|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:25 PM Original message |
Poll question: Will You Vote For A Candidate In 08 Who Supported The Iraq War Resolution ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. never-- in fact, I will do whatever I can to work for their defeat.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I Think Those That Voted Yes Ought To Tell Us Why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. the problem is that I don't trust any of them to tell the truth.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'd vote for someone who supported IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Leaving The Water Run In The Bathtub Is A Mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. LOL! I knew someone would start with the semantics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 04:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
37. Few DUers Were For The War. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
63. But I'm sure you remember the thread after Powell's performance supporting the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. No, I want someone with the good judgment to recognize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starlight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
49. I'm constantly appalled that so many politicians & "experts" couldn't see what was so obvious to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. Absolutely not. A war supporting nominee would take the war off the table too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fermezlabush (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. OP question refers to "support" not "vote". We know with some non-senators where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. yes-- without hesitation.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
60. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fermezlabush (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. K&R. The one relevant 2008 question today. My answer is "NO" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm not a single issue voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
12. I did it in '04 and if necessary I'll do it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
43. Politics is about winning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
13. No. One warmonger for my lifetime was enough. Let's try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
14. no in the primaries, yes in the GE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davekriss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Perfect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
17. Guiliani, Pataki, Romney, Huckabee didn't vote for the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 04:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. You Can't Catch Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 04:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. My bad, the IWR threads are running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I Would Vote For Any (D) In The General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. Yes. Reluctantly. A stinky ol' rotten Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
45. what's in a name? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bookman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yes, if ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. I will vote for whomever has a (d) next to his/her name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
21. might have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
22. By 2008, no one should be terribly interested in how a candidate voted on the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 04:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
39. I agree - can a candidate get us OUT of Iraq? Heck - most Dems won't say 'Civil War' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
73. agreed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. In the primary or in the general election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eugene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
24. Yes, as long as he or she admits the war is a mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. yes, if they are the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davekriss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
26. I will vote for any Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
28. For those who answered NO, does that mean that you would vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. People seem to have unrealistic expectations of politicians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Ok, here is my explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Exactly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. Will you vote for a candidate who distorts and distracts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
31. I could *maybe* pass on the vote, but I'll look at their words carefully |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Thank you - those are the two I've gotten raked over for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
34. I didn't even vote for Hillary as Senator. I voted straight Dem for all other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
35. Primary or general? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
36. Not if I have a choice. Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
42. NO - Not in the primary - Quite simply, even if they are great, its my Litmus test.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
44. Primary or General? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Not advacating but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:42 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
47. Primary or General? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
50. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. While I believe and always have.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
52. Primary or general election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frustrated_lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
53. If they don't dilly dally and they have the balls to call a spade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
here_is_to_hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
54. No. Never. Not. Wont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. So you didn't vote Kerry in 04? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
57. Everyone who says "NO" -- does that mean you didn't vote Kerry in 04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frustrated_lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:51 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Hopefully |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:54 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I didn't think Kerry was a "lousy candidate" at all. You didn't vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frustrated_lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 09:44 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. I consoled myself with the knowledge that a vote for Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:08 PM Response to Reply #57 |
66. nope-- I didn't vote for Kerry and won't vote for anyone else... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:30 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. If you didn't vote for Kerry, then you essentially help re-elect Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:33 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. it's called democracy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. Good on you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:00 AM Response to Reply #70 |
80. It's called electing the guy who closest represents your ideals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:08 AM Response to Reply #80 |
85. that's why I voted for David Cobb-- he more closely represented... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
59. Fuck NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
65. Only if they have recanted -- with sincerity and modesty and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:31 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Not voting means one less vote for the Dem, which is essentially a vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:36 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. that's a damned lie, and one intended to suppress democracy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:01 AM Response to Reply #71 |
81. Nope. WHY do you think "Get out the vote" is important on election day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:04 AM Response to Reply #81 |
83. I have not missed an election since the early 70s.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:13 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. The person in this subthread I originally posted to said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #68 |
91. Then the nominee had better damn well make sure s/he has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
69. Not in the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
72. i'm going to say 'yes' if only because saying 'no' reduces the field... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
74. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
75. It doesn't matter one little bit whether they voted for it or not. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
76. In a time of war Bush & Cheney say they'll truthful about WMD'S being the reason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
77. No, but if they recanted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jen4clark (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
79. Primary -- no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Rabbit (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
82. I wish your poll had more categories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
84. would I? yes ... will I? probably not ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imperial jedi (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
87. absolutely not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
88. I will support anyone who wants to end this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coventina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
89. Not only would I not vote for them, but should they become the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
90. Never. and i will even work to see them defeated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
92. No, not in the primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC