Okay lefties, all together now! One, two, three, STAB!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/28/nyregion/28hillary.html?pagewanted=all



:evilgrin:

back in the whitehouse :)

Not so much whether or not she is our nominee in 2008.

And I suspect that she and her analysts are miscalculating.

Why hold the comment against her?

and the statement reflects how she's been acting. I'm pretty sure this is what she believes.

very testy.

but the last election showed the power of the least worst option - the left flocked to Kerry though he advocated the same Iraq policy as Bush.

Triangulation will work as long as there is no left alternative to the democrats.

...so there is NO progressive media whatsoever. The 1996 Telecommunications Act played a big part in establishing the BushCo propaganda machine we see in operation today.

Or....maybe he could convince Hillary to screw the clamps a little tighter on those "welfare queens" who drive around in fancy cars on our dime.

He should have fucking inhaled.

like the ones on John Kerry's team that told him he shouldn't speak out, rather be mysterious so people won't know not to vote for you...

May they never run a national election again.

I do think ol' Hillary has miscalculated here. I think she's forgotten the primaries and is running for the general election.

"We will pick your candidates and you will pretend to like them, no matter how horrible neocon warmongering traitors they are. What else are you gonna do, vote Republican"??

FUCK THAT!

Fuck Hillary, and fuck the cancer (DLC) she rode in on. I am not in her back pocket, nor will I ever be.

this makes me mad

Can we have a GOOD CANDIDATE. How about someone that people believe in. Do we need to always chose between best of two evils.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

The left is not in her back pocket. Maurice Carroll has NO idea what he is talking about.

Good lord...:eyes:

the way she's acting

Tasini just laughs. www.tasinifornewyork.org/

Hillary's seen as a forgone conclusion for re-election.

even really progressive people don't see challenging her as worth the futile effort.
this is when i'd rather be an idealistic greenparty/nader supporter...... :(

but she does do some good things in Congress and as president, she will be much better than what we have now.........

At the vigil in front of her office for the 2000th soldier i could really feel how important it is to replace her as my rep in WDC. I have no hope that this is possible...

BUT what i HATE about Hill is her total supplication before the M-I-C. IF she were president, i do think the energy in the country would be different. We would in fact be a different and better nation.

Sheeesh. If she doesn't like protestors, she should consider the fact that her political position on Iraq is enabling the killing to continue. And, she certainly doesn't have the left in her back pocket. :eyes:

She is in a perfect position to challenge it, but she does not. My only guess is that she is either beholden to the DLC or to her husband's new buddies, George and George.

:rofl:

she should read polls of the American People sometime and find out how few support her little war in Iraq. Wouldn't she like to be with the 66 percent who want it over NOW?????

oh, right--getting elected isn't the goal--it's pleasing the centrists in the party.

that would explain why it smells like ass in here.

elite propaganda but will read it if posted on DU) I can say that when i called her office to explain why there would be lots of candle wax on the sidewalk in front of her Manhattan office i was struck by the vapid hollow ring that came from the other end of the phone. I could really feel that she and her staffers have ABSOLUTELY NO CONCERN FOR THE AMERICANS THAT ARE LOSING THEIR LIVES IN IRAQ. This is something we cannot forget!

edited for spelling

I hope she hasn't forgotten that. This pundit certainly has.

of the USA want (progressive political goals) and what the Democratic Party needs (continued stability of the elite's "two party system")

especially this jerk.

It's obvious he doesn't know what "the left" is, who make up the party's traditional base, and where the center is.

Al From must be writing this crap for him.

because the DLC has full time mediawhores in the ears of the presstitutes that write the tripe for the NYT-propaganda machine!

YES!

Who the hell is he kidding? This is typical, another push for the party to move more towards the center. Any further center and she'll be on the right...

trying to move even further right. She's just a corporatist politiwhore at the trough, where she intends to stay as long as she can.

Who is the New York Times' daddy TODAY?

:boring:
rocknation

foreign policy, economic justice, oppose the policies of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Nothing personal against her as a person.

No further comment needed.



Keith’s Barbeque Central

That Hillary doesn't think the left is a factor worth considering or courting.

Courting the swing voters won't help her there, I reckon.

To make HRC worry about being renominated in 2006. And from what little I know about NY politics, it looks like she doesn't have a lot to fear from the GOP there either.

I really don't want to see defeating Clinton in 2006 become some sort of crusade for the antiwar left. For one, I think it's a battle we will lose, and in losing it we will strengthen the prowar part of the party. I would much rather see us spend our time, and especially money, in knocking off repubs and regaining control of the Senate and HoReps.

If New Yorkers want to contribute to Hillary's primary challenger, fine. But any dollar that comes from out of state is a dollar that could have been better spent somewhere else.

but I think she was planted very early on to undermine whatever left there was.

I'd love to see all these leftists clamoring for room in Hillary's pockets. Sounds like a pipedream to me.

The difference is that she has even fewer. I voted for Al, but DLCHillary will have a very difficult search if she thinks she can find me or a lot of Democrats who don't vote for Republicans(D) in her back pocket.

Since the election, he's been a wonder to behold. I detect the same fire now in Kerry as well.

As far as I've heard, Kerry still supports the occupation of Iraq. As for Al, I haven't heard what his stance is.

Oh no he doesn't hon. He is supporting Murtha and has his own idea(s) about getting out.

Hardly the same as Murtha's. And Not acceptable.

and no one said it was the "same as Murtha's"

But, on the other hand, it's an improvement over Bush and Hillary.

It's one thing to say that his plan for withdrawl is unacceptable, still another to say that he has no plan for withdrawl, which would be someone who supports Iraq occupation.

Hence, he can not be lumped in with Hillary and Lieberman and other pro-war Dems.

He fits in better with Feingold and Murtha, with Mutha's plan being the fastest of the three.

I was quite pleased to see Kerry share company with Murtha and Dean on a RW cartoon. An honorable trio. So often he shares company with Lieberman, and that's just weird.

But anyway...

also mean that HIS plan can take 12 months, too. Does that make Murtha's plan unacceptable to you?

.

since he got rid of all his DLC advisors spouting the kind of pandering political 'wisdom' that Hillary Clinton seems to be dutifully obeying these days.

If she doesn't want anything to do with me than I won't have anything to do with her. Fuck it. What, I'm not "mainstream" enough for you? So wanting to end an illegal war, wanting jobs, health care, etc isn't in the "mainstream"? Has she seen the polls?! I know I'll work hard to support anyone but her. Now it's Kerry, Feingold and/or Warner I'm supporting in 2008. If I do vote for her it'll be holding my nose which will be a first for me.

Talk about lowering the bar. She dissapoints me.

they are so pristine, free of DLC taint... i have no interest in picking up hilary's banner anytime soon. it left an unpleasant, sticky sensation. now if only someone in my state will run against difi...

would you like some soap to wash your hands of hilary, too?
:evilgrin:

like that. I have my problems with Hillaryt, but no Quinnipiac tool will make me spew.
We need to be savvyer than that.

I assumed it was a DLC Dem group, not the GOP.

Well, fuck em then, if it's the GOP. You're right, they're just playing us. Though I suspect that they want to run against her, and are trying to make it seem inevitable, and would therefore not be happy with the backlash their words are creating.

and what is your comment on this? I'm not sure what you meant by your thread title, by putting that line in bold, or by your devil.

something I was not aware of when I started the thread.

I assumed that someone who was on Hillary's side was saying this, which struck me as smug, which made me feel like giving her a good sharp poke in the butt, assuming I'm just sitting there in her back pocket and all.

Hence...

And Quinnipiac institute is not a source I would trust.

He clearly said it to be inflammatory, not because it's accurate, which it isn't. He's just doing the old rightwing tactic of painting her left.

He's got less cred than Scott Republicmussen.

Unlike some of our DU posters, he appears to be someone who actually knows what he talks about...

http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/bullpen/maurice_carroll/backgrounder.html

he sure knows what he's talking about! At the height of Giuliani's popularity (post 911) he was conducting polls against Hillary gloating he would win - except that none of them was running for anything at the time. hell, yeah - the man is a JOURNALIST - and we know - they always tell the truth - especially those associate with the NY Times!

and Carroll predicted no such thing....

"First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton has opened up a big 51 - 39 percent lead over U.S. Rep. Rick Lazio among New York State likely voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Nine percent are undecided. "

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11373.xml?ReleaseID=623

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/10/19/politics/main242465.shtml

Funny to see they had the opposite one in their pockets too - however up to the last day of elections, the headlines were about that opposite one - and I remember because Hillary made fun of them in her acceptance speech. I don't know why you'll protect such a lousy polster - just because their mastermind made you happy with his "Hillary can shit on the lefties"
Evetything, what he said, you rejoycing it is like a kkkarl wet dream. And not real.
Yes, Virginia - Hillary is the designated loser to the BFEE puppet - unless she declines to run.
And yes - who cares, as national elections are a thing of the past anyway.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Everyone else does too - it won't make a difference. The BFEE openly declared war on this country, a shitfest is exactly the way to go... Don't forget to flush!


Clowntime is Over: The Last Stand of the American Republic

Wednesday, 28 December 2005
http://www.chris-floyd.com/

And as far as I can see, the far left deserve what they get....

everyone is getting (unless you are BFEE and then you get to screw everyone).
What you fail to grasp is that any talk of candidates, shades this way of Atila the Hun is IRRELEVANT.
We're all done for my friend, you don't get any priviledges for being "centrist" or whatever it is you call yourself. In the words of Eric Idle:

And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space
Because there' bugger all down here on earth.

Sorry to disappoint you, but with the BFEE you don't get any points for not being a lefty. Bend all you want, it's the same for all.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Good! Then she will have no problems understanding why we will be on her ass about getting on Bush's ass. She put us there.
When you take away the torture, the civillian casualties, Halliburton price gouging, KBR's double billing, and all the other bad things that happened in Iraq. What your left with is a war crime. I would hate to think of Hillary as another one of those Armchair Schindlers.

and could easily be convinced to vote third party against her.

She has to EARN my vote, and her stance on the war makes it highly unlikely she deserves it.

Let's see, how about this equation:

Hillary popularity (-) Name recognition = Base support.

Her percentages for the nomination range between 26% (Zogby) to 43% (CNN). That's quite a spread.

Lets peg it at 36% minus name recognition, with much of that soft support.

So, what's the big deal. She's doing the four corners defense, a stall, as though she can run out the clock and take the prize.

Here's the big factor: Iraq. It's is and will be a mess. About the time the Muslim fundies tell us to get the hell out OR the press actually is forced into coverage, anyone who voted for the authority bill will look like a complete tool. Then it's time for Hillary to pay her dues.

She doesn't have the left in her pocket. I'd seriously think of voting for someone else if she gets th nomination. I wouldn't (unless they were very viable) but I'd think about it. I wouldn't work for her or give money, on that I'm sure.

So much for this leftie.

Rumors of her nomination are greatly exaggerated.

I don't care who it is. All anti-war Democrats should let the party know that they CAN NOT count on our votes.

Is it not the progressives who think Hillary is leaning to much toward the Right?

Seems Hillary hasn't looked at the grass in a long time. If she would have she'd know something is up with the roots.

she is being PUSHED down our throats.........I think I'm a moderate centrists progressive and I'll NEVER vote for her.....or any war backing Democrat.....for that matter


Perhaps the MACHINES will vote for her???????

Bama

"oh please, anything but Hillary"

i for one would not be surprised if Hillary turns out to be the candidate, with polls showing lack of popular support, but gets elected anyway.

That statement about the left being Clinton's back pocket is total bullshit.

Now I understand why what he said is total bullshit.

I think not.

"Left in her back pocket"?! Give me what they're smoking, for I see the left dead set against Hillary, and if she runs in '08, she's going to get her ass handed to her. Too many on the left would either go third party, or sit out this one, because for an ever increasing number of people, getting out of Iraq is priority one.

I think that this is simply wishful thinking on the part of the author, the NY Times, and possibly even Hillary herself. Hopefully though they all wake up soon and smell the discontent. Otherwise reality is going to turn out to be a real bitch.

If "she has the left in her back pocket", then who the hell were all the antiwar activists publically protesting her? Libertarians? Is her primary challenger not "on the left"?

:wtf: This is journalism?

If you want to talk about a DINO, the asswipe challenging her from the left was in the Green Party until about ten minutes before he jumped in....and the demonstrators are the ususal clot of loonies who hate Democrats.

but that's a FAR FUCKING CRY from saying she's entitled to the Presidential nomination.

I will not vote for Hillary 'moving to the right' Clinton or any other republican lite candidate

I find the democrats to be a collection of self-serving, egotistical, whiney, egotistical, voters. We have no problem destroying people within our own party if it suits our particular self-interest. Narrow minded comes to mind. Republicans blow, but you have to give them credit for RALLYING around the people in their own party. Unity.. it's not just a convention theme.

eom

"our particular self-interest" that you speak of?

Personally I am a registered independent because politically I am socialist. I did not vote for Nader in either presidential election.

don't take us for granted. Is that so wrong?

Hillary can kiss my ass (as well as clueless right-wing pundits)

Someone on here is saying nasty things and the mods don't seem to care? Not sure if this person is an operative for the DLC or not? Wondering...

Quinniapac University Polling Institute do some work for Fox news, in fact you've probably seen the results of some of their polls.