Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest Major League Bullshit from Little Big Dick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 10:55 PM
Original message
Latest Major League Bullshit from Little Big Dick
To the American Legion (brave man, little big dick!). Once again pretending there's the slightest risk that Sadr and Sistani would allow Sunnis like bin Laden and Zarqawi to "take charge of Iraq"--or that Major League himself had nothing to do with creating the conditions for making that slim chance at all likely. :eyes:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/02/20060228-2.html

"Here in Washington, if any believe America should suddenly withdraw from Iraq and stop fighting al-Qaida in the very place they have gathered, let them say so clearly. If any believe that America should break our word and abandon our Iraqi allies to death and prison, let them make it known. If any believe that America should be safer -- or would be safer with men like bin Laden and Zarqawi in charge of Iraq, let them try to make that case."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. So ....
how many al-Qaida members were running Iraq BEFORE we invaded, huh? :eyes:

Don't you just love how Junior conveniently ignores little details like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It was uncle dick.
Junior is in India. But you're right that details mean nothing to little big dick, especially the ones that are inconvenient to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh ... I thought "little dick" was junior ... LOL!
:rofl:

I can't keep up with all the nicknames we have for these people! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You musta missed the Big between the Little and the Dick...
;)

(They're all Dicks anyway, after all, aren't they?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL ... actually, I did!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, that some serious bullshit, alright.
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Adventures of Big Dick and Little Half Wit continue... n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sure, so the guys should ask that criminal why he refused to...
attack Zarqawi THREE times while he was (suspected to be) there?

~snip~
But NBC News has learned that long before the war the Bush administration had several chances to wipe out his terrorist operation and perhaps kill Zarqawi himself — but never pulled the trigger.

In June 2002, U.S. officials say intelligence had revealed that Zarqawi and members of al-Qaida had set up a weapons lab at Kirma, in northern Iraq, producing deadly ricin and cyanide.

The Pentagon quickly drafted plans to attack the camp with cruise missiles and airstrikes and sent it to the White House, where, according to U.S. government sources, the plan was debated to death in the National Security Council.

...

“Here we had targets, we had opportunities, we had a country willing to support casualties, or risk casualties after 9/11 and we still didn’t do it,” said Michael O’Hanlon, military analyst with the Brookings Institution.

Four months later, intelligence showed Zarqawi was planning to use ricin in terrorist attacks in Europe.

The Pentagon drew up a second strike plan, and the White House again killed it. By then the administration had set its course for war with Iraq.

...

In January 2003, the threat turned real. Police in London arrested six terror suspects and discovered a ricin lab connected to the camp in Iraq.

The Pentagon drew up still another attack plan, and for the third time, the National Security Council killed it.

Military officials insist their case for attacking Zarqawi’s operation was airtight, but the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq could undercut its case for war against Saddam.

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war, but it was too late — Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone. “Here’s a case where they waited, they waited too long and now we’re suffering as a result inside Iraq,” Cressey added.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/


Why, oh, WHY nobody DARES to ASK?? (repeatedly) 'why?' (afraid to hear all the LIES again?) After all, that criminal coward's got only 13-18% 'approval' (by who? Zombies?) rattings...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC