Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top commanders approved use of dogs at Guantanamo Bay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 08:18 PM
Original message
Top commanders approved use of dogs at Guantanamo Bay
Edited on Sun Mar-12-06 08:23 PM by kpete
Post Monday: Top commanders approved use of dogs at Guantanamo Bay
RAW STORY
Published: March 12, 2006



When Army Sgt. Michael J. Smith faces a court-martial Monday on charges that he used his military working dog to harass and threaten detainees, one of the prime examples of that alleged misconduct will be a photograph of Smith holding the dog just inches from the face of a detainee, the Washington Post begins in Monday editions of the paper -- in an article revealing that top military commanders approved the use of dogs at Guantanamo Bay, RAW STORY has learned. Excerpts:


Although officials characterized the other detainees who appeared in the Abu Ghraib photographs as common criminals and rioters, the orange-clad detainee seen cowering before the dog was different. Detainee No. 155148 was considered a high-value intelligence source suspected of having close ties to al-Qaida. According to interviews, sworn statements from soldiers and military documents obtained by The Washington Post, Ashraf Abdullah Ahsy was at the center of a military intelligence “special project” designed to break him down, and was considered important enough that his interrogation was mentioned in a briefing to high-ranking intelligence officials at the Pentagon.

Although Ahsy — also identified in documents by the tribal last name of al-Juhayshi — was described without his name in an Abu Ghraib military investigation as a “high value” detainee, he has largely remained a mystery. Ahsy’s story, and his months of intense interrogations, contrast with statements by U.S. officials that the images of abuse at Abu Ghraib depicted malfeasance of a few soldiers randomly selecting victims on the night shift.


Ahsy could become a central figure in Smith’s trial because attorneys for the Abu Ghraib dog handlers have said military intelligence (MI) directed the soldiers to use their animals as part of an interrogation regimen, one that top officers approved in December 2003. Unlike others implicated in the Abu Ghraib abuse, the dog handlers can point directly to approvals of the technique in question from top commanders.

In a Jan. 25 sworn statement to investigators after he was granted immunity, Col. Thomas Pappas, who ran the Abu Ghraib operation, said he approved the use of dogs for a few detainees in the days before the picture of Ahsy was taken, though he said he did not remember signing off on using dogs with Ahsy. Army officials confirmed Ahsy is the one in the photograph.



http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Post_Monday_Top_commanders_approved_use_0312.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't we hang people at Nuremberg for doing this? (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. this is the Torture Master from GITMO...
who brought his techniques to Iraq....

Gen. Geoffrey Miller

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC