Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bushies screw up again-- this time in Moussaiou's trial!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SushiFan Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 01:51 PM
Original message
Bushies screw up again-- this time in Moussaiou's trial!
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060312121509990008&ncid=NWS00010000000001


Angry Judge Halts Moussaoui Sentencing Trial
Death Penalty May Be Eliminated as Option

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (March 13) -- An angry federal judge considered Monday whether to dismiss the government's death penalty case against confessed al-Qaida conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui after a federal attorney coached witnesses in violation of her rules. "I do not want to act precipitously," U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema said in scheduling a special hearing on the case Tuesday, but she said that it was "very difficult for this case to go forward."

Brinkema said a lawyer for the Transportation Security Administration sent e-mail to seven Federal Aviation Administration officials outlining the prosecution's opening statements and providing commentary on government witnesses from the first day of testimony. That was in violation of her pre-trial order barring witnesses from exposure to any opening statements of trial testimony.

"An attorney for the TSA ... egregiously breached that order," she told jurors before excusing them. Of the seven, three were to testify for the government and four were potential defense witnesses. "This is the second significant error by the government affecting the constitutional rights of this defendant and more importantly the integrity of the criminal justice system of the United States in the context of a death case," Brinkema told lawyers outside the presence of the jury.

Defense attorney Edward MacMahon moved to have the judge dismiss the death penalty as a possible outcome, saying "this is not going to be a fair trial." In the alternative, he said, at least she should excuse the government's FAA witnesses from the case.

more.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Make no mistake. Bush was SUPPOSED to screw this up
As so to justify the Patriot Act and the shredding of freedoms.

You see, if Moussaoui gets a conviction, then that proves the pre-9/11 system works, and we don't need to give up our freedoms for security.

If Moussaoui walks, then the Bushies can point to this case and say "See! See! We need to install cameras into everyone's home!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree. NO LAWYER would do such a thing VIA EMAIL.
Lawyers HATE email because it is SO TRACKABLE and once it's sent, you can't gaurantee it's ever going to be deleted. The communication touches SO MANY different machines and/or hard-drives...

No lawyer, even incompetent ones, would screw up this BADLY. She did it on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SushiFan Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. No way she did it knowingly because
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 02:31 PM by SushiFan
the bushies are very clumsy and not too bright.

See my reply to tavener in the post a couple down below yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. No way he's going to walk - but that's not what this was about.
It was about giving him the DP for involvement with 9/11. His is a self-admitted terrorist and will get life in any case, but the link to 9/11 was never more than tenuous at best. They say that if he told all he knew, they could have prevented 9/11, but that doesn't account for all the information they already had that pointed more directly at 9/11 which they ignored.

It's about them losing their scapegoat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yup. "What he knew" was much less than what THEY knew!
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 02:24 PM by dicksteele
And, as time goes by, we have begun to see that they
had a repeated and deliberate pattern of BLOCKING
all investigations which might POSSIBLY have prevented
the events of Sept 11.

This criminal already PLEAD GUILTY to enough stuff
to receive "Life plus 100"...and I'll shed no tears if he never sees the sun again.

But that's not why they want his name in the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SushiFan Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I disagree...... you give the bushies too much credit because
they can't think this smart to outfox this and outfox that in case this happens and that happens.

They screwed up their own case. They screw up all the time. This is just more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. These stupid f**kers have to cheat in everything they do.
Even when they already hold all the aces, and know it, they still can't resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree. They can't help themselves. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Anyone involved in 9/11 will walk... Everyone...
we don't even know if Atta was really on that plane or not!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SushiFan Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You're abs. right lovuian. And that's what's such a
shame that this entire mess, from twin towers implosions to the current trial had to happen in the most corrupt regime America has ever known in the BA's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC