Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Update: Iran says ready to talk with U.S. on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:50 AM
Original message
Update: Iran says ready to talk with U.S. on Iraq
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 10:51 AM by FLDem5
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-03/16/content_4310180.htm
<snip>
TEHRAN, March 16 (Xinhuanet) -- Iran is willing to negotiate with the Unite States on Iraqi issues now, the country's senior official said on Thursday.

Speaking to reporters after making a speech to parliament, AliLarijani, head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said "We will accept the proposal to help resolve the problems in Iraq and establish an independent government there as it was made by Mr. Hakim, a top Islamic leader in Iraq."

Three months after elections, negotiations on forming a power-sharing government have been in deadlock in Iraq and the country is now at the brink of a civil war.

Iraqi Shi'ite leader Abdul Aziz al-Hakim had called on Shi'it Iran to help solve the disputes, and Tehran had previously said that it was not interested in getting involved unless U.S. troops pull out of Iraq.


http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/14112907.htm
<snip>
U.S. willing to talk with Iran about IraqAssociated Press

WASHINGTON - The United States said Thursday it was prepared to talk with Iran about Iraq, but said any discussions must be restricted to that topic and not include other contentious subjects like Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons program.

Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, is authorized to talk with Iran about Iraq, much as the United States has talked with Iran about issues relating to Afghanistan, White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.
"But this is a very narrow mandate dealing specifically with issues relating to Iraq," McClellan said. U.S. concerns about Iran's nuclear program are being dealt with at the United Nations. "That's a separate issue from this," McClellan said.

The White House statement came after Ali Larijani, Iran's top nuclear negotiator and secretary of the country's Supreme National Security Council, said Tehran was ready to open direct talks with the United States over Iraq, marking a major shift in Iranian foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. good news-maybe one side will offer other to share his sandbox
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. doesn anyone else think these talks about "Iraq" will include
discussion on the nuclear program?

I find it interesting that after these talks were announced Bush came out with a "strike first" paper. Now he can look like his tough talk forced Iran's hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's what I was thinking....
much like how we 'cowed' Libya into submission. They actually think their drunk cowboy lynch'em strategy is working. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm thinking of sexing up the title
to add that - because that was my first thought when I saw the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yep - I don't know what's worse
Going to war with Iran, or Bush "claiming victory".

No, that's wrong - obviously we all want to see a peaceful resolution, even if it does give BushCo a "moral victory".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He is allowed to claim victory if it will save lives
I don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC