Internet Backlash Stalls Jersey Civility Bill

A New Jersey lawmaker's attempt to legislate civility on an Internet discussion board runs into a wall of opposition from bloggers and others who see it as an attempt to stifle free speech.

By K.C. Jones
Mar 14, 2006 04:04 PM


A New Jersey Assemblyman's Internet civility bill is on ice since opponents blasted it as an assault on free speech.

Assemblyman Peter Biondi and his staff said they were trying to curb malicious exchanges on some local discussion boards when they introduced a bill requiring people to provide their real names and addresses before posting on public Web sites. The bill also stated that hosts could be sued for failing to disclose the identities of people disseminating false or defamatory information.

Biondi's staff drafted the measure late last year. In was introduced in January. The bill hadn't even made it to committee before a small weekly newspaper published an article about it and Internet news providers began spreading the word. Then, callers from as far away as Canada deluged Biondi's office with complaints.

"For a bill that's basically one of 45 just sitting there to be picked out – and for people in Portland, Oregon and Canadian broadcasters to be calling about it – it's a little bizarre," Biondi's Chief of Staff Scott Ross said during an interview. "For something that's not even on the radar screen in Trenton, it's incredible. It's definitely a first for us. It hit the Drudge Report and it was like 'Holy moly!"

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=181503705&subSection=Columns

Good thing this was squashed, this is just a nut bill

He should come here. Douchebag would know what freedom of speech is all about. And unfortunately, being from NJ, I have no apologies for this asswipe.

http://www.bluejersey.net/showDiary.do?diaryId=969
There's one small problem: The NJ Supreme Court ruled that banning anonymous online speech is unconstitutional.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/nb/nb3.htm

The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court on Wednesday upheld an earlier N.J. Superior Court ruling that a corporation cannot unmask the identity of an anonymous user of an Internet message board because it did not demonstrate that it suffered "harm" as a result of the user's posts.

The unanimous decision by the N.J. Appellate Court's three-judge panel found that N.J. Superior Court Judge Kenneth MacKenzie was correct when he ruled that Dendrite International could not discover the true name of a John Doe defendant.

That decision goes back to 2002.

Fuck him and the boat he floated in on.

Right here! :D