Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hypothetical Question: Assuming a Dem is elected in '08

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:13 PM
Original message
Hypothetical Question: Assuming a Dem is elected in '08
How would you feel if he asked the more 'mature' SCOTUS members (ie. the liberal ones) to 'retire' and then appoint younger members so they could 'last longer' and safeguard the makeup of the court (ie. not going farther to the right) for another 20-30 years?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. He?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I go with The West Wing
"A president can't be seen influencing what the justices have for breakfast."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't see that happening. Not even sure if a Pres can do that.
I suspect all the SCOTUS members have their own intentions of when they want to retire and under what leadership.

I would also hope that a Dem leader would nominate a candidate who would be a constitutional scholar and vote their judgement according to the law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. If a Dem wins in '08
He or she will have no time for your scenario. They will be under constant fire for each and every little thing he or she does. It happened to the last Democrat president and there's no reason to believe that it won't happen again. Repubs will not take losing what they consider theirs lying down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Marylander Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. If the only seat that changes is the presidents
the new picks will have a hard time ever being put on the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. There might be some retirements on SCOTUS no matter who wins in 2008
I mean there are a few Justices who are getting older other than Stevens, Ginsburg is already in her early 70's, and Scalia is turning 70 this year. But if a Dem wins in 2008, there is no way in hell would Scalia retire under a Dem., unless he just drops dead one day. But Ginsburg may be just waiting for a Dem. to come into office, even through I've heard rumors of her retirement may soon become a reality, but yet there have are people I know, who feel that there's no way in hell that Ginsburg would retire under a Repug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pack the F'n Court!
It was good enough for FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Not that FDR succeeded.
A president could certainly ask older justices to retire, but they'd probably laugh in his or her face, regardless of party. The appointment is for life, and most of them are loathe to give it up. Notice that Rehnquist didn't retire, even when he was dying of cancer. And it looks as if the only reason O'Connor retired is that her husband has Alzheimer's and needs a lot of care.

The problems of this country have little to do with the Supreme Court.

Even if a Dem is elected in two years, that person will inherit a huge massive deficit, wars in the middle east, a declining economy, and, what have I left out?

I'm beginning to think we don't want a Dem to have any chance of winning in '08 because why should we have to clean up the messes the Republicans have made? And shouldn't things get so incredibly bad that in the end EVERYONE will fully understand how terrible these people have been. I want them to have a zero percent approval rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC