Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We don't need a CEO for President.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:06 AM
Original message
We don't need a CEO for President.
This is the one lesson this nation should take away from the trainwreck of the * government that we must extricate ourselves from. How many times have you heard someone say that the government should be run "like a business?" Hell, no, it shouldn't. The CEO as a model for governance doesn't work. When you inject profit motive into the system, you institutionalize corruption. Efficiency and stewardship in government is realize through the honesty and integrity of its employees and through transparency.

We do not need a CEO. We need a real President--someone who understands how to govern and not dictate from the penthouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. It's fascism.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Amen, Skidmore!
When I first heard Bush say that he was going to run the government like a company, I thought, "Oh God, this is going to be worse than I thought."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. And not a CEO that has FAILED at every Corp he ran
:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. To be fair, Bush never was a good executive even in the business world
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 05:17 AM by Selatius
The government, at its best, should be operated "like a business."

When I say that, I mean it must be efficient, clear of bloat, clear of glut, clear of pork. A firm that operated the same way the federal government has for the past several decades would end up in bankruptcy before long.

When I say that, I do not mean that it should be a government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations. The government's modern role now, ideally, is not only to ensure the well-being of the population it reigns over but also to check the power of the corporation. The government should operate based on facts and ideas formulated with respect to those facts, like the idea of universal health care for instance. It should not operate inspite of the facts, like the idea of invading/occupying Iraq being a "cake walk."

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.


-- Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Always felt that way. The Am. thought was govt. from the bottom..
A new plan and the world thought we were nuts. Founders did not trust power and thats why the people, with add ons, finally went with this messy Constitution with all the checks in it. What no one wanted was a 'CEO'. I do not think this is taught in schools any more.The House was to be the House of the people and the power of war and money sat with them and every 2 years we could get rid of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. We Have A Court Appointed CLO-
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 06:01 AM by Hubert Flottz
WN

Edit: CLOWN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. yep,,,,,
The first time I ever saw * speak, I recognized that CEO persona and it scared me to death,,,, Being a 'public servant' is very very different from running a corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. We need a diplomat.
The president should be representing the people of this nation with diplomacy around the world. We are always attacking and being attacked. We need someone who will stop putting us in the line of fire. The American people want peace. It is the leadership who profit from being the antagonist. They will use our military as if they are playing a game with toy soldiers instead of real people. They take our money and spend it frivolously lining their pockets. We need the ultimate diplomat to soothe relations with other countries and we need oversight on every thing they do. We have neither right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Let's bring back the civil servant.
Duty and Honor, really don't seem compatible with Capitalism, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Certainly not one that's an MBA (ugh!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. Above all, we need someone INTELLIGENT for the presidency.
This fucking idiot moron who has hacked our democracy for a fascist regime may be the answer for a third world nation, NOT AMERICA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfisher Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Instead we got a decider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. The wallet is mightier than the ballot.
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 11:30 AM by Gregorian
It's like a version of privatization. Especially in this maladministration. Never has it been so obvious that there is a conflict of interest. As if Cheney wasn't fully involve in Halliburton. That war was created for Halliburton, et. al.

I forgot to say that we are electing policies through our wallets. Our purchases are paving the way for legislation. They speak implicitly for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thank you.
I've been making this point for 10 years now, with mixed results. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nailed it
k & r!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. They fail to see one fundamental difference: the desirability of "excess capacity."
Government is almost all about "excess capacity." The CEO mentality either attempts to eradicate it (and be totally unprepared for catastrophes like Katrina) or "put it to work" (and take a 'ready' Army and initiate unprovoked wars for PROFIT).

I've posted about this before (in my Journal) ... and I think it's one of the more important things to comprehend about the flaws in the "run it like a business" fallacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC