Now many people out there might read the story and think "secret service" means "Secret Service," but that is the same difference between "democratic" and "Democratic."
To the UK, secret service is like intelligence service.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_service^^^Article about this.^^^
Article about Dianna's phone being bugged:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1968664,00.htmlSo that means that the ECHELON program was in fact real.
I can now guarantee you that your telephone conversations have been monitored by a foreign government as part of this program.
The idea is simple, since no democratic nation on Earth would allow its government to intercept all the telephone calls of its people without a warrant, governments cannot wiretap their own people en masse.
However, the people of a democratic nation 1 do not have control over democratic nation 2, and if democratic nation 2 were to spy on the people in democratic nation 1, then it wouldn't be illegal.
If you ask anyone in America if they have a problem with wiretapping calls on foreign soil made by foreign peoples, they will probably respond that they don't have a problem.
However, they don't realize that another democratic government may be listening on their phone calls. And they probably wouldn't guess that the information gathered in those calls may indeed get back to the US government.
Article about ECHELON at Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELONThis is what happened in the Dianna case, and because it is so distracting no one is paying attention to the overarching problem, the long alleged ECHELON program is real.
This actually brings up another problem, since we know the 9/11 hi-jackers made telephone calls, how is it that this ECHELON system didn't prevent 9/11, if it is so integral to national security?