|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:08 AM Original message |
More Bush - Signing Statement Abuse : Mail Can Now Be Opened Without A Search Warrant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah..."Enhancement." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. I hate that sleeze! k(pete)nr. ...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good God what next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeykick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Good Post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Probalby talking about DHS, Fed-Ex and UPS etc... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. "strengthen the free market for" UPS, FEDEX, etc. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Thank goodness laws CAN be repealed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. The new congress should overturn every fucking 'signing statement' the monkey has made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Agreed! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. How can you do that...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never cry wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Could a new president reverse previous signing statements? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MockSwede (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 06:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
28. Not "should." They BETTER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
8. K&R......n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
9. Self-Delete: Dupe.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. U.S. Constitution -- RIP --nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
12. And who gets to decide who's mail meets that criteria? What |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. They have been doing this for at least a couple years, I know they opened my mail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
14. I thought there were already allowances to open mail... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. I wouldn't mind if he opened some of my mail... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeanette in FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. Put a friendly message in all your correspondence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
18. Number one.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. It carries the "force of law" in that it's being done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. All that has to happen.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divernan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Governors do not write "signing statements" for state laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Their last comment was in a dissent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
26. What mail? Between US Citizens? Any mail? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
27. "Get government off my back", and into my mail, my bedroom, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
29. There's no way these "signing statements" are legitimate considerations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
30. Oh come on peoples, this could be fun!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC