show some level of common sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. Where is a smokers responsibility
to show some common decency? There are no smoke-free bars. Why should an entire class of people be denied the right to go out in the evening so that a small group of people can smoke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #61
92. Where do you live?
There are smoke free bars EVERYWHERE. It's become a *very* popular option. And many places that permit smoking are offering smoke-free happy hours. There are smoke free rock clubs now, even. There are, in fact, entire cities and I think even a state or two where smoking in bars and restaurants is forbidden altogether, a ban that's enforcable by police intervention if necessary, which should appeal to you.

By the way, upthread you were talking about smoking outdoors. Glad to see you dropped that bit of silliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #92
140. There aren't any in my town right now
Seriously, not a single no smoking bar, club or pub. So that means that I don't go there, which means that someone else's bad habit is limiting what I do in my own life.

Beaumont, TX (my area) has passed an oridnance which bans smoking in enclosed public places. One can still smoke, just not in a restaurant or bar or movie theater or the like. So I ask you, why is it not enough to be able to smoke in the open air? Why do smokers feel like they should have the right to impose their bad habits on others? Because they are when they smoke in public, notwithstanding their protestations to the contrary. A drunk downing a 5th 2 feet from me does nothing to me, and if s/he wants to destroy her/his liver, not my business. But there is no way for a smoker to get around the fact that second hand smoke is harmful (unless of course they write it off as junk science). So why the antagonism from smokers to the rest of us, who just want to be able to go to a pub without leaving smelling like an ashtray, with clogged sinuses and a pounding headache? I really don't get why that is so hard for some people to appreciate. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #140
215. Drunk drivers kill many people
"A drunk downing a 5th 2 feet from me does nothing to me"

If that 'drunk' is speeding their car right at you or falls asleep at the wheel with you in their path, because they are dead ass drunk, I think they are definitely a hazard to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #140
375. No someone elses habit has nothing to do with it
You have no "right" to enter a privately owned business, the owner has a right to determine whether or not smoking is allowed there, he/she probablky figure it's better for their bottom line to allow smokers, if you don't like that don't go in there.

Bars are NOT public spaces. You have no "right" to be there at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Label Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #61
122. If you don't like it
Get some money together and open a smoke-free bar/restaurant. I used to smoke but I quit about 10 years ago and no normally smoke doesn't bother me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #61
125. Come to Austin, TX.
No smoking in bars or resturants here.

Quit whining, if your area dosen't offer it... go somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #125
239. Oh yeah that's fair.
"Don't like me poisoning your air? Just move hundreds of miles away from your home!" Yeah, that's reasonable. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #61
126. Even the private club where I work and am a member...
voted to go non-smoking indoors. And the smokers still complian when they go out to the patio they forced us to go out to. Funny... they NEVER went out there until the smoking in the building ban went into effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #61
175. again you are so wrong..and you are bordering on lying..
you state, quote:

There are no smoke-free bars.

that is total bullshit!

and a total untruth!

come to Fla ..or LA..or NY, or NJ

or many other states..

you are so silly..and total bullshit!

fly

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #175
241. In my six county area
there are ZERO smoke free bars. Maybe you're a jet-setter who can afford to fly to another state anytime you want to go out for a drink with friends, but most of us don't have that luxury. The fact that you can name a few cities with smoke free bars is joke and completely irrelevant to everyone who doesn't live in those places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #241
325. You are wrong.
Sorry, but you are. See post 324.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #241
355. first of all if you have such problems why are you drinking at all??
Edited on Sat Jul-01-06 11:52 PM by flyarm
my work has been to fly darlin...if you call working <flying>.... jet setting, so be it..but i call it as i see it..if you are so ill, why do you drink??????????

and why do you need to sit in a bar??

i have never found the need to sit in a bar..so why do you need to be such a pain in the ass to people who want to embibe when you are so damn ill you have to be a thorn in their ass for your pleasure?????????

your attitude is typical of the guy who says, do as i say, not as i do...

sit home and drink your damn drinks, if you can't take the heat when everyone else is enjoying themselves..if its not a joy to you..then do not put yourself in that situation!

oh i know..you just enjoy being the victim!..the self inflicted victim!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
251. That used to be called "assumption of the risk."
And it completely barred a tort action. Now it's just comparative negligence.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
184. And most people with asthma aren't whiners like you.
And they're not necessarily affected by smoke. Many are affected by dander. Should cats and dogs be banned next? How else can we accomodate you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #184
186. Molds, food allergies, pollen and
even being allergic to your own secretions can cause asthma. BBQs, camp fires, fireplace fires, fireworks, car emissions, trash burnering, even certain medications can trigger asthma attacks. It's the popular thng to blame cigarette smoke for all our ills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #186
261. Hallelujah!
I was recently diagnosed asthmatic, and the first doctor tried telling me it was because I smoked...well I've smoked off and on for a long while, and I smoke maybe 4 cigarettes a day at most if I am not in a bar or with other heavy smokers...and cigarettes don't aggravate my asthma. I asked him if he could be wrong and requested an allergy screening and he said it was definitely smoke.

So I get a 2nd opinion, get screened for allergies, and it's actually mold (some at my work) and cats (one recently decided to live with me) that aggravate my asthma the worst..cigarettes barely phase me unless I smoke a pack in a day or so.

Its the initial knee-jerk "Cigarettes are the devil" that bugs the shit out of me. Yes, I know they are unhealthy, but so are a lot of things we do and love...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #261
329. It is obvious...
...that I get respiratory distress from exposure to cigarettes because I am "allergic" to other things. Cigarettes are innocent!

Thanks for clarifying this, Doc! How could I have been so blind??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #186
368. Bingo! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #184
240. I see most of the whining coming from the smokers.
"I have a right to poison others around me! waaah waaah!"

Since most establishments don't allow cats and dogs inside their store, that's a great comparison. Thanks for making my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #240
302. Vs. charging people with assualt because your body can't handle nature?
You can't tell me that your asthma and allergies are so severe and yet they are only triggered by cig smoke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #302
330. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #302
337. Logically speaking, other asthma triggers are completely irrelevant.
Whether or not a person has other asthma triggers has no bearing on whether s/he should be avoiding exposure to second hand smoke . Physicians advise patients to avoid all of the patient's asthma triggers, which vary from person to person. Cigarette smoke is a pretty universal trigger, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #184
336. Nobody brings dogs and cats to bars and restaurants, unless they're
service animals.

I don't see the analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
42. Oh smoke that cigareeeete
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. My non-lawyer opinion- if you're in a place where you have a reasonable...
expectation of being free from cigarette smoke, I think you might have a case.

You can't sue someone for assault for punching you if you get in a boxing ring with them. You can't sue someone for assault for blowing smoke in your face in a bar where they allow smoking.

However, if you are in a movie theater, public library, hospital waiting room, train platform, elevator, or some other place where it is illegal to smoke, then I think it would be interesting to see the results of making a citizens arrest or filing a civilian criminal complaint.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Okay, I smoke. About a pack and a half a week.
Where I live there are many bars and restaurants that allow smoking. I'm sure that Carmona's press release will stop many establishments from smoking. Diehard smokers will go elsewhere. I don't smoke at home, and I work outdoors, so I hope my karma's still OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Intent could be a problem and I'm here to smoke up your thread!
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:29 PM by lonestarnot
:smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke: And I had intent, so sue me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. LOL!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. how about demanding that places have better ventilation instead of
being so mad at smokers?

I am an allergic non-smoker, but I don't get incensed over people smoking in public. if someone's smoke is bothering me, I will simply move. quite frankly, I think there are more important health issues to deal with, like the poisoning of our air, water and food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
43. are you sneezing yet?
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #43
171. lighting my incense cone, placing baking soda in your ash tray. . . .
have a drink!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #171
196. I smoke but incense makes me gag! n/t
The wife doesn't, same bullshit about my smoking indignation, damn that stinks, scowl, then she fires up a stick of incense and then there ten times as much smoke in the area. I can breath tobacco but not that damn perfume!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good idea.
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:16 PM by Luminous Animal
First, I am going after those who start fires in their fire places. Every year on the first cold nights of the year, I am in agony. Then I'm going after briquette using BBQers. It's all fun and games until someone (i.e., me) can't breathe.

Then, I'm going after car owners. Not are they only befouling the air in my immediate vicinity and negatively impacting my health, but their persistant activity is killing the entire damn planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
46. heh heh heh
:smoke: :evilgrin: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
104. And sue those bastards with gas lawnmowers, weed whackers, and
generators, too, while you are at it!!!!! And people who light CANDLES--the smoke from those things can kill ya!!!!!!!!!!

Next, mow down anyone who wears scent--be it aftershave or perfume. Let's sterilize the world, to benefit the few!!!!!

Shut down those coal fired plants too, before we find an alternative source of energy, screw the people who will freeze in winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. We all have to die from something.
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:17 PM by lildreamer316
AND you don't always get to choose what from.
BTW I don't smoke; I've never smoked, neither did my mother; and she died from 3 different kinds of cancer.
I don't like smokers, but it's supposed to be s free country, and I'd rather noone limited anyone's rights that much.
You have to draw the line somewhere.

IMHO; threads like this in an election year are a red herring. We have more important fish to fry. Ha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
71. The sooner the better, for some.
:shrug: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
97. One of my best friends died of lung cancer
She was a non-smoker all her life, never lived with a smoker, parents never smoked, had courteous smoking friends (like me) who went out on her deck to smoke (using the ashtray she provided) she jogged, was a vegitarian, took vitamins, was a total fitness and health freak.

Dead of lung cancer at age 39.

Fuck it...


:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #97
129. Japanese men smoke more than ...
any other segments in the world. Guess what? They have a lower rate of lung cancer than those same like segments of the world. If they are heavier smokers, they 'should' have a much higher cancer rate. Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #129
145. Do they smoke American cigs?
I honestly don't know if they do or not, but that might be the difference. American tobacco companies add so many toxins to their tobacco to make it more addictive than it naturally is, and that also makes it much more lethal than the natural form. Evil mo fos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #129
303. The statistics I'm looking at refute your claims
"Smoking related-diseases kill one in 10 adults globally, or cause four million deaths"

"It's estimated that about one in eight deaths is due to smoking (in Japan)"
"Lung cancer is the leading cancer, with more than 50,000 deaths a year (in Japan)."

Maybe Japan's not the best example to prove your point.

http://www.wpro.who.int/media_centre/fact_sheets/fs_20020528.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #97
176. i know a lady who also just died of lung cancer..who didn't smoke
who's dad was the athletic director at princeton u. whole family non smokers..she was a teacher..seems one of the schools she taught at had aspestos years ago..

she was the classic health nut..as was her whole family

so if someone wants to go after anyone..please feel free to fight this administration that just helped haliburton get away with murder over aspestos!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #97
202. That happens, but it is (thankfully) rare
MOst people who die of lung cancer were smokers. And, they almost always have secondary illnesses/diseases: emphysema, heart disease, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
338. Go fry them somewhere else then.
I always wonder about people who come into a thread only to tell other people they shouldn't be participating in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. Sue people who walk their dogs or let their cats out.
Or, how about people who grow plants that spur asthma attacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. eeewwww let's just think it over
with a :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. charge them with assault????
wow - try not going into bars where people smoke. This doesn't force you to be a hermit! There are plenty of non-smoking establishments. As someone else mentioned - people also have perfume allergies. Certain perfumes can give one a terrible headache, breathing problems, nausea - so what should one do? Sue someone for wearing too much perfume or simply remove themselves from the situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. "allergic to cigarette smoke"??
There're no allgergens in ETS. :shrug: Find an allergist who graduated from a real medical school. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
51. Yes and I suggest exposure on a grand scale.
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
68. You're right
I read an article in the waiting room of my doctor's office(of all places)that said one can't be allergic to smoke. The author equated the effect to one sniffing pepper and sneezing as a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
77. I know. It's an oft-repeated lie.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
85. Cigarette smoke contains toxic chemicals and irritants
That make allergies worse. THAT is what is meant when people -- and doctors -- say people are allergic to cigarette smoke. It greatly aggravates their allergies, or their asthma. That's what many REAL allergists have told me... and what every REAL medical source will also say. Playing semantics doesn't mean the core statement isn't true. When I smoked, I petty much had no real respiratory "life." Now, cigarette smoke has an adverse effect on me... and my sister, who is a nurse, and also says she's allergic to cigarette smoke, because it's easier than saying "Cigarette smoke contains toxic chemicals and irritants that make my allergies worse." Being a toxic chemical or irritant does not lessen the effect upon someone "allergic" to cigarette smoke, or mean the effects aren't real. Although apparently some posters on here think it does.

Although I understand the OP's point, and have empathy for it, I don't think people should charge smokers in a bar with assault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #85
94. I have a client who is a coroner
and he says that people who smoke 10 cigs a day or less show no different lung damage than a non smoker. So how in the hell is second hand smoke that detrimental?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #94
180. Jeez, tell me about it!
Next thing, they'll try to say that all the studies done on Global Warming weren't just made up by a hack. I mean, scientists have done research that secondhand smoke is dangerous, causes lung cancer, and causes asthma is children, but those studies must've been done by kooks who didn't know what they were talking about.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #180
201. Gosh I know -- just junk science... like all the rest of the kooks
Like global warming, etc. Sorry, you're right -- I've seen the light!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #180
221. Um! There Are Wholly Contradictory Studies
The studies conducted by NIH and CDC in the mid-90's (i was on the peer review committee for the publication of those studies, reviewing the math and statistics used in the conclusions) are completely at odds with the study just released.

In the 90's study, there was no causative link identified for cancer, heart disease, or the fomentation of any significant respiratory maladies from 2nd hand smoke. The study released on Tuesday had contradictory conclusions, but of course, i haven't seen the dataset upon which those conclusions were based.

So, it's not a matter of scientists being kooks, or proof of 2nd hand smoke's dangers. It's a matter of science being imperfect and fully credentialed and validly respected practitioners disagreeing about theories.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #221
320. The statistical commoditization of human beings seems to corrupt
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 10:58 PM by TahitiNut
... not only economics and politics, but science as well. (I'll try to be careful how I say this but, unless I were to go through successive drafts, revisions, and reviews, more than mere edits to correct typos and misspellings, I'm sure to express it clumsily.)

I'm not at all convinced that everything can be treated as impacting every human being in the same direction or manner. (We pretty well know it's not the same degree.) While this "Newtonian" approximation might have served us, in net, for many, many years, I think it's evident that there are major differences in the ways in which each human being is affected by certain substances, and these differences are totally and completely eradicated when the statistical myth of the "average person" is employed in today's science-based public policies and discussions.

These differences pose a very serious ethical conundrum in adapting public discourse to that reality in an ethical and just way, coming far too close to the age-old evils of racism, eugenics, and bigotry that lurk, ready to pounce, on any opportunity to necrotize social compassion, amity, and justice. Where, we must ask, is the line to be drawn between a society infringing upon the freedoms of multitudes instead of expecting the unfortunately susceptible to take reasonable steps on their own to compensate for their own susceptibility? After all, don't we expect those of use (including me) with bad eyesight to wear glasses? How large must we draw all signage? What size printing do we criminalize? I have yet to see a single person wearing an air-filtration mask in public. Not one. (I hear it's different in Japan.) The hyper-reactive Kaped Krusaders out to self-importantly stamp out all Evil, no matter how small and no matter who's harmed, are no better, imho. Between the two extremes, often indistinguishable from one another, there's not much room for reason and contemplation.

The majority of the most reputable and reliable studies indicate that there is a strong, but nowhere near total, correlation between the amount of smoking/drinking and the degree to which many (but nowhere near all) people are afflicted with associated maladies (lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, liver damage, brain damage). We think "more smoking means greater harm" because we reduce the mass population to the particular: one individual, slightly more female than male. To the degree there's some considerable amount of truth in the idea that more smoking means greater harm, there's a similar degree of completely contrary logic in the claim that tobacco smoke that's at least 100 times attenuated and dispersed poses some material risk. If that were so, the logic of proportionality (which infuses statistical analyses) forces us to conclude, then anyone who 'mainstreams' pack after pack, day after day, is sure to be quickly felled, just like a pine tree attacked by Paul Bunyan. After all, aren't we also certain that small (or 'moderate') amounts of alcoholic beverages are actually 'good' for us while far greater amounts inevitably result in cirrhosis, encephalopathy, and Korsakoff/Wernicke syndrome, including the permanent state of being a "falling down (former) drunkard." (I have direct, personal experience with the latter - and one far from being called a 'drunkard' by anyone. My mother.)

How are we, oh woe is us, to resolve the "a little is good" with "a little is bad" conflict? After all, if we're to accept the Sidestream Breathers of Truth proclamation that ETS is akin to sarin gas (or Agent Orange, my once-upon-a-time additive for swimming, showering, and bathing), then how can we drink to that (in a healthy way, of course)?

We seem trapped in the melodramatic paradigm of villain/victim/rescuer ... and it just does not serve us well. From my point of view, the "rescuers" are often identical to the "villains" and the victims are rarely themselves on stage.


Fuck the melodrama actors! The cartoonish, self-important posturing and lying is despicable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #94
199. Guess your coroner knows more than oncologists, etc.
I'm not arguing with you about this: cigarettes are bad for you and those who live in a smoking environment. This something you can't argue -- the facts back it up.

It is 2006, right? You do know when the news came out about cigarettes being bad, right?

Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #94
213. Because your friend is wrong,

Regular exposure to second hand smoke increases risks of various illnesses (cancer, I think emphysema, and possibly others) somewhat; smoking ten a day will increase them considerably.

I suspect that your friend is guilty of placing to much weight on personal experience and not enough on statistical evidence.

Possibly what he meant was "I have seen people who smoked ten a day who's lungs were no worse than those of many non-smokers", which is undoubtedly true. However, it is not true that smoking ten a day will not *on average* lead to worse lungs than not smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #85
127. Thanks for the 'enlightenment' ...
... aka a rationalization of a lie. :shrug: Funny how zealotry necessitates such contrived rationalizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #127
317. TN, I have the greatest respect for you and your posts,
but I think you're way off the mark here.

Here's what happens when I'm in an enclosed space with someone who is smoking: within five minutes my throat gets scratchy and I get post-nasal drip. Within ten minutes, I'm congested and start to get a sinus headache. Within twenty minutes I lose my voice and my eyes dry out. Later that day, if the exposure was prolonged enough, my eczema flairs up and I get hives. Strangely enough, these are the exact same symptoms I get when I'm exposed to dust and pet dander, which my last allergy tests confirmed as triggers.

I'm not an anti-smoking zealot. I honestly don't care if people smoke or not. As long as they don't blow the smoke in my face, it's none of my damn business. But I do have a severe physiological reaction to second-hand smoke (whether you want to call it an allergy or not)and to dismiss it as a contrived rationalization is absurd. When I first moved to a "smoke-friendly" country about three years ago, I would wake up every morning and cough for thirty solid minutes until my chin and the front of my shirt were soaked in phlegm. I've been low-grade congested for three solid years. I've adjusted somewhat (so that I don't cough until my chest is sore every day) but I still feel like hell most of the time.

I respect the right of people to smoke, but I would ask for a certain amount of understanding that the byproducts can be a serious irritant for other people (and not just hysterics).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #127
385. Its pretty zealous for smokers
to hide behind the weak rationalization that its ok to smoke around others because technicality they aren't allergic to cigarette smoke, even though it causes all the same problems as if they were.

I mean really, why should someone give a shit that they just gave the person next to them a runny nose, itchy eyes, sneezes, irritated throat and an asthma attack because after all no one is technically allergic to cigarette smoke? I guess the real-world effects don't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Can a smoker sue you for repression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. don't go to hell...lotsa smoke there (i hear)
with all the horrible crimes going on, for you to add to the public's burden of things to worry about by invoking tobacco smoke and pushing iraq, global warming, the corrupt media, a criminal regime in washington, growing ignorance of the mob etc, to the background...what this does is empowers the enemy, our common enemy. by creating the illusion that protestors are just whiners who'd whine about something else if, say, the bush admin was impeached, or if carbon taxes were instituted ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. Jeeze and I need to sue mother nature - I'm tired of frog eyes in spring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. No shit
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guinivere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
29. There are plenty of bars and restaurants that don't allow smoking.
Good grief! Why are people so sue-happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:31 PM
Original message
don't believe the rumor of the litigious society it's RW propoganda
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
109. It's the epitome of whining...
Bring your whining to court and spin the big wheel... maybe you'll get lucky;)


:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #109
289. Smokers whine a lot lately
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 12:50 PM by Radical Activist
"Waaah! I can't harm other people with my addiction by smoking in public! Bars will go out of business! Waaah!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #289
299. That's funny
The only whining I'm hearing is from non-smokers.

The bars in California have been non-smoking for years, and they are still in business.

:shrug:

No one wants to harm another and if they do, then it just goes to show how they can be just as rude as non-smokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #289
376. nope the whinging is PURELY from your end
smokers accept that we're the new lepers and we know that in most places we can't smoker anymore. However when a PRIVATE establishment allows me to smoke I will, if you don't like it take it up with the owners, who will no doubt say "I'm not forcing you to drink here"

From July next year smoking will be banned in all pubs here and from then on I accept that even if the owner would prefer to allow it, I can't have a smoke and a drink.

Since when is going to a bar neccesary anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. hmmmf microwave popcorn bags cause cancer
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. If you drive your car near me can I charge YOU?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
288. If I hit you with my car
then yes.
CAFE standards are there for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #288
364. Please tell me what CAFE standards...
Have to do with this thread. Fuel economy and smoking? Gotta see the linkage you are attempting here. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #364
383. Here it is:
People are saying we can't make laws against cigarette smoke because car pollution causes some of the same problems and there's no law against that! Its a kind of knee-jerk Rush Limbaugh argument that isn't thought through.

But, there is a law against it. There's a reason the government passes laws about containments in fuels, like lead at one time, and why there are laws (however weak) to make cars get better MPG, so that less people are negatively impacted by pollution from auto exhaust. So, if we can regulate emissions from cars, we can regulate emissions from smokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #383
399. I see where you are trying to go
But I don't see it as successful. CAFE standards are not in place for pollutant reasons. They are in place for mileage. Pure and simple. To insinuate that they help with pollutant levels in disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. You could start by suing this well know smoker.


And, he died to an allergy to fascist bullets, not smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. Heh heh heh
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #35
182. I was going to say the same thing! Hysterical! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
45. Don't go to bars!!!!
}(

Unless you wanna' outlaw drinking, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. OMG NOT!
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke: :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Be careful
you might trigger the spam bot. It doesn't irritate me that you're spamming my thread, but it does make you look childish, fyi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #53
59. You're thread irritated me
And I thought I was being rather clever. Guess you got my point. It's supposed to be a free fucking country, with emphasis on supposed to be. But the RW Surgeon General has apparently given you some work space, but it's not smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke: free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. If its a free country
I should be able to go out in public without my right to breath freely being taken away. I don't know why you think spamming is clever but I doubt anyone else does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #65
76. You sound like a whiner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #76
278. Oh no you hurt my feelings now
:eyes:
I've heard more than enough whining from smokers who don't want a public smoking ban. Its the biggest bunch of cry-babies I've ever heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
48. What do you when you cross the street?
Do you issue moral citations to all the car owners idling away whilst you walk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. I
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. Tobacco company execs as good as murdered my dad. I'm all for
giving them the death penalty, preferably by slow torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #55
222. Gee, There's A Progressive Point Of View
Sheesh!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #222
318. The appropriate response to your post would get me tombstoned
so I will have to content myself with wishing you no less than what I went through when my father died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #318
322. There would be a 'hint' in that.
Since when is 'progressive' equated with "hot-blooded, angry revenge"??

May the Bluebird of Happiness build a nest in your ribcage. :silly:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #318
326. I am very sorry for your loss
Watching a loved one or friend slowly die from wasting disease is utterly painful, and your have my deepest sympathies. What an ordeal for your poor father, and for those who sat by his side, helpless, at the end.

I am also sorry you're getting beat up in here for "daring" to say so. I am kinda shocked that you are getting mocked here because of your strong feelings about the role cigarettes played in your father's death. There seems to be deeper feeling for libertarianism and the science that proves cigareetes are not as harmful as many allege, and who have anecdotes about how some cigarette smokers avoid lung disease and who aver that cigerette smoking is no more dangerous than falling out of bed etc, than there is for the loss of a human being to serious illness. Go figure. I can't believe that people, whatever their political opinions are, don't have the decency and compassion to recognize your loss.

My mother in law slowly died from emphysema. She had 1.5 lungs, and still was so addicted that she couldn't stop. She even smoked in the hospital when she was ordered there during bouts of pneumonia. It was my first encounter with someone truly and hopelessly addicted, and it was tragic.

I wrote Lawton Chiles (former Gov of Fl and an anti-smoking activist) a letter about how, as I wheeled her into the hospice where she eventually died, that she was smoking in her wheelchair, flicking her ashes in a portable ashtray with "Smokers' Rights 1-800-555-5555" silk-screened onto it. He was similarly struck by the tragic absurdity of this scene, and sent me a touching letter back.

I guess I was too overwhelmed by her terrible illness to applaud her "choice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #55
298. Me, Too!
The executives who push death-by-addiction murdered many people near and dear to me, too.

I'd also like to see them receive the death penalty -- as slow and painful as the MILLIONS of deaths they inflicted through their lies and deceit in pursuit of PROFITS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
56. But what if I am allergic to the fibers in your suit or your clothing?
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:39 PM by tinfoilinfor2005
Or are you a cat or a dog lover? I have a deathly allergy to dog hair or sometimes cat hair. And if you have a guinea pig or white rats in my vicinity, you might as well call 911 because I'm dropping over dead with these allergens.

And you better not EVEN have a peanut shell laying around near me. Because I WILL CALL MY LAWYER BEFORE I DIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
57. PLEASE stop using my oxygen, OK? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. Every time he exhales, he's causing global warming. That's genocide.
Same 'logic' ... without the l*e about being "allergic" to tobacco smoke. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #63
197. LOL
That's some crazy wisdom, TN. Much appreciated, thanks for the giggles :D :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
58. I have asthma and cystic fibrosis and I disagree with you.
I think there should be bars that allow smoking and bars that don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #58
130. Where do you people live?
There are plenty of cities that have a smoke ban in place now days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #130
148. Not everywhere TG
In fact, the places that do are notable because they are so rare. There are 4 cities in the state of Texas that have passed such public bans- 4! And, um, Houston and Dallas are not included in that 4. The state's 2 largest cities do not have no smoking bans, just think about that before you jump on people. Not everyone can live in a place as cool as Austin. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #148
219. do something then...
Get on your town committee, introduce a bill... go door to door if you have to. Lobby a local establishment to change their smoking policy and start a group that frequents that place... show them there is money in offering an alternative. Don't whine to us. As far as rarity is concerned with no smoking establishments... i'm sorry you're stuck in an ass-backwards state. Nearly EVERYWHERE on the east coast has laws restricting smoking indoors. You can't even smoke in outdoor stadiums and public parks anymore!

As for medical studies there are some that are accurate and some THAT ARE NOT. Key is to check the agency/group supporting the study and where they get their money from. Recent studies on Marijuana and alfalfa sprouts are good examples. MJ study force fed monkeys and rats a mixture of 80% smoke (from MJ seed, no less) and 20% oxygen every hour on the hour for weeks on end. Guess what? The monkeys and rats were sick and lethargic and some of them died. With alfalfa they used dried sprouts and fed the mice only dried alfalfa in extraordinary amounts for the length of the study. Guess what? They concluded that alfalfa is unhealthy and can make you sick. That being said, i'm sure that living in a house with a smoker will affect how you feel, as will working at a smoking establishment. I know that smoking has affected my health and hey guess what... i'd rather go to a non-smoking bar too! As long as there is a patio i can light up on...

Peace and goodwill...
and hey, goodluck too...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #58
160. You should be careful...
yours is a reasonable suggestion. It should be up to the establishment..but every medium and large sized city should have both.

I say be careful because the purity police (on both sides of the issue) might take exception with you because your compromise is a good idea (IMO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
62. I am a smoker and it is my "right" to do so.
During the day, at my office, I smoke outside. And no one has the right to tell me I can't smoke inside my own home. I think that you just want to start a flame war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. My post
says nothing against those who smoke outside or in their own home, where it doesn't effect others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. No, you are just flaming against smokers, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
66. Pure flamebait...nothing more...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
67. Because it's flat out ridiculous.
Jesus Fuck, should I be allowed to charge people with assault because perfume and cologne make me sick to my stomach? I thought we were pro-freedom and anti-fascist here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
73. That's absurd
If you have a special condition, you should treat yourself with care and alter your behaviors accordingly. Why should the rest of the world cater to your issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_Aflaim Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
79. NOTHING is stopping you.
You just need to find a prosecutor insane enough to present the charges to a Grand Jury.

Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. Good one Freedom_Aflaim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #79
90. The only thing stopping you is the common sense of grand juries
And thank God for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #90
98. Thank GOD!
AND THANK GOD THE PRETZEL IS CLEAN (NEIL YOUNG ATTACK) smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
80. While you're at it
see if you can get the death penalty for those who insist on wearing perfume a half bottle at a time, cheap after shave afficienados and patchouli-lovers. OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #80
244. When someone shows that those things kill people
I'll think about it. Until then, the comparison is senseless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
84. Wouldn't it just be easier to lobby your state legislature to
change the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #84
95. No, easier to sue sue sue
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
87. Anyone got a light? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #87
96. sure
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #87
107. Wanna light of my cig?
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #107
153. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
91. So don't go to bars.
I have Asperger's Syndrome, and thanks to the way my brain is wired, I process auditory input differently than most people. Noisy environments lead to overstimulation, because I'm not able to separate the words of someone right next to me from background noise...I hear everything at more or less the same level, and can't filter my input. This leads to sensory overload, which at its most severe is basically indistinguishable from a fullblown panic attack. So you know what I do? I AVOID places where that's likely to happen. Simple common sense. Apparently you either lack same, or have an overblown sense of entitlement and the bizarre idea that the rest of the world should change simply to accomodate you (which is something most people outgrow by their sophomore year of college).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. OMG, you've describe the sense of entitlement deeply ingrained in most
repukes with such clarity! Wish I could nominate your post! smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #91
245. Aren't you describing those who smoke in public
with this sentence?
"have an overblown sense of entitlement and the bizarre idea that the rest of the world should change simply to accommodate you"

Why should the rest of the world change their behavior to accommodate those who use a deadly addictive drug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #245
250. No...
because smoking out of doors and in designated areas indoors is still LEGAL, last time I checked...which makes it not a 'sense of entitlement', but a RIGHT. You need to learn the difference. You also need to look up the meaning of the word 'logic', because you don't seem very well acquainted with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #250
254. You didn't even address my point.
Most logic/debate courses would say my point stands when it isn't challenged. My post wasn't about smoking outdoors or in places that don't affect others. The fact is that smokers are expecting the rest of society to change their behavior and be put at a greater health risk to accommodate their habit. That sounds like an astounding sense of entitlement to claim the "right" to harm others. No one has a right to knowingly harm others without cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #254
258. To address your point:
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 10:55 AM by Spider Jerusalem
I suggest you look up the statistics regarding the relationship between air quality, automobile exhaust emissions, and respiratory illnesses including asthma, emphysema, and lung cancer in major US metropolitan areas. (Statistically significant, and there's an observed direct relationship etween lower air quality and increased incidence of the foregoing.)

Secondly, in locales where the laws currently allow smoking in designated areas of bars and restaurants, non-smokers are very obviously aware that they may be exposed to secondhand smoke, and IF they voluntarily place themselves in such environments and THEN complain about exposure to smoke (which they bloody well ought to expect, if they aren't total morons) they have no-one to blame but themselves for choosing to enter that environment, and they have the option of lobbying for a change in the laws instead of just whining about it. If your right to not be exposed to smoke is so fucking precious, then DON'T GO PLACES WHERE IT'LL HAPPEN. It does NOT take a genius to figure this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #258
263. First,
You're correct about the problems of auto exhaust. That's a good reason to switch to alternative fuels, but it doesn't justify smokers. Its a completely tangential argument.

Second, the law doesn't always correlate to what is moral. You sound like a segregationist in the 50's. "If those people know what's good for them they'll stay in their own areas. If they use a whites only table they know what to expect and only have themselves to blame for what happens. Just don't go where you won't get lynched and stop whining about it." You're blaming the victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #263
272. 'blaming the victim'...
no, I'm not. Can you construct an argument without introducing a red herring? And are you not aware of the geerally negative consequences of attempts to deicde morality through legislation? There's no comparison between smoking laws and racial segregation. Faulty comparison, because in this instance non-smokers have the choice of patronising establishments with clearly separated smoking areas (and in some instances, these will even have separate ventilation), while Southern blacks in the Jim Crow era had no choice but to patronise racially segregated businesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #272
275. You don't get it.
No, I don't have the choice or freedom to patronize smoking establishments, not for more than a short time. That right has been taken away from me by smokers who make that environment uninhabitable for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #275
279. As previously noted...
you also have the right to petition for a change in the laws. Or alternatively to make efforts to have business owners realise that there's a large enough market of nonsmokers to make completely smoke-fre environments viable. Want nonsmoking restaurants? Organise a boycott. Do something constructive. If yo're too lazy to do that, MOVE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #254
280. Well, actually, the rest of society is expecting smokers to change
For most of history people smoked, wore perfume, etc when and where they wanted to or were allowed to by a business owner (who had freedom to make choices about the business they made and paid for).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #280
283. Yes, society sometimes asks those who harm others to change.
Child abusers and polluters have been asked to change too. Tough shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RangerSmith Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
99. I think the problem probably lies in the details..
You aren't allergic to cigarette smoke... you have allergies and are sensitive to cigarette smoke... among many other things.

It's technically not possible to be allergic to cigarette smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. Nope it's something deeper
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:58 PM by lonestarnot
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke: It's the have it my way, Frank Sinatra syndrome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #99
246. hmmm....
Tell that to my eyes, lungs and nasal passages because they seem to think I am and let me know that in very obvious ways. Plus, I tested positive on an allergy test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RangerSmith Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #246
268. doesn't mean it won't make your existing
allergies worse, you just can't technically be allergic to second hand smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
102. Reminds me of the guy who got upset about the profanity in a bar
Don't be in a bar, or find one that's non-smoking.

You go into a bar with athsma, that's your problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. yep!
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #102
238. Did the profanity
give anyone cancer? Stupid comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
106. If You're An Asthmatic That Goes To A Bar Knowing There Are Many Smokers
then any attack you suffer is your own damn fault ain't it?

This OP was extremist logic if I've ever seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
108. I love this little smokie smilie!
I've never used it before. Thanks for drawing my attention to him. I think I'll use him all the time now.

:smoke:


Ahhhh... so round, so firm, so fully packed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #108
118. mmmmm mmmm
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #118
230. puff puff...
this is the first *place* I've lit up in a *public place* in years....feels goooood---:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
110. I think you can punch them
self defense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #110
119. Or you can "smoke 'em out" cough cough cough puke cough puke
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
113. Why would you want to?
Do you like garnering attention with your problem? Seriously, I have physical problems that make life damn tough sometimes but I don't talk about them, I don't use them to excuse myself and I dom't impose them on others. It's really whiney and boring. The poor me syndrome doesn't endear you to others.

Find other things to do that don't involve sitting in a smoke filled bar....if you don't want to do that for yourself then sit at home and feel sorry for yourself.

Or you could make it simpler and go to a smoke filled bar, threaten to sue the smoking patrons and get that punch in the face you say sounds preferable.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #113
120. ewweee you be smok'n tonight.
smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke::smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
114. Move to Ireland.
And whatever you do, never, ever, never go to France. Not only do they smoke like chimneys, but their DOGS are there with them! Oooh.

But all sarcasm aside, there are a couple of venues that I used to love: one for its Red Hook ISB on tap and great grad student/junior faculty ambience, but the stogies and clove smoke would kill me, even with all the doors propped open and a fire dept. ventilation going by 11pm.
The other place was much better -- it had a patio. It had great bands and once again, cheap ISB on tap. Great ambience. Grad student and junior faculty and indy music scene bar with bikers, drag queens and Mercedes Benz factory workers mixed in... the smoke was overwhelming, but the music and the patio made it bearable and enjoyable.
One of the best things about Chicago is that most bars have out door patios or decks. It's great. I haven't been to NYC since the ban, but I can't imagine it much honored in dance clubs or after hour places!
To allow a place to allow smokers where it is not illegal is a business decision. Were there enough bar flies in your area who did not like smoke, surely someone would cater to the non-smoking ones.
Anyone with asthma that bad probably should not be anywhere near a bar that allows smoking.
Start your own or lobby to your local officials, but don't expect any support or sympathy from me. People know what goes on in bars. Why not go to the local coffee shop? But not in Europe! They smoke there, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
121. Because I'll kick your asthmatic ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #121
137. hahhaa....laughed so hard my Camel fell on my keyboard !!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #137
217. That reminds me
My dad smoked unfiltered Camels for 50 years. When he died, there was nothing wrong with his lungs. He smoked in the house all the time when my brother and I were kids, we inhaled all that second hand smoke for years, and we are both fine. Many of my friends can tell the same story. Makes me wonder about all these second hand smoke warnings...

Oh, and for the OP, I would never smoke in the presence of someone who has a medical condition that could be aggravated by it, and unless the person smoking is a flaming asshole, I can't think of any other smoker who would do such a thing. The vast majority will put it out if they know. I always ask if anyone minds if I smoke as do all the people I know who smoke. How is the person who is smoking supposed to know that you have asthma? We can't read minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #217
316. I hear ya...my old man smoked Pall Mall non-filters for 65 years...
Died at 86.....OLD AGE.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #121
144. Joad is in a royal ass way tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spacelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
123. Just take responsibility for your own health, nobody has an obligation
to be your caretaker. You are the only one who can know what to do to avoid an attack. Take precautions like somone with a bee allergy knows that going to a public park can "bee" hazardous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #123
386. Smokers should take responsibility for their addiction
and stop forcing it on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
124. I love this thread.
:smoke::smoke::smoke:

I think DU should have a smokers ONLY get together...it would be a blast! Beer and cigs for everyone!:toast::smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #124
132. half of us in Portland would be there!
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #132
143. Alright!
:smoke::toast:

I think a 'smokers ONLY' Du get together would be fun. No one bitchin', complainin', coughin', waving their hands to move the smoke, threatening to charge us with assault, and LOTS OF BOOZE would be flowin'!

Do smokers have more fun? I wonder.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #143
151. tis why we always meet outside
Portland has an amazing plethera of outside venues.

we're considerate types. :)

of course we have more fun! live hard, die young
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #124
146. Wooodamn whoo!
:smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke: :beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
128. It's odd....
You say cigarette smoke is a poison that kills you, but you failed to include liquor in that equation. I'm assuming you go to these bars to drink liquor, right? I take it you don't want to die from cigarette smoke, but cirrhosis of the liver is ok? Your complaint makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #128
133. Alcohol causes brain damage.
Q.E.D. :shrug: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #133
138. Hahaha
Well that COULD explain a few things. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #138
147. That about splains it all!
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 11:02 PM by lonestarnot
:beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer: :beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer: :smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke:

:beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer: on edit another :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #128
214. Two points.
The first is that when you drink, no-one else gets drunk, whereas if you smoke, people around you are placed at increased risk of cancer. Conversely, when I suffer the adverse effects of alcohol, I also get the pleasure, whereas with cigarette smoke I am suffering the drawback for someone else.

The second is that in the dangers of alcohol are far more non-linear than those of smoking. Smoking 100 cigarettes (or inhaling the second-hand smoke from them) is (very, very roughly), twice as bad for you as 50 cigarettes would be. Conversely, going teetotal for a month and then downing a bottle of spirits at one sitting is potentially fatal; drinking it at a rate of one sip a night is more or less completely harmless. Responsible drinking is more or less completely safe; there's no way of smoking that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #214
308. Oh man, you need some education on that idea that responsible
drinking is more or less completely safe. For some there is no such thing as responsible drinking and that puts others in danger. That argument just does not wash. Just talk to some clinics that specialize in alcoholism. Drinking does quite often result in loss of life to totally innocent people.

With that I'll go have a :smoke: and a :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #308
313. What?
Yes, drinking does quite often result in loss of life to innocent people. That doesn't have anything to do with whether or not there's such a thing as responsible drinking - for it to be evidence, you'd have to show that there were no approaches to drinking that didn't sometimes result in something bad.

A glass of wine every ?day?week? (I forget the recommended intake; I have a feeling that "red" may have been specified) is actually beneficial, I believe, and in no way either irresponsible or dangerous unless you try and drive or similar while under the influence of it.

It is probably the case that some people are not capable of drinking responsibly. It is undoubtedly the case that many people drink irresponsibly. It is not the case that responsible drinking is not safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
135. Come down to North Florida...smoking outlawed in bars and guess what???
Plenty of room for you....most of them are fucking empty now ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #135
149. heh heh heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #135
150. Plus it's easy to buy a gun and conceal it...
So if anyone assaults anyone with smoke, they can get shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #150
152.  Oh nice deaththreats while on line ..... hmmmf
:smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer::smoke: :beer:v
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #135
162. LOL. See? Smokers help keep bars in business!
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 01:04 AM by in_cog_ni_to
We're good for the economy! Not only do we pay out of our asses for our vice, but we help busineses stay in business.:smoke::beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #135
242. Yeah right.
Chicago went smoke free not long ago. I went to the bars there since then and they're as busy as ever. In fact, they have a lot of new customers who were kept away by the minority of the population that smokes. I guess it didn't occur to some owners that the only reason most of their customers smoke is that their larger base of potential non-smoking customers were being driven away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueraven95 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #135
265. I can't say specifically about North Florida
but a quick google search seems to suggest otherwise.

I found this article particularly interesting.

Restaurants Surprised to Find Smoking Bans Positively Affect Business By Louise Taylor, Lexington Herald-Leader, Ky.
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News


Smoking bans do affect business -- positively.

"It increased our business because our table turn is quicker," Brown said. "People just don't linger to smoke. And we have some new customers."

Brown's experience is anecdotal, but more than 80 scientific studies, most peer-reviewed and published in economic and medical magazines such as the Journal of the American Medical Association, back it up. Those studies, undertaken by academics, individual states, cities and the federal Centers for Disease Control, looked at restaurant or bar sales-tax collections in Texas, Indiana, California, New York and several other states -- and found that smoking bans have no adverse financial effect on restaurants and bars. Sometimes business increases by going smoke-free.

snip

In El Paso, Texas, which has one of the toughest bans in the nation, officials report the effects were stunningly positive for businesses that fought the ban hardest: an 18 percent increase in bar liquor sales in the first nine months after the ban compared with the same nine months a year earlier. Restaurants showed a smaller increase, about 4 percent

http://www.hotel-online.com/News/PR2003_1st/Feb03_BanAffect.html


There are, of course, websites that argue either one side or another, but I tried to stay away from anything that seemed obviously biased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
154. Because it would be over the top; the courts are already overcrowded
and we already have too many laws.

Though it amazes me the bitter personal attacks on this thread in defense of something that is killing the people who are doing it. Those getting first hand smoke are only damaging their health, so it must be a true addiction to get so emotional about it. If you could sue them for assault, then it might save their lives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #154
156. Me too
I don't understand it either. Denial really is a strong emotion, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adwon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
157. A couple of reasons
1. You came to the nuisance. While the particular doctrine doesn't necessarily fit to this particular example, the reasoning does. You chose to go to a place where smokers were. Then you complain when the smoke affects you. You brought yourself to the cause; the cause did not come to you.

2. In the four states that still have it: contributory negligence. Reasoning is the same as #1.

3. Comparative negligence. If you are determined to have been less than 50% responsible, you get a payout. I figure you could try a suit on this theory. I don't think you could persuade a jury. Why? The problem would have been caused by smoke at the bar that you freely chose to patronize.

Oh, I forgot the criminal aspect. That's easy. It's not a crime to smoke. The police don't get that kind of discretion, thanks to a great William O. Douglas opinion. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
158. So pity those who started smoking as kids, then punch them as adults, hm
Start young. Punch those smoking kids. That'll teach em, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
159. Just move to California, for pete's sake. It's not personal.
I live here, and smokers have fewer and fewer places to light up, indoors or out. .

As for your health problems, I'm sorry for your troubles but please give the rest of the world a break. Not everything is personal or aimed at you with malicious intent.

Use your energy in trying to get the EPA back on track, and in trying to get a national health care system in place. That would help you and everyone else as well, better than lashing out at individual addicts.

Hekate -- a nonsmoker

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazz2006 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
165. You're kidding, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
167. You WILL see smoking raised as an issue in custody disputes (rightly so)
The Surgeon General concludes: "The scientific evidence is now indisputable: secondhand smoke ... is a serious health hazard that can lead to disease and premature death in children and nonsmoking adults" because "secondhand smoke exposure causes heart disease and lung cancer in adults and sudden infant death syndrome and respiratory problems in children":

Health Effects of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Children

Now let’s turn to the special health risks that secondhand smoke poses to children. Because their bodies are still developing, infants and children are especially vulnerable to the poisons in secondhand smoke.

Respiratory Infections

Secondhand smoke is a cause of respiratory conditions in children—we’ve known that since our study of second hand smoke effects began in 1986. However, after further research and analysis, we have found that the consequences of smoke on a child’s respiratory system are more severe than originally thought. Acute respiratory infections such as bronchitis and pneumonia, respiratory symptoms such as cough, phlegm, wheezing, and breathlessness, more frequent and severe asthma attacks, slowing of lung growth, and ear infections have all been proven to be results of exposure to secondhand smoke in children.

SIDS

In an important new finding, we have determined that secondhand smoke is a cause of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Infants who die from SIDS tend to have higher concentration of nicotine in their lungs and higher levels of cotinine (a biological marker for secondhand smoke exposure) than infants who die from other causes. We have also found that infants who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth are also at increased risk of dying of SIDS.

In addition, babies of nonsmoking women who are exposed to secondhand smoke during pregnancy are at risk for a small reduction in birth weight. Chemicals in secondhand smoke appear to affect the brain in ways that interfere with its regulation of infants’ breathing.



Will parental smoking now be a factor in custody disputes? You bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingpie2500 Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #167
200. Please-----This report from a surgeon general appointed by Bush?
They have to blame the cig's because if not, they would HAVE to do something about the TRUE cause. Put the blame where it REALLY lies!! This country is SO polluted and we have got to blame tobacco or we have to blame the air! And we know bush's record on pollution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #167
218. There was one a few years ago
I forget which state it was, but the mother, who smokes, was ordered by the court (after her ex husband filed a complaint) that she had to quit smoking or lose joint custody of her son. The judge deemed the cigarette smoke to be harmful to the child's health. She could not even smoke when the child was not in her home. I'm not kidding, I'll try to find a link and post it if I find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #167
228. But if the judge is a smoker?
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #228
339. Judges who regularly speed still enforce speeding tickets.
Just because the judge smokes you can't assume he would not consider smoking in the presence of children a factor to weigh against awarding custody. In fact, I know several parents who smoke, and most of them don't smoke in front of their kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDU Socialist Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
169. because the law on assault is pretty clear
and was made that way to prevent stupidity like you suggested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
170. Because it's a totally fucked-up idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressivePatriot Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
173. Non-smokers hate my pursuit of life, liberty and happiness.
It works both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
174. Because what you're proposing is illegal.
These people are not reaching down your throat and putting their cigarettes out on your precious lungs.

You know, my mother who has tons of allergies and sinus problems went gambling the other day and came back complaining about the smoke. But did she break down and whine about it like a victim? No, she f'n dealed.

Lessons from our mothers, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
179. Why shouldn't epileptics be able to charge the cops with assault...

...all those flashing lights!

Why shouldn't Porphyria sufferers be able to sue the towns that own public beaches for not putting up a huge sun shield over the whole beach and attached ocean?

Peanut allergies? Let's make them little buggers illegal.

And damn it, I think that lawnmowing going on over there across the street may be givimg me a hay fever. That's it. I'm getting my shotgun. It's self defense after all.

You have a disease. I'm sorry to hear that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
187. You'e Wasted My Time - I'm Calling The Cops!
Grow up. Just because you have a condition (one that I share, by the way, but I'm allergic to grass, trees and diesel fumes) doesn't mean the whole fucking world has to carry you around on a chip. Should I be suing the public transportation department because their buses make me ill? Or should I be responsible for my own health?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
188. Can I charge
someone with assault if they are wearing a cologne or perfume that I'm allergic to?

We have a vendor that comes into my workplace. His cologne/aftershave sends me into sneezing fits, my head fills up, eyes water. One time, I banged my head on my desk from sneezing so hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
189. Join us here in Washington State!!
We have fabulous anti-smoking regulations for bars, restaurants, and all public places!

I have asthma, too, and I'm beyond ecstatic that I can finally go to a restaurant or a bar and breathe while I have fun and enjoy myself.

I do think those of us who are allergic to cigarette smoke should be able to sue for assault and battery. Pretty soon the law should catch up with what is only common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #189
195. perfume never gave anyone cancer. what a provocative opener
to this thread but what a sad thread this is. people die from smoke. some think this is an assault on their liberties and rights to kill themselves by smoking. it isn't. this is a defense -taking out the assualt part- on the VAST majority of non-smokers not to be infected by smoke.

when drinkers drive, their private act of drinking affects negatively others.

When smokers blow out their smoke, I have to breathe it and my CHOICE NOT TO DO THAT doesn't seem to mean dick to a lot of folks. Very sad.

Your freedom ends at my nose.

Reread this:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/27/AR2006062700710.html

among those that die each year from second hand smoke:

The report does not present new scientific data but is an analysis of the best research on secondhand smoke. It said, for instance, that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated last year that exposure to secondhand smoke kills more than 3,000 nonsmokers from lung cancer, approximately 46,000 from coronary heart disease, and as many as 430 newborns from sudden infant death syndrome.

"This report once and for all ends any scientific debate about whether exposure to secondhand smoke is a cause of serious diseases like lung cancer and heart disease," said Matthew Myers of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

The report, he said, "leads to one inescapable conclusion: Only comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws can protect all workers and the public from the serious, proven health risks of secondhand smoke. . . . Public-health advocates will use this report in every state and every city and every workplace, restaurant and meeting place that doesn't already have a comprehensive smoke-free law."

430 newborn babies. Dead from second hand smoke. Not funny, not clever, not whining. Fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingpie2500 Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #195
204. So where are the reports on OTHER pollutants? Factory emissions, etc.
No NEW scientific data? This is such a crock and a red herring.
There are no smoking bans in England and their cancer rate is 1/3 ours is.
Simple explanation? Stricter pollution bans overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #204
310. You make it either/or. ban all pollutants. Factories? Ban them.
ALL pollutants, including smoking someone else's smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
191. I have high blood pressure. If I don't take my medication and
continue to do activities that raise my blood pressure without doing anything to lower it, who do I get to sue?

Most. Stupid. Argument. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
203. We have jumped the shark in terms of civility in this country
I am truly sorry for your problems, but should that impinge upon everyone else?

At the same time, smokers, shouldn't you also think about those around you (note, many of you do)?

What gets lost in the argument is any sense of civility, balance, or (that old-fashioned word) compromise...

Yes, person with lung problems AVOID going to places that have smoke!

And you, yes you smoker! Try not to make an obnoxious plonker out of yourself!

Anti-smoking nazis and smoking ones can both go to h#$$ as far as I'm concerned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
205. I'm just glad that I'm an ex-smoker now
(for a handful of months anyway) and I don't have to worry about it.

It's good to be free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
206. It is your right not to go to a bar were smokingis allowed
Why would you want to go to a place were you know harm will come to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
207. Arguing with addicts about their addiction
is always a losing proposition.
It won't be long before smoking is illegal in most public places. Be patient.
Until then, it's best to accept your predicament and protect yourself as best you can.
You have my sympathy, I used to sing in a band and had to breathe in a bunch of nasty smoke while doing it. Wreaked havoc on my voice, and made me feel like shit the next day - I didn't smoke or drink!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
209. I'm With You!! Throw the Fucking Book At All of Them!
Find the BEST lawyer you can find, and throw the fucking book at every last one of them!

There is ABSOLUTELY NO good reason for ANYONE to keep smoking -- NONE!!!

It is an addiction that degrades the health of the person who smokes! People who smoke are in a STRONG state of denial -- they must think that they will be the lucky ones who don't die of llung cancer or COPD or some other long, painful illness that robs them of their ability to beathe. I'm told it's like drowning. People who smoke are like addicts that REFUSE to get the help they need.

Give them the "push" they need to stop -- Get the legal system on them!

And the cancer-pushing tobacco companies that made them that way -- sue the fucking shit out of them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #209
229. bwwwwwwwwwwwaa hah hah hah
:smoke: :smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
210. Two words
Grow up.

If your so sickly should you be out drinking poison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobby911 Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #210
224. probably shouldn't post this but
Here in my little town in Virginia we smoke all day at work.


:smoke: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
220. My friend is allergic to peanuts.
Can he charge me with assault with a deadly weapon because I eat a PB sandwich near him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
223. because assault has to have intent.
not everyone will know your problems with cigarette smoke.
However, IF they knew, and INTENTIONALLY blew smoke at you, that would be assault.
(haven't read the whole thread, probably someone already brought this up)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
227. A bar is a private establishment...
If that private establishment allows smoking, and it bothers you, go somewhere else that doesn't allow smoking. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timber84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #227
232. Agree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #227
234. That argument sounds familiar.
Like those who said they have the right to segregate their privately owned establishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #234
276. What a load.
Please don't compare your situation with civil rights violations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
231. don't we have better things to do with our time folks
really...i mean, c'mon. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
237. You can charge them yourself Go to the courthouse and file your lawsuit
You can sue an individual for it or all smokers you have come in contact with.

If you want it to be a criminal charge then you will have to go and get your local government or state to pass a law and you will probably need help raise money for friend of the court briefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
243. i'm with you, Radical Activist.
i went "home" to the states a few days before christmas healthy. i ended up in the ER with severe respiratory distress because even in the hotel we stayed in, you walk into the building and you're hit BAM with the smell of smoke. anywhere we went it was the same thing. no bars involved. i used to smoke - quit 25 years ago this october when i "got it" about how dangerous the stuff is. the point is, i had to go to the ER, i had to pay for it, i had to lose several days of my vacation because of that habit. there's no excuse anymore for anyone to plea ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #243
247. Wow.
I hear smokers rights advocates maintain that its their right and its no one else's business. Some don't seem to get that they are effecting other people whether they realize it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #247
249. exactly.
i couldn't care less what people want to do in the name of their freedom. i draw the line when it infringes on my freedom to be healthy.

another beef: it affects all of us in how much we pay for health insurance. you can't imagine how many patients i do reports on who have COPD, are on O2, and STILL SMOKE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #243
253. 'home to the States'?
Where do you live, then? Not Europe, I'm guessing. (Funny thing...most countries in Europe, once derided as the home of 'nanny statists', still allow smoking in most public places including bars and restaurants.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #253
271. we've been down here in
st. lucia for almost a year (dh's med school). so much clean air! nobody smokes. these people are so healthy that it really makes you wonder about what most americans think is a state of health, not just a lack of disease. i've seen people walking down the beach, pop up in the air and flip over, and go right on walking, smiling all the way! it will be very, very hard to leave, which we have to do in august.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
255. well you can move to a city with a smoking ban in bars such as
Madison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
256. As a former two pack a day smoker...I watched something terrible happen to
my 4 year old boy last Wednesday.

Took him to a local lakeside restaurant. Our table wasn't ready so they seated us in the large open bar area. Here he was...fresh faced and clean little fella...bright eyes. Sipping his Shirley Temple.

The couple two tables away finished their meal and lit up. Within seconds, the smell and cloud hits my little boy.

Within 5 minutes, his nose was running and his eyes were red and "scratchy". He was going through kleenex after kleenex. He had NO idea it was from the cloud of poison that he was breathing in.

Now, before all the pro-smokers jump on me, I KNOW that he was not done any irrepairable harm. We were only in there for about 10 minutes. (That's all I could take because the smoke from two measly cigs triggered a migraine for me and I had to leave.)


But just seeing that perfect little healthy boy being so grossly affected by that stench and fumes really made me thank God about that I was able to quit.

When I was able to quit, I promised myself that I wouldn't turn into one of those anti-smoking nazis. And I haven't. But it really is a horrible thing to inflict on other people.

Fortunately, little by little, smoking will no longer be tolerated in public. I am in favor of that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
257. This thread is making me want a cigarette
So I'll catch y'all later. Gotta go outside to the designated smoking area, which is behind a 10-foot concrete block wall and next to the pump room, so it's noisy as hell.

Thanks to lonestarnot for teaching me the :smoke: smiley!!

:smoke: :smoke: :smoke: :smoke: :smoke:

Tell St. Peter at the pearly gate that I hate to make him wait
But I just gotta have another cigarette!

:smoke: :smoke: :smoke: that cigarette!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
259. I like a country where we can actually have this fight to begin with.
You would prefer your opponent be stopped by law. I'd like to blow smoke in your face and you be pissed about it. I'd like someone to blow smoke in my face and I be pissed about it. I'd like to be free to be pissed off and pissed on.

Why do you hate our freedoms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateShame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
260. ""Non-smokers die every day. Sleep tight!

See, I know you've employed some kind of eternal life fantasy because you've chosen not to smoke; let me be the first to pop that fucking bubble and send you hurtling back to reality – because you're dead too. And you know what doctors say: 'Shit, if only you'd smoked, we'd have the technology to help you. It's you people dying from nothing who are screwed.'"

Words from a man wiser than I.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #260
281. What stand up comic said that?
Gosh, I never realized I was going to die. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
262. Ignore the corporate polluters, and go after citizens.
Mission Accomplished!

Thanks for not spending energy going after the REAL rapers of enviornment and public health. The corporate polluters that dump chemicals in our atmosphere and waters.

Just go after the little guy. See how much personal freedom you can erode, while giving the big polluters a free ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #262
267. Don't worry
I can do both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
264. Because that would make you a jerk
and you are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
266. there is no such thing as an allergy to cig smoke
it's a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #266
269. Again
tell that to my eyes, lungs and nasal cavities that tell me a very different story. Or, read the posts up-thread that address this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #269
284. I'll check them out, thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #269
292. Irritant, not allergen.
There's a difference. It is IMPOSSIBLE to be 'allergic' to cigarette smoke. Repeated clinical tests have shown that exposure to tobacco smoke does not trigger production of IgE antibodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #292
293. So what?
If the effects are the same it really doesn't matter. Its a pointless technicality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #293
294. By that logic, we should call snow 'rain'...
after all, it's still H2O precipitation, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #294
295. lol
that really made no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #295
296. Makes perfect sense...
after all, one is the same as the other, no? No different than your insisting that you can say you have an 'allergy' to cigarette smoke (even though it's impossible) because the effects are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
270. Moral indignation again? Get a life!! If you don't like it don't go to
bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
287. I don't smoke indoors, but why shouldn't I be able to sue you
for assault over perfumes or even your car exhaust?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
291. Why shouldn't I be able to charge cat owners with assault?
Living in Massachusetts, I don't have a problem with finding smoke free bars, but I also have asthma and while not all that allergic to smoke, cat hair (and some dog hair) just kills me. If I'm out anywhere (not just in bars), and come into contact with someone with their pet hair all over them, why shouldn't I be able to call the cops?

As far as second hand smoke causing more harm then physical assault, who the hell came up with that assertion? Second hand smoke may kill you if you are exposed to it OFTEN over an extended period of time. If you got beat up OFTEN over an extended period of time, I'll bet the effects of second hand smoke would not seem nearly so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvilAL Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #291
304. maybe
he knows because he does get physically assaulted on a regular basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #291
328. Avoid cats n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
300. I'll call you a waaambulance !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #300
327. Are you serious?
Edited on Sat Jul-01-06 01:07 AM by chookie
So people who suffer seriously from respiratory disease need to ride to the hospital in a "waaaa-mbulance" when their symptoms arising by exposure to irritants they were unable to avoid cause shortness of breath and collapse?

Thanks for pointing this out! Next time I get into a life-threatening breathing emergency from exposure to an irritant that I was unable to avoid, I'll be sure to call for the "waaaa-mbulance."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ani Yun Wiya Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
305. It would seem to me...
That:

1. You have a serious condition.
2. You are willing to place yourself at risk.

Might I suggest something not mentioned as a possible alternative:

Wear a gas mask, or some other form of protection when going to such places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
306. I'm stationed mostly in Germany
...where the notion of a smoke-free restaurant is on a par with the Scream movies, and
elicits a similarly horrified reaction from the populace. The so-called Greens here have kids
on their arms at party meetings, and blow constant streams of smoke at them while they decry
nuclear power on TV as hazardous to their kids' health.

If you're a nicotine addict, fine. If you intend to stay that way, fine, too. You wouldn't
think of forcing me to shoot heroin if I don't want it. You wouldn't think of forcing me to
drink 150 proof vodka if I didn't want it. Don't force me to breathe in your smoke either.
What you do in your own home or car is your business.

The Germans vehemently defend their right to smoke in all restaurants, just like they defend
their right to drive at 150 miles an hour down the autobahn just because there are no speed limits.
But you would think at some point rational thinking would enter into the equation. I wish.

I ask them if they think it's OK to take a crap on the floor in the middle of a restaurant.
They say, no, of course not. I ask why? They answer: it's disgusting, it stinks, and it
is dangerous to the health of everyone else. I ask, so why, in that case, is smoking cigarettes
or cigars OK? When cigarette or cigar smokers leave the stench of their smoke in the furniture
or drapery of a place, do they take it with them when they leave? Hardly.

If you're a smoker, fine. If you're addicted, fine, but admit it. Just consider the effect it
has on those who are adversely affected by it, and act accordingly. If that is too much to ask,
then you need treatment. If not, then by all means do your thing.

I always get the argument about the 98 year old man who smoked 14000 cigarettes a year and never
was sick a day in his life. There is always the comparison to the blind man who crossed the Autobahn
on foot at rush hour and was never hit by a car. In both cases, we are talking about the exception,
not the rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #306
309. I like
your analogy about taking a dump in a restaurant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
312. because cigarettes are legal.
if they're such a problem for you- don't frequent establishments where people are likely to be performing legal acts that you can't tolerate- pretty simple, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #312
314. So Let's Make The ILLEGAL
Really, you make this far too easy.

I suggest that we make cigarettes illegal.

That way, the state would not have to worry about "enforcing" the ban (something that seems to be a real concern with some of the people who have posted here).

Instead, the state could simply rely on people like me filing lawsuits against anyone I see smoking, and charging them with assault.

PERFECT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #314
321. go for it...but don't get your hopes up-
because it isn't going to happen, and it definitely SHOULDN'T happen- and i'm a non-smoker.
making tobacco illegal would be just as ignorant as making alcohol illegal during the prohibition years.

why do some misguided fools think that a nannny-state is a good thing?

it really boggles my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #312
344. Why should I be forced to give up my social life
for the benefit of smokers? They're the ones giving people cancer. Seems pretty simple that my right to exist in public should supersede their right to harm others without cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #344
350. you aren't.
Edited on Sat Jul-01-06 05:06 PM by QuestionAll
i don't understand why you would want to go to a place where smokers congregate in the first place, if their legal habit is so offensive to you.
especially when there are LOTS of smoke-free places for you to spend your social life.
for instance- people can't smoke in movie theatres- go to the movies.
ditto for book stores, plays, many restaurants, and many many other places...like my grandmother used to say- only the boring are bored- i don't drink alcohol, or smoke tobacco, so i have no reason to go to bars anyway, and my social life is FANTASTIC!

but if it's that important to you- you are completely free to open up an establishment of your own, and make it completely smoke-free if that's what you like-
see, no social life problems AT ALL...:hi:

that's what makes this a great country- adults are free to make their own choices.

btw- there are a number of people with peanut allergies, who can be put into lethal anphylactic shock by the mere smell of peanut butter/peanuts- do you feel those items should be banned in all public places so that those with the conditon can enjoy a full social life?
Ditto for perfumes and colognes that can severe health problems for people with multiple chemical sensitivies...so, same qquestion- should they be banned in public places?

also- there is NO conclusive proof that second-hand smoke causes cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #350
379. You must be libertarian
Because libertarians are the ones who suggest that only those with enough money to own land or open a business should have rights and that is what you're arguing here:

"but if it's that important to you- you are completely free to open up an establishment of your own, and make it completely smoke-free if that's what you like-"

That's nice that you're happy with a social life that doesn't involve any bars, bowling alleys or dance clubs, but I'm not you so your preferences are irrelevant to my life.

The peanut argument has been brought up earlier in the thread. Its a weak attempt to grasp at straws. Let me know when millions of people start dying of peanuts, as is the case with cigarettes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #379
387. you seem like a very selfish person-
Edited on Sun Jul-02-06 10:39 AM by QuestionAll
you want the rest of the world to bow down to YOUR desires.

YOU want a social life that involves "bars, bowling alleys or dance clubs", and YOU want them to be smoke-free for YOU.

it must be that old forbidden-fruit thing at play we ALL want what we can't have...
i'm confused- if you can't step inside bars bowling alleys and dance clubs for fear of your very life, how do you even know that those are the places you want to be? and why would you even want your social life to revolve around smoke-filled places?

and are you saying that there are absolutley NO bars, bowling alleys or dance clubs that exist in your area? plenty of churches and other social groups have dance nights, and i'm guessing that many of them would be smoke-free. have you ever actively sought ought such alternate venues...?

"...Let me know when millions of people start dying of peanuts, as is the case with cigarettes."

millions of people are not killed by second-hand smoke, and i'm guessing that the people who have peanut allergies feel just as strongly about their health problems and socializing as YOU do about YOUR asthma- it's nice of you to re-inforce and confirm the whole selfish, self-centeredness of YOUR attitude. :hi: thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #387
388. Selfish?
Smokers giving other people health problems because they can't stop satisfying their addiction long enough to wait until they get home is selfish. Forcing a majority of the population out of most evening night spots because they just have to light up in public is selfish.

Oh golly gee, I can go to a church dance you say? How wonderful. Thanks smokers, the only night life I can have is the church social! :hurts:

I didn't claim that millions died from "second-hand" smoke, but from cigarettes, and millions do die because of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #388
394. selfish.
you seem to want everything to be done on YOUR terms.
LOTS of people apparently enjoy dance clubs, bars, and bowling alleys just fine the way they are- if there were a market for smoke-free ones, they'd be all over the place.

and as a severe asthma sufferer, i guess you're learning about what it's like to be part of a minority of people that many others don't really think is significant enough to worry about- kinda like what peanut-allergy sufferers go thru...

oh, the irony...
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #394
395. You can repeat the red peanut herring all you want
Its still an invalid comparison and weak argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #395
398. and the severe asthma sufferer argument is just as weak-
Edited on Sun Jul-02-06 01:10 PM by QuestionAll
and your selfishness is hilariously, deliciously ironic...

:rofl: :rofl:

btw- since alcohol is responsible for MANY MANY deaths as well- and drunk drivers impose their dangerous habits on others as well, so-

don't you think that we ought to consider banning alcohol at bars and dance clubs as well...?

happy dancin'... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #398
400. There are criminal penalties
for harming others when driving drunk. That's a good comparison that once again, proves my point that cigarettes should be treated similar to other acts that harm others and carry a criminal punishment.

BTW, Have you been smoking because...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-03-06 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #400
401. i don't smoke.
well, not tobacco anyway- and it doesn't bother me in the least to go into a smoke-filled establishment...but if it DID bother me- i'd just go elsewhere, rather than go off crying like a little girl about how my rights to enter any building i choose, whenever i choose, and under my terms, is being violated...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reckon Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
315. Then can I sue or charge drivers with a crime?
Do you drive?

Auto's pollute much more than smokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #315
343. Its called CAFE standards.
So yes, companies that produce cars which cause too much air pollution due to low mileage are charged with a crime. I think those laws should be stricter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
323. I understand your frustration
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 11:58 PM by chookie
I too have serious chronic lung disease which makes my life miserable - COPD, which, if I live long enough, has the potential to turn into emphysema. Bummer. And I'm not a smoker.

My social life is curtailed to some degree -- I do not go to bars, to avoid the smoke, and had to give up going to see live music in clubs because of the smokers. Thank heavens I work out of my home. I make every attempt to avoid places where smokers can be found, and I am the "suffer in silence" type, so I do not ask others to stop, wishing that they would be thoughtful enough to stop, but this is rare.

Recently I've had a few episodes in outdoor gatherings -- outdoor concerts -- where I find myself getting blasted by cigarette or cigar smoke. I gasp for breath and cough horribly. A disturbing episode last week -- I started coughing badly when somone started smoking, and when I looked around to see where the smoker was so I could get away, he glared at me with intense hatred, as if I was making some political statement by coughing and wanted to curtail his constitutional right to smoke. It was very weird.... Another time, I was in a group of people who approached the stage closely, so we were pretty packed in there -- and some guy lit up a cigar in the middle of the dense crowd. Sorry -- I think that is out of line, and the libertarians here can kiss my ass for disapproving.

In my city, the local zoo passed a regulation calling for the zoo to be smoke free. Some libertarian lady wrote a passionate LTTE, incensed that Big Government was regulating peoples' lives, etc etc etc. Come on -- insisting on smoking at the ZOO? -- a place popular with children, and in which the keepers must consider the health of the animals above the God-Given-Rights of smokers? After all -- I have to avoid places where smoking occurs -- why is it so offensive to make *some* public spaces smoke-free? Gosh -- do libertarians want me to avoid the zoo too?

I just don't get the hysteria of the libertarian types, who don't give a shit about their fellow man -- even the disabled and the infirm -- and put their own personal habits above all, and abstract concepts above lives and health of others. Ha ha -- and this is a "democrat" forum -- I shudder to think what the Repukes have to say about the subject.

That being said -- I can't get behind you on the "sue for assault" platform.

But I can sympathize why you feel that way -- people who ain't been there probably don't realize that encountering smoke (and other irritants) *feels* like a serious assault. I have trouble breathing for days afterwards, which seriously affects my life. I guess the Crusading Libertarians would have me stay in my home, to allow smokers to roam free and unmolested. Makes me feel bad. I am saddened by the attitude here that people with lung disease can get fucked for being sick and should just stay home because we fail the Darwin test -- how heartless that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mace_Windex Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
331. that's just ignorant
People wanting to sue tobacco companies for their declining health is just ignorant and irresponsible. No one on this planet smokes a cigarette or uses tobacco in any form without being aware of what it's doing to their body. If people still want to, that's their right to do so. But it also makes it their own fault if they get cancer. If the sign says "DON'T WALK" and you walk anyway and get hit by a car, that's your fault, not the fault of the driver or the fault of the city government for not making a sign that actually stops you from not walking into the street. It's the same thing here.

And if you don't want to be around smoke, don't go places where there is smoke. You have no "right to be in public places." Show me that right in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #331
342. People who don't have the right to go out in public are called prisoners.
I have no intention of letting smokers make me a prisoner in my own town.

Since people know the damages of second-hand smoke, as you point out, it is ignorant to inflict that upon others who choose not to smoke. Very ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #342
351. there are PLENTY of smoke-free public places.
what's ignorant is to claim otherwise, or consider yourself a "prisoner" because you're afraid to go into a particular building.
if it's a legitimate health hazard for you to go into a particular establishment- don't go in it- i mean really, how hard is that to figure out...?
and guess what- nobody can go into any building they want.
even in this country- so nobody is slighting you in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
346. Can I sue people who go to work with a cold or flu...
... anyone who drives, farmers who spray pesticides, farmers who harvest their crops, people who mow their lawns, etc.?

Assault does not just imply that there is a mortal danger. It applies that some injury has occurred. All of those cases could cause injury to some person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #346
348. If someone knowingly passes on a disease
that kills you, yes they can be prosecuted. There are laws for that. There are laws against DDT because it was deadly, so yes farmers who spray cancer-causing pesticides are breaking the law. There is a mortal danger with cigarette smoke, so I think it meets your criteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #348
349. What about car exhaust, harvesting crops, and lawn mowing?
Everyone knows that they could harm someone with allergies by doing those things. By doing those things people are knowingly causing physical harm to someone else. By definition they are assaulting them.

So why not lock up everyone who drives, farms, or owns a yard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #349
352. don't forget peanuts/peanut products, and all perfumes/colognes.
Edited on Sat Jul-01-06 05:14 PM by QuestionAll
they must be BANNED, because there ARE people who can be put into LETHAL anaphylactic shock by exposure to other people using/wearing them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #349
380. Car exhaust and pesticides are regulated because they can be harmful.
Edited on Sun Jul-02-06 10:05 AM by Radical Activist
Cigarette smoke should be too. Yes, the government did ban farming methods that cause death, so once again, banning public smoking would be consistent with that. When millions of people die from lawn mowing or eating peanuts, let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
353. As Someone Who Stays Away From Bars, Places Where People Smoke
for similar reasons, asthma, allergies, sinusitis, I understand the sentiment.

I think that it is a losing battle to tackle, unless more energy moves in behind your sentiment and ideas. The fact is that smokers generally take the attitude that many have in this post- then don't go. But what if I want to listen to a band at a bar, or somewhere that people smoke?

It isn't fair. It isn't healthy for anyone to be in a bar full of smoke. (or anywhere else for that matter)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #353
365. it isn't safe for non smokers to drink and get in cars either!!
see the cars weigh tons and kill instantly!!

but that doesn't stop people...

three boys my son grew up with were killed instantly by a drunk driver..the driver just came out of a bar..the boys didn't die from smoke..but they haven't shut down bars yet have they????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
357. For the sane reason that your after shave gave me asthma attack
Edited on Sun Jul-02-06 12:20 AM by Artiechoke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
358. "Radical Activist" wants to call the fuzz.
Good lord, what's this world comin' to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #358
361. we can't fight the regime, better each other
There are so many important issues to be addressing here, and there are how many "Ban" threads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #361
362. Not sure I agree with that.
What do we accomplish by discussing the stuff we all agree on?

I'd like to see some threads on how people in solid-blue states can help congressional campaigns in other places. That would be interesting.

But I don't want a support group--we can whine together and die together.

One of the most important functions of this site is to communicate the feelings of the "base" to the Democratic leadership. And I think our stance on social-control legislation and action is one of the most important areas that needs "correction."

Still, I find it ironic that someone with a Che icon who calls him/herself "Radical Activist" is bemoaning his/her inability to get the police involved in minor situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #362
366. Points taken
I agree, but I think what is upsetting is the number of replies these banning posts receive, especially in light of the events of the past week. Still, it reflects what the many are upset with, which seems a bit sad (to me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #366
367. I think we're fatigued with the crimes of Bush and co
He's managed pretty deftly to keep it a couple of removes from our everyday lives--most of us, that is. We can only feel the slow deterioration, the slow burn of our collective future. We want to lash out at things we can see and fight people who are there to fight back against us. It's understandable after six years of sheer misery. Every day that man's in office feels like rape, like being stabbed in the guts. It'll ruin your health surer than secondhand smoke ever will. The infighting feels more winnable, so I guess it's kind of an escape. And some of us believe that whipping the party into shape to actually inspire Americans of today is our best bet to turn the tide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #367
369. Really well stated. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
378. These are always interesting discussion for a variety of reasons.
While virtually everyone agrees that tobacco products can cause some serious harm to one who uses them, there is no empirical evidence that second hand smoke causes cancer/heart disease in those who do not smoke. There have been many studies that have been made, and a couple of somewhat dubious ones are what the cases against the tobacco industry were used in the law suits. there is no doubt in my mind that tobacco kills, but it kills the user, usually the heavy user, and there is a genetic equation as to a precursor to some of the diseases involved as well.

Smoke can trigger a variety of reactions, including an asthma attack, and the irritants contained in TS can surely affect those who do not smoke, manifesting themselves in a variety of ways, generally watery eyes, sneezing, itching etc...the usual allergy related symptoms that we are familiar with.

While I, as a smoker, feel that my use of tobacco can affect some around me who do not smoke, go outside when others who do not smoke are present. Standing on a city street, my smoke wafts off to mix with other chemicals in the atmosphere, and I occasionally get the "stare" from those who think I should be doing something "better" w/my time; but the tobacco smoke I am placing in the air cannot compare with the deadly cocktail being spewed out from fossil fuels at an incredible rate and with far more deadly consequences for those who inhabit this planet w/me.

I have been accosted on the street by some radical non-smokers on a few occasions. I choose to ignore them, blissfully aware that they have decided that I am a pariah that can be easily attacked even while I am trying to be courteous. People I do not know fell free to berate me and call me a murderer of their children while they drive off in a Hummer, go figure.

The vast majority of those of us who are addicted to nicotine realize that we are not doing anything great to our our bodies, and we also are aware that common courtesy is a valid option when we choose to light up....we go to Smoking Areas in restaurants and bars that allow smoking. We are shunted off, away from the masses that have found, (with some excellent reasoning), that they might be affected in some way, (usually an irritation/allergy type response), and we have accepted that as part of the cost of our use of said products.

To have the Government pass laws that affect an ever decreasing segment of society, borders on a
"legitimization" of a class of people that will be denied the rights that others enjoy. This never works to an advantage for a society based on 'freedom'.

Assaults on those who have behaviors that some deem 'wrong' have been on the increase over the past 10 years or so. Alcohol, tobacco, drivers of gas-guzzlers, people who choose to wear some types of clothing, people who spit, people who wear 'odd' clothes, you name it, someone is out there to make a statement because they have been offended in some way. I sympathize with your plight, but there are options that you have as well, you can avoid Establishments that allow the use of tobacco or alcohol; you can make your self known as to what you believe, as you did here; you can protest and you you can support anti-smoking groups. There are options for everyone in this situation.

But the water you drink, and the air you breathe; the food you take in and the chemicals in everyday products will kill you or set off your asthma. The pollen in the air, mixed with the acids and nitrogen compounds will do more harm to humanity than a smoke filled room used for an hour or so.

My mother has severe asthma, and it is easily triggered by tobacco smoke. Those who smoke, will not do so while she is around, not just out of concerns for her health, but also out of common courtesy. This is as it should be...w/o the government threatening us w/fines or imprisonment for something we choose to do; particularly when we go outside, to desiganted areas, so as not to offend those who do not smoke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
382. I live in Houston... It is really bad here
I don't worry about the smokers, it is the factories that spew all of their contaminants into the air.. At night when you see them, you can really see just how much is being spewed 24/7....

I only wish smokers were the problem....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Fawkes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-03-06 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
403. Find a bar where people don't smoke.
I have astham, and I too am allergic to cigarette smoke. I have a novel cure: don't go where people smoke. There, problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-03-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
405. I suspect that every bar in your
Edited on Mon Jul-03-06 08:29 AM by Puglover
area could go non-smoking but one and you would whine that you can't patronize the bar you WANT to go to. I'm a ex-smoker, I hate those things and quite frankly you're making me want to start up again. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Threedifferentones Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-04-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
408. First of since you abhor smoke so much I
imagine you don't inhale it that often. Inhaling some smoke once in a while will not measurably increase your chances for getting any disease. Secondly, smoking and drinking mesh wonderfully together. I do not regularly buy tobacco because I do not want to be an addict but I will gladly have a cigar or a cig or two when drinking with my buddies.

I understand that ashmatics cannot be around smoke period, and so I definitely agree that the vast majority of public places should not allow smoking. However, as bastions of vice and intoxication, I strongly feel that bars should be able to allow smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC