What is it with people equating adult porn and child porn?

Why is it that whenever a story like the recent child pron ring bust comes up we get people coming out equating pornography in general with child pornography? As someone who watches adult pornography, I'll admit it freely without any guilt, I find the accusation both ridiculous and insulting.

They (rw) want to control everything you see hear or do if it doesn't fit into their belief system. They want bed room police and want to take the country back to the good old days when there was no sex crimes. Though they over look the fact that the good old days never were like those good old TV shows they mistake as documentaries.

Documentaries, huh?

thus more profitable. It won't go away.
I worked with a bible-thumping, home schooling, make his wife wear a long skirt fundie. I was really surprised when he was busted for child porn. Most reich-wingers I know are porn freaks.

What they want to go away is free porn.

and scrutinize it *very* closely, to check just how bad it really is.

And they will hold onto it as "evidence".

.... who, when they hear about some pedophiles like the priests who abused young boys, make a leap over logic and assume that all gay people must be pedophiles -- apparently without any understanding that pedophilia is an illness unto itself that can be found among both the heterosexual and homosexual populations. The fact that the vast majority of pedophiles identify themselves as heterosexual makes no difference to people whose understanding of these issues is next to nil and who are easily manipulated by those who most stand to profit by fanning he flames of homophobia.

I'd wager that a good number of them are "addicted" to porn, too screwed-up to accept that they get their jollies looking at pictures. Like the way they view masturbation, it's OK, as long as you don't "do it too much". So, just what is "too much"?

Those of us who are too old, fat, and homely to attract sexual interest from someone else accept a need for porn as part of an evolving sexuality and sense of self. Doesn't help the self-image seeing where I'm considered "sick" by "good, Christian" people, who probably get their nut off of kiddie smut.

Not that it's anyone's biz,but I'm into what they call "Matures" or "Granny porn" so just put those thoughts of me beinfg a NAMBLA fan out of your pointed little heads...

Is your post supposed to mean something?

Sid

hyper fear.

conservatives don't want a little control -- they want a lot of control.

this is simply a subset of god, guns and gays.

and anything perceived as a threat to children will silence any opposition.

I prefer the real thing...

:shrug:

they also said there is child porn on-demand. :crazy:

so outrageous.

You asked: <18 porn and >=18 porn are both porn. If you draw a distinction based on the age of the "actors" then you are correct in your complaint. If you do not draw an age distinction, then all porn is either good or bad.

Depends on your perspective. Personally, I agree with you.

One is viewing material made by consenting adults for consenting adults. The other is raping children and filming it. Your argument would make more sense if it was rape in both cases or consensual in both cases.

I simply said that both are porn, an unexceptionable statement. I also said I agreed with the original poster that >=18 is OK, while <18 is not. I don't see why you disagree with me, as I think we agree. Perhaps I did not express myself clearly ?

being "sex".

This regime which has killed & maimed countless innocent Iraqi children doesn't really care about children or porn in general -- it cares about power.

Gonzales didn't twist the arms of Yahoo & Google to get the goods on porn purveyors (kiddie or adult). Under this ruse, he's gaining access the the free web in order to data-mine and exert control over it.

If successful, genuine dissent will be stifled on the net -- just like it's been suppressed in the mainstream media.

There are allot of busy little government geeks hacking away on the web, as we speak. ...And they're not looking for porn.

Child/teen porn is disgusting, because these kids were coerced.

Adult porn, for the most part, is done by willing participants. I like adult porn.

I can give you an anecdote that explains why it happens at times but I believe the answer is that we view the discussion through our own experiences and because we don't always use words to correctly distinguish between the two. Now for my anecdote.

My ex-husband used to like porn. He loved the invention of the internet because of it's free and easy access to porn. (Note: his use of the word "porn", not distinct from adult or child.) Near the end of my marriage, I found some of the sites he used to visit on the computer. His favorite? A site of 13 year old girls. Now, to me, that's child porn and it's illegal. But he didn't make that distinction. To him it was just "porn" and "porn" was "natural and healthy".

So, you say porn and I wonder - do you mean legal, adult porn or do you mean what my ex-husband meant? Unless you use the words that distinguish the difference between the two, I have no way of knowing which you are promoting.

Just some honest thoughts in regards to your question. I suppose it would have been easier (and less productive) to just rave about how stupid people are to think the comparison is "ridiculous and insulting".

Those who don't make the distinction are the ones with a serious illness.