Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Z Machine" sets unexpected Earth temperature record:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:05 PM
Original message
"Z Machine" sets unexpected Earth temperature record:


Z Machine Sets Unexpected Earth Temperature Record


Explanation: Why is this plasma so hot? Physicists aren't sure. What is known for sure is that the Z Machine running at Sandia National Laboratories created a plasma that was unexpectedly hot. The plasma reached a temperature in excess of two billion Kelvin, making it arguably the hottest human made thing ever in the history of the Earth and, for a brief time, hotter than the interiors of stars. The Z Machine experiment, pictured above, purposely creates high temperatures by focusing 20 million amps of electricity into a small region further confined by a magnetic field. Vertical wires give the Z Machine its name. During the unexpected powerful contained explosion, the Z machine released about 80 times the world's entire electrical power usage for a brief fraction of a second. Experiments with the Z Machine are helping to explain the physics of Solar flares, design more efficient nuclear fusion plants, test materials under extreme heat, and gather data for the computer modeling of nuclear explosions.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060313.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Future power source? When something releases more power
than you put into it, that's usually a good thing! (And also an horrible weapon of course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unfortunately it's most likely the latter that is being explored...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyuzoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nothing releases more energy than you put into it.
That violates Newtonian physics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Newton never considered atomic energy...
I suspect that we are seeing the thermonuclear burning of something here. It remains to be seen what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ahem, Newton was wrong. Einstein proved that a century ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyuzoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Einstein never disproved Conservation of Energy nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. No
The energy being released is still stored within the atom. You cannot create energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. you never heard my ex lecture me, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. actually, it wasn't newton, it's the 1st law of thermodynamics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyuzoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. But kinetic + potential must net zero.
That's Newton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. when you deal with a quantum soup in a multiverse, all sorts of weird shit
begins to happen. As much as I study it, my meager mental resources still seize up and misfire. However, virtual particles can be generated in a vacuum, in fact, a 10 or 11 dimensional universe demands them to. If particles can appear, they have mass. If mass can be described as energy, then what we perceive as excess energy creation can also occur. What actually happens in the quantum soup is quite different, however, our perceptions are what we report.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. There is more than just kinetic and potential energy
There is also internal energy, the release of which is keeping you warm right now and running your computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. where did it say more energy came out than was put in???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cold Fusion here we come
I still hold out hope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Plasma - hot or cold it is the energy of the future, also can be used for
almost any application in everyday life.

Plasma is huge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I wrote a paper about fusion in my early teens
the thesis of the paper (based on contemporary sources) that usable fusion was 5-10 years away. I am 37. They have been talking about fusion for energy since the 50s but the physics are really hard.

I think the only workable fusion device will remain the thermonuclear bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arger68 Donating Member (562 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Did Kelly LeBrock come rising up
out of that thing when they were done??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. Two billion Kelvin?
Still not hot enough to get my wife's steak done to her liking :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC