Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

End Of Anonymous Free Speech In New Jersey?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:10 PM
Original message
End Of Anonymous Free Speech In New Jersey?
ASSEMBLY, No. 1327

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

212th LEGISLATURE



PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2006 SESSION





Sponsored by:

Assemblyman PETER J. BIONDI

District 16 (Morris and Somerset)









SYNOPSIS

Makes certain operators of interactive computer services and Internet service providers liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites.



CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

As introduced.



An Act concerning the posting of certain Internet messages and supplementing chapter 38A of Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes.



Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:



1. As used in this act:

"Information content provider" means any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.

"Interactive computer service" means any information system, service, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides service to the Internet.

"Internet" means the international computer network of both federal and non-federal interoperable packet switched data networks.

"Internet service provider" or "provider" means any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this State that provides individuals, corporations, or other entities with the ability to connect to the Internet through equipment that is located in this State.

"Operator" means any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this State that operates an interactive computer service.



2. The operator of any interactive computer service or an Internet service provider shall establish, maintain and enforce a policy to require any information content provider who posts written messages on a public forum website either to be identified by a legal name and address, or to register a legal name and address with the operator of the interactive computer service or the Internet service provider through which the information content provider gains access to the interactive computer service or Internet, as appropriate.



3. An operator of an interactive computer service or an Internet service provider shall establish and maintain reasonable procedures to enable any person to request and obtain disclosure of the legal name and address of an information content provider who posts false or defamatory information about the person on a public forum website.



4. Any person who is damaged by false or defamatory written messages that originate from an information content provider who posts such messages on a public forum website may file suit in Superior Court against an operator or provider that fails to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required pursuant to section 2 of P.L. , c. (C.) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), and may recover compensatory and punitive damages and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee, cost of investigation and litigation from such operator or provider.



5. This act shall take effect on the 90th day following enactment.





STATEMENT



This bill would require an operator of any interactive computer service or an Internet service provider to establish, maintain and enforce a policy requiring an information content provider who posts messages on a public forum website either to be identified by legal name and address or to register a legal name and address with the operator or provider prior to posting messages on a public forum website.

The bill requires an operator of an interactive computer service or an Internet service provider to establish and maintain reasonable procedures to enable any person to request and obtain disclosure of the legal name and address of an information content provider who posts false or defamatory information about the person on a public forum website.

In addition, the bill makes any operator or Internet service provider liable for compensatory and punitive damages as well as costs of a law suit filed by a person damaged by the posting of such messages if the operator or Internet service provider fails to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required by section 2 of the bill.

http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2006/Bills/A1500/1327_I1.HTM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nasty sneaky little bill there, isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. the industry will pound that into oblivion
IMHO, the industry of service providers will kill this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. yep
won't even get on the floor, I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Never happen. No way in hell will a law go through that requires
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 05:15 PM by Redstone
message-board operators to collect a "registered legal name."

For one thing, how is the board operator going to be able to PROVE that you're who you say you are? Require a copy of your driver's license? What's to stop someone else from copying your driver's license?

This is just extraordinarily stupid and will last about a week if passed before a court strikes it down.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well this country doesn't seem to care enough to take to the streets
until all is gone and will never be recovered...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh boy, another flamer and troll bill! n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can see why people think things
like this need to be done, but you really got to look at it in another way. The way I read it, this act basically means that any board operator has to keep track of user's name and adresses so that if someone says something defamatory or such, the operator would have to turn the info over to authorities.

Chilling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Questions for New Jersey Legislators
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 05:32 PM by Boojatta
2. The operator of any interactive computer service or an Internet service provider shall establish, maintain and enforce a policy to require any information content provider who posts written messages on a public forum website either to be identified by a legal name and address, or to register a legal name and address with the operator of the interactive computer service or the Internet service provider through which the information content provider gains access to the interactive computer service or Internet, as appropriate.

If you do not have a legal address, then would this law prohibit you from posting written messages on a public forum website? Might such a prohibition be a violation of the principle of equal protection under the law?

What if someone posts "written messages" that have been encrypted and can only be identified as meaningful information by someone who has access to an encryption password or key? In that case is there no problem because the general public cannot interpret the message as being "false or defamatory information" or is there a serious problem because the government wants to know the meaning of the message?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Two more legal issues
Doesn't copyright law specifically provide authors with the option of publishing their works under pen names?

If a variety of organizations will collect personal information by law, then what will be their duties regarding protection of privacy? If they use some system that is generally believed to be effective in protecting privacy, but it turns out that the system is not effective, then will they be held responsible? If an employee violates someone's privacy, then will the organization be held responsible or will the person whose privacy was violated have to sue the employee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC