Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not about a draft, but about draftees.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:14 PM
Original message
Not about a draft, but about draftees.
Edited on Wed Dec-13-06 05:25 PM by flamin lib
I had a conversation with a ‘friend’ ‘while back ‘bout how the draft would fuck up the all volunteer military. He sez the draftees were just screwups and didn’t add that much to the service. So I sez to him,”First Army, 544 Supply and Support Battalion, HQ company, Petroleum Laboratory. Where’d you serve?” Seems he had a bad back or sumthin’.

Ya’ know, I for one am damn tired of hearing that argument. True, I didn’t enjoy being shanghaied for two years and I would have left at the first honorable moment, but dammit I did my job and I did it well. I also shared billets with lifers who couldn’t pour piss out of a boot with instructions on the heel.

There were five of us assigned to a petroleum laboratory that maintained quality surveillance on everything that went into a military vehicle on Ft. Lee, VA. Three specialists (all drafted with college backgrounds), one Sergeant (from the hills of Georgia who had an innate sense of duty) and one (make that two) Second Lieutenant who was a ROTC wonder. Four out of five were short-timers.

There was only one “event” that caused damage to a vehicle. A C-47 fell out of the sky on takeoff. The next day a line of Airmen formed at the door of my lab. Seems the locals had short-cut the process and didn’t run their fuel through us first. Too much trouble and just red tape anyway.

In 18 months of duty not one single clogged fuel filter, not one single case of mixed contamination, not one single ding on our record but I keep hearing that draftees just weren’t up to the job.

To those who question the quality of American draftees, I say again, “First Army, 544 Supply and Support Battalion, HQ Company, Petroleum Laboratory. Where did you serve?”

Sign in, sound off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great post!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm just tired of being dissed by people who don't know and
didn't serve. If you volunteered in the 60's & 70's you have a right, but dammit step up before you speak up.

To meet TO&E standards there are a host of tests that have to be run on everything from drinking water to jet fuel. Halliburton doesn't have to drink the water or fly the jets. Who'da' thought standards would fall short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Great observation.
And that is a fact - they can just quit and go home. They don't have to do anything.

That is a big part of the problem.

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Amen. As a draftee in Nam, I can certainly call "bullshit" on the claim that ...
... draftees aren't up to the job or, as some here claim, "make a substandard conscript Army." That's just complete bullshit - propaganda from the professional militarists. Draftees won medals and awards in Viet Nam every bit as much as the career military ... which, given the tendancy to award them to Regular Army personnel, is quite remarkable. Yes, the 'Regular Army' was far more inclined to award recognition to career soldiers ... because it was their career!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC