Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ECHELON has been confirmed by the Princess Dianna spy story...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:37 AM
Original message
ECHELON has been confirmed by the Princess Dianna spy story...
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 09:05 AM by originalpckelly
Now many people out there might read the story and think "secret service" means "Secret Service," but that is the same difference between "democratic" and "Democratic."

To the UK, secret service is like intelligence service.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_service

^^^Article about this.^^^

Article about Dianna's phone being bugged:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1968664,00.html

So that means that the ECHELON program was in fact real.

I can now guarantee you that your telephone conversations have been monitored by a foreign government as part of this program.

The idea is simple, since no democratic nation on Earth would allow its government to intercept all the telephone calls of its people without a warrant, governments cannot wiretap their own people en masse.

However, the people of a democratic nation 1 do not have control over democratic nation 2, and if democratic nation 2 were to spy on the people in democratic nation 1, then it wouldn't be illegal.

If you ask anyone in America if they have a problem with wiretapping calls on foreign soil made by foreign peoples, they will probably respond that they don't have a problem.

However, they don't realize that another democratic government may be listening on their phone calls. And they probably wouldn't guess that the information gathered in those calls may indeed get back to the US government.

Article about ECHELON at Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON

This is what happened in the Dianna case, and because it is so distracting no one is paying attention to the overarching problem, the long alleged ECHELON program is real.

This actually brings up another problem, since we know the 9/11 hi-jackers made telephone calls, how is it that this ECHELON system didn't prevent 9/11, if it is so integral to national security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they were listening to Diana
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 08:42 AM by DoYouEverWonder
then they are listening to everyone else.

This is such a betrayal of the British people who are supposedly our allies. Friends aren't suppose to spy on friends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of course, either the British or the Canadians are spying on us...
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 08:45 AM by originalpckelly
this is a consensual agreement, they (their governments) know it is happening, even though MI6 wasn't informed (that's probably BS by the way, though people on both sides might have a special agreement not to spy on leaders.)

This may very well be a big day in a couple of years. People are going to realize that this is 2006, and it's a hell of a lot worse than 1984.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Listening to the bad guys is one thing
Listening to the British Royal Family is a much more serious matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. ECHELON wasn't just about bad guys...
and it shows how Clinton was not a real Democrat. No real Democratic President would allow this, and one has to wonder if that's why none other than Clinton have been elected in so many years. Of course Al Gore and John Kerry are both DLCers.

This is pretty scary stuff.

I think however, that all the participating governments must have had limits on whom they could spy, and one of the logical limits would be not spying on leaders. Hence, the Dianna flap that is about to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Since these were probably landlines, it also means the extent of ECHELON is even larger...
than previously reported.

It widely reported after 60 Minutes did a story on ECHELON, that the program was solely an electronic signal intercept. Meaning over the air. Meaning, only long distance satellite telephone communications were being monitored, and that anything at the local level was safe. Well, somehow the US government has managed to get taps on the landlines of Europe. This program must be spying on millions of innocent everyday people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's not called the Information Age for nothing
If the rabble get to take pictures with their phones, corporations and governments get to do fun stuff like that too. And since institutions are much more important than any individual person in this world, the watchers/listeners don't care if they might be watched/listened to. If they get caught, the system goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's really pretty fucked up when you think about it, isn't it?
And the thing is that it's going to be hard to tell Americans what's wrong here. It's such a complicated scheme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It depends on where you're looking
To the idea of freedom(whatever that is)? Yes, it's fairly fucked up.

For the idea of security, order, predictability, chanceless existence? It makes sense, and the further you go, the more sense it makes.

It's not just this program obviously. It's all these data mining/information gathering programs. It's everything on credit, it's computers, it's phones, it's everything period. Hell, to simply protest, you need to fill out regulation forms to get permission to do it. It's our entire way of life. It's the ease of order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC